President Elect Trump

Go Beavers

g under p said:

Jason P said:

Trump on getting elected: "I outworked everybody, I think I outworked anyone who ever ran for office. I learned that from Belichick."

OMGoodness Trump really said that.....Oh boy.

Peace

I thought that was AMT humor. Holy crap.

InHiding80

Jason P said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzLHU6S4oic

Gabbo's lineup is just as pathetic as the Trump performers if you think about it. RHCP and Bette Midler would never support Orange Bin Laden.

InHiding80

Go Beavers said:

what dreams said:

A president for all white people. Trying to find a person of color on the National Mall while listening to the Archbishop pray for wisdom . . .

That Archbishop has a wicked sense of humor.

Don't start any blasphemous rumors, now.

InHiding80

HughFreakingDillon said:

a billionaire business man had to learn his work ethic from a football coach.

Tom Brady for Secretary of Offense!

Just another reason to hate the Pats. At least the Cowgirls got eliminated. Silver lining.

InHiding80

jeffbr said:

At the Inaugural Concert tonight The Donald and Melania walked out to the Rolling Stones' "Heart of Stone". Who picks these walkout songs?

There's been so many girls that I've known
I've made so many cry, and still I wonder why
Here comes a little girl, I see her walking down the street
She's all by herself, I try to knock her off her feet
'Cause you'll never break, never break, never break, never break
This heart of stone, oh no, no, this heart of stone
What's different about her I don't really know
No matter how I try, I just can't make her cry
'Cause you'll never break, never break, never break, never break
This heart of stone, oh no, no, this heart of stone
Don't keep on looking that same old way
If you try acting sad, you'll only make me glad
Better listen little girl, if you going walking down the street
I ain't got no love, I ain't the kind to meet
'Cause you'll…

Edit: He picks the most ironic Stones' songs: "Heart of Stone" tonight. "Can't Always Get What You Want" at his rallies. "Sympathy for the Devil" at his victory speech. Really strange! Or really honest!

And I thought Adam Levine ruined their legacy.

This country is shattered. We need some emotional rescue. Trump's so cold. He's so cold cold cold. Rape and murder it's just a shot a way with him in charge.

bootlegger10

josevolution said:

bootlegger10 said:

dignin said:

bootlegger10 said:

The boycotts of the inaugural by politicians is ridiculous. All we heard about during the campaign was how precious our democracy is and how elections should be honored. Now, when there is a peaceful transition of power between unrelated people (which was a crazy idea back in the 1700's), the Dems are boycotting. I thought they loved their country and democracy. Maybe it was all just a partisan game after all? I get that they think Trump is an idiot.

It's still peaceful. I don't see the problem.

They are boycotting because they don''t view the election as legit. That is exactly what the Dems were crying about during the last few weeks of the election.

They don't view it legit based on the briefing presented to them by intelligence community !

Again, the hypocrisy of the left criticizing Trump for giving a wait and see answer during the debate when the libs should have said the same thing based on what they are doing now.

HughFreakingDillon

my god. reading his inaugural speech, that sounded like the speech of a supreme dicator in some dystopian future.

I will never submit to getting a tiny orange hand tattooed on my left wrist. NEVER!

HughFreakingDillon

bootlegger10 said:

josevolution said:

bootlegger10 said:

dignin said:

bootlegger10 said:

The boycotts of the inaugural by politicians is ridiculous. All we heard about during the campaign was how precious our democracy is and how elections should be honored. Now, when there is a peaceful transition of power between unrelated people (which was a crazy idea back in the 1700's), the Dems are boycotting. I thought they loved their country and democracy. Maybe it was all just a partisan game after all? I get that they think Trump is an idiot.

It's still peaceful. I don't see the problem.

They are boycotting because they don''t view the election as legit. That is exactly what the Dems were crying about during the last few weeks of the election.

They don't view it legit based on the briefing presented to them by intelligence community !

Again, the hypocrisy of the left criticizing Trump for giving a wait and see answer during the debate when the libs should have said the same thing based on what they are doing now.

how is it hypcrisy? no one in their right mind believed there would be "rigging". trump didn't even know. it was a lucky guess borne of paranoia and extreme narcicism.

jeffbr

HughFreakingDillon said:

my god. reading his inaugural speech, that sounded like the speech of a supreme dicator in some dystopian future.

I will never submit to getting a tiny orange hand tattooed on my left wrist. NEVER!

The audio sounded like it, too. Staccato delivery, alienating instead of unifying, slamming past presidents (who were on the podium), current congress (who were on the podium), foreign nations, etc... Very nationalistic (America First!), isolationist, and confrontational. But at least he's going to Make America Great Again!

bootlegger10

HughFreakingDillon said:

bootlegger10 said:

josevolution said:

bootlegger10 said:

dignin said:

bootlegger10 said:

The boycotts of the inaugural by politicians is ridiculous. All we heard about during the campaign was how precious our democracy is and how elections should be honored. Now, when there is a peaceful transition of power between unrelated people (which was a crazy idea back in the 1700's), the Dems are boycotting. I thought they loved their country and democracy. Maybe it was all just a partisan game after all? I get that they think Trump is an idiot.

It's still peaceful. I don't see the problem.

They are boycotting because they don''t view the election as legit. That is exactly what the Dems were crying about during the last few weeks of the election.

They don't view it legit based on the briefing presented to them by intelligence community !

Again, the hypocrisy of the left criticizing Trump for giving a wait and see answer during the debate when the libs should have said the same thing based on what they are doing now.

how is it hypcrisy? no one in their right mind believed there would be "rigging". trump didn't even know. it was a lucky guess borne of paranoia and extreme narcicism.

Tell me then, what is wrong with saying that you will evaluate the election results after they happen? How stupid is it that the Republicans signed a pledge to support the eventual nominee and then had to back off the pledge when Trump won the nomination?

I don't think it makes sense to made decisions on hypotheticals. I think Jeb Bush should be able to say, "I will decide to support the Republican candidate (if not me) when the Republican candidate wins the nomination." Why can't Trump say, "I will determine whether to challenge the election when there is an election that can be challenged". But instead, the media forces candidates into positions they cannot possibly make a decision on currently.

And by the way, Trump's answer was completely, utterly correct (which doesn't happen much) as borne out by actual events.

tbergs

It was a great speech. Tremendous. He even used a line by Bane from Batman. Maybe it was coincidental...

Ledbetterman10

tbergs said:

It was a great speech. Tremendous. He even used a line by Bane from Batman. Maybe it was coincidental...

Wma31394

Thought the Donald and family did a good job..baron behaved..and there wasn't that moment where all i could do is shake my head in disbelief and embarasment..lets see what happens

HughFreakingDillon

bootlegger10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

bootlegger10 said:

josevolution said:

bootlegger10 said:

dignin said:

bootlegger10 said:

The boycotts of the inaugural by politicians is ridiculous. All we heard about during the campaign was how precious our democracy is and how elections should be honored. Now, when there is a peaceful transition of power between unrelated people (which was a crazy idea back in the 1700's), the Dems are boycotting. I thought they loved their country and democracy. Maybe it was all just a partisan game after all? I get that they think Trump is an idiot.

It's still peaceful. I don't see the problem.

They are boycotting because they don''t view the election as legit. That is exactly what the Dems were crying about during the last few weeks of the election.

They don't view it legit based on the briefing presented to them by intelligence community !

Again, the hypocrisy of the left criticizing Trump for giving a wait and see answer during the debate when the libs should have said the same thing based on what they are doing now.

how is it hypcrisy? no one in their right mind believed there would be "rigging". trump didn't even know. it was a lucky guess borne of paranoia and extreme narcicism.

Tell me then, what is wrong with saying that you will evaluate the election results after they happen? How stupid is it that the Republicans signed a pledge to support the eventual nominee and then had to back off the pledge when Trump won the nomination?

I don't think it makes sense to made decisions on hypotheticals. I think Jeb Bush should be able to say, "I will decide to support the Republican candidate (if not me) when the Republican candidate wins the nomination." Why can't Trump say, "I will determine whether to challenge the election when there is an election that can be challenged". But instead, the media forces candidates into positions they cannot possibly make a decision on currently.

And by the way, Trump's answer was completely, utterly correct (which doesn't happen much) as borne out by actual events.

I don't recall personally having an issue with him saying that. i thought it was overblown by the media and the clinton camp. but to me, at the time, it showed his ridiculous paranoia and ego in that he couldn't possibly lose unless his opponent cheated. I think the real issue was that people feared that it was going to cause violent outbreaks if he lost.

bootlegger10

HughFreakingDillon said:

bootlegger10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

bootlegger10 said:

josevolution said:

bootlegger10 said:

dignin said:

bootlegger10 said:

The boycotts of the inaugural by politicians is ridiculous. All we heard about during the campaign was how precious our democracy is and how elections should be honored. Now, when there is a peaceful transition of power between unrelated people (which was a crazy idea back in the 1700's), the Dems are boycotting. I thought they loved their country and democracy. Maybe it was all just a partisan game after all? I get that they think Trump is an idiot.

It's still peaceful. I don't see the problem.

They are boycotting because they don''t view the election as legit. That is exactly what the Dems were crying about during the last few weeks of the election.

They don't view it legit based on the briefing presented to them by intelligence community !

Again, the hypocrisy of the left criticizing Trump for giving a wait and see answer during the debate when the libs should have said the same thing based on what they are doing now.

how is it hypcrisy? no one in their right mind believed there would be "rigging". trump didn't even know. it was a lucky guess borne of paranoia and extreme narcicism.

Tell me then, what is wrong with saying that you will evaluate the election results after they happen? How stupid is it that the Republicans signed a pledge to support the eventual nominee and then had to back off the pledge when Trump won the nomination?

I don't think it makes sense to made decisions on hypotheticals. I think Jeb Bush should be able to say, "I will decide to support the Republican candidate (if not me) when the Republican candidate wins the nomination." Why can't Trump say, "I will determine whether to challenge the election when there is an election that can be challenged". But instead, the media forces candidates into positions they cannot possibly make a decision on currently.

And by the way, Trump's answer was completely, utterly correct (which doesn't happen much) as borne out by actual events.

I don't recall personally having an issue with him saying that. i thought it was overblown by the media and the clinton camp. but to me, at the time, it showed his ridiculous paranoia and ego in that he couldn't possibly lose unless his opponent cheated. I think the real issue was that people feared that it was going to cause violent outbreaks if he lost.

Well, the only people that should be fearing "political" violence against them are the ones wearing Trump gear it seems. One Trump supporter in Chicago was beaten and had his car stolen, and I never saw that in the MSM.

Go Beavers

Wma31394 said:

Thought the Donald and family did a good job..baron behaved..and there wasn't that moment where all i could do is shake my head in disbelief and embarasment..lets see what happens

What's your timeline for seeing what happens? Mine has already passed and it's it's past tense. I've seen what has happened.

HughFreakingDillon

bootlegger10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

bootlegger10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

bootlegger10 said:

josevolution said:

bootlegger10 said:

dignin said:

bootlegger10 said:

The boycotts of the inaugural by politicians is ridiculous. All we heard about during the campaign was how precious our democracy is and how elections should be honored. Now, when there is a peaceful transition of power between unrelated people (which was a crazy idea back in the 1700's), the Dems are boycotting. I thought they loved their country and democracy. Maybe it was all just a partisan game after all? I get that they think Trump is an idiot.

It's still peaceful. I don't see the problem.

They are boycotting because they don''t view the election as legit. That is exactly what the Dems were crying about during the last few weeks of the election.

They don't view it legit based on the briefing presented to them by intelligence community !

Again, the hypocrisy of the left criticizing Trump for giving a wait and see answer during the debate when the libs should have said the same thing based on what they are doing now.

how is it hypcrisy? no one in their right mind believed there would be "rigging". trump didn't even know. it was a lucky guess borne of paranoia and extreme narcicism.

Tell me then, what is wrong with saying that you will evaluate the election results after they happen? How stupid is it that the Republicans signed a pledge to support the eventual nominee and then had to back off the pledge when Trump won the nomination?

I don't think it makes sense to made decisions on hypotheticals. I think Jeb Bush should be able to say, "I will decide to support the Republican candidate (if not me) when the Republican candidate wins the nomination." Why can't Trump say, "I will determine whether to challenge the election when there is an election that can be challenged". But instead, the media forces candidates into positions they cannot possibly make a decision on currently.

And by the way, Trump's answer was completely, utterly correct (which doesn't happen much) as borne out by actual events.

I don't recall personally having an issue with him saying that. i thought it was overblown by the media and the clinton camp. but to me, at the time, it showed his ridiculous paranoia and ego in that he couldn't possibly lose unless his opponent cheated. I think the real issue was that people feared that it was going to cause violent outbreaks if he lost.

Well, the only people that should be fearing "political" violence against them are the ones wearing Trump gear it seems. One Trump supporter in Chicago was beaten and had his car stolen, and I never saw that in the MSM.

one isolated incident doesn't mean squat. just like when people were talking smack about some trump supporters trashing that office, equating them with your average trump supporter, I also said "bullshit". thugs will be thugs, no matter which party.

bootlegger10

HughFreakingDillon said:

bootlegger10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

bootlegger10 said:

HughFreakingDillon said:

bootlegger10 said:

josevolution said:

bootlegger10 said:

dignin said:

bootlegger10 said:

The boycotts of the inaugural by politicians is ridiculous. All we heard about during the campaign was how precious our democracy is and how elections should be honored. Now, when there is a peaceful transition of power between unrelated people (which was a crazy idea back in the 1700's), the Dems are boycotting. I thought they loved their country and democracy. Maybe it was all just a partisan game after all? I get that they think Trump is an idiot.

It's still peaceful. I don't see the problem.

They are boycotting because they don''t view the election as legit. That is exactly what the Dems were crying about during the last few weeks of the election.

They don't view it legit based on the briefing presented to them by intelligence community !

Again, the hypocrisy of the left criticizing Trump for giving a wait and see answer during the debate when the libs should have said the same thing based on what they are doing now.

how is it hypcrisy? no one in their right mind believed there would be "rigging". trump didn't even know. it was a lucky guess borne of paranoia and extreme narcicism.

Tell me then, what is wrong with saying that you will evaluate the election results after they happen? How stupid is it that the Republicans signed a pledge to support the eventual nominee and then had to back off the pledge when Trump won the nomination?

I don't think it makes sense to made decisions on hypotheticals. I think Jeb Bush should be able to say, "I will decide to support the Republican candidate (if not me) when the Republican candidate wins the nomination." Why can't Trump say, "I will determine whether to challenge the election when there is an election that can be challenged". But instead, the media forces candidates into positions they cannot possibly make a decision on currently.

And by the way, Trump's answer was completely, utterly correct (which doesn't happen much) as borne out by actual events.

I don't recall personally having an issue with him saying that. i thought it was overblown by the media and the clinton camp. but to me, at the time, it showed his ridiculous paranoia and ego in that he couldn't possibly lose unless his opponent cheated. I think the real issue was that people feared that it was going to cause violent outbreaks if he lost.

Well, the only people that should be fearing "political" violence against them are the ones wearing Trump gear it seems. One Trump supporter in Chicago was beaten and had his car stolen, and I never saw that in the MSM.

one isolated incident doesn't mean squat. just like when people were talking smack about some trump supporters trashing that office, equating them with your average trump supporter, I also said "bullshit". thugs will be thugs, no matter which party.

Exactly. The more the media can report both sides than I think that can help the country come together. When people feel like they are not be preresented fairly they take it out on others (who aren't even at fault since it is the politicians and media that try to manufacture conflict).

ledvedderman

I guess we liberals are supposed to take ownership of the morons rioting in D.C. I guess if we have to own faux liberals, you need to own faux conservatives like David Duke and his "We did it!" tweet today.

Ledbetterman10

ledvedderman said:

I guess we liberals are supposed to take ownership of the morons rioting in D.C. I guess if we have to own faux liberals, you need to own faux conservatives like David Duke and his "We did it!" tweet today.

Yeah what you're describing is one of my biggest annoyances through all this. People calling looters/rioters "Hillary Supporters" like those people give a shit one way or another about Hillary.