Russia's Influence On The American Election

CM189191

JC29856 said:

JimmyV said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

And you have no information that Trump Tower (DJT's office or residence) was tapped either.  But that doesn't stop you from speculating and generally making shit up.  

John Carney

Ill try again, last time..."Comey knew trump was being spied on"

Can you try this again?  I'm looking for someone to represent "John Carney" as reputable.  

wrong John Carney

Yeah, sure okay.  My point stands firmly.  There's no evidence to substantiate that Trump's residence or his business offices were tapped.  

No evidence and no indication. Just a strong desire in some corners that the story be true.

Im fairly certain Trump was spied on, the "residence and businesses being tapped" was created by others, whatever their reasons. A simple posts scroll will show (while you're at it can you find what I'm making up?).
Ill say it again thou for those that arent following along. Comey knew Trump was being spied on.

there is still no indication that Trump himself was targeted by wiretapping; the report leaves open the possibility that a conversation with Trump may have been swept up in the Manafort tap, but we have no indication that it was.

But please, go on with your ad-hominem attacks on Comey and the FBI to protect your precious tRump.

mrussel1

JC29856 said:

JimmyV said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

And you have no information that Trump Tower (DJT's office or residence) was tapped either.  But that doesn't stop you from speculating and generally making shit up.  

John Carney

Ill try again, last time..."Comey knew trump was being spied on"

Can you try this again?  I'm looking for someone to represent "John Carney" as reputable.  

wrong John Carney

Yeah, sure okay.  My point stands firmly.  There's no evidence to substantiate that Trump's residence or his business offices were tapped.  

No evidence and no indication. Just a strong desire in some corners that the story be true.

Im fairly certain Trump was spied on, the "residence and businesses being tapped" was created by others, whatever their reasons. A simple posts scroll will show (while you're at it can you find what I'm making up?).
Ill say it again thou for those that arent following along. Comey knew Trump was being spied on.

I added this part because it's important.  Paul Manafort had a private residence in Trump Tower.  So it's rational to think that the physical tower had a tap in Manafort's residence.  But that doesn't mean Trump, his private residence or his business residence were tapped, with him being the target.  I apologize that precision of information doesn't fit your agenda.  

JC29856

CM189191 said:

JC29856 said:

JimmyV said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

And you have no information that Trump Tower (DJT's office or residence) was tapped either.  But that doesn't stop you from speculating and generally making shit up.  

John Carney

Ill try again, last time..."Comey knew trump was being spied on"

Can you try this again?  I'm looking for someone to represent "John Carney" as reputable.  

wrong John Carney

Yeah, sure okay.  My point stands firmly.  There's no evidence to substantiate that Trump's residence or his business offices were tapped.  

No evidence and no indication. Just a strong desire in some corners that the story be true.

Im fairly certain Trump was spied on, the "residence and businesses being tapped" was created by others, whatever their reasons. A simple posts scroll will show (while you're at it can you find what I'm making up?).
Ill say it again thou for those that arent following along. Comey knew Trump was being spied on.

there is still no indication that Trump himself was targeted by wiretapping; the report leaves open the possibility that a conversation with Trump may have been swept up in the Manafort tap, but we have no indication that it was.

But please, go on with your ad-hominem attacks on Comey and the FBI to protect your precious tRump.

den·si·ty

ˈdensədē/

noun

1. the degree of compactness of a substance.

   "a reduction in bone density"

   synonyms:

   solidity, solidness, denseness, thickness, substance, mass; Morecompactness, tightness, hardness

   "a loss of bone density"
   • Computing

     a measure of the amount of information on a storage medium (tape or disk). For magnetic tape it is the amount of information recorded per unit length of tape (bits per inch or millimeter); for a disk, a fixed number of bits per sector, sectors per track, and tracks per disk.

     noun: packing density; plural noun: packing densities

     "chip density doubles every eighteen months"
   • Physics

     degree of consistency measured by the quantity of mass per unit volume.
   • the opacity of a photographic image.
   • the quantity of people or things in a given area or space.

     "areas of low population density"

HughFreakingDillon

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

you have an issue with a direct, true, statement? 

understatement of the year

not sure if this helps

state·ment

ˈstātmənt/

noun

a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.

an·swer

ˈansər/

noun

a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.

I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to. 

The Juggler

JC29856 said:

JimmyV said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

JC29856 said:

mrussel1 said:

And you have no information that Trump Tower (DJT's office or residence) was tapped either.  But that doesn't stop you from speculating and generally making shit up.  

John Carney

Ill try again, last time..."Comey knew trump was being spied on"

Can you try this again?  I'm looking for someone to represent "John Carney" as reputable.  

wrong John Carney

Yeah, sure okay.  My point stands firmly.  There's no evidence to substantiate that Trump's residence or his business offices were tapped.  

No evidence and no indication. Just a strong desire in some corners that the story be true.

Im fairly certain Trump was spied on, the "residence and businesses being tapped" was created by others, whatever their reasons. A simple posts scroll will show (while you're at it can you find what I'm making up?).
Ill say it again thou for those that arent following along. Comey knew Trump was being spied on.

nope

JC29856

HughFreakingDillon said:

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

you have an issue with a direct, true, statement? 

understatement of the year

not sure if this helps

state·ment

ˈstātmənt/

noun

a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.

an·swer

ˈansər/

noun

a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.

I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to. 

Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when
1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 
2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.

HughFreakingDillon

JC29856 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

you have an issue with a direct, true, statement? 

understatement of the year

not sure if this helps

state·ment

ˈstātmənt/

noun

a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.

an·swer

ˈansər/

noun

a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.

I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to. 

Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when
1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 
2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.

it IS simple. you are the one making things up out of thing air and then claiming everyone else is. 

JimmyV

JC29856 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

you have an issue with a direct, true, statement? 

understatement of the year

not sure if this helps

state·ment

ˈstātmənt/

noun

a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.

an·swer

ˈansər/

noun

a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.

I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to. 

Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when
1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 
2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

Those are Trump's words. His "wires tapped in Trump Tower." Pretty clear that he was in fact claiming the wiretapping was directed at him.

CM189191

JimmyV said:

JC29856 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

you have an issue with a direct, true, statement? 

understatement of the year

not sure if this helps

state·ment

ˈstātmənt/

noun

a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.

an·swer

ˈansər/

noun

a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.

I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to. 

Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when
1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 
2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

Those are Trump's words. His "wires tapped in Trump Tower." Pretty clear that he was in fact claiming the wiretapping was directed at him.

Not to mention:

Obama did it
- no, the President can not order wiretaps

Nothing found
- then why is Mueller allegedly threatening Manafort with indictments?

McCarthyigm
- add this to the list of complicated things that tRump doesn't understand

JC29856

CM189191 said:

JimmyV said:

JC29856 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

you have an issue with a direct, true, statement? 

understatement of the year

not sure if this helps

state·ment

ˈstātmənt/

noun

a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.

an·swer

ˈansər/

noun

a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.

I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to. 

Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when
1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 
2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

Those are Trump's words. His "wires tapped in Trump Tower." Pretty clear that he was in fact claiming the wiretapping was directed at him.

Not to mention:

Obama did it
- no, the President can not order wiretaps

Nothing found
- then why is Mueller allegedly threatening Manafort with indictments?

McCarthyigm
- add this to the list of complicated things that tRump doesn't understand

All this man-splaining has made me hungry, Im thinking about indicting a "ham sandwich"
I'm full up on alt-stupid, if only we could figure out how to power our automobiles on it, anyway "let me sleep" on my assertions and we'll catch up tomrw.

mrussel1

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

JimmyV said:

JC29856 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

you have an issue with a direct, true, statement? 

understatement of the year

not sure if this helps

state·ment

ˈstātmənt/

noun

a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.

an·swer

ˈansər/

noun

a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.

I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to. 

Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when
1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 
2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

Those are Trump's words. His "wires tapped in Trump Tower." Pretty clear that he was in fact claiming the wiretapping was directed at him.

Not to mention:

Obama did it
- no, the President can not order wiretaps

Nothing found
- then why is Mueller allegedly threatening Manafort with indictments?

McCarthyigm
- add this to the list of complicated things that tRump doesn't understand

All this man-splaining has made me hungry, Im thinking about indicting a "ham sandwich"
I'm full up on alt-stupid, if only we could figure out how to power our automobiles on it, anyway "let me sleep" on my assertions and we'll catch up tomrw.

Yes, everyone is stupid but you.  Keep thinking that.  See if you can find some Jay Carney "truths" to validate your point.  

The Juggler

JimmyV said:

JC29856 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

you have an issue with a direct, true, statement? 

understatement of the year

not sure if this helps

state·ment

ˈstātmənt/

noun

a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.

an·swer

ˈansər/

noun

a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.

I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to. 

Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when
1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 
2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

Those are Trump's words. His "wires tapped in Trump Tower." Pretty clear that he was in fact claiming the wiretapping was directed at him.

Obvious to anyone except those with an agenda to, predictably, muddy up the waters.

CM189191

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

JimmyV said:

JC29856 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

you have an issue with a direct, true, statement? 

understatement of the year

not sure if this helps

state·ment

ˈstātmənt/

noun

a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.

an·swer

ˈansər/

noun

a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.

I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to. 

Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when
1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 
2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

Those are Trump's words. His "wires tapped in Trump Tower." Pretty clear that he was in fact claiming the wiretapping was directed at him.

Not to mention:

Obama did it
- no, the President can not order wiretaps

Nothing found
- then why is Mueller allegedly threatening Manafort with indictments?

McCarthyigm
- add this to the list of complicated things that tRump doesn't understand

All this man-splaining has made me hungry, Im thinking about indicting a "ham sandwich"
I'm full up on alt-stupid, if only we could figure out how to power our automobiles on it, anyway "let me sleep" on my assertions and we'll catch up tomrw.

not often I get to reference an article from Cracked.com, much less 2 days in a row - yet here we are

CM189191 said:

"There's this tone that implies they're smarter than everyone else, that they're dropping profound truth bombs that we're all too dumb or irrational to see. They talk about humanity like they're not part of it, like by saying "The fact that more people use Instagram than Wolfram is proof that #humanityisdoomed #notgettinglaid." They talk like they've evolved beyond us mere mortals and our petty problems, and they only grace us with their presence because they're stuck with us. They should be discussing impenetrably deep concepts with beings of pure light and Mark Twain's disembodied brain. Instead, fate has trapped them in Virginia.

Remember that kid at school who always bragged about how smart he was, but never did any work? They're that kid. They want to acknowledge the problem without doing anything about it, to appear intelligent without being intelligent, because they equate dispassionate cynicism with genius. But what they truly are, almost invariably, are people who are unaffected by whatever news story they're declaring to be proof that Rome has fallen. They are above everyone else, but only in the sense that after pronouncing our species doomed, they can head to Starbucks instead of having to deal with the floodwaters rising around them..."

The Single Most Entitled Reaction To Modern Problems

Halifax2TheMax

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

JimmyV said:

JC29856 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

JC29856 said:

CM189191 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

you have an issue with a direct, true, statement? 

understatement of the year

not sure if this helps

state·ment

ˈstātmənt/

noun

a definite or clear expression of something in speech or writing.

an·swer

ˈansər/

noun

a thing said, written, or done to deal with or as a reaction to a question, statement, or situation.

I would say what Comey said was exactly that, a "definite or clear expression of something in speech". it was pretty damn clear to me. not sure why you are focusing so headstrong on semantics, is what this boils down to. 

Lets back up here, I made 1 single post about Comey inserting the phrase "directed at him" in his response to Schiffs question. I thought it was peculiar to add that phrase when
1. trumps tweet never claimed the "wire tapping" was directed at him 
2. the same point it made without the phrase "directed at him" included (see below)

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping directed at him by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

"With respect to the president's tweets about alleged wiretapping by the prior administration, I have no information that supports those tweets, and we have looked carefully inside the FBI,"

I thought is was pretty simple, then the usual suspects ran wild like Hulk-a-mania, tearing off their shirts and screaming profanities.

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

Those are Trump's words. His "wires tapped in Trump Tower." Pretty clear that he was in fact claiming the wiretapping was directed at him.

Not to mention:

Obama did it
- no, the President can not order wiretaps

Nothing found
- then why is Mueller allegedly threatening Manafort with indictments?

McCarthyigm
- add this to the list of complicated things that tRump doesn't understand

All this man-splaining has made me hungry, Im thinking about indicting a "ham sandwich"
I'm full up on alt-stupid, if only we could figure out how to power our automobiles on it, anyway "let me sleep" on my assertions and we'll catch up tomrw.

Some 3D weak sauce to go with that nothing burger. 3D is exhausted from D'ing. Needs sleep. The sun will rise and shine on the indictments tomorrow. 7Xs.

Halifax2TheMax

Maybe he ought to tell his boss?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/19/politics/jon-huntsman-russia-election-interference/index.html

JC29856

this confirms the Russia Russia Russia hoax

committee to investigate Russia

Rob Reiner
The committee's advisory board, which will oversee the progress of the nonprofit organization, includes top influencers from both sides of the aisle including former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Max Boot, American Enterprise Institute resident scholar Norman Ornstein and others.

JC29856

James Clapper 

CLAPPER:But I will say that, for the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there was no such wiretap activity mounted against– the president elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign. I can’t speak for other Title Three authorized entities in the government or a state or local entity.

TODD: Yeah, I was just going to say, if the F.B.I., for instance, had a FISA court order of some sort for a surveillance, would that be information you would know or not know?
CLAPPER:  Yes.
TODD:  You would be told this?
CLAPPER:  I would know that.
TODD:  If there was a FISA court order–
CLAPPER:  Yes.
TODD:  –on something like this.
CLAPPER:  Something like this, absolutely.
TODD:  And at this point, you can’t confirm or deny whether that exists?
CLAPPER:  I can deny it.

Halifax2TheMax

JC29856 said:

this confirms the Russia Russia Russia hoax

committee to investigate Russia

Rob Reiner
The committee's advisory board, which will oversee the progress of the nonprofit organization, includes top influencers from both sides of the aisle including former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Max Boot, American Enterprise Institute resident scholar Norman Ornstein and others.

Ummmmm, sure.

Halifax2TheMax

JC29856 said:

James Clapper 

CLAPPER:But I will say that, for the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there was no such wiretap activity mounted against– the president elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign. I can’t speak for other Title Three authorized entities in the government or a state or local entity.

TODD: Yeah, I was just going to say, if the F.B.I., for instance, had a FISA court order of some sort for a surveillance, would that be information you would know or not know?
CLAPPER:  Yes.
TODD:  You would be told this?
CLAPPER:  I would know that.
TODD:  If there was a FISA court order–
CLAPPER:  Yes.
TODD:  –on something like this.
CLAPPER:  Something like this, absolutely.
TODD:  And at this point, you can’t confirm or deny whether that exists?
CLAPPER:  I can deny it.

Link? Date? Larger context? And your point is? 

josevolution

He won't even pay for his legal fees all on campaign funds dime he's the best total crooked billionaire!!!