Podesta Emails, part 2

1246713

Comments

  • tonifig8tonifig8 USAPosts: 2,672
    EMAIL 30826 https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/30826

    Haitian orphans being questionably handed to GOH rather than Haitian organizations which US military believed would do a much better job reuniting kids with their parents or good foster care.
    Military being prevented from helping in the immediate rescue efforts despite desire to go ashore and help.
    Shipping containers containing the aid and supplies donated to relief efforts being withheld despite desperate need.
    "don't criticize what you can't understand" b.d
    "this is my language,
    leave me to my own" e.v
    "How I've learned to hide, how I've locked inside ... you'd be surprised if shown, but you'll never know"... N.M
    <iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_ZkAkwEjIyc"; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • tonifig8tonifig8 USAPosts: 2,672
    Kind of like those deplorables? More right wing baiting?

    image
    "don't criticize what you can't understand" b.d
    "this is my language,
    leave me to my own" e.v
    "How I've learned to hide, how I've locked inside ... you'd be surprised if shown, but you'll never know"... N.M
    <iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_ZkAkwEjIyc"; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • tonifig8tonifig8 USAPosts: 2,672

    CNN colluding with DNC over questions to ask Trump. Apr 2016
    https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/25846
    https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/25284
    Here's another one for Cruz:
    https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/23554
    permalinkembedsavereportgive goldREPLY
    "don't criticize what you can't understand" b.d
    "this is my language,
    leave me to my own" e.v
    "How I've learned to hide, how I've locked inside ... you'd be surprised if shown, but you'll never know"... N.M
    <iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_ZkAkwEjIyc"; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • tonifig8tonifig8 USAPosts: 2,672
    image
    "don't criticize what you can't understand" b.d
    "this is my language,
    leave me to my own" e.v
    "How I've learned to hide, how I've locked inside ... you'd be surprised if shown, but you'll never know"... N.M
    <iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_ZkAkwEjIyc"; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 11,057
    So, can anyone dispute the nickname Clinton News Network, or is this just another thing we expect from politicians (even though you complain about it) so it is perfectly fine? Clinton could shoot someone in Times Square and you Clinton supporters would still vote for her.
  • bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 11,057
    Folks from CNN will hopefully be getting fired.
  • tonifig8tonifig8 USAPosts: 2,672

    Folks from CNN will hopefully be getting fired.

    I want to believe that a lot of people will be going down soon. It would be a complete disgrace and slap to our face if Clinton takes these crooks into the White House with her. Her network should be shaken up and eventually, as typical criminals do, someone will crack to save their own ass.
    "don't criticize what you can't understand" b.d
    "this is my language,
    leave me to my own" e.v
    "How I've learned to hide, how I've locked inside ... you'd be surprised if shown, but you'll never know"... N.M
    <iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_ZkAkwEjIyc"; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • tonifig8tonifig8 USAPosts: 2,672
    Wikileaks, in 10 years produced 10 million documents with 100% accuracy. How does that compare to NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox, MSNBC, Washington Post, New York Times etc.?

    image
    "don't criticize what you can't understand" b.d
    "this is my language,
    leave me to my own" e.v
    "How I've learned to hide, how I've locked inside ... you'd be surprised if shown, but you'll never know"... N.M
    <iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_ZkAkwEjIyc"; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,608
    edited November 2016
    [Edited quote removed by Admin. Never change anyone else's words. Google picks up every post and someone's words should only be exactly what they said. If you want to comment on what someone said, please feel free to do so but never change the quote. Thank you.]

    Fixed it.
    Post edited by Kat on
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/25661

    DNC false sexual harassment charges and the craigslist ad.




    Subject: Re: Approval: Craigslist Job Post

    If we have a likelihood of getting sued I need to look at it closely too if you want to move forward.

    You can take it to them first to decide and if they say no that will save me time but I may end up making edits - or I may not - before it actually goes out.

    My team if great as you know but I lawsuit should be on my shoulders.
    “I used to spend a lot of time in this room...back when it was a shit hole and I was a shit head.”
    big·otˈbiɡət/ noun: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
    big·ot·ryˈbiɡətrē/ noun: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    VinceFoster
    Madeleine McCann
    Ron Brown

    Russia Russia Russia

    https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/27381

    We don't have a ton on Simes, but the pro-Russia stuff ties in pretty well to idea that Trump is too friendly with Putin/weak on Russia


    “I used to spend a lot of time in this room...back when it was a shit hole and I was a shit head.”
    big·otˈbiɡət/ noun: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
    big·ot·ryˈbiɡətrē/ noun: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    VinceFoster
    Madeleine McCann
    Ron Brown

    image
    “I used to spend a lot of time in this room...back when it was a shit hole and I was a shit head.”
    big·otˈbiɡət/ noun: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
    big·ot·ryˈbiɡətrē/ noun: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    DNC and Hilliary camp brushing up on Arkansas Bill's Lolita express air miles

    https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/27438
    “I used to spend a lot of time in this room...back when it was a shit hole and I was a shit head.”
    big·otˈbiɡət/ noun: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
    big·ot·ryˈbiɡətrē/ noun: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    edited November 2016
    “I used to spend a lot of time in this room...back when it was a shit hole and I was a shit head.”
    big·otˈbiɡət/ noun: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
    big·ot·ryˈbiɡətrē/ noun: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

  • tonifig8tonifig8 USAPosts: 2,672

    tonifig8 said:

    Wikileaks, in 10 years illegally produced 10 million documents with 100% accuracy. How does that compare to NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox, MSNBC, Washington Post, New York Times etc.?

    image

    Fixed it.
    "Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost."

    Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Dr. James Currie (28 January 1786)
    "don't criticize what you can't understand" b.d
    "this is my language,
    leave me to my own" e.v
    "How I've learned to hide, how I've locked inside ... you'd be surprised if shown, but you'll never know"... N.M
    <iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_ZkAkwEjIyc"; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    tonifig8 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    Wikileaks, in 10 years illegally produced 10 million documents with 100% accuracy. How does that compare to NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox, MSNBC, Washington Post, New York Times etc.?

    image

    Fixed it.
    "Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost."

    Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Dr. James Currie (28 January 1786)
    Today is the day!
    “I used to spend a lot of time in this room...back when it was a shit hole and I was a shit head.”
    big·otˈbiɡət/ noun: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
    big·ot·ryˈbiɡətrē/ noun: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

  • unsungunsung Posts: 9,485

    tonifig8 said:

    Wikileaks, in 10 years illegally produced 10 million documents with 100% accuracy. How does that compare to NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox, MSNBC, Washington Post, New York Times etc.?

    image

    Fixed it.
    You aren't allowed to do that on these forums due to the username being connected to the post and google search. Mods have noted this publicly.
  • unsungunsung Posts: 9,485
    Wikileaks does the job that ABC, CBS, NBC, etc used to do.
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    “I used to spend a lot of time in this room...back when it was a shit hole and I was a shit head.”
    big·otˈbiɡət/ noun: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
    big·ot·ryˈbiɡətrē/ noun: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    “I used to spend a lot of time in this room...back when it was a shit hole and I was a shit head.”
    big·otˈbiɡət/ noun: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
    big·ot·ryˈbiɡətrē/ noun: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/54756

    "Bernie Madoff" to Podesta

    I have in my possession the sum of Seventy Million United States of American Dollars (70,000,000.00USD) in a Bank, which nobody else knows about this except my account officers because the money was deposited under serial codes. I need your help, to get this money out from the bank where its deposited and keep safely for me as I am sure of coming out from jail soon from my appeal.
    This is the sharing modalities, 50% goes to charity and 20% will be mapped out for the promotion of gospel, building of churches and mosques all over the world and 25% for you while 4% goes to the bank officials who will help you facilitate the transaction and 1% for my up keeping in the prison.
    “I used to spend a lot of time in this room...back when it was a shit hole and I was a shit head.”
    big·otˈbiɡət/ noun: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
    big·ot·ryˈbiɡətrē/ noun: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

  • tonifig8tonifig8 USAPosts: 2,672
    edited November 2016
    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/54937

    Laura and team - Suggestion back was not name him specifically. Reference ideology, without using the exact language Bernie used, and making it very clear what she's referencing.

    Something like, "those who suggest that we looks past human rights violations, blatant disregard of international law and ... by the leading state sponsor of terrorism, Iran, are dangerously naive or who largely uninformed about how the world works."

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/29523#efmADXAI1 Podesta Email 29523:

    John Podesta 2015-12-05

    On page 4, last graph I think the sentence "Countering Iran and defeating ISIS are not distinct missions--they are intimately related." Is intellectually flabby and can get us in more trouble than it's worth. Saying that we have to deal with both problems simultaneously is not the same as implying that both need resolution or neither can be solved.

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27475#efmA0BA5C Podesta Email 27475:

    Hillary Clinton 2014-08-17

    While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.

    Clinton Foundation donation levels:

    Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: $10,000,000 - $25,000,000
    State of Qatar: $1,000,000 - $5,000,000

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27294#efmAHeAIu Email 27294:

    Clinton Global Initiative 2013-10-06

    • Sponsorship: Sponsorship stands at $15.2 million versus a final total of $13.7 million for 2012. This reflects an increase of $200K since the end of August. While we received a late addition of $400K from the Qatar 2022 Supreme Committee, this was partially offset by a change in our accounting for Coca-Cola revenue to coincide with a change in the term of the company’s grant.

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396#efmAEOAGW Podesta Email 8396:

    Clinton Foundation 2012-04-16

    QATAR

    Would like to see WJC "for five minutes" in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC's birthday in 2011.

    Post edited by tonifig8 on
    "don't criticize what you can't understand" b.d
    "this is my language,
    leave me to my own" e.v
    "How I've learned to hide, how I've locked inside ... you'd be surprised if shown, but you'll never know"... N.M
    <iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_ZkAkwEjIyc"; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    doing what they do best

    From:[email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    CC: [email protected], [email protected]
    Date: 2015-03-16 23:58
    Subject: Re: April 20

    I think this is a great way to do a reset with the press - tell them a big, elaborate lie.
    “I used to spend a lot of time in this room...back when it was a shit hole and I was a shit head.”
    big·otˈbiɡət/ noun: a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
    big·ot·ryˈbiɡətrē/ noun: intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.

  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 4,144
    .....any....day....now....
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18
  • tonifig8tonifig8 USAPosts: 2,672
    edited November 2016
    CM189191 said:

    .....any....day....now....

    The sheep are funny.


    https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/795448080317419520

    The math:
    1/ We've published >7mil emails. Clinton uses pseudonyms and proxies, of which Huma is one, so most need to be read by hand.
    2/ At 3 min per email thats 504 officers for 8 days, not including all support and management. So you need around 1000 officers.
    3/ To development the workflow and resources for 1000 officers takes many days. Eight is implausible.
    4/ Most importantly, this is only a partly paralisable task. Threads, vocab and knowledge flows need to be followed.
    5/ That task of following the back and forth doens't work if you have the emails split up to 500 different people for speed.
    Post edited by tonifig8 on
    "don't criticize what you can't understand" b.d
    "this is my language,
    leave me to my own" e.v
    "How I've learned to hide, how I've locked inside ... you'd be surprised if shown, but you'll never know"... N.M
    <iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_ZkAkwEjIyc"; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • FreeFree Posts: 3,562

    tonifig8 said:

    Wikileaks, in 10 years illegally produced 10 million documents with 100% accuracy. How does that compare to NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox, MSNBC, Washington Post, New York Times etc.?

    image

    Fixed it.
    Yes, truth bothers people to the point of falsifying it to satisfy the lies.
  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 4,144
    tonifig8 said:

    CM189191 said:

    .....any....day....now....

    The sheep are funny.


    https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/795448080317419520

    The math:
    1/ We've published >7mil emails. Clinton uses pseudonyms and proxies, of which Huma is one, so most need to be read by hand.
    2/ At 3 min per email thats 504 officers for 8 days, not including all support and management. So you need around 1000 officers.
    3/ To development the workflow and resources for 1000 officers takes many days. Eight is implausible.
    4/ Most importantly, this is only a partly paralisable task. Threads, vocab and knowledge flows need to be followed.
    5/ That task of following the back and forth doens't work if you have the emails split up to 500 different people for speed.
    Assuming that's accurate, maybe Comey should've have kept his mouth shut before commenting on an on-going investigation, which had been closed, on materials he didn't have a warrant for, and hadn't reviewed? Because that's how things normally work, instead of leaking a vague letter to (R) Congress Critters.
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18
  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 4,144
    tonifig8 said:

    CM189191 said:

    .....any....day....now....

    The sheep are funny.


    https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/795448080317419520

    The math:
    1/ We've published >7mil emails. Clinton uses pseudonyms and proxies, of which Huma is one, so most need to be read by hand.
    2/ At 3 min per email thats 504 officers for 8 days, not including all support and management. So you need around 1000 officers.
    3/ To development the workflow and resources for 1000 officers takes many days. Eight is implausible.
    4/ Most importantly, this is only a partly paralisable task. Threads, vocab and knowledge flows need to be followed.
    5/ That task of following the back and forth doens't work if you have the emails split up to 500 different people for speed.
    Can FBI review 650,000 emails in nine days? Absolutely, says Edward Snowden
    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18
  • tonifig8tonifig8 USAPosts: 2,672
    CM189191 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    CM189191 said:

    .....any....day....now....

    The sheep are funny.


    https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/795448080317419520

    The math:
    1/ We've published >7mil emails. Clinton uses pseudonyms and proxies, of which Huma is one, so most need to be read by hand.
    2/ At 3 min per email thats 504 officers for 8 days, not including all support and management. So you need around 1000 officers.
    3/ To development the workflow and resources for 1000 officers takes many days. Eight is implausible.
    4/ Most importantly, this is only a partly paralisable task. Threads, vocab and knowledge flows need to be followed.
    5/ That task of following the back and forth doens't work if you have the emails split up to 500 different people for speed.
    Assuming that's accurate, maybe Comey should've have kept his mouth shut before commenting on an on-going investigation, which had been closed, on materials he didn't have a warrant for, and hadn't reviewed? Because that's how things normally work, instead of leaking a vague letter to (R) Congress Critters.
    Perhaps, maybe, just perhaps, maybe you got it all wrong. Maybe the DOJ applied the pressure. Maybe there is much more to this then some Fox News report. Maybe there are bigger hands at play.
    One thing is absolutely certain: You can't fudge the math.



    ALWAYS WITH HER
    "don't criticize what you can't understand" b.d
    "this is my language,
    leave me to my own" e.v
    "How I've learned to hide, how I've locked inside ... you'd be surprised if shown, but you'll never know"... N.M
    <iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/_ZkAkwEjIyc"; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
  • CM189191CM189191 Minneapolis via ChicagoPosts: 4,144
    tonifig8 said:

    CM189191 said:

    tonifig8 said:

    CM189191 said:

    .....any....day....now....

    The sheep are funny.


    https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/795448080317419520

    The math:
    1/ We've published >7mil emails. Clinton uses pseudonyms and proxies, of which Huma is one, so most need to be read by hand.
    2/ At 3 min per email thats 504 officers for 8 days, not including all support and management. So you need around 1000 officers.
    3/ To development the workflow and resources for 1000 officers takes many days. Eight is implausible.
    4/ Most importantly, this is only a partly paralisable task. Threads, vocab and knowledge flows need to be followed.
    5/ That task of following the back and forth doens't work if you have the emails split up to 500 different people for speed.
    Assuming that's accurate, maybe Comey should've have kept his mouth shut before commenting on an on-going investigation, which had been closed, on materials he didn't have a warrant for, and hadn't reviewed? Because that's how things normally work, instead of leaking a vague letter to (R) Congress Critters.
    Perhaps, maybe, just perhaps, maybe you got it all wrong. Maybe the DOJ applied the pressure. Maybe there is much more to this then some Fox News report. Maybe there are bigger hands at play.
    One thing is absolutely certain: You can't fudge the math.



    ALWAYS WITH HER
    The absence of evidence is proof of cover up. got it.

    WI 6/27/98 WI 10/8/00 MO 10/11/00 IL 4/23/03 MN 6/26/06 MN 6/27/06 WI 6/30/06 IL 8/5/07 IL 8/21/08 (EV) IL 8/22/08 (EV) IL 8/23/09 IL 8/24/09 IN 5/7/10 IL 6/28/11 (EV) IL 6/29/11 (EV) WI 9/3/11 WI 9/4/11 IL 7/19/13 NE 10/09/14 IL 10/17/14 MN 10/19/14 FL 4/11/16 IL 8/20/16 IL 8/22/16 IL 08/18/18 IL 08/20/18
This discussion has been closed.