Hillary won more votes for President

CM189191

pjalive21 said:

CM189191 said:

....any....day....now....

I know you come, troll, and take off...but that statement you are saying in jest is probably closer to be true now than it ever was before

It was confirmed by multiple FBI agents who are leaking information that the FBI is going for indictment and that major media outlets like ABC and NBC are covering it up

Hillary has been slandered, smeared and libeled for as long as my memory will serve me. From Whitewater to Benghazi and back again. Either the Clinton's are a couple of the most successful criminal masterminds of all time. Or it's a witch hunt that seems to bubble to the surface every time she runs for office or has an agenda she wants to push (god forbid). Either way, I keep hearing this "lock her up" narrative from the right that doesn't seem to coincide reality. So I'll sit here and patiently wait why you continue to drone on about how the election was rigged, how the media is in Hillary's pocket. While you can't fathom that's she actually winning, not because she cheated or broke the rules, but because some people might actually want Hillary to be the next President.

But please, go on about the unnamed & retired FBI sources connected to Guiliani. Who are trying to sell some book. Pretend that releasing some vague letter about reopening an investigation a week before Election Day isn't suspicious at best. The timing alone should give you moment for pause, no?

If the FBI has grounds for indictment, I don't think ABC or NBC are going to stop them from moving forward. The MSM narrative is growing dull, too. Ever think for a second that the MSM media doesn't cover a story, not because they're covering it up, but because it's unsubstantiated hearsay? Or Maybe they're actually doing an investigation, instead of regurgitating the latest rumor to any crazy ear that will listen. Remember when Obama was A Gay, Cocaine-Using Hustler? You think ABC & NBC didn't cover that because they were covering up?

oftenreading

pjalive21 said:

yeah the email scandal is bullshit lol...she said sorry so it should be ok...what a crap ass article...wonder how much Clinton paid that person to write that ^^^

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3904816/Julian-Assange-says-Trump-won-t-allowed-win-accuses-Clinton-donors-backing-rise-ISIS.html

First summary point from this article:
Julian Assange claimed Washington elites want Hillary Clinton to win

That's not exactly a shocker. Most sane people want Clinton to win over Trump. The idea that "the entire US establishment is backing Clinton" is entirely expected and not news to anyone, since most of that establishment has been open in their support.

Godfather.

Gern Blansten said:

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13500018/clinton-email-scandal-bullshit

.



Great summary....this is what a lot of us have been saying all along.

sounds like top rated media source "VOX" / "FOX" you have given into the same thing you have been accusing me of.....let go already she's toast.

Godfather

Boxes&Books

CM189191 said:

tonifig8 said:

CM189191 said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

Gern Blansten said:

tonifig8 said:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44761

DWS: wanted to choose the city that was best prepared. Spoke with POTUS last night. Focused on logistics and money and the delegate has the best experience possible, Philadelphia was the strong leader. Wasn't even a close call.

HRC: I know the last visit you had there, they had more $$ in the bank then expected

DWS: They really did. Nutter called last night & mentioned another $1 million cash on hand. It really was about the delegate experience though and . No convention center, midtown manhattan, etc. Columbus was also very spread out. This is the setup that we want our delegates to have.

HRC: do you have to tell BdB and Coleman?

DWS: I do.

HRC: Important to say you went over all this with the president.

DWS: yes, met last night. Honestly, Philly was the most put together, best proposal by far, etc.

HRC: capacity to raise the money?

DWS: oh yes. Sat for an hour with David Cohen who will take a title with the host committee, benchmark fundraising will now be in the contract. I met with each mayor at the DNC and was firm about the money.

HRC: who are you putting in charge of the convention?

DWS: need to hire a CEO. Will run a process and determine that. If you have candidates that are good to look at, let me know and we'll be sure to let you know.

HRC: congratulations on the process. If we plan it right, all the great, historical sites of Philadelphia will be great for us

DWS: agreed, liberty bell, etc. It's great. Second thing, I've seen an uptick of negative stories about you in the press, I will gladly speak on your behalf.

HRC: thank you. Biding my time for now and thank you for the offer. Who should we talk to about this?

DWS: Tracey.

Wow... Unbelievable

Seriously.

How does this rate as noteworthy at all?

Oh, right, rigged.

This is the Hillary thread right?
Forgot to ask ... Wasn't the DNC neutral? At of all people I would think germ would be upset by this stuff, considering he is a former BernieBro.

No, The DNC is not neutral. Their job is to get democrats elected. And they're succeeding.

Well that's not what was said to the public. Kind of like Hillary... Private policy and Public policy... It's hard to understand the expectations when they consistently do this. I'm not a fucking mind reader.

And I'd hardly consider being neck and neck with Donald Fucking Trump "succeeding"

Show me. Where did the DNC say they were neutral?

Still waiting for your reply.

Gern Blansten

CM189191 said:

pjalive21 said:

CM189191 said:

....any....day....now....

I know you come, troll, and take off...but that statement you are saying in jest is probably closer to be true now than it ever was before

It was confirmed by multiple FBI agents who are leaking information that the FBI is going for indictment and that major media outlets like ABC and NBC are covering it up

Hillary has been slandered, smeared and libeled for as long as my memory will serve me. From Whitewater to Benghazi and back again. Either the Clinton's are a couple of the most successful criminal masterminds of all time. Or it's a witch hunt that seems to bubble to the surface every time she runs for office or has an agenda she wants to push (god forbid). Either way, I keep hearing this "lock her up" narrative from the right that doesn't seem to coincide reality. So I'll sit here and patiently wait why you continue to drone on about how the election was rigged, how the media is in Hillary's pocket. While you can't fathom that's she actually winning, not because she cheated or broke the rules, but because some people might actually want Hillary to be the next President.

But please, go on about the unnamed & retired FBI sources connected to Guiliani. Who are trying to sell some book. Pretend that releasing some vague letter about reopening an investigation a week before Election Day isn't suspicious at best. The timing alone should give you moment for pause, no?

If the FBI has grounds for indictment, I don't think ABC or NBC are going to stop them from moving forward. The MSM narrative is growing dull, too. Ever think for a second that the MSM media doesn't cover a story, not because they're covering it up, but because it's unsubstantiated hearsay? Or Maybe they're actually doing an investigation, instead of regurgitating the latest rumor to any crazy ear that will listen. Remember when Obama was A Gay, Cocaine-Using Hustler? You think ABC & NBC didn't cover that because they were covering up?

I watched a little bit of "All the President's Men" last night. The inner workings of legitimate news organizations really haven't changed much. They require documented facts rather than bullshit. What Brent Bair introduced the other night (sources saying an FBI indictment is coming) was bullshit.

Guilliani sold his soul to Cheeto Hitler.

Gern Blansten

PJPOWER said:

Gern Blansten said:

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13500018/clinton-email-scandal-bullshit



Great summary....this is what a lot of us have been saying all along.

Stop reading faux news.

Cable news has been, if anything, worse, and many prestige outlets have joined the pileup. One malign result of obsessive email coverage is that the public is left totally unaware of the policy stakes in the election. Another is that the constant vague recitations of the phrase ‘‘Clinton email scandal’’ have firmly implanted the notion that there is something scandalous about anything involving Hillary Clinton an email, including her campaign manager getting hacked or the revelation that one of her aides sometimes checked mail on her husband’s computer.

But none of this is true. Clinton broke no laws according to the FBI itself. Her setup gave her no power to evade federal transparency laws beyond what anyone who has a personal email account of any kind has. Her stated explanation for her conduct is entirely believable, fits the facts perfectly, and is entirely plausible to anyone who doesn't simply start with the assumption that she's guilty of something.

Given Powell’s conduct, Clinton wasn't even breaking with an informal precedent. The very worst you can say is that, faced with an annoying government IT policy, she used her stature to find a personal workaround rather than a systemic fix that would work for everyone. To spend so much time on such a trivial matter would be absurd in a city council race, much less a presidential election. To do so in circumstances when it advances the electoral prospects of a rival who has shattered all precedents in terms of lacking transparency or basic honesty is infinity more scandalous than anything related to the server itself.

Boxes&Books

Good little summary:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3901376/Secret-recordings-fueled-FBI-s-desire-probe-Clinton-Foundation-case-moves-likely-indictment.html

bootlegger10

if you are going to own the 4.9% unemployment rate (which we all know is bs because it doesn't include those that have given up looking), than you need to own the shrinking of the middle class and the growing disparity between the top earners and poor earners.

dignin

tonifig8 said:

CM189191 said:

tonifig8 said:

CM189191 said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

Gern Blansten said:

tonifig8 said:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44761

DWS: wanted to choose the city that was best prepared. Spoke with POTUS last night. Focused on logistics and money and the delegate has the best experience possible, Philadelphia was the strong leader. Wasn't even a close call.

HRC: I know the last visit you had there, they had more $$ in the bank then expected

DWS: They really did. Nutter called last night & mentioned another $1 million cash on hand. It really was about the delegate experience though and . No convention center, midtown manhattan, etc. Columbus was also very spread out. This is the setup that we want our delegates to have.

HRC: do you have to tell BdB and Coleman?

DWS: I do.

HRC: Important to say you went over all this with the president.

DWS: yes, met last night. Honestly, Philly was the most put together, best proposal by far, etc.

HRC: capacity to raise the money?

DWS: oh yes. Sat for an hour with David Cohen who will take a title with the host committee, benchmark fundraising will now be in the contract. I met with each mayor at the DNC and was firm about the money.

HRC: who are you putting in charge of the convention?

DWS: need to hire a CEO. Will run a process and determine that. If you have candidates that are good to look at, let me know and we'll be sure to let you know.

HRC: congratulations on the process. If we plan it right, all the great, historical sites of Philadelphia will be great for us

DWS: agreed, liberty bell, etc. It's great. Second thing, I've seen an uptick of negative stories about you in the press, I will gladly speak on your behalf.

HRC: thank you. Biding my time for now and thank you for the offer. Who should we talk to about this?

DWS: Tracey.

Wow... Unbelievable

Seriously.

How does this rate as noteworthy at all?

Oh, right, rigged.

This is the Hillary thread right?
Forgot to ask ... Wasn't the DNC neutral? At of all people I would think germ would be upset by this stuff, considering he is a former BernieBro.

No, The DNC is not neutral. Their job is to get democrats elected. And they're succeeding.

Well that's not what was said to the public. Kind of like Hillary... Private policy and Public policy... It's hard to understand the expectations when they consistently do this. I'm not a fucking mind reader.

And I'd hardly consider being neck and neck with Donald Fucking Trump "succeeding"

Show me. Where did the DNC say they were neutral?

Still waiting for your reply.

Still waiting for something of substance to come from the hacked emails, weren't we promised a BOMSHELL!! yesterday? Looks like were all waiting for something.

Boxes&Books

Isn't Hillary Great!

"HRC did a paid speech in NYC for Deutsche Bank. I wrote her a long riff about economic fairness and how the financial industry has lost its way, precisely for the purpose of having something [to] show people if ever asked what she was saying behind closed doors for two years to all those fat cats."

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43027

unsung

I really don't want to vote, but more and more of me wants to just to silence one Clinton supporter.

Jason P

dignin said:

tonifig8 said:

CM189191 said:

tonifig8 said:

CM189191 said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

Gern Blansten said:

tonifig8 said:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44761

DWS: wanted to choose the city that was best prepared. Spoke with POTUS last night. Focused on logistics and money and the delegate has the best experience possible, Philadelphia was the strong leader. Wasn't even a close call.

HRC: I know the last visit you had there, they had more $$ in the bank then expected

DWS: They really did. Nutter called last night & mentioned another $1 million cash on hand. It really was about the delegate experience though and . No convention center, midtown manhattan, etc. Columbus was also very spread out. This is the setup that we want our delegates to have.

HRC: do you have to tell BdB and Coleman?

DWS: I do.

HRC: Important to say you went over all this with the president.

DWS: yes, met last night. Honestly, Philly was the most put together, best proposal by far, etc.

HRC: capacity to raise the money?

DWS: oh yes. Sat for an hour with David Cohen who will take a title with the host committee, benchmark fundraising will now be in the contract. I met with each mayor at the DNC and was firm about the money.

HRC: who are you putting in charge of the convention?

DWS: need to hire a CEO. Will run a process and determine that. If you have candidates that are good to look at, let me know and we'll be sure to let you know.

HRC: congratulations on the process. If we plan it right, all the great, historical sites of Philadelphia will be great for us

DWS: agreed, liberty bell, etc. It's great. Second thing, I've seen an uptick of negative stories about you in the press, I will gladly speak on your behalf.

HRC: thank you. Biding my time for now and thank you for the offer. Who should we talk to about this?

DWS: Tracey.

Wow... Unbelievable

Seriously.

How does this rate as noteworthy at all?

Oh, right, rigged.

This is the Hillary thread right?
Forgot to ask ... Wasn't the DNC neutral? At of all people I would think germ would be upset by this stuff, considering he is a former BernieBro.

No, The DNC is not neutral. Their job is to get democrats elected. And they're succeeding.

Well that's not what was said to the public. Kind of like Hillary... Private policy and Public policy... It's hard to understand the expectations when they consistently do this. I'm not a fucking mind reader.

And I'd hardly consider being neck and neck with Donald Fucking Trump "succeeding"

Show me. Where did the DNC say they were neutral?

Still waiting for your reply.

Still waiting for something of substance to come from the hacked emails, weren't we promised a BOMSHELL!! yesterday? Looks like were all waiting for something.

HughFreakingDillon

Godfather. said:

Gern Blansten said:

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13500018/clinton-email-scandal-bullshit

.



Great summary....this is what a lot of us have been saying all along.

sounds like top rated media source "VOX" / "FOX" you have given into the same thing you have been accusing me of.....let go already she's toast.

Godfather

maybe he'll pull it out, maybe he won't. but most aren't giving him much of a shot. there's only a few perfect scenarios where he can win.

Boxes&Books

More right wing baiting... Fucking faux news

"If I told you that Democratic Party lobbyist Tony Podesta, whose brother John Podesta chairs Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, is a registered foreign agent on the Saudi government’s payroll, you’d probably think I was a Trump-thumping, conspiratorial nutcase. But it’s true. "

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/11779826

bootlegger10

tonifig8 said:

Isn't Hillary Great!

"HRC did a paid speech in NYC for Deutsche Bank. I wrote her a long riff about economic fairness and how the financial industry has lost its way, precisely for the purpose of having something [to] show people if ever asked what she was saying behind closed doors for two years to all those fat cats."

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43027

Unfortunately Wikileaks only proves what we already knew about Hillary. You are wasting your time on here. People know she doesn't care about common people. They know she will crush anyone in her path. They know she is greedy. They know the Clinton Foundation's main purpose is political and a place to employee their political team in between campaigns. They know not to believe anything she says in public.

....and they are voting for her anyway.

Boxes&Books

unsung said:

I really don't want to vote, but more and more of me wants to just to silence one Clinton supporter.

Just silence them!! Trust me... I already threw up at the thought of it, but it's going to fuckin happen.

HughFreakingDillon

tonifig8 said:

More right wing baiting... Fucking faux news

"If I told you that Democratic Party lobbyist Tony Podesta, whose brother John Podesta chairs Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, is a registered foreign agent on the Saudi government’s payroll, you’d probably think I was a Trump-thumping, conspiratorial nutcase. But it’s true. "

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/11779826

not making any excuses for clinton, but this paragraph is weak in its execution:

The lobby firm created by both Tony and John Podesta in 1988 receives $140,000 a month from the Saudi government, a government that beheads nonviolent dissidents, uses torture to extract forced confessions, doesn’t allow women to drive, and bombs schools, hospitals and residential neighborhoods in neighboring Yemen

The US government, historically, does many of these same things. Guantanamo? Iraqi civilian collateral damage? Will it stop with Clinton. nope. would it stop with Trump? definitely not. he has openly admitted to it. which is something, I guess. points for honesty.

Boxes&Books

bootlegger10 said:

tonifig8 said:

Isn't Hillary Great!

"HRC did a paid speech in NYC for Deutsche Bank. I wrote her a long riff about economic fairness and how the financial industry has lost its way, precisely for the purpose of having something [to] show people if ever asked what she was saying behind closed doors for two years to all those fat cats."

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43027

Unfortunately Wikileaks only proves what we already knew about Hillary. You are wasting your time on here. People know she doesn't care about common people. They know she will crush anyone in her path. They know she is greedy. They know the Clinton Foundation's main purpose is political and a place to employee their political team in between campaigns. They know not to believe anything she says in public.

....and they are voting for her anyway.

I am very well aware of this. My hope isn't changing the minds of 4 or 5 people on here... My work is for the lurkers.

Boxes&Books

This one is for you, JC ... It's getting warmer...

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/4/wikileaks-john-podesta-invited-to-spirit-dinner-ho/

CM189191

tonifig8 said:

CM189191 said:

tonifig8 said:

CM189191 said:

tonifig8 said:

rgambs said:

Gern Blansten said:

tonifig8 said:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44761

DWS: wanted to choose the city that was best prepared. Spoke with POTUS last night. Focused on logistics and money and the delegate has the best experience possible, Philadelphia was the strong leader. Wasn't even a close call.

HRC: I know the last visit you had there, they had more $$ in the bank then expected

DWS: They really did. Nutter called last night & mentioned another $1 million cash on hand. It really was about the delegate experience though and . No convention center, midtown manhattan, etc. Columbus was also very spread out. This is the setup that we want our delegates to have.

HRC: do you have to tell BdB and Coleman?

DWS: I do.

HRC: Important to say you went over all this with the president.

DWS: yes, met last night. Honestly, Philly was the most put together, best proposal by far, etc.

HRC: capacity to raise the money?

DWS: oh yes. Sat for an hour with David Cohen who will take a title with the host committee, benchmark fundraising will now be in the contract. I met with each mayor at the DNC and was firm about the money.

HRC: who are you putting in charge of the convention?

DWS: need to hire a CEO. Will run a process and determine that. If you have candidates that are good to look at, let me know and we'll be sure to let you know.

HRC: congratulations on the process. If we plan it right, all the great, historical sites of Philadelphia will be great for us

DWS: agreed, liberty bell, etc. It's great. Second thing, I've seen an uptick of negative stories about you in the press, I will gladly speak on your behalf.

HRC: thank you. Biding my time for now and thank you for the offer. Who should we talk to about this?

DWS: Tracey.

Wow... Unbelievable

Seriously.

How does this rate as noteworthy at all?

Oh, right, rigged.

This is the Hillary thread right?
Forgot to ask ... Wasn't the DNC neutral? At of all people I would think germ would be upset by this stuff, considering he is a former BernieBro.

No, The DNC is not neutral. Their job is to get democrats elected. And they're succeeding.

Well that's not what was said to the public. Kind of like Hillary... Private policy and Public policy... It's hard to understand the expectations when they consistently do this. I'm not a fucking mind reader.

And I'd hardly consider being neck and neck with Donald Fucking Trump "succeeding"

Show me. Where did the DNC say they were neutral?

Still waiting for your reply.

"The DNC remains neutral in this primary based on our rules"

ARTICLE ONE
The Democratic Party of the United States of America shall:
Section 1. Nominate and assist in the election of Democratic candidates for the offices of President
and Vice President of the United States