its funny you know cause for the longest time I didn't consider myself a feminist cause ive always grown up with a strong sense of myself as female and my belief that simply because I didn't have a penis didn't mean I wasn't equal to males. ive never liked labels cause to me that smacks of conformity. I remember being younger(preteen) and being told girls don't play football but you can be a cheerleader. I thought why the fuck would I want to be a cheerleader... I want to play, not watch. talk about disillusion. and I definitely dont want to be shaking pom poms for anyone
It is crazy to think that we still have people who truly believe that women are not equal. It's sad.
Feminist is not a bad term to fall under. Hell I am one. Just the rhetoric at times can be too much. I do know that I wouldn't want a man shaking pom poms for me though
the rhetoric of anything can get too much.
tho I have to say it amuses me no end how threatened some men get when confronted with a woman with strong opinions and convictions. rise up to my level, dont drag me down to yours...
Well said. I don't know if it's a cultural or geographical thing for people to regard women as lesser but a woman with strong traits is a breath of fresh air.
its a cultural thing. its deeply embedded in the history of mankind. woman have been made the scapegoats for a shitload of crap throughout 'history'. all you gotta do is flip through the bible... or note how desperate men are to control female reproductive rights.
No doubt it is deeply embedded. I have to ask - Are you of the religious folk? Some men want to control reproductive rights. And to that I say they are not men but inhuman.
Well said. I don't know if it's a cultural or geographical thing for people to regard women as lesser but a woman with strong traits is a breath of fresh air.
its a cultural thing. its deeply embedded in the history of mankind. woman have been made the scapegoats for a shitload of crap throughout 'history'. all you gotta do is flip through the bible... or note how desperate men are to control female reproductive rights.
No doubt it is deeply embedded. I have to ask - Are you of the religious folk? Some men want to control reproductive rights. And to that I say they are not men but inhuman.
tis as if those opposed to reproductive rights want to control something they have zero control over. forcing anyone into an act against their will is slavery.. in this case gestational slavery, pure and simple.
I am not of the religious folk.
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
The fact that trolls are citing the Ghostbusters remake as feminist makes me wanna laugh and cry at the same time.
This movie is going to bomb and it is because of the all women casting.
no.. its gonna bomb regardless of gender because theyre trying to remake a classic the moment bill murray declined to be involved in any sort of remake was the moment film makers should have said hmmm perhaps this is a bad idea.
yes, I agree. Remakes of any classic at best are a bad idea. Doing it with a feminist agenda? - bad idea also.
I haven't read any post after this one. I have never actually literally face palmed myself until i I read that last sentence.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Projected to make 154 million. THAT is why its being redone.
Projection is not accurate. Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
Right, as in we're guessing we'll make this amount based off the track record of a couple of the stars we lined up to act in the lead roles. Projected.
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion. In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Projected to make 154 million. THAT is why its being redone.
Projection is not accurate. Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
Right, as in we're guessing we'll make this amount based off the track record of a couple of the stars we lined up to act in the lead roles. Projected.
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion. In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
I would like to know who makes those headlines too. Because of these headlines the movie will bomb. Regressive feminism.
Projected to make 154 million. THAT is why its being redone.
Projection is not accurate. Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
Right, as in we're guessing we'll make this amount based off the track record of a couple of the stars we lined up to act in the lead roles. Projected.
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion. In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
I would like to know who makes those headlines too. Because of these headlines the movie will bomb. Regressive feminism.
I don't see it as feminism.. regressive or otherwise. its just a marketing ploy. wow! look new ghostbusters with WOMEN! are we clever? aren't we being progressive and pro women? no youre not clever and no youre not being clever.. nor are you being pro women. youre thinking remaking a classic with the novelty of women will be enough to draw crowds(women) to the cinema. but I do appreciate you thinking we're stupid enough to fall for it... NOT.
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Projected to make 154 million. THAT is why its being redone.
Projection is not accurate. Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
Right, as in we're guessing we'll make this amount based off the track record of a couple of the stars we lined up to act in the lead roles. Projected.
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion. In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
I would like to know who makes those headlines too. Because of these headlines the movie will bomb. Regressive feminism.
I don't see it as feminism.. regressive or otherwise. its just a marketing ploy. wow! look new ghostbusters with WOMEN! are we clever? aren't we being progressive and pro women? no youre not clever and no youre not being clever.. nor are you being pro women. youre thinking remaking a classic with the novelty of women will be enough to draw crowds(women) to the cinema. but I do appreciate you thinking we're stupid enough to fall for it... NOT.
It is a very bad marketing strategy to shove women full throttle into something they shouldn't be.
Projected to make 154 million. THAT is why its being redone.
Projection is not accurate. Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
Right, as in we're guessing we'll make this amount based off the track record of a couple of the stars we lined up to act in the lead roles. Projected.
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion. In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
I would like to know who makes those headlines too. Because of these headlines the movie will bomb. Regressive feminism.
I don't see it as feminism.. regressive or otherwise. its just a marketing ploy. wow! look new ghostbusters with WOMEN! are we clever? aren't we being progressive and pro women? no youre not clever and no youre not being clever.. nor are you being pro women. youre thinking remaking a classic with the novelty of women will be enough to draw crowds(women) to the cinema. but I do appreciate you thinking we're stupid enough to fall for it... NOT.
It is a very bad marketing strategy to shove women full throttle into something they shouldn't be.
what do you mean by that?
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Projected to make 154 million. THAT is why its being redone.
Projection is not accurate. Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
Right, as in we're guessing we'll make this amount based off the track record of a couple of the stars we lined up to act in the lead roles. Projected.
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion. In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
I would like to know who makes those headlines too. Because of these headlines the movie will bomb. Regressive feminism.
I don't see it as feminism.. regressive or otherwise. its just a marketing ploy. wow! look new ghostbusters with WOMEN! are we clever? aren't we being progressive and pro women? no youre not clever and no youre not being clever.. nor are you being pro women. youre thinking remaking a classic with the novelty of women will be enough to draw crowds(women) to the cinema. but I do appreciate you thinking we're stupid enough to fall for it... NOT.
It is a very bad marketing strategy to shove women full throttle into something they shouldn't be.
what do you mean by that?
Hollywood is run by elite men. Look at the latest Oscar fiasco. This movie will not do well.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Projected to make 154 million. THAT is why its being redone.
Projection is not accurate. Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
Right, as in we're guessing we'll make this amount based off the track record of a couple of the stars we lined up to act in the lead roles. Projected.
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion. In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
I would like to know who makes those headlines too. Because of these headlines the movie will bomb. Regressive feminism.
I don't see it as feminism.. regressive or otherwise. its just a marketing ploy. wow! look new ghostbusters with WOMEN! are we clever? aren't we being progressive and pro women? no youre not clever and no youre not being clever.. nor are you being pro women. youre thinking remaking a classic with the novelty of women will be enough to draw crowds(women) to the cinema. but I do appreciate you thinking we're stupid enough to fall for it... NOT.
It is a very bad marketing strategy to shove women full throttle into something they shouldn't be.
what do you mean by that?
Hollywood is run by elite men. Look at the latest Oscar fiasco. This movie will not do well.
yes hollywood is run by men but lets not absolve the women involved. theyre not slaves... nor indentured workers(as far as I know). they had the choice to say yes or no... and they exercised that choice. on some level they all thought doing this movie was a good idea. personally I just don't see it as a particularly good opportunity for women. tho you never know.. perhaps in time we'll discover one of the actresses involved was able to bring an important piece of film making to fruition because of the pay packet she got by selling her soul doing ghostbusters. *shrugs*
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Projected to make 154 million. THAT is why its being redone.
Projection is not accurate. Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
Right, as in we're guessing we'll make this amount based off the track record of a couple of the stars we lined up to act in the lead roles. Projected.
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion. In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
I would like to know who makes those headlines too. Because of these headlines the movie will bomb. Regressive feminism.
I don't see it as feminism.. regressive or otherwise. its just a marketing ploy. wow! look new ghostbusters with WOMEN! are we clever? aren't we being progressive and pro women? no youre not clever and no youre not being clever.. nor are you being pro women. youre thinking remaking a classic with the novelty of women will be enough to draw crowds(women) to the cinema. but I do appreciate you thinking we're stupid enough to fall for it... NOT.
It is a very bad marketing strategy to shove women full throttle into something they shouldn't be.
what do you mean by that?
Hollywood is run by elite men. Look at the latest Oscar fiasco. This movie will not do well.
yes hollywood is run by men but lets not absolve the women involved. theyre not slaves... nor indentured workers(as far as I know). they had the choice to say yes or no... and they exercised that choice. on some level they all thought doing this movie was a good idea. personally I just don't see it as a particularly good opportunity for women. tho you never know.. perhaps in time we'll discover one of the actresses involved was able to bring an important piece of film making to fruition because of the pay packet she got by selling her soul doing ghostbusters. *shrugs*
Do you mean when an aspiring actress who makes millions clutches her award and spews during her acceptance speech that women are lesser in Hollywood and demand change?
Projected to make 154 million. THAT is why its being redone.
Projection is not accurate. Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
Right, as in we're guessing we'll make this amount based off the track record of a couple of the stars we lined up to act in the lead roles. Projected.
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion. In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
I would like to know who makes those headlines too. Because of these headlines the movie will bomb. Regressive feminism.
I don't see it as feminism.. regressive or otherwise. its just a marketing ploy. wow! look new ghostbusters with WOMEN! are we clever? aren't we being progressive and pro women? no youre not clever and no youre not being clever.. nor are you being pro women. youre thinking remaking a classic with the novelty of women will be enough to draw crowds(women) to the cinema. but I do appreciate you thinking we're stupid enough to fall for it... NOT.
It is a very bad marketing strategy to shove women full throttle into something they shouldn't be.
what do you mean by that?
Hollywood is run by elite men. Look at the latest Oscar fiasco. This movie will not do well.
yes hollywood is run by men but lets not absolve the women involved. theyre not slaves... nor indentured workers(as far as I know). they had the choice to say yes or no... and they exercised that choice. on some level they all thought doing this movie was a good idea. personally I just don't see it as a particularly good opportunity for women. tho you never know.. perhaps in time we'll discover one of the actresses involved was able to bring an important piece of film making to fruition because of the pay packet she got by selling her soul doing ghostbusters. *shrugs*
Do you mean when an aspiring actress who makes millions clutches her award and spews during her acceptance speech that women are lesser in Hollywood and demand change?
no but but i think once you've made millions and are standing on stage clutching an oscar, youre no longer aspiring.
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Projected to make 154 million. THAT is why its being redone.
Projection is not accurate. Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
Right, as in we're guessing we'll make this amount based off the track record of a couple of the stars we lined up to act in the lead roles. Projected.
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion. In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
I would like to know who makes those headlines too. Because of these headlines the movie will bomb. Regressive feminism.
I don't see it as feminism.. regressive or otherwise. its just a marketing ploy. wow! look new ghostbusters with WOMEN! are we clever? aren't we being progressive and pro women? no youre not clever and no youre not being clever.. nor are you being pro women. youre thinking remaking a classic with the novelty of women will be enough to draw crowds(women) to the cinema. but I do appreciate you thinking we're stupid enough to fall for it... NOT.
It is a very bad marketing strategy to shove women full throttle into something they shouldn't be.
what do you mean by that?
Hollywood is run by elite men. Look at the latest Oscar fiasco. This movie will not do well.
yes hollywood is run by men but lets not absolve the women involved. theyre not slaves... nor indentured workers(as far as I know). they had the choice to say yes or no... and they exercised that choice. on some level they all thought doing this movie was a good idea. personally I just don't see it as a particularly good opportunity for women. tho you never know.. perhaps in time we'll discover one of the actresses involved was able to bring an important piece of film making to fruition because of the pay packet she got by selling her soul doing ghostbusters. *shrugs*
Do you mean when an aspiring actress who makes millions clutches her award and spews during her acceptance speech that women are lesser in Hollywood and demand change?
no but but i think once you've made millions and are standing on stage clutching an oscar, youre no longer aspiring.
Let's see how many movies she will make after her "speech". I venture to say not many. She is now become aspiring.
Projected to make 154 million. THAT is why its being redone.
Projection is not accurate. Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
Right, as in we're guessing we'll make this amount based off the track record of a couple of the stars we lined up to act in the lead roles. Projected.
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion. In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
I would like to know who makes those headlines too. Because of these headlines the movie will bomb. Regressive feminism.
I don't see it as feminism.. regressive or otherwise. its just a marketing ploy. wow! look new ghostbusters with WOMEN! are we clever? aren't we being progressive and pro women? no youre not clever and no youre not being clever.. nor are you being pro women. youre thinking remaking a classic with the novelty of women will be enough to draw crowds(women) to the cinema. but I do appreciate you thinking we're stupid enough to fall for it... NOT.
It is a very bad marketing strategy to shove women full throttle into something they shouldn't be.
what do you mean by that?
Hollywood is run by elite men. Look at the latest Oscar fiasco. This movie will not do well.
yes hollywood is run by men but lets not absolve the women involved. theyre not slaves... nor indentured workers(as far as I know). they had the choice to say yes or no... and they exercised that choice. on some level they all thought doing this movie was a good idea. personally I just don't see it as a particularly good opportunity for women. tho you never know.. perhaps in time we'll discover one of the actresses involved was able to bring an important piece of film making to fruition because of the pay packet she got by selling her soul doing ghostbusters. *shrugs*
Do you mean when an aspiring actress who makes millions clutches her award and spews during her acceptance speech that women are lesser in Hollywood and demand change?
no but but i think once you've made millions and are standing on stage clutching an oscar, youre no longer aspiring.
Let's see how many movies she will make after her "speech". I venture to say not many. She is now become aspiring.
are we speaking of someone specific???
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
No tell us why they shouldnt be in something like this.
I can't tell anymore if you are angry or just inquisitive. It is like BET, etc. This movie has cast women to placate women.
I disagree. how could women be placated by the recasting of male roles simply to make a buck? its not as if the original idea was to remake it wth female leads... that scenario came about because bill murray very wisely said no... no doubt seeing zero merit in such an enterprise. tho I have no doubt there are women out there who will see it as a good thing. we need our own stories not rehashed male stories.
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
No tell us why they shouldnt be in something like this.
I can't tell anymore if you are angry or just inquisitive. It is like BET, etc. This movie has cast women to placate women.
My impression is you believe they arent up to the task as if they are incapable.
No. This movie is making aspiring actresses take on an insurmountable task.
So Melissa McCathy is apsiring huh? Bankable STAR. Kristen Wiig is great as well. I hardly would describe them as "aspiring" .
The definition of aspiring is looking forward to something with great desire, hoping for some dream or goal to come true, or working towards making something happen.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
No tell us why they shouldnt be in something like this.
I can't tell anymore if you are angry or just inquisitive. It is like BET, etc. This movie has cast women to placate women.
My impression is you believe they arent up to the task as if they are incapable.
No. This movie is making aspiring actresses take on an insurmountable task.
So Melissa McCathy is apsiring huh? Bankable STAR. Kristen Wiig is great as well. I hardly would describe them as "aspiring" .
The definition of aspiring is looking forward to something with great desire, hoping for some dream or goal to come true, or working towards making something happen.
They each have done well alone. Putting them all together to celebrate will not work.
Many examples of the cliche man in here, in control of the world and too afraid to give it up.
The reason Hollywood is dominated by men is because Hollywood is a sexist, rigged city. Take a look at how much men make compared to women there. It's time to change
Listen to some of my music here (if you want to):
[url="My soundcloud"]
its funny you know cause for the longest time I didn't consider myself a feminist cause ive always grown up with a strong sense of myself as female and my belief that simply because I didn't have a penis didn't mean I wasn't equal to males. ive never liked labels cause to me that smacks of conformity. I remember being younger(preteen) and being told girls don't play football but you can be a cheerleader. I thought why the fuck would I want to be a cheerleader... I want to play, not watch. talk about disillusion. and I definitely dont want to be shaking pom poms for anyone
It is crazy to think that we still have people who truly believe that women are not equal. It's sad.
Feminist is not a bad term to fall under. Hell I am one. Just the rhetoric at times can be too much. I do know that I wouldn't want a man shaking pom poms for me though
the rhetoric of anything can get too much.
tho I have to say it amuses me no end how threatened some men get when confronted with a woman with strong opinions and convictions. rise up to my level, dont drag me down to yours...
There are so many men who are so insecure...it is just nuts.
its funny you know cause for the longest time I didn't consider myself a feminist cause ive always grown up with a strong sense of myself as female and my belief that simply because I didn't have a penis didn't mean I wasn't equal to males. ive never liked labels cause to me that smacks of conformity. I remember being younger(preteen) and being told girls don't play football but you can be a cheerleader. I thought why the fuck would I want to be a cheerleader... I want to play, not watch. talk about disillusion. and I definitely dont want to be shaking pom poms for anyone
It is crazy to think that we still have people who truly believe that women are not equal. It's sad.
Feminist is not a bad term to fall under. Hell I am one. Just the rhetoric at times can be too much. I do know that I wouldn't want a man shaking pom poms for me though
the rhetoric of anything can get too much.
tho I have to say it amuses me no end how threatened some men get when confronted with a woman with strong opinions and convictions. rise up to my level, dont drag me down to yours...
There are so many men who are so insecure...it is just nuts.
i love insecure men such a turn on
Plenty in church.
In temples, mosques and other places of comfort and prayer for many as well?
There are men and women all over this earth who question themselves at times, or even often.
I have moments of insecurity too; who hasn't? And so what? Recognize it, learn from it, hopefully get over it, and move on.
Comments
I have to ask - Are you of the religious folk?
Some men want to control reproductive rights. And to that I say they are not men but inhuman.
I have to ask - Are you of the religious folk?
Some men want to control reproductive rights. And to that I say they are not men but inhuman.
tis as if those opposed to reproductive rights want to control something they have zero control over. forcing anyone into an act against their will is slavery.. in this case gestational slavery, pure and simple.
I am not of the religious folk.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
LIVEFOOTSTEPS.ORG/USER/?USR=435
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Can't wait to see the real results on opening day.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
I'm slightly interested to know who exactly stated it was with a feminist agenda. Like who attached to the movie makes this assertion.
In fact no I am not. Its a fucking movie. Watch or dont.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Because of these headlines the movie will bomb.
Regressive feminism.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
This movie will not do well.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
It is like BET, etc.
This movie has cast women to placate women.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
I venture to say not many.
She is now become aspiring.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
This movie is making aspiring actresses take on an insurmountable task.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
The definition of aspiring is looking forward to something with great desire, hoping for some dream or goal to come true, or working towards making something happen.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Putting them all together to celebrate will not work.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
The reason Hollywood is dominated by men is because Hollywood is a sexist, rigged city. Take a look at how much men make compared to women there. It's time to change
Our new Prime Minister
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-canada-united-nations-women-1.3494181
There are men and women all over this earth who question themselves at times, or even often.
I have moments of insecurity too; who hasn't? And so what? Recognize it, learn from it, hopefully get over it, and move on.
Find a way.