Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Surprise, surprise, surprise, RICO statue violations being mentioned in the same breath as Ruddy Ghouliani and Team Trump Treason. SDNY is working on it while Treasury sits on it.
Dimitri Firtash and the four stooges. SDNY is “following the money.” What’s that? Following the money from Russia. With love. And a PTape. All the fucking way. To impeachment. I look forward to the senate trial.
"If Barack Obama had been doing something like this, Republicans would be going crazy," he claimed. "Now it's their own guy doing it. What's fair is fair."
My breakdown of the repub impeachment vote becuase the dems need 20 repubs to join them along with the 2 indies. * indicates up for re-election in 2020 (all predictions made with my gut):
Voting to Convict (11):
Susan Collins* Joni Ernst* Cory Gardner* Richard Burr Chuck Grassley Jim Inhofe* Lisa Murkowski Mitt Romney Marco Rubio Tim Scott Pat Toomey
Sitting on the Fence, Seeing Which Way the Wind Blows (and it will blow hard) (12):
Lamar Alexander* Shelley Moore Capito* John Cornyn* Lindsey Graham* (because he's swishy that way) Moscow Mitchy Baby* (even he'll get ultimately disgusted when the evidence is made public via House investigation and subsequent articles) Ben Sasse* Thom Tillis* Ted Crud Ron Johnson Rick Scott Rob Portman Martha McSally
Going Down with the Shit of State (30):
Bill Cassidy* Tom "I'm A Warrior, Hear Me Roar (but I'm afraid of the press)" Cotton* Steve Daines* Mike Enzi* Cindy Hyde Smith* Dan Sullivan* John Thune John Barrasso Roy Blunt Todd Young Marsha Blackburn Richard Shelby Mike Rounds* Pat Roberts* Jim Resch* David Purdue* Randy Paul Jerry Moran Mike Lee James Lankford John Kennedy Johnny Isakson John Hoeven Josh Hawler Deb Fischer Kevin Cramer Mike Crapo Bill Cassidy Mike Braun John Boozman
I look forward to the House Articles of Impeachment and subsequent Senate trial. Going to be a hot, hot summer either defending Team Trump Treason and/or your vote, one way or the other.
My breakdown of the repub impeachment vote becuase the dems need 20 repubs to join them along with the 2 indies. * indicates up for re-election in 2020 (all predictions made with my gut):
Voting to Convict (11):
Susan Collins* Joni Ernst* Cory Gardner* Richard Burr Chuck Grassley Jim Inhofe* Lisa Murkowski Mitt Romney Marco Rubio Tim Scott Pat Toomey
Sitting on the Fence, Seeing Which Way the Wind Blows (and it will blow hard) (12):
Lamar Alexander* Shelley Moore Capito* John Cornyn* Lindsey Graham* (because he's swishy that way) Moscow Mitchy Baby* (even he'll get ultimately disgusted when the evidence is made public via House investigation and subsequent articles) Ben Sasse* Thom Tillis* Ted Crud Ron Johnson Rick Scott Rob Portman Martha McSally
Going Down with the Shit of State (30):
Bill Cassidy* Tom "I'm A Warrior, Hear Me Roar (but I'm afraid of the press)" Cotton* Steve Daines* Mike Enzi* Cindy Hyde Smith* Dan Sullivan* John Thune John Barrasso Roy Blunt Todd Young Marsha Blackburn Richard Shelby Mike Rounds* Pat Roberts* Jim Resch* David Purdue* Randy Paul Jerry Moran Mike Lee James Lankford John Kennedy Johnny Isakson John Hoeven Josh Hawler Deb Fischer Kevin Cramer Mike Crapo Bill Cassidy Mike Braun John Boozman
I look forward to the House Articles of Impeachment and subsequent Senate trial. Going to be a hot, hot summer either defending Team Trump Treason and/or your vote, one way or the other.
I forgot to add that if I’m the DNC or the DSCC, I’m hitting those with asterisks hard with advertising dollars, tying Team Trump Treason around their neck and stapling him to their back, early and often, as soon as articles are passed and right up to Election Day. If the dems don’t get 20 for impeachment, they just need 4 to flip to gain control of the senate and 13 for a filibuster proof majority.
As
Congress left for the week, a few Republicans dared to criticize Mr.
Mulvaney. I spoke with one of them: Representative Francis Rooney of Florida, a former ambassador who sits on the House Foreign Affairs
Committee.
What
was your reaction to what Mick Mulvaney said?
I thought, “Wow, O.K.” We’ve had this
president saying that the withholding of the funds was not related to his
pressure of the new president of Ukraine. I gave the guy the benefit of
the doubt. And then this week we had some testimony from the impeachment
hearings. Then this thing comes out from Mulvaney. It looks like game,
set, match to me on that issue. I heard the words like anyone else, and I
couldn’t believe it.
What
did you think of Mr. Mulvaney’s attempt to revise what he said?
I don’t know how you can walk it back.
It’s not like, “I said these three vague things and one thing was
misinterpreted.” I didn’t see a lot of gray area in what he said. It was
pretty clear.
Why
did you react the way you did?
There are a few things that really bother
you. I’ve been involved in the diplomatic business. I have great respect
for our professional diplomats who go about their work. This has
undermined them and put them in a bad light. Like Senator Murkowski said,
I don’t think its right to use the power and prestige of the U.S. for a
political situation. Our foreign policy is supposed to advance the
interests of the United States. That’s what we’re in the business of.
Why
were you one of the few to actually speak out today?
There are a lot of people in the
Republican conference. You’ve got all different shades of response. A lot
of them have no response. A lot of them have a defiant response. Some of
them are equivocating. And then you have a couple like me that say, “This
is kind of bothersome.”
Have
you talked to your constituents about this?
They don’t understand how anyone could say
anything remotely at variance with President Trump. I’m sorry, but I’m
just going to call ‘em like I see ‘em.
I forgot to add that if I’m the DNC or the DSCC, I’m hitting those with asterisks hard with advertising dollars, tying Team Trump Treason around their neck and stapling him to their back, early and often, as soon as articles are passed and right up to Election Day. If the dems don’t get 20 for impeachment, they just need 4 to flip to gain control of the senate and 13 for a filibuster proof majority.
They should already be doing those ads.
They should also be holding these hearings in public.
I forgot to add that if I’m the DNC or the DSCC, I’m hitting those with asterisks hard with advertising dollars, tying Team Trump Treason around their neck and stapling him to their back, early and often, as soon as articles are passed and right up to Election Day. If the dems don’t get 20 for impeachment, they just need 4 to flip to gain control of the senate and 13 for a filibuster proof majority.
They should already be doing those ads.
They should also be holding these hearings in public.
2 things.
1. it denies gop from grandstanding during public hearings like we have seen.
2. more important allows the witnesses to be more forthcoming in that setting.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
I forgot to add that if I’m the DNC or the DSCC, I’m hitting those with asterisks hard with advertising dollars, tying Team Trump Treason around their neck and stapling him to their back, early and often, as soon as articles are passed and right up to Election Day. If the dems don’t get 20 for impeachment, they just need 4 to flip to gain control of the senate and 13 for a filibuster proof majority.
They should already be doing those ads.
They should also be holding these hearings in public.
2 things.
1. it denies gop from grandstanding during public hearings like we have seen.
2. more important allows the witnesses to be more forthcoming in that setting.
I agree. It also stops the grandstanding by the democrats, which is also positive.
I've also heard that by making it private it is mostly democrat lawyers asking questions...which is also a net positive.
Let them gather the evidence and once the trial in the Senate happens (where this will all really matter) it will be public and the democrats should be well prepared and organized. All the groundwork and foundation of impeachment in place.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
I forgot to add that if I’m the DNC or the DSCC, I’m hitting those with asterisks hard with advertising dollars, tying Team Trump Treason around their neck and stapling him to their back, early and often, as soon as articles are passed and right up to Election Day. If the dems don’t get 20 for impeachment, they just need 4 to flip to gain control of the senate and 13 for a filibuster proof majority.
They should already be doing those ads.
They should also be holding these hearings in public.
2 things.
1. it denies gop from grandstanding during public hearings like we have seen.
2. more important allows the witnesses to be more forthcoming in that setting.
I agree. It also stops the grandstanding by the democrats, which is also positive.
I've also heard that by making it private it is mostly democrat lawyers asking questions...which is also a net positive.
Let them gather the evidence and once the trial in the Senate happens (where this will all really matter) it will be public and the democrats should be well prepared and organized. All the groundwork and foundation of impeachment in place.
Yeah, this may all well be true but I am primarily concerned about public sentiment because that seems to be the only thing that will sway republican senator's minds. I have a feeling that the longer this goes on behind closed doors, the more impatient the public will become which may feed back into the president's narrative of it being another version of the witch hunt.
Definitely a fine line the dems are walking here between dotting all the i's/crossing all the t's and handling the politics of the impeachment process. I think they have to be as aggressive as possible politically.
I forgot to add that if I’m the DNC or the DSCC, I’m hitting those with asterisks hard with advertising dollars, tying Team Trump Treason around their neck and stapling him to their back, early and often, as soon as articles are passed and right up to Election Day. If the dems don’t get 20 for impeachment, they just need 4 to flip to gain control of the senate and 13 for a filibuster proof majority.
They should already be doing those ads.
They should also be holding these hearings in public.
2 things.
1. it denies gop from grandstanding during public hearings like we have seen.
2. more important allows the witnesses to be more forthcoming in that setting.
I agree. It also stops the grandstanding by the democrats, which is also positive.
I've also heard that by making it private it is mostly democrat lawyers asking questions...which is also a net positive.
Let them gather the evidence and once the trial in the Senate happens (where this will all really matter) it will be public and the democrats should be well prepared and organized. All the groundwork and foundation of impeachment in place.
Yeah, this may all well be true but I am primarily concerned about public sentiment because that seems to be the only thing that will sway republican senator's minds. I have a feeling that the longer this goes on behind closed doors, the more impatient the public will become which may feed back into the president's narrative of it being another version of the witch hunt.
Definitely a fine line the dems are walking here between dotting all the i's/crossing all the t's and handling the politics of the impeachment process. I think they have to be as aggressive as possible politically.
Nancy knows what she’s doing and what she’s doing is ensuring that the charges stick. The repubs are waiting to see which way the polling winds blow. All of the evidence will come out either during the run up to the impeachment vote or during the senate trial. And the evidence will be overwhelming and voters will pay attention, particularly indies. Repubs will have a choice, POS Team Trump Treason or the Constitution.
I forgot to add that if I’m the DNC or the DSCC, I’m hitting those with asterisks hard with advertising dollars, tying Team Trump Treason around their neck and stapling him to their back, early and often, as soon as articles are passed and right up to Election Day. If the dems don’t get 20 for impeachment, they just need 4 to flip to gain control of the senate and 13 for a filibuster proof majority.
They should already be doing those ads.
They should also be holding these hearings in public.
2 things.
1. it denies gop from grandstanding during public hearings like we have seen.
2. more important allows the witnesses to be more forthcoming in that setting.
I agree. It also stops the grandstanding by the democrats, which is also positive.
I've also heard that by making it private it is mostly democrat lawyers asking questions...which is also a net positive.
Let them gather the evidence and once the trial in the Senate happens (where this will all really matter) it will be public and the democrats should be well prepared and organized. All the groundwork and foundation of impeachment in place.
Yeah, this may all well be true but I am primarily concerned about public sentiment because that seems to be the only thing that will sway republican senator's minds. I have a feeling that the longer this goes on behind closed doors, the more impatient the public will become which may feed back into the president's narrative of it being another version of the witch hunt.
Definitely a fine line the dems are walking here between dotting all the i's/crossing all the t's and handling the politics of the impeachment process. I think they have to be as aggressive as possible politically.
Nancy knows what she’s doing and what she’s doing is ensuring that the charges stick. The repubs are waiting to see which way the polling winds blow. All of the evidence will come out either during the run up to the impeachment vote or during the senate trial. And the evidence will be overwhelming and voters will pay attention, particularly indies. Repubs will have a choice, POS Team Trump Treason or the Constitution.
Yeah. I know all this. This is the plan. I’m just worried about it losing some steam with everything being done behind closed doors is all....
Comments
Dimitri Firtash, the four stooges and the NRA.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
They release the readout of the call. Then text messages confirming it. Then he did it live on TV. So Mulvaney is just having some fun I guess.
Democrats have to figure out a way to demonstrate why crime is bad. It sound absurd but that's where we are.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
“What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening,” Trump
https://apple.news/A5PVeRobjRamWJOuE-8hRVA
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Dimitri Firtash and the four stooges. SDNY is “following the money.” What’s that? Following the money from Russia. With love. And a PTape. All the fucking way. To impeachment. I look forward to the senate trial.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/18/politics/kasich-calls-for-trump-impeachment/index.html
"If Barack Obama had been doing something like this, Republicans would be going crazy," he claimed. "Now it's their own guy doing it. What's fair is fair."
www.headstonesband.com
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/18/politics/parnas-trump-doral-kfile/index.html
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/466362-judge-rules-doj-improperly-redacted-court-filing-related-to-mueller
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Voting to Convict (11):
Susan Collins*
Joni Ernst*
Cory Gardner*
Richard Burr
Chuck Grassley
Jim Inhofe*
Lisa Murkowski
Mitt Romney
Marco Rubio
Tim Scott
Pat Toomey
Sitting on the Fence, Seeing Which Way the Wind Blows (and it will blow hard) (12):
Lamar Alexander*
Shelley Moore Capito*
John Cornyn*
Lindsey Graham* (because he's swishy that way)
Moscow Mitchy Baby* (even he'll get ultimately disgusted when the evidence is made public via House investigation and subsequent articles)
Ben Sasse*
Thom Tillis*
Ted Crud
Ron Johnson
Rick Scott
Rob Portman
Martha McSally
Going Down with the Shit of State (30):
Bill Cassidy*
Tom "I'm A Warrior, Hear Me Roar (but I'm afraid of the press)" Cotton*
Steve Daines*
Mike Enzi*
Cindy Hyde Smith*
Dan Sullivan*
John Thune
John Barrasso
Roy Blunt
Todd Young
Marsha Blackburn
Richard Shelby
Mike Rounds*
Pat Roberts*
Jim Resch*
David Purdue*
Randy Paul
Jerry Moran
Mike Lee
James Lankford
John Kennedy
Johnny Isakson
John Hoeven
Josh Hawler
Deb Fischer
Kevin Cramer
Mike Crapo
Bill Cassidy
Mike Braun
John Boozman
I look forward to the House Articles of Impeachment and subsequent Senate trial. Going to be a hot, hot summer either defending Team Trump Treason and/or your vote, one way or the other.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
www.headstonesband.com
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
A rare Republican critic
As Congress left for the week, a few Republicans dared to criticize Mr. Mulvaney. I spoke with one of them: Representative Francis Rooney of Florida, a former ambassador who sits on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
What was your reaction to what Mick Mulvaney said?
I thought, “Wow, O.K.” We’ve had this president saying that the withholding of the funds was not related to his pressure of the new president of Ukraine. I gave the guy the benefit of the doubt. And then this week we had some testimony from the impeachment hearings. Then this thing comes out from Mulvaney. It looks like game, set, match to me on that issue. I heard the words like anyone else, and I couldn’t believe it.
What did you think of Mr. Mulvaney’s attempt to revise what he said?
I don’t know how you can walk it back. It’s not like, “I said these three vague things and one thing was misinterpreted.” I didn’t see a lot of gray area in what he said. It was pretty clear.
Why did you react the way you did?
There are a few things that really bother you. I’ve been involved in the diplomatic business. I have great respect for our professional diplomats who go about their work. This has undermined them and put them in a bad light. Like Senator Murkowski said, I don’t think its right to use the power and prestige of the U.S. for a political situation. Our foreign policy is supposed to advance the interests of the United States. That’s what we’re in the business of.
Why were you one of the few to actually speak out today?
There are a lot of people in the Republican conference. You’ve got all different shades of response. A lot of them have no response. A lot of them have a defiant response. Some of them are equivocating. And then you have a couple like me that say, “This is kind of bothersome.”
Have you talked to your constituents about this?
They don’t understand how anyone could say anything remotely at variance with President Trump. I’m sorry, but I’m just going to call ‘em like I see ‘em.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://apple.news/A8aVkIuAiQX-pAA3ckTSBzA
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
I've also heard that by making it private it is mostly democrat lawyers asking questions...which is also a net positive.
Let them gather the evidence and once the trial in the Senate happens (where this will all really matter) it will be public and the democrats should be well prepared and organized. All the groundwork and foundation of impeachment in place.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-23/trump-friendly-lawyers-join-legal-team-of-ukraine-s-firtash
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-25/firtash-extradition-to-u-s-allowed-by-top-austrian-court
Good, good friends of Ruddy Ghouliani.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
This isn't about how Devin Nunes is feeling... it's about facts.
Definitely a fine line the dems are walking here between dotting all the i's/crossing all the t's and handling the politics of the impeachment process. I think they have to be as aggressive as possible politically.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©