Aren't liberals supposed to be pro-gay? Terrorists at Milo event...
Comments
-
Milo Yiannopoulos resigns from Breitbart News
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/02/21/milo-yiannopoulos-resigns-breitbart-news/98203984/0 -
Bannon must have just found out Milo is gay.Bentleyspop said:Milo Yiannopoulos resigns from Breitbart News
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/02/21/milo-yiannopoulos-resigns-breitbart-news/98203984/Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer0 -
lolHughFreakingDillon said:
Bannon must have just found out Milo is gay.Bentleyspop said:Milo Yiannopoulos resigns from Breitbart News
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/02/21/milo-yiannopoulos-resigns-breitbart-news/98203984/0 -
the pen is mightier than the sword my friend...PJPOWER said:
Not definitive, but many right wing extremists that I have encountered are ex-military pro-second amendment supporters. Many left wing extremists that I've encountered are loudmouth "it's not fair" latte drinkers...when I gauge which ones would win an actual battle...the right wingers seem to have the advantage. Of course, there are exceptions on both sides I'm sure.HughFreakingDillon said:
so liberal extremists are unorganized pansies, but conservative extremists are well organized tough guys? I'm not trying to be argumentative or put anything in your mouth, just trying to gauge your point here.PJPOWER said:
Because I only picture the extremists participating. And they are usually unorganized pansies that turn and run when it gets heavy...like in the example I posted above.HughFreakingDillon said:
how does that post reinforce that idea?PJPOWER said:
I most definitely agree with that! Which is another reason that a leftist anarchist movement would fail miserably.ledvedderman said:
I don't think it's a case of those who spoke the loudest. The marches around the world the day after the inauguration with 3+ million people involved and no arrests is what speaks the loudest. I think maybe it's a case of what makes the best story. On the left it's assholes at this Milo event getting violent or people that got out of hand on inauguration day. On the right, the racists and Nazis make the best story, not the hundreds of thousands who marched for life peacefully. Every group (liberals, conservatives, blacks, police officers, etc.) has it's bad apples. The sad thing is that bad apples make the best news and are used to fire up the other side. Every group that I listed above are made up of 99% good people, but the 1% of the bad apples are making the opposite side paint with a broad brush stroke and that is what really divided our country.PJPOWER said:
That is entirely possible...but from what I've seen, not so much. Maybe it's a it's a situation of "those that speak the loudest"... Care to enlighten me? Everyone's perception is different based on experience. Maybe you can teach me what and who they really are.PJ_Soul said:
You have a really fucked up idea of what and who liberals are man. I mean REALLY fucked up.PJPOWER said:
You are the one that called them "pussies"...Freudian slip? I just said they are ill equipped crybabies and eluded that a mass anarchist movement by them would fail patheticly and miserably. Does that make them "pussies"? I don't think so, just naive.HughFreakingDillon said:
I wish the right would decide on what liberals are: pussies or violent anarchists. you can't have both (baseless) insults.PJPOWER said:
When I think about liberal anarchy, I picture a lot ill-equipped crybabies getting their asses handed to them and a lot of confusion about the lack of participation ribbons.PJ_Soul said:
And?cottagesteeze said:It's funny reading the reactions of this thread. These aren't liberals. These are anarchists.
I figure now's the time for liberals to turn into anarchists, given the fact that the US government seems to be aiming for a dictatorship and possible war. Isn't that basically the one of the few instances where anarchists are useful? And what the Constitution suggests in such times?
and why do you always talk about right/left going to "battle"? and always equate these things in some form of physical fight between right & left like this is the 5th grae playground? would you like to see your fellow Americans get gunned down in the streets over politics? maybe you remember that Dallas shooting recently? did you think that was cool?
the issues and political questions we face as a nation will be decided peacefully by people with degrees, not guns....0 -
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Has Bannon made public his hatred for gay people?HughFreakingDillon said:
Bannon must have just found out Milo is gay.Bentleyspop said:Milo Yiannopoulos resigns from Breitbart News
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/02/21/milo-yiannopoulos-resigns-breitbart-news/98203984/0 -
Why do you "always" use infinitives? I would argue that I rarely do any of the things you mentioned above. I do not want to see my fellow Americans hurt, which is why I "always" argue against these violent forms of protest. Do you think it was cool seeing the woman bashed over the head by a flagpole at the Milo event?my2hands said:
the pen is mightier than the sword my friend...PJPOWER said:
Not definitive, but many right wing extremists that I have encountered are ex-military pro-second amendment supporters. Many left wing extremists that I've encountered are loudmouth "it's not fair" latte drinkers...when I gauge which ones would win an actual battle...the right wingers seem to have the advantage. Of course, there are exceptions on both sides I'm sure.HughFreakingDillon said:
so liberal extremists are unorganized pansies, but conservative extremists are well organized tough guys? I'm not trying to be argumentative or put anything in your mouth, just trying to gauge your point here.PJPOWER said:
Because I only picture the extremists participating. And they are usually unorganized pansies that turn and run when it gets heavy...like in the example I posted above.HughFreakingDillon said:
how does that post reinforce that idea?PJPOWER said:
I most definitely agree with that! Which is another reason that a leftist anarchist movement would fail miserably.ledvedderman said:
I don't think it's a case of those who spoke the loudest. The marches around the world the day after the inauguration with 3+ million people involved and no arrests is what speaks the loudest. I think maybe it's a case of what makes the best story. On the left it's assholes at this Milo event getting violent or people that got out of hand on inauguration day. On the right, the racists and Nazis make the best story, not the hundreds of thousands who marched for life peacefully. Every group (liberals, conservatives, blacks, police officers, etc.) has it's bad apples. The sad thing is that bad apples make the best news and are used to fire up the other side. Every group that I listed above are made up of 99% good people, but the 1% of the bad apples are making the opposite side paint with a broad brush stroke and that is what really divided our country.PJPOWER said:
That is entirely possible...but from what I've seen, not so much. Maybe it's a it's a situation of "those that speak the loudest"... Care to enlighten me? Everyone's perception is different based on experience. Maybe you can teach me what and who they really are.PJ_Soul said:
You have a really fucked up idea of what and who liberals are man. I mean REALLY fucked up.PJPOWER said:
You are the one that called them "pussies"...Freudian slip? I just said they are ill equipped crybabies and eluded that a mass anarchist movement by them would fail patheticly and miserably. Does that make them "pussies"? I don't think so, just naive.HughFreakingDillon said:
I wish the right would decide on what liberals are: pussies or violent anarchists. you can't have both (baseless) insults.PJPOWER said:
When I think about liberal anarchy, I picture a lot ill-equipped crybabies getting their asses handed to them and a lot of confusion about the lack of participation ribbons.PJ_Soul said:
And?cottagesteeze said:It's funny reading the reactions of this thread. These aren't liberals. These are anarchists.
I figure now's the time for liberals to turn into anarchists, given the fact that the US government seems to be aiming for a dictatorship and possible war. Isn't that basically the one of the few instances where anarchists are useful? And what the Constitution suggests in such times?
and why do you always talk about right/left going to "battle"? and always equate these things in some form of physical fight between right & left like this is the 5th grae playground? would you like to see your fellow Americans get gunned down in the streets over politics? maybe you remember that Dallas shooting recently? did you think that was cool?
the issues and political questions we face as a nation will be decided peacefully by people with degrees, not guns....Post edited by PJPOWER on0 -
I heard he wanted his old job back. At Comet Pizza.Bentleyspop said:Milo Yiannopoulos resigns from Breitbart News
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/02/21/milo-yiannopoulos-resigns-breitbart-news/98203984/09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR; 05/03/2025, New Orleans, LA;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
i knew the right couldn't handle this guy. fucking cowards.0
-
At least we now know where the line is for the new right.0
-
Yeah he pretty much went all Madonna.mrussel1 said:At least we now know where the line is for the new right.
Hopefully he will adopt a kid and make amends.0 -
His fall is beautiful. See yaPJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Yeah he pretty much went all Madonna.mrussel1 said:At least we now know where the line is for the new right.
Hopefully he will adopt a kid and make amends.0 -
he didn't do anything. he simply talked about an experience that very few people can relate to. it wasn't the typical "feminists are ridiculous and Trump is fabulous" line that we normally hear. the line conservatives love. fucking cowards0
-
I agree.mrussel1 said:
His fall is beautiful. See yaPJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Yeah he pretty much went all Madonna.mrussel1 said:At least we now know where the line is for the new right.
Hopefully he will adopt a kid and make amends.
It was also as beautiful as Hillary Clintons fall.
0 -
She didn't lose everything. He did. Nice try.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I agree.mrussel1 said:
His fall is beautiful. See yaPJfanwillneverleave1 said:
Yeah he pretty much went all Madonna.mrussel1 said:At least we now know where the line is for the new right.
Hopefully he will adopt a kid and make amends.
It was also as beautiful as Hillary Clintons fall.0 -
He will be picked up soon by some TV station.
The ratings will be huge, "a former Breitbart persona goes mainstream" is what they will sell.
This has self promotion written all over it and before you know it he will be co-anchor on some CBS talkshow.
This is a brilliant move by him.0 -
I do spin for a living, and appreciate a good spin...you're doing some drastic reaching here well beyond spin. I agree that Milo will get picked up by a far right news outlet, but his hopes of being in the mainstream are over.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:He will be picked up soon by some TV station.
The ratings will be huge, "a former Breitbart persona goes mainstream" is what they will sell.
This has self promotion written all over it and before you know it he will be co-anchor on some CBS talkshow.
This is a brilliant move by him.0 -
I don't mean primetime co-anchor.ledvedderman said:
I do spin for a living, and appreciate a good spin...you're doing some drastic reaching here well beyond spin. I agree that Milo will get picked up by a far right news outlet, but his hopes of being in the mainstream are over.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:He will be picked up soon by some TV station.
The ratings will be huge, "a former Breitbart persona goes mainstream" is what they will sell.
This has self promotion written all over it and before you know it he will be co-anchor on some CBS talkshow.
This is a brilliant move by him.
I just think he will be picked up at the lower level but up a little of msm like he already has being on maher et al.
0 -
He's toxic. You get canned from breitbart and you're going main stream?PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
I don't mean primetime co-anchor.ledvedderman said:
I do spin for a living, and appreciate a good spin...you're doing some drastic reaching here well beyond spin. I agree that Milo will get picked up by a far right news outlet, but his hopes of being in the mainstream are over.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:He will be picked up soon by some TV station.
The ratings will be huge, "a former Breitbart persona goes mainstream" is what they will sell.
This has self promotion written all over it and before you know it he will be co-anchor on some CBS talkshow.
This is a brilliant move by him.
I just think he will be picked up at the lower level but up a little of msm like he already has being on maher et al.0 -
^^^
He didn't get canned.0 -
Use your head. He was forced to resign.PJfanwillneverleave1 said:^^^
He didn't get canned.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help







