I found this to be rather interesting.... 1. pelosi who previously called for Trump to be impeached 2. if the investigation were to turn up any sort of "concrete criminal evidence" On what grounds was she previously calling for impeachment? If evidence existed wouldn't she be privy to it?
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said Sunday that even if
Democrats were to retake control of the House in the 2018 elections,
pushing for impeachment proceedings of President Donald Trump would not
be one of their legislative priorities.
"It's not someplace that I think we should go," Pelosi, appearing on CNN's "State of the Union,"
The California Democrat left the door open to the possibility, however,
saying that if ongoing investigations into Russian election meddling
were to turn up any sort of concrete criminal evidence, lawmakers might
reconsider the matter. "If that's there, perhaps it will come out in
these investigations" she said.
I found this to be rather interesting.... 1. pelosi who previously called for Trump to be impeached 2. if the investigation were to turn up any sort of "concrete criminal evidence" On what grounds was she previously calling for impeachment? If evidence existed wouldn't she be privy to it?
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said Sunday that even if
Democrats were to retake control of the House in the 2018 elections,
pushing for impeachment proceedings of President Donald Trump would not
be one of their legislative priorities.
"It's not someplace that I think we should go," Pelosi, appearing on CNN's "State of the Union,"
The California Democrat left the door open to the possibility, however,
saying that if ongoing investigations into Russian election meddling
were to turn up any sort of concrete criminal evidence, lawmakers might
reconsider the matter. "If that's there, perhaps it will come out in
these investigations" she said.
I found this to be rather interesting.... 1. pelosi who previously called for Trump to be impeached 2. if the investigation were to turn up any sort of "concrete criminal evidence" On what grounds was she previously calling for impeachment? If evidence existed wouldn't she be privy to it?
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said Sunday that even if
Democrats were to retake control of the House in the 2018 elections,
pushing for impeachment proceedings of President Donald Trump would not
be one of their legislative priorities.
"It's not someplace that I think we should go," Pelosi, appearing on CNN's "State of the Union,"
The California Democrat left the door open to the possibility, however,
saying that if ongoing investigations into Russian election meddling
were to turn up any sort of concrete criminal evidence, lawmakers might
reconsider the matter. "If that's there, perhaps it will come out in
these investigations" she said.
What’s interesting to you? To me, she not showing her cards because there’s no need to at the moment.
Exactly. Why give the trump and repubs campaign ad material for the 2018 mid terms. Dems want Congress back. Giving the other side campaign and fundraising material now is just stupid campaign strategy.
I found this to be rather interesting.... 1. pelosi who previously called for Trump to be impeached 2. if the investigation were to turn up any sort of "concrete criminal evidence" On what grounds was she previously calling for impeachment? If evidence existed wouldn't she be privy to it?
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said Sunday that even if
Democrats were to retake control of the House in the 2018 elections,
pushing for impeachment proceedings of President Donald Trump would not
be one of their legislative priorities.
"It's not someplace that I think we should go," Pelosi, appearing on CNN's "State of the Union,"
The California Democrat left the door open to the possibility, however,
saying that if ongoing investigations into Russian election meddling
were to turn up any sort of concrete criminal evidence, lawmakers might
reconsider the matter. "If that's there, perhaps it will come out in
these investigations" she said.
I found this to be rather interesting.... 1. pelosi who previously called for Trump to be impeached 2. if the investigation were to turn up any sort of "concrete criminal evidence" On what grounds was she previously calling for impeachment? If evidence existed wouldn't she be privy to it?
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said Sunday that even if
Democrats were to retake control of the House in the 2018 elections,
pushing for impeachment proceedings of President Donald Trump would not
be one of their legislative priorities.
"It's not someplace that I think we should go," Pelosi, appearing on CNN's "State of the Union,"
The California Democrat left the door open to the possibility, however,
saying that if ongoing investigations into Russian election meddling
were to turn up any sort of concrete criminal evidence, lawmakers might
reconsider the matter. "If that's there, perhaps it will come out in
these investigations" she said.
I found this to be rather interesting.... 1. pelosi who previously called for Trump to be impeached 2. if the investigation were to turn up any sort of "concrete criminal evidence" On what grounds was she previously calling for impeachment? If evidence existed wouldn't she be privy to it?
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said Sunday that even if
Democrats were to retake control of the House in the 2018 elections,
pushing for impeachment proceedings of President Donald Trump would not
be one of their legislative priorities.
"It's not someplace that I think we should go," Pelosi, appearing on CNN's "State of the Union,"
The California Democrat left the door open to the possibility, however,
saying that if ongoing investigations into Russian election meddling
were to turn up any sort of concrete criminal evidence, lawmakers might
reconsider the matter. "If that's there, perhaps it will come out in
these investigations" she said.
What’s interesting to you? To me, she not showing her cards because there’s no need to at the moment.
Its simple, if one had or was privy to evidence would one ask "if evidence were to turn up?"
She’s not privy to Mueller’s investigations and the repubs control the other congressional hearings. You can bet their bottom dollar that they’re doing everything they can to limit the damage by controlling the process. Are you really this politically naive? Oh wait, Bernie was a democrat, you are.
I found this to be rather interesting.... 1. pelosi who previously called for Trump to be impeached 2. if the investigation were to turn up any sort of "concrete criminal evidence" On what grounds was she previously calling for impeachment? If evidence existed wouldn't she be privy to it?
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said Sunday that even if
Democrats were to retake control of the House in the 2018 elections,
pushing for impeachment proceedings of President Donald Trump would not
be one of their legislative priorities.
"It's not someplace that I think we should go," Pelosi, appearing on CNN's "State of the Union,"
The California Democrat left the door open to the possibility, however,
saying that if ongoing investigations into Russian election meddling
were to turn up any sort of concrete criminal evidence, lawmakers might
reconsider the matter. "If that's there, perhaps it will come out in
these investigations" she said.
Ooooooo, it’s your very own shower for 30, occupied by your 29 nearest and dearest cell block mates but that’s not all Steve, you get a bar of soap without the rope! Exciting! Back to you Bob!
Steve? Why the long face? After all, you’ll have plenty of time! Plenty of time to enjoy your new hobbies like dominoes and distilling. And thats not all Steve, you’ll have plenty of time to catch up on your reading on such classics as Gone With The Wind and reread some of those classics like Mein Kampf and Twelve Angry Men. Sounds grand, doesn’t it Steve?
Steve? Why the long face? After all, you’ll have plenty of time! Plenty of time to enjoy your new hobbies like dominoes and distilling. And thats not all Steve, you’ll have plenty of time to catch up on your reading on such classics as Gone With The Wind and reread some of those classics like Mein Kampf and Twelve Angry Men. Sounds grand, doesn’t it Steve?
Definitely the new leader of the hitler youth Or at the very least the alt-right, white nationalists, and white supremacists
Ooooooo, it’s your very own shower for 30, occupied by your 29 nearest and dearest cell block mates but that’s not all Steve, you get a bar of soap without the rope! Exciting! Back to you Bob!
As funny as that is, and as much as I dislike POTUS, can we all agree here noone will be going to jail?
What a fucking stewnad. And Asstrange? Ambassador to the US? Hahahahahahaha! You can’t make this shit up. I guess the Peruvian embassy has gotten stale? Truth, justice and the Asstrange way.
What a fucking stewnad. And Asstrange? Ambassador to the US? Hahahahahahaha! You can’t make this shit up. I guess the Peruvian embassy has gotten stale? Truth, justice and the Asstrange way.
So Sessions doesn’t remember, but kinda sorta remembers?
yeah what a crock ha the whole administration is full of liars , i didn't watch it did they even press him on it wtf this is absurd all these politicians covering for eachother they should all be thrown in jail ...
A group of Democrats on Wednesday announced that they would be filing multiple articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, marking the most significant push to remove the president from office. The move was led by Representative Steve Cohen of Tennessee, who first declared his intention to initiate the impeachment process following Trump’s controversial “both sides” remarks in response to deadly violence at a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.
Cohen is joined in his efforts by five colleagues, including fellow Judiciary Committee Democrat Luis Gutiérrez of Illinois, who announced his decision to join the push two weeks ago. Also at the press conference were Representatives Adriano Espaillat of New York and Al Green of Texas. The latter is one of the president's loudest critics, and he has previously filed his own articles of impeachment.
Comments
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Yup. Winds are at their back after Tuesday....
2
0
1
9
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Lamar Smith (R-Texas)
Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas)
Ted Poe (R-Texas)
Frank LoBiondo (R-N.J.)
all retired last 2 weeks, good riddance
STEPHEN MILLER!
Come on down!!
Your next in line... to meet with Special Counsel Robert Mueller!!
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Or at the very least the alt-right, white nationalists, and white supremacists
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
What Mueller's org chart reveals about his Russia probe - POLITICO https://apple.news/AR5a8Hr7vQayk7YSaKt8Xtw
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
As funny as that is, and as much as I dislike POTUS, can we all agree here noone will be going to jail?
This is glorious.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/the-secret-correspondence-between-donald-trump-jr-and-wikileaks/545738/
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/13/politics/jeff-sessions-special-counsel/index.html
This should also bring his backers back out of the woodwork. 3, 2, 1, ..................
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
www.headstonesband.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
www.cluthelee.com
www.cluthe.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
A group of Democrats on Wednesday announced that they would be filing multiple articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, marking the most significant push to remove the president from office. The move was led by Representative Steve Cohen of Tennessee, who first declared his intention to initiate the impeachment process following Trump’s controversial “both sides” remarks in response to deadly violence at a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.
Cohen is joined in his efforts by five colleagues, including fellow Judiciary Committee Democrat Luis Gutiérrez of Illinois, who announced his decision to join the push two weeks ago. Also at the press conference were Representatives Adriano Espaillat of New York and Al Green of Texas. The latter is one of the president's loudest critics, and he has previously filed his own articles of impeachment.
http://www.newsweek.com/trump-impeachment-articles-democrats-president-711525