The Pearl Jam 2016 Poster Experience!

EM194007

demetrios said:

EM194007 said:

derbydave said:

drakeheuer14 said:

I think he said AP of 100

300 AP
100 Variant

The Pearl Jam posters are both 12x36 6 colour screenprints -
the regular has a metallic gold ink throughout, has an artists edition of 300 and is $50.
The variant has metallic bronze throughout, has an artists edition of 100 and is $120.



also releasing a DMB poster tomorrow!!

Mitch sending out the wrong info in the e-mail, that figures. Thanks for the clarification.

I liked his first email better with the $50 variant price.

Got the right. Variants might sell out, might take a little while. But don't see the regular version going quickly. If they were signed, then it might help. Buddy of mine picked up one that was from the show for $40 shipped to his door. Having someone at Posters and toys # them isn't worth the extra money, IMO. It's a cool print/poster though.

derbydave

scurtis said:

derbydave said:

buck502000 said:

I wonder what the Taylor variant will look like in person....

The gold show edition is AMAZING...
I'll bet the bronze will be just as nice.
This is definitely the best of the Wrigley posters to me!!

I'm totally biased cause I was there, but I thought all the Wrigley posters were great. I thought Fenway had two good ones and that was it. I'm not sure I could really rank the Wrigley ones cause I like them all for different reasons.

I'll give it a shot...
1 - Taylor
2 - Klausen
3 - Feldman
4 - Faile
5 - Cliver
I completely agree with you on the Wrigley / Fenway statement.
I bought all 5 Wrigley posters...
and would have only bought 2 if I had done the Fenway shows!!

Merkin Baller

Those Cliver

derbydave said:

scurtis said:

derbydave said:

buck502000 said:

I wonder what the Taylor variant will look like in person....

The gold show edition is AMAZING...
I'll bet the bronze will be just as nice.
This is definitely the best of the Wrigley posters to me!!

I'm totally biased cause I was there, but I thought all the Wrigley posters were great. I thought Fenway had two good ones and that was it. I'm not sure I could really rank the Wrigley ones cause I like them all for different reasons.

I'll give it a shot...
1 - Taylor
2 - Klausen
3 - Feldman
4 - Faile
5 - Cliver
I completely agree with you on the Wrigley / Fenway statement.
I bought all 5 Wrigley posters...
and would have only bought 2 if I had done the Fenway shows!!

I love how different everyone's opinions are with these posters.

Personally, I would have ranked the Taylor & Feldman as tied for last out of these 5, but neither of us are wrong!

tschav

Damn, the bronze one is making me rethink framing the gold one - the gold one looks much better in person than I originally thought.

handreads7-30

derbydave said:

I'm totally biased cause I was there, but I thought all the Wrigley posters were great. I thought Fenway had two good ones and that was it. I'm not sure I could really rank the Wrigley ones cause I like them all for different reasons.

I'll give it a shot...
1 - Taylor
2 - Klausen
3 - Feldman
4 - Faile
5 - Cliver
I completely agree with you on the Wrigley / Fenway statement.
I bought all 5 Wrigley posters...
and would have only bought 2 if I had done the Fenway shows!!

Just curious, which other one (Thomas is the understood #1) from Fenway?

For me, the Shuss is really growing on me due to its simplicity (even though he confirmed he completely mailed it in).

handreads7-30

^^

I completely butchered quoting people here...my apologies...

twhite1221

EM194007 said:

demetrios said:

EM194007 said:

derbydave said:

drakeheuer14 said:

I think he said AP of 100

300 AP
100 Variant

The Pearl Jam posters are both 12x36 6 colour screenprints -
the regular has a metallic gold ink throughout, has an artists edition of 300 and is $50.
The variant has metallic bronze throughout, has an artists edition of 100 and is $120.



also releasing a DMB poster tomorrow!!

Mitch sending out the wrong info in the e-mail, that figures. Thanks for the clarification.

I liked his first email better with the $50 variant price.

Got the right. Variants might sell out, might take a little while. But don't see the regular version going quickly. If they were signed, then it might help. Buddy of mine picked up one that was from the show for $40 shipped to his door. Having someone at Posters and toys # them isn't worth the extra money, IMO. It's a cool print/poster though.

I think they will both sell out. Taylor has plenty of fans outside of us PJ crazies and at $50 for the reg its not a bad price. He will be at Mondocon in Austin in October for anyone near there that wants to try for a signature. His 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea print is my top ISO for non-show related prints.

derbydave

handreads7-30 said:

Just curious, which other one (Thomas is the understood #1) from Fenway?
For me, the Shuss is really growing on me due to its simplicity (even though he confirmed he completely mailed it in).

It would have been the Shuss for me as well...
I really like that he tried to do his version of a Hatch Show Print!!
Even though he didn't like it...
it's way better than the 2 Ames Bros posters,
and the Mark5 playing card theme has been overdone!!

twhite1221

I want the Bronze Taylor as well since his poster was my favorite of the Wrigley lot but after dropping so much on that damn Faile yesterday, I don't think I will be able to pull the trigger.

HesCalledDyer

Am I the only one that doesn't like the Ken Taylor Wrigley? I mean, if you like highly detailed drawings of eagles, then it's a great print. It's just that it has absolutely not one single thing to do with Wrigley or Chicago (other than the eagle holding a baseball bat..which just makes it even more odd). If they played Nationals Stadium or Citizens Bank Park, sure. But for Wrigley, it just doesn't make sense.

drakeheuer14

HesCalledDyer said:

Am I the only one that doesn't like the Ken Taylor Wrigley? I mean, if you like highly detailed drawings of eagles, then it's a great print. It's just that it has absolutely not one single thing to do with Wrigley or Chicago (other than the eagle holding a baseball bat..which just makes it even more odd). If they played Nationals Stadium or Citizens Bank Park, sure. But for Wrigley, it just doesn't make sense.

I just dont like the colors. But the image itself is pretty awesome. Second favorite for Wrigley still.

Stoj

HesCalledDyer said:

Am I the only one that doesn't like the Ken Taylor Wrigley? I mean, if you like highly detailed drawings of eagles, then it's a great print. It's just that it has absolutely not one single thing to do with Wrigley or Chicago (other than the eagle holding a baseball bat..which just makes it even more odd). If they played Nationals Stadium or Citizens Bank Park, sure. But for Wrigley, it just doesn't make sense.

I kind of feel the same way. I've been staring at it on and off the past few days trying to make sense of it. I can't even tell if the eagle is holding the bat, or impaled on it.

To each his/her own. I think Klausen & Faile nailed it.

3days

HesCalledDyer said:

Am I the only one that doesn't like the Ken Taylor Wrigley? I mean, if you like highly detailed drawings of eagles, then it's a great print. It's just that it has absolutely not one single thing to do with Wrigley or Chicago (other than the eagle holding a baseball bat..which just makes it even more odd). If they played Nationals Stadium or Citizens Bank Park, sure. But for Wrigley, it just doesn't make sense.

I figured PJ's last shows before the election might have been Taylor's inspiration. Or maybe it's just a play on America's pasttime. Eagle and baseball do say America.

I think it's a really sharp poster

CantKeepmedown

Merkin Baller said:

Those Cliver

derbydave said:

scurtis said:

derbydave said:

buck502000 said:

I wonder what the Taylor variant will look like in person....

The gold show edition is AMAZING...
I'll bet the bronze will be just as nice.
This is definitely the best of the Wrigley posters to me!!

I'm totally biased cause I was there, but I thought all the Wrigley posters were great. I thought Fenway had two good ones and that was it. I'm not sure I could really rank the Wrigley ones cause I like them all for different reasons.

I'll give it a shot...
1 - Taylor
2 - Klausen
3 - Feldman
4 - Faile
5 - Cliver
I completely agree with you on the Wrigley / Fenway statement.
I bought all 5 Wrigley posters...
and would have only bought 2 if I had done the Fenway shows!!

I love how different everyone's opinions are with these posters.

Personally, I would have ranked the Taylor & Feldman as tied for last out of these 5, but neither of us are wrong!

Totally. For me, Thomas is the hands down winner out of the 11 posters. I also liked the Green Lady enough to buy one. The others don't do much for me.

Wrigley......the Faile is the only one I was (still am) interested in. I didn't care much for the other Wrigley prints.

Red Lukin

EM194007 said:

KEN TAYLOR GO UP FOR SALE TOMORROW
(WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 31st)
at 2pm CENTRAL TIME!!!

http://postersandtoys.com/


Pearl Jam (Wrigley Field)
12" x 36" Screenprint, AP Edition of 300, $50:




Pearl Jam (Wrigley Field) Variant
12" x 36" Screenprint, AP Variant Edition of 100, $120:

Anyone know if these are signed or numbered?

leach7

Can anybody tell me what the Ames Fenway Green Monster Variant originally sold for on there website?
Thanks!

Stoj

Red Lukin said:

EM194007 said:

Anyone know if these are signed or numbered?

Numbered only, I believe.

scurtis

leach7 said:

Can anybody tell me what the Ames Fenway Green Monster Variant originally sold for on there website?
Thanks!

$150 plus shipping

twhite1221

HesCalledDyer said:

Am I the only one that doesn't like the Ken Taylor Wrigley? I mean, if you like highly detailed drawings of eagles, then it's a great print. It's just that it has absolutely not one single thing to do with Wrigley or Chicago (other than the eagle holding a baseball bat..which just makes it even more odd). If they played Nationals Stadium or Citizens Bank Park, sure. But for Wrigley, it just doesn't make sense.

I think this is the case with a lot of show posters. It would have been awesome had Todd Slater's recent bear cub print been used for these shows.

derbydave

HesCalledDyer said:

Am I the only one that doesn't like the Ken Taylor Wrigley? I mean, if you like highly detailed drawings of eagles, then it's a great print. It's just that it has absolutely not one single thing to do with Wrigley or Chicago (other than the eagle holding a baseball bat..which just makes it even more odd). If they played Nationals Stadium or Citizens Bank Park, sure. But for Wrigley, it just doesn't make sense.

It's very subtle...
but there is also a baseball diamond in the background under the eagle.
I'm not really that big of a baseball fan to begin with...
to me, it's a gig poster for a concert at a baseball stadium,
doesn't really have to have a baseball theme to make it good!!
I really like the details Ken puts in all of his posters!!
The Columbia bat poster was my favorite poster of the tour as well!!