Mixing of the 2016 boots?
Spiritual_Chaos
Posts: 30,188
in The Porch
First off, I know nothing about audio pretty much.
But I noticed that
1) They don't up the volume on the crowd when Eddie lets them sing. I feel that's a pretty unessascary omission?
2) The backing vocals are weirdly high in volume sometimes and really sticks out.
You that know more than me, what do you say? I guess the mixing is good and all. But yeah. Cool to know. I find the sound of the 2003 boots to be the best to my ear, buy maybe that's because they put more time into or it's some personal preference.
But I noticed that
1) They don't up the volume on the crowd when Eddie lets them sing. I feel that's a pretty unessascary omission?
2) The backing vocals are weirdly high in volume sometimes and really sticks out.
You that know more than me, what do you say? I guess the mixing is good and all. But yeah. Cool to know. I find the sound of the 2003 boots to be the best to my ear, buy maybe that's because they put more time into or it's some personal preference.
"Mostly I think that people react sensitively because they know you’ve got a point"
0
Comments
I will say...at their age...there is NO lack of energy. Stoked to hear the rest of the 2016 boots
My other fave band, The Headstones, record their shows (or so the lead singer claims sometimes), but nothing has ever been released (save for one radio broadcast-not a "real" show).
www.headstonesband.com
I know 10 club blamed uneven power for the problems on that tour, but that sounded fishy to me. Only because... what are the odds the same uneven power would happen in Mexico as it did in South America, yet this never happened in any previous tours down there? I was afraid this scratching would continue in to the NA tour bootlegs. Gosh I hope not.