Trump

cutz

What a GONG show!!!

And embarrassing too.

JC29856 said:

https://youtu.be/EEQvsK5w-jY

dignin

Speaking of fishy......

Breitbart coordinated with liberal activist and organizer who disrupted GOP primary campaign events

Black has resurfaced recently as one of the people featured in undercover video from the Project Veritas group. In the video, he claims to work for the Democratic National Committee. Though he does not appear on their payroll, his bio at Democracy Partners credits him with "working closely with the Democratic National Committee" during the 2012 election cycle. Black in the video says he helped organize violent protests in Chicago that led to Trump's cancellation of a rally there in March.

"He worked directly with Breitbart’s political team on the ground in the primary states to sabotage Marco Rubio & Ted Cruz, and elect Trump as nominee of [the Republican] party,” the source told POLITICO. “[Black] was coordinating with [Breitbart’s] top staff to rabble rouse against Rubio at rallies."


http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/breitbart-liberal-activist-230255#ixzz4O3KlZGxq

mrussel1

Fox News.... Welcome to your existential threat.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/302590-trump-launches-nightly-facebook-live-streams

Cliffy6745

https://twitter.com/AnnaMariaDP/status/791005132918054912

BS44325

https://youtu.be/pADHLsECWxY

HughFreakingDillon

mrussel1 said:

Fox News.... Welcome to your existential threat.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/302590-trump-launches-nightly-facebook-live-streams

so he wants to expand on his base by showing a live stream to......his base.

brilliant.

Cliffy6745

BS44325 said:

https://youtu.be/pADHLsECWxY

You watch a lot of YouTube, dude.

mrussel1

HughFreakingDillon said:

mrussel1 said:

Fox News.... Welcome to your existential threat.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/302590-trump-launches-nightly-facebook-live-streams

so he wants to expand on his base by showing a live stream to......his base.

brilliant.

This isn't an election move at all. They have been angling to split the hard right base from Fox all season. It could really damage Fox if they lose half their viewership.

Go Beavers

Godfather. said:

and you guy's wonder why threads get shut down ? do any of you understand what reasonable debate means ? good grief !

Godfather.

I'm assuming you're asking because you don't know the answer?

lukin2006

brianlux said:

Quack! Nice move Hillary. Thanks for being so relevant to important issues... quack...

At least she's has experience...hahahah...

PJfanwillneverleave1

Go Beavers said:

Godfather. said:

and you guy's wonder why threads get shut down ? do any of you understand what reasonable debate means ? good grief !

Godfather.

I'm assuming you're asking because you don't know the answer?

Wow.
Quite out of the blue and an unnecessary attack which adds no real input to the thread.
Too many of these by posters is what gets a thread shut down.

This article is funny and contradicts itself which is not surprising coming from an unbiased liberal source.

Oh the drama.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-uselection-tracking-polls-1.3818965

HughFreakingDillon

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Go Beavers said:

Godfather. said:

and you guy's wonder why threads get shut down ? do any of you understand what reasonable debate means ? good grief !

Godfather.

I'm assuming you're asking because you don't know the answer?

Wow.
Quite out of the blue and an unnecessary attack which adds no real input to the thread.
Too many of these by posters is what gets a thread shut down.

This article is funny and contradicts itself which is not surprising coming from an unbiased liberal source.

Oh the drama.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-uselection-tracking-polls-1.3818965

he was responding to a person who lately has actually wished death on hillary and her supporters, calling others ignorant and stupid, etc.

the question from Go Beavers is quite valid.

PJfanwillneverleave1

HughFreakingDillon said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Go Beavers said:

Godfather. said:

and you guy's wonder why threads get shut down ? do any of you understand what reasonable debate means ? good grief !

Godfather.

I'm assuming you're asking because you don't know the answer?

Wow.
Quite out of the blue and an unnecessary attack which adds no real input to the thread.
Too many of these by posters is what gets a thread shut down.

This article is funny and contradicts itself which is not surprising coming from an unbiased liberal source.

Oh the drama.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-uselection-tracking-polls-1.3818965

he was responding to a person who lately has actually wished death on hillary and her supporters, calling others ignorant and stupid, etc.

the question from Go Beavers is quite valid.

Makes sense.
If a person doesn't have time to recollect the entire thread from memory - especially this succinct thread it seems oddly out of place.

Smellyman

xx what

JC29856 said:

https://youtu.be/EEQvsK5w-jY

From the people who brought you the ACORN 'scandal'.

The right is sure easy to dupe.

EL OH EL

Go Beavers

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Go Beavers said:

Godfather. said:

and you guy's wonder why threads get shut down ? do any of you understand what reasonable debate means ? good grief !

Godfather.

I'm assuming you're asking because you don't know the answer?

Wow.
Quite out of the blue and an unnecessary attack which adds no real input to the thread.
Too many of these by posters is what gets a thread shut down.

This article is funny and contradicts itself which is not surprising coming from an unbiased liberal source.

Oh the drama.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-uselection-tracking-polls-1.3818965

Where in the article are you seeing it contradict itself? And my comment to g'father is warranted for someone who lowers the bar in here and then makes a comment trying to raise it.

PJfanwillneverleave1

^^^
I can't explain it to a non Canadian that doesn't know CBC.
It has undertones that are gifted from federal funding.

Go Beavers

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

^^^
I can't explain it to a non Canadian that doesn't know CBC.
It has undertones that are gifted from federal funding.

So it's "undertones" are contradictory. I thought you wrote that it contrdicts itself?

PJfanwillneverleave1

Go Beavers said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

^^^
I can't explain it to a non Canadian that doesn't know CBC.
It has undertones that are gifted from federal funding.

So it's "undertones" are contradictory. I thought you wrote that it contrdicts itself?

I get that you want to continue the conversation about CBC.
Your line of thinking won't work though.

Go Beavers

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

Go Beavers said:

PJfanwillneverleave1 said:

^^^
I can't explain it to a non Canadian that doesn't know CBC.
It has undertones that are gifted from federal funding.

So it's "undertones" are contradictory. I thought you wrote that it contrdicts itself?

I get that you want to continue the conversation about CBC.
Your line of thinking won't work though.

No. i was just curious where you thought the article was contradictory. Maybe you re-read it and see that it's not, but now you're trying to claim this mystical understanding is exclusive to Canadians.

PJfanwillneverleave1

^^^
Now I am finally realizing why some get called trolls and others not.
And again I state that gimmiesomtruth had very valid points and now I can see why he/she was frustrated by some posters.