Aren't liberals supposed to be pro-gay? Terrorists at Milo event...

2456710

Comments

  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    JC29856 said:

    Alex Soros attends UC Berkeley

    And the circle is complete.


  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    JC29856 said:

    Im getting the sense these protestors dont think too highly of women. Is this love trumping hate?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSMKGRyWKas

    "Were not the enemy, were not the enemy"

    These are not protesters, these are violent terrorist hate groups and should be treated as such...
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    PJPOWER said:

    JC29856 said:

    Im getting the sense these protestors dont think too highly of women. Is this love trumping hate?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSMKGRyWKas

    "Were not the enemy, were not the enemy"

    These are not protesters, these are violent terrorist hate groups and should be treated as such...
    I tend to give benefit of doubt.
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,621
    PJPOWER said:

    JC29856 said:

    Im getting the sense these protestors dont think too highly of women. Is this love trumping hate?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSMKGRyWKas

    "Were not the enemy, were not the enemy"

    These are not protesters, these are violent terrorist hate groups and should be treated as such...
    So the definition of terrorism is now people in a group destroying property and assaulting others? I need to know the correct label to use on the fans of the next team that wins the championship.
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited February 2017

    PJPOWER said:

    JC29856 said:

    Im getting the sense these protestors dont think too highly of women. Is this love trumping hate?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSMKGRyWKas

    "Were not the enemy, were not the enemy"

    These are not protesters, these are violent terrorist hate groups and should be treated as such...
    So the definition of terrorism is now people in a group destroying property and assaulting others? I need to know the correct label to use on the fans of the next team that wins the championship.
    ter·ror·ism
    ˈterəˌrizəm/
    noun
    the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
    Seems fitting to me...
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    PJPOWER said:

    PJPOWER said:

    JC29856 said:

    Im getting the sense these protestors dont think too highly of women. Is this love trumping hate?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSMKGRyWKas

    "Were not the enemy, were not the enemy"

    These are not protesters, these are violent terrorist hate groups and should be treated as such...
    So the definition of terrorism is now people in a group destroying property and assaulting others? I need to know the correct label to use on the fans of the next team that wins the championship.
    ter·ror·ism
    ˈterəˌrizəm/
    noun
    the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
    Seems fitting to me...
    If anarchy is a political aim I guess so.

    It's almost like no one has heard the term black bloc before.
  • mace1229
    mace1229 Posts: 9,911
    Does cyber bullying count? Because then we can include some of those recently banned!
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,621
    PJPOWER said:

    PJPOWER said:

    JC29856 said:

    Im getting the sense these protestors dont think too highly of women. Is this love trumping hate?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSMKGRyWKas

    "Were not the enemy, were not the enemy"

    These are not protesters, these are violent terrorist hate groups and should be treated as such...
    So the definition of terrorism is now people in a group destroying property and assaulting others? I need to know the correct label to use on the fans of the next team that wins the championship.
    ter·ror·ism
    ˈterəˌrizəm/
    noun
    the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
    Seems fitting to me...
    What if the fans are demanding a new stadium be built?
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    unsung said:

    Just read a report that the Trump supporter that got hit with the shovel is dead. Hopefully it is not true.

    Any people wonder why cars get driven through these parades of dumbasses. I'm all for protesting. Violent riots...not so much.
  • HesCalledDyer
    HesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,498
    PJPOWER said:

    unsung said:

    Just read a report that the Trump supporter that got hit with the shovel is dead. Hopefully it is not true.

    Any people wonder why cars get driven through these parades of dumbasses. I'm all for protesting. Violent riots...not so much.
    That is something we can agree on. It pisses me off every single time I see people fighting violence with violence, regardless of their views.
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,621
    PJPOWER said:

    unsung said:

    Just read a report that the Trump supporter that got hit with the shovel is dead. Hopefully it is not true.

    Any people wonder why cars get driven through these parades of dumbasses. I'm all for protesting. Violent riots...not so much.
    Road rage is a different topic. But one guy on here who's currently on a time out said he'd run someone over if it made him late for work. Some people resort to violence when their needs aren't met. Conservatives, liberals, and in betweens.
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499

    PJPOWER said:

    PJPOWER said:

    JC29856 said:

    Im getting the sense these protestors dont think too highly of women. Is this love trumping hate?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSMKGRyWKas

    "Were not the enemy, were not the enemy"

    These are not protesters, these are violent terrorist hate groups and should be treated as such...
    So the definition of terrorism is now people in a group destroying property and assaulting others? I need to know the correct label to use on the fans of the next team that wins the championship.
    ter·ror·ism
    ˈterəˌrizəm/
    noun
    the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
    Seems fitting to me...
    What if the fans are demanding a new stadium be built?
    I don't even know wtf you are talking about? Aren't you one of the ones around here that cries when I point out double standards though?
  • jeffbr
    jeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    JC29856 said:

    unsung said:

    JC29856 said:
    Tolerant left assaulting women. So much for women's rights.

    These people can't be negotiated with. Antifa is worse than the alt-right.

    One of these terrorists is going to pepper spray the wrong person.
    Ill make a bold prediction, someone will get shoot at the next rodeo. This stuff brings out the worst in people, someone will bring a gun to one of these protests, and either pull it or fire it, then the shit really fans out.
    No prediction necessary. That is already a historical fact. It happened last week at the University of Washington in Seattle.
    http://patch.com/washington/seattle/man-who-shot-milo-yiannopoulos-protester-uw-student-report
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,621
    PJPOWER said:

    PJPOWER said:

    PJPOWER said:

    JC29856 said:

    Im getting the sense these protestors dont think too highly of women. Is this love trumping hate?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSMKGRyWKas

    "Were not the enemy, were not the enemy"

    These are not protesters, these are violent terrorist hate groups and should be treated as such...
    So the definition of terrorism is now people in a group destroying property and assaulting others? I need to know the correct label to use on the fans of the next team that wins the championship.
    ter·ror·ism
    ˈterəˌrizəm/
    noun
    the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
    Seems fitting to me...
    What if the fans are demanding a new stadium be built?
    I don't even know wtf you are talking about? Aren't you one of the ones around here that cries when I point out double standards though?
    I'm talking about how people define terrorism. It seems like the word is often used if there's a group of people doing something that oerson doesn't like.
  • unsung said:

    JC29856 said:
    Tolerant left assaulting women. So much for women's rights.

    These people can't be negotiated with. Antifa is worse than the alt-right.

    One of these terrorists is going to pepper spray the wrong person.
    Timothy McVie, so much for federal government employees and their children's rights.

    Ted Kzynski, so much for industrial/corporate CEO rights.

    Dylan Roof, so much for African American church goer's rights.

    Eric Rudolph, so much for Olympic attendees' rights.

    And the rights of men and woman assinated for providing legally protected medical services, so much for those rights as well.

    What's the common theme that connects them all?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited February 2017

    PJPOWER said:

    PJPOWER said:

    PJPOWER said:

    JC29856 said:

    Im getting the sense these protestors dont think too highly of women. Is this love trumping hate?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSMKGRyWKas

    "Were not the enemy, were not the enemy"

    These are not protesters, these are violent terrorist hate groups and should be treated as such...
    So the definition of terrorism is now people in a group destroying property and assaulting others? I need to know the correct label to use on the fans of the next team that wins the championship.
    ter·ror·ism
    ˈterəˌrizəm/
    noun
    the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
    Seems fitting to me...
    What if the fans are demanding a new stadium be built?
    I don't even know wtf you are talking about? Aren't you one of the ones around here that cries when I point out double standards though?
    I'm talking about how people define terrorism. It seems like the word is often used if there's a group of people doing something that oerson doesn't like.
    I am not for rioting or violent protesting in any manner or form...but the definition of terrorism includes violence with the motive of influencing a political outcome. The people in some of these riots in the videos above meet that definition, do they not?
    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • cottagesteeze
    cottagesteeze St. Paul, MN Posts: 218
    It's funny reading the reactions of this thread. These aren't liberals. These are anarchists.
  • PP193448
    PP193448 Here Posts: 4,282

    It's funny reading the reactions of this thread. These aren't liberals. These are anarchists.

    Hard to sometimes tell the difference... especially with celebrities who dream about blowing up the White House. :wink:
    2006 Clev,Pitt; 2008 NY MSGx2; 2010 Columbus; 2012 Missoula; 2013 Phoenix,Vancouver,Seattle; 2014 Cincy; 2016 Lex, Wrigley 1&2; 2018 Wrigley 1&2; 2022 Louisville
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,760
    edited February 2017

    It's funny reading the reactions of this thread. These aren't liberals. These are anarchists.

    And?
    I figure now's the time for liberals to turn into anarchists, given the fact that the US government seems to be aiming for a dictatorship and possible war. Isn't that basically the one of the few instances where anarchists are useful? And what the Constitution suggests in such times?
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata