Malheur protestors
Comments
-
People who block traffic and damage propery are often charged and convicted. These protesters should've also been convicted and also be made to pay back the damage they did.pjalive21 said:
They arent protestors unless they are blocking traffic, burning down cities, and called the Black Lives Matter...otherwise they are a hinderanceunsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
both the Indians and this "militia" should be left alone in these separate cases0 -
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487Theres so much butthurt from the left that these guys were not convicted. I love it.0 -
Entitled misguided white guys think they're sticking it to the feds will get blind support from other victimized white guys. But in a different protest, it's justified to kill people who block traffic.unsung said:Theres so much butthurt from the left that these guys were not convicted. I love it.
0 -
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it."It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.0 -
I'll take your bait. It is about land rights, and how public land (emphasis public) should be managed. The entitled ranchers want to destroy the land while trying to make money, clinging to a dying occupation. The gun issue heightened the level of intimidation, but also revealed how entitled they feel they are.unsung said:
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.0 -
You quoted me and yet are saying "you guys". Come on man, I'm not that schizophrenic.unsung said:
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.
And really, you've gotta know by now when I think or believe something relevant here. I SAY IT!
I've stated my thoughts about guns (oh, that fuckery of a subject) elsewhere. Now that you mention it, the only thing that is a gun issue here for me is that you have a group of unarmed Native Americans being confronted by heavily armed cops with heavy armored vehicles coming in desecrating sacred lands and breaking treaties YET AGAIN in one issue (North Dakota pipeline), and a bunch of yahoo militia types who are armed coming in and trying to commandeer public lands. Those are the only relevance to guns in these issues. And don't try to tell me otherwise because some of my other me's might not like that. We stand by what we think.
No you don't.
Yes I do, damn it.
Hey, you're both full of shit.
Fuck off.
Stop it, all of me!!!"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
Well, those were some of the charges brought against them:unsung said:
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.
possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in federal facilities
use and carry of firearms in relation to a crime of violence
And yes, I do take issue with this:
It'll be interesting to see what happens next time a bunch of these idiots see fit to protest again. I don't think the Federal Government will be so patient with them.0 -
I do too but I guess I just take it for granted that militia yahoo types are also gun toting types. They might have had grenades or rocket launchers or star wars laser swords or searing eyeball beams. They are militia therefor they are armed. The issue for me here is more about how they think it's OK to steal public lands and to be against government yet without having anything useful with which to replace it.CM189191 said:
Well, those were some of the charges brought against them:unsung said:
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.
possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in federal facilities
use and carry of firearms in relation to a crime of violence
And yes, I do take issue with this:
It'll be interesting to see what happens next time a bunch of these idiots see fit to protest again. I don't think the Federal Government will be so patient with them.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
When I saw the makeup of that jury, I just knew that these people were going to acquit one of their own. The fact is that these people feel that they are entitled to do whatever they want. Their culture says that if you don't want to listen to "The Man" that you can just go ahead and and act like a wild savage. They have enablers and pimps in the media that make excuses for these animals.Go Beavers said:
I'll take your bait. It is about land rights, and how public land (emphasis public) should be managed. The entitled ranchers want to destroy the land while trying to make money, clinging to a dying occupation. The gun issue heightened the level of intimidation, but also revealed how entitled they feel they are.unsung said:
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.
I'm sorry if that offends the PC Police, but I'm just telling it like it is. The sad part is that these thugs are now emboldened to commit more crimes in their own communities and against their own people. These people will never rise up and overcome until they address the problems in their culture.
Sad!
/stolen with pride0 -
Perfectly stated.CM189191 said:
When I saw the makeup of that jury, I just knew that these people were going to acquit one of their own. The fact is that these people feel that they are entitled to do whatever they want. Their culture says that if you don't want to listen to "The Man" that you can just go ahead and and act like a wild savage. They have enablers and pimps in the media that make excuses for these animals.Go Beavers said:
I'll take your bait. It is about land rights, and how public land (emphasis public) should be managed. The entitled ranchers want to destroy the land while trying to make money, clinging to a dying occupation. The gun issue heightened the level of intimidation, but also revealed how entitled they feel they are.unsung said:
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.
I'm sorry if that offends the PC Police, but I'm just telling it like it is. The sad part is that these thugs are now emboldened to commit more crimes in their own communities and against their own people. These people will never rise up and overcome until they address the problems in their culture.
Sad!
/stolen with pride"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
Well played.CM189191 said:
When I saw the makeup of that jury, I just knew that these people were going to acquit one of their own. The fact is that these people feel that they are entitled to do whatever they want. Their culture says that if you don't want to listen to "The Man" that you can just go ahead and and act like a wild savage. They have enablers and pimps in the media that make excuses for these animals.Go Beavers said:
I'll take your bait. It is about land rights, and how public land (emphasis public) should be managed. The entitled ranchers want to destroy the land while trying to make money, clinging to a dying occupation. The gun issue heightened the level of intimidation, but also revealed how entitled they feel they are.unsung said:
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.
I'm sorry if that offends the PC Police, but I'm just telling it like it is. The sad part is that these thugs are now emboldened to commit more crimes in their own communities and against their own people. These people will never rise up and overcome until they address the problems in their culture.
Sad!
/stolen with pride
For a second there I was going to commend you for using thug and savage the way they were meant to be used! I do agree that these guys are thugs. Crazy Mormon jihadists. "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/080 -
Should have been scalped by an Apache helicopter firing a tomahawk cruise missile. That might have learned him.CM189191 said:
Well, those were some of the charges brought against them:unsung said:
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.
possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in federal facilities
use and carry of firearms in relation to a crime of violence
And yes, I do take issue with this:
It'll be interesting to see what happens next time a bunch of these idiots see fit to protest again. I don't think the Federal Government will be so patient with them.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Haha! Now that put me in major grin mode!Halifax2TheMax said:
Should have been scalped by an Apache helicopter firing a tomahawk cruise missile. That might have learned him.CM189191 said:
Well, those were some of the charges brought against them:unsung said:
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.
possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in federal facilities
use and carry of firearms in relation to a crime of violence
And yes, I do take issue with this:
It'll be interesting to see what happens next time a bunch of these idiots see fit to protest again. I don't think the Federal Government will be so patient with them.
"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0 -
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
I see. You support the murder of US citizens by militarized police.brianlux said:
Haha! Now that put me in major grin mode!Halifax2TheMax said:
Should have been scalped by an Apache helicopter firing a tomahawk cruise missile. That might have learned him.CM189191 said:
Well, those were some of the charges brought against them:unsung said:
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.
possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in federal facilities
use and carry of firearms in relation to a crime of violence
And yes, I do take issue with this:
It'll be interesting to see what happens next time a bunch of these idiots see fit to protest again. I don't think the Federal Government will be so patient with them.
How progressive.0 -
Bump to get open threads on page 10
-
Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh!unsung said:
I see. You support the murder of US citizens by militarized police.brianlux said:
Haha! Now that put me in major grin mode!Halifax2TheMax said:
Should have been scalped by an Apache helicopter firing a tomahawk cruise missile. That might have learned him.CM189191 said:
Well, those were some of the charges brought against them:unsung said:
Both fighting over land rights.brianlux said:
Way different, unsung. One is a group of indigenous people still having their land and culture taken by force after hundreds of years, the other a group of white guys trying to commandeer public lands. You can't honestly be implying these situations are similar.unsung said:
Both victims of government.Bentleyspop said:From Robert Reich. ....
On the same day that a jury acquitted the Bundy brothers and their fellow protesters for taking over federal land in Oregon last January, police in North Dakota today used pepper spray gas and a painful high-pitched siren, and then arrested 117 Native Americans and others for protesting a private oil pipeline across land they say belongs to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe under a 19th-century treaty. In other words, it's fine to mount an armed insurrection so your cattle can graze for free on federal land, but not if you want to protect your sacred burial ground or your only source of water from a private for-profit oil pipeline company.
A jury decided to not convict oregon protestors. Deal with it.
Why dont you guys really say what's on your mind? The real reason that you are against the Malheur protestors is because they had guns. Just say it. Have some backbone.
possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in federal facilities
use and carry of firearms in relation to a crime of violence
And yes, I do take issue with this:
It'll be interesting to see what happens next time a bunch of these idiots see fit to protest again. I don't think the Federal Government will be so patient with them.
How progressive.
Ummm, it was a joke. A racist, anti-Indian joke that worked because actually it is pro American Indian, funny as hell and just a joke, and sheeeeeeeeesh...
(The tension mounts. unsung comes out of the corner, lux is bleeding slightly from minor wound to ego. unsung circles...)"It's a sad and beautiful world"-Roberto Benigni0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help