Someone please explain to me why the only military in the war room is the person watching the door?
Funny indeed but that isn't the "war room" as I assume you are aware. That is Mar-a-lago during/after the China meeting. The military people are on video conference from the Pentagon of course. But please...continue.
So it's been confirmed that this is indeed a meeting about the Syria mission in the so-called Mar-a-lago situation room. I am curious as to what your comment means here. Were you inventing a fact, trying to suggest this isn't the full gang of idiots behind an act of war? Or simply wanted point out that this isn't in the WH war room?
With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
If all the past chemical attacks were done by the terrorists / rebels in hopes of pullling the west into action and the all failed .... why would the terrorists / rebels try doing it again after the White House indicated they were not going to interfere with Syria.
You would have to be a pretty stupid terrorist / rebel to think that would work.
But if your a brutal dictator that maybe didn't turn over all of your chemical weapons and just heard the White House say they were going to be hands off, I'd think that would be a good time to go shooting some chemical weapons.
uhhh ... this doesn't make any sense ... chemical attack just happened = US intervention ... so, your theory holds absolutely no water ...
Assad was testing a new leader and how Trump would respond. One week after Trump Administration say hands off and we have a chemical weapons attack. It makes sense. Water held.
you got to be kidding me ...
syria is finally winning the war, they even have a US congresswoman supporting them, trump has stated that they don't want to intervene ... so, the smart thing to do is then gas your own people!?? ... c'mon ... this is not thinking critically ... what does assad gain? ... does he endear himself to his people - no ... does he garner more international support - no ... international support he desperately needs because he is fighting fucking al qaeda AND ISIS ...
Once the body count goes past 400K, I don't think being endeared by your people is near the top of your to-do list. He has Russia backing him, ready to lie. Just tell the people he has under control that terrorist did it (like he is), so he isn't losing any shame to them.
if he's fighting al qaeda and isis - the last thing he needs is having his people turn on him ... gassing his own people is not only impossible because he has no chemical weapons - it is totally illogical ... watch interviews of assad - he is not some raging dictator lunatic trope ...
Even more scary that Assad isn't a raging lunatic. He keeps his pulse under 60 while carpet bombing Aleppo. Demoralize the population by giving zero fucks on if your enemy or your citizens are killed and herd them out. Siege the city and starve everyone out.
And to claim Assad doesn't have any chemical weapons but the Jihads do is totally illogical. Even if he did turn over every chemical weapon he had (doubtful), he has had around 4 years to make some more.
it's not illogical ... did you read the articles pointing to ISIS and chemical weapons? ... where is your response? ... the UN organization oversaw the dismantling of syria's chemical weapons ... that oversight doesn't just end after it's over ... it continues to present day ...
If all the past chemical attacks were done by the terrorists / rebels in hopes of pullling the west into action and the all failed .... why would the terrorists / rebels try doing it again after the White House indicated they were not going to interfere with Syria.
You would have to be a pretty stupid terrorist / rebel to think that would work.
But if your a brutal dictator that maybe didn't turn over all of your chemical weapons and just heard the White House say they were going to be hands off, I'd think that would be a good time to go shooting some chemical weapons.
uhhh ... this doesn't make any sense ... chemical attack just happened = US intervention ... so, your theory holds absolutely no water ...
Assad was testing a new leader and how Trump would respond. One week after Trump Administration say hands off and we have a chemical weapons attack. It makes sense. Water held.
you got to be kidding me ...
syria is finally winning the war, they even have a US congresswoman supporting them, trump has stated that they don't want to intervene ... so, the smart thing to do is then gas your own people!?? ... c'mon ... this is not thinking critically ... what does assad gain? ... does he endear himself to his people - no ... does he garner more international support - no ... international support he desperately needs because he is fighting fucking al qaeda AND ISIS ...
Once the body count goes past 400K, I don't think being endeared by your people is near the top of your to-do list. He has Russia backing him, ready to lie. Just tell the people he has under control that terrorist did it (like he is), so he isn't losing any shame to them.
if he's fighting al qaeda and isis - the last thing he needs is having his people turn on him ... gassing his own people is not only impossible because he has no chemical weapons - it is totally illogical ... watch interviews of assad - he is not some raging dictator lunatic trope ...
Even more scary that Assad isn't a raging lunatic. He keeps his pulse under 60 while carpet bombing Aleppo. Demoralize the population by giving zero fucks on if your enemy or your citizens are killed and herd them out. Siege the city and starve everyone out.
And to claim Assad doesn't have any chemical weapons but the Jihads do is totally illogical. Even if he did turn over every chemical weapon he had (doubtful), he has had around 4 years to make some more.
it's not illogical ... did you read the articles pointing to ISIS and chemical weapons? ... where is your response? ... the UN organization oversaw the dismantling of syria's chemical weapons ... that oversight doesn't just end after it's over ... it continues to present day ...
I Googled ISIS and chemical weapons. Thr 1st thing that came up was an institute that cited rebel / terrorists chem attacks were from local reports, social media, and ISIS propaganda. They stated "ISIS propaganda" as one of their 3 sources.
I did similar citations when I was stoned and late for a 10th grade book report. Thank god for The Red Badge of Courage
FAKE NEWS!
Need some Russian reporters to make sense of this
Hmmm
I'm not going to declare that rebel / terrorist have not used chemical weapons. I wonder were they got them from. Spoils of victory? From The Great Interviewer? Good bomber of carpets?
All the rolling hills, I'll flatten 'em out, yeah It's herd behavior, uh huh It's evolution, baby
I Googled ISIS and chemical weapons. Thr 1st thing that came up was an institute that cited rebel / terrorists chem attacks were from local reports, social media, and ISIS propaganda. They stated "ISIS propaganda" as one of their 3 sources.
I did similar citations when I was stoned and late for a 10th grade book report. Thank god for The Red Badge of Courage
FAKE NEWS!
Need some Russian reporters to make sense of this
Hmmm
I'm not going to declare that rebel / terrorist have not used chemical weapons. I wonder were they got them from. Spoils of victory? From The Great Interviewer? Good bomber of carpets?
All the rolling hills, I'll flatten 'em out, yeah It's herd behavior, uh huh It's evolution, baby
Well, I guess it was a resounding success. $59 million worth of missiles and all we got was suspension of flights from the airbase for 24 or 36 hours. Seems a worthy investment in the administration's overarching Syria policy.
Someone please explain to me why the only military in the war room is the person watching the door?
Funny indeed but that isn't the "war room" as I assume you are aware. That is Mar-a-lago during/after the China meeting. The military people are on video conference from the Pentagon of course. But please...continue.
So it's been confirmed that this is indeed a meeting about the Syria mission in the so-called Mar-a-lago situation room. I am curious as to what your comment means here. Were you inventing a fact, trying to suggest this isn't the full gang of idiots behind an act of war? Or simply wanted point out that this isn't in the WH war room?
It's pretty clear what I meant and everything I posted above is 100% correct. No facts invented.
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
Refresh my memory....How many times did Syria use Sarin gas while Obama was President?
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
Refresh my memory....How many times did Syria use Sarin gas while Obama was President?
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
Wow! Someone got triggered. Does every solution to every problem end in a bomb being dropped for you?
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
You're about as fair as Faux News and even less "balanced."
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
You really think Trump is some sort of brilliant military strategist? Are you kidding me? The article you linked ends by stating that Trump wants to beat Obama. That's what drives him? Seriously? And you act as if Trump's lobbing of 59 missiles has no consequences nor are there opposing reactions to his actions? Iran and Russia are powerless? My god are you naive. And please explain what strategic value Syria has for the US, other than doing Bibi's bidding.
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
Refresh my memory....How many times did Syria use Sarin gas while Obama was President?
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
Refresh my memory....How many times did Syria use Sarin gas while Obama was President?
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
Refresh my memory....How many times did Syria use Sarin gas while Obama was President?
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
Refresh my memory....How many times did Syria use Sarin gas while Obama was President?
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
Refresh my memory....How many times did Syria use Sarin gas while Obama was President?
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
Refresh my memory....How many times did Syria use Sarin gas while Obama was President?
You need to rephrase the question.
How so?
So BS can understand it.
Got it.....How many times did Syria use Sarin gas while Obama was black?
I Googled ISIS and chemical weapons. Thr 1st thing that came up was an institute that cited rebel / terrorists chem attacks were from local reports, social media, and ISIS propaganda. They stated "ISIS propaganda" as one of their 3 sources.
I did similar citations when I was stoned and late for a 10th grade book report. Thank god for The Red Badge of Courage
FAKE NEWS!
Need some Russian reporters to make sense of this
Hmmm
I'm not going to declare that rebel / terrorist have not used chemical weapons. I wonder were they got them from. Spoils of victory? From The Great Interviewer? Good bomber of carpets?
All the rolling hills, I'll flatten 'em out, yeah It's herd behavior, uh huh It's evolution, baby
they get them from the biggest arms dealers in the world ... the US ... this isn't even tin foil stuff ... you guys gladly talk about what countries you're gonna invade and how you're gonna do it ...
What is wrong with you, for real? You used to offer balanced right perspective but not so much any more. The NRO clips one part of a speech sans context and you declare fact. What if..
A. He was referring to a time prior to 2014 B. A contingency plan they developed in the event the Russians were untruthful C. Misquote, whether intentional or not
Bullshit. The chemical weapons deal was a crock of shit. Obama's policy on Syria was an epic joke and even democrats who were a part of his administration are saying so.
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
Refresh my memory....How many times did Syria use Sarin gas while Obama was President?
this is BS ... it has already been proven Syria did not use chemical weapons in 2013 ... so, how can CNN still post that he survived the Syrian chemical weapons attack in 2013?
How is this article "proof" of anything? It's an attempt at persuasive writing, with a clear opinion. There's no evidence that it's meticulously researched and sourced. It's no different than reading any other article at any other site. The only difference is that you post ones with pro-Russia positions. I don't know how you can say you discovered the "truth" by reading coutnerpunch, global research, sputnik or RT.
Comments
I did similar citations when I was stoned and late for a 10th grade book report. Thank god for The Red Badge of Courage
FAKE NEWS!
Need some Russian reporters to make sense of this
Hmmm
I'm not going to declare that rebel / terrorist have not used chemical weapons. I wonder were they got them from. Spoils of victory? From The Great Interviewer? Good bomber of carpets?
All the rolling hills, I'll flatten 'em out, yeah
It's herd behavior, uh huh
It's evolution, baby
SAD!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/continued-bombing-by-assad-shows-limits-of-single-us-attack/2017/04/08/1c70cb1a-1c83-11e7-bcc2-7d1a0973e7b2_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_trump710pm:homepage/story&utm_term=.a0cd32fe9304
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13960119001418
It's pretty much the Mullah's point of view.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/04/trump-syria-attack-doctrine-foreign-policy-theory-214999
The words in that article from Obama's people are damning and I refuse to "balance" my thoughts on what was the most atrocious aspect of his presidency. The fecklessness of hope and change.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
https://mobile.nytimes.com/aponline/2017/04/08/world/middleeast/ap-ml-israel-treating-syrians.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0&referer=https://t.co/F0iNXHIwzr?amp=1
2013 sarin attack in Syria
2014 UN agreement, no sarin attacks until
2017 sarin attack while trump is president
How is this Obama's fault again?
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/09/middleeast/syria-missile-strike-chemical-attack-aftermath/index.html
The wind is a blowing and shart he goes.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
http://www.globalresearch.ca/syria-un-mission-report-confirms-that-opposition-rebels-used-chemical-weapons-against-civilians-and-government-forces/5363139
people - this is history repeating itself ...