Text of Muslim Ban Executive Order in a few posts

1…91011121315»

Comments

  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,797
    Right back in his orange face let's see him blame Obama for this decision because the judge is from Hawaii I can hear it coming !
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:
    Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
    Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.
    any update on the "muslim ban"?
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    The SCOTUS issued their opinion today.
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    unsung said:
    The SCOTUS issued their opinion today.
    Their opinion was : " we will listen to oral arguments in October " 
  • unsung
    unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    And the 9th was slammed down 9-0.
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,618
    unsung said:
    And the 9th was slammed down 9-0.
    The end result is that it their decision didn't change much, since they'll allow people with connections to people in the US. Better keep that threat level at Super Code Red Level 10!  
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:
    Liz Warren Let me repeat: the @POTUS fired the nation’s top law enforcement officer for refusing to defend an illegal, unconstitutional, immoral order.
    Guess who's money is being referred to in this quote......
     "In a matchup between @realDonaldTrump’s #MuslimBan & the Constitution, my money’s on the Constitution every time. The 9th Circuit agrees."
  • CM189191
    CM189191 Posts: 6,927
    unsung said:
    And the 9th was slammed down 9-0.
    That is to say, all 9 judges have an interest in letting tRump have his day in court.  There was no decision made, other than inviting tRump to come explain himself.  Don't make this something it isn't.  
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
    Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.
    any update on the "muslim ban"?

    Sally Yates say what?
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,797
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
    Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.
    any update on the "muslim ban"?

    Sally Yates say what?
    HRC how’s that investigation going ? 
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    josevolution said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
    Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.
    any update on the "muslim ban"?

    Sally Yates say what?
    HRC how’s that investigation going ? 
    oh boy! Wray stated today that there is an ongoing investigation into Clinton emails and the FBIs handling of that investigation.
    #PLEATAPE
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,797
    JC29856 said:
    josevolution said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
    Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.
    any update on the "muslim ban"?

    Sally Yates say what?
    HRC how’s that investigation going ? 
    oh boy! Wray stated today that there is an ongoing investigation into Clinton emails and the FBIs handling of that investigation.
    #PLEATAPE
    who do you think will be in jail 1st her or someone from bafoon's team ?
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    josevolution said:
    JC29856 said:
    josevolution said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
    Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.
    any update on the "muslim ban"?

    Sally Yates say what?
    HRC how’s that investigation going ? 
    oh boy! Wray stated today that there is an ongoing investigation into Clinton emails and the FBIs handling of that investigation.
    #PLEATAPE
    who do you think will be in jail 1st her or someone from bafoon's team ?
    you and I go to jail, "they" don't.
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,656
    JC29856 said:
    josevolution said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
    Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.
    any update on the "muslim ban"?

    Sally Yates say what?
    HRC how’s that investigation going ? 
    oh boy! Wray stated today that there is an ongoing investigation into Clinton emails and the FBIs handling of that investigation.
    #PLEATAPE

    Please wake me when that investigation concludes with charges. Which comes first, charges against Hillary or the damning report from the voting fraud commission?
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • JC29856
    JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    Halifax2TheMax said:
    JC29856 said:
    josevolution said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    JC29856 said:
    Yes, it looks like it'll be up to the Judicial Branch to be the firewall to protect the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, etc. Next we'll be hearing about how all the judges and lawyers are sleazy, bought off, etc. The administration will attempt to undermine those tell them they're doing it all wrong.
    Legal precedent is not on the side of immigrants. I'm not sure what trumps "in the interest of national security", spying on Americans hasnt, habeas corpus hasn't and drone killing American citizens hasn't, good luck with immigrant vetting.
    any update on the "muslim ban"?

    Sally Yates say what?
    HRC how’s that investigation going ? 
    oh boy! Wray stated today that there is an ongoing investigation into Clinton emails and the FBIs handling of that investigation.
    #PLEATAPE

    Please wake me when that investigation concludes with charges. Which comes first, charges against Hillary or the damning report from the voting fraud commission?
    judges too! with clerks! 
    Alex had major issues with the Muslim ban and sexual harassment all the way back in 1991.


    Kozinski, 67, has previously dealt with the issue of sexual harassment in his role as a judge. In 1991, he joined an opinion that said cases should be decided from the point of view of the victim, using the "reasonable woman" standard. The Post quotes Kozinski's writings about sexual harassment in 1992 in which he said that men "must be aware of the boundaries of propriety and learn to stay well within them." Women, he wrote, "must be vigilant of their rights, but must also have some forgiveness for human foibles: misplaced humor, misunderstanding or just plain stupidity."


    https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/12/08/569559223/federal-appeals-judge-alex-kozinski-accused-of-sexual-harassment


Categories