Hillary won more votes for President
Comments
-
lolHughFreakingDillon said:
it is the highest office. i didn't say it was occupied by the highest. an eagle's nest full of rats.lukin2006 said:
You really think POTUS is the highest office in the land? Is that why out of a country of 300 + million these are the best the US can do, no way sir, I seriously doubt the best and brightest enter politics...more like leeches who suck off the productivity of others.HughFreakingDillon said:I don't know how many times this has to be stated: it is a fact, in my opinion, that you simply cannot get to the highest office in the land without backroom bullshit. I am shocked that nothing about Obama has come to light. Maybe he's the exception, maybe he's just that damn good. Either way both hillary and donald are not immune. If you think he is anti establishment, you are a fool. If you think he gives a shit about you, you are a fool. If you think he wont use the presidency as a springboard to make millions afterwards, you are a fool.
Either participate in the system or dont. But dont even try to put one candidate on a an anti corruption pedestal over the other. If you do, you are a fool.
It comes down, unfortunately, in this particular election, of who you think wont put the country into the ground financially, socially, progressively, and diplomatically.
To me, without question, that person is hillary. Trump has the bigger potential to be a trainwreck. He is a massive risk that i cant believe so many are comfortable taking. With hillary, you get more of the same. With trump, you dont have a sweet clue what you are getting.I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon0 -
PJfanwillneverleave1 said:
It is very strange that a Canadian regard POTUS the highest office of the land from Canada.lukin2006 said:
You really think POTUS is the highest office in the land? Is that why out of a country of 300 + million these are the best the US can do, no way sir, I seriously doubt the best and brightest enter politics...more like leeches who suck off the productivity of others.HughFreakingDillon said:I don't know how many times this has to be stated: it is a fact, in my opinion, that you simply cannot get to the highest office in the land without backroom bullshit. I am shocked that nothing about Obama has come to light. Maybe he's the exception, maybe he's just that damn good. Either way both hillary and donald are not immune. If you think he is anti establishment, you are a fool. If you think he gives a shit about you, you are a fool. If you think he wont use the presidency as a springboard to make millions afterwards, you are a fool.
Either participate in the system or dont. But dont even try to put one candidate on a an anti corruption pedestal over the other. If you do, you are a fool.
It comes down, unfortunately, in this particular election, of who you think wont put the country into the ground financially, socially, progressively, and diplomatically.
To me, without question, that person is hillary. Trump has the bigger potential to be a trainwreck. He is a massive risk that i cant believe so many are comfortable taking. With hillary, you get more of the same. With trump, you dont have a sweet clue what you are getting.
Whats the highest office in Canada?I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin
"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon0 -
0 -
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/28/daughter-eric-garner-slams-clinton-campaign-over-emails-about-fathers-death.html
“I’m troubled by the revelation that you and this campaign actually discussed ‘using’ Eric Garner … Why would you want to ‘use my dad?” she said. “These people will co opt anything to push their agenda. Police violence is not the same as gun violence.
Hillary for president and all costs ?
Godfather.0 -
what? no link to the actual email?Godfather. said:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/28/daughter-eric-garner-slams-clinton-campaign-over-emails-about-fathers-death.html
“I’m troubled by the revelation that you and this campaign actually discussed ‘using’ Eric Garner … Why would you want to ‘use my dad?” she said. “These people will co opt anything to push their agenda. Police violence is not the same as gun violence.
Hillary for president and all costs ?
Godfather.
once again, when you actually read the content it seems pretty benign.
and i hate to toss around the word irony so loosely. but you're accusing the campaign of 'using' Eric Garner to push their agenda, while you're 'using' Erica Garner to push yours.0 -
I'm telling you, this conspiracy thing goes all the way to top. Now they got to the VP: Clinton eyes Biden for secretary of state0
-
CM189191 said:
I'm telling you, this conspiracy thing goes all the way to top. Now they got to the VP: Clinton eyes Biden for secretary of state
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/33202CM189191 said:
what? no link to the actual email?Godfather. said:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/28/daughter-eric-garner-slams-clinton-campaign-over-emails-about-fathers-death.html
“I’m troubled by the revelation that you and this campaign actually discussed ‘using’ Eric Garner … Why would you want to ‘use my dad?” she said. “These people will co opt anything to push their agenda. Police violence is not the same as gun violence.
Hillary for president and all costs ?
Godfather.
once again, when you actually read the content it seems pretty benign.
and i hate to toss around the word irony so loosely. but you're accusing the campaign of 'using' Eric Garner to push their agenda, while you're 'using' Erica Garner to push yours.
Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
From:kfinney@hillaryclinton.com
To: nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2016-03-17 21:42
Subject: Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
Agree with 1-3, couple of things - first as former senator from NY we need
an NYC example, either naming a victim or applauding some of the efforts in
the City to deal with the issue like a group of mothers in Harlem or
members of the city council pushing CDC to collect data;
Also reminder that Re: Eric Garner he wasn't killed by a gun it was police
violence.
Last just flagging that one of the more high-profile cases recently
involved two police officers from the precinct right next to the Avalon
apt building a bunch of us live in, I think they were shot sitting in their
car. So would keep the emphasis on young people losing their lives to gun
violence
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Nick Merrill
wrote:
Four small things:
I'd change "him" to "them" in the first line.
I'm not sure I'd say she's lead the fight on the Charleston loophole,
because she really has no power other than to advocate or denounce. Good
to be strong in our language but might lose that first line.
And check the NRA piece with Jen. That played strangely in Ohio for us at
least initially. I think it should stay in but flag that for her.
Finally, I know we have Erica Garner issues but we don't want to mention
Eric at all? I can see her coming after us for leaving him out of the
piece.
On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Corey Ciorciari
wrote:
Here is 55k back-up: http://labs.time.com/story/gun-loophole/
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> This op-ed is live again, and we've made a few revisions. Would be great
> if everyone could take another quick look so we can get to HRC tonight.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Emily Aden
> wrote:
>
>> Research edits attached, need backup on one stat.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Harrell Kirstein <
>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I like it. Since it is the NYDN I think we should add the terrorist
>>> watch list piece. I defer to you on where but we could stick at the end of
>>> this riff as a proof point against the NRA?
>>>
>>> I’ve been fighting for this issue for years. So have families across
>>> the country. Still, the NRA and their allies in Congress have managed to
>>> block even the most commonsense reforms.
>>> ---
>>> Harrell Kirstein
>>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com
>>> 609 915-5662 | @harrellkirstein
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Attaching a draft op-ed from HRC on gun violence for placement in the
>>>> New York Daily News.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know any edits or comments in the next hour or so.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
> Benjamin A. Krauss
> +1 (914) 299-6480
> bakrauss@gmail.com
>
--
Corey Ciorciari
Policy Department
Hillary for America
@CoreyCiorciariPost edited by pjalive21 on0 -
And your issue is?pjalive21 said:CM189191 said:I'm telling you, this conspiracy thing goes all the way to top. Now they got to the VP: Clinton eyes Biden for secretary of state
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/33202CM189191 said:
what? no link to the actual email?Godfather. said:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/28/daughter-eric-garner-slams-clinton-campaign-over-emails-about-fathers-death.html
“I’m troubled by the revelation that you and this campaign actually discussed ‘using’ Eric Garner … Why would you want to ‘use my dad?” she said. “These people will co opt anything to push their agenda. Police violence is not the same as gun violence.
Hillary for president and all costs ?
Godfather.
once again, when you actually read the content it seems pretty benign.
and i hate to toss around the word irony so loosely. but you're accusing the campaign of 'using' Eric Garner to push their agenda, while you're 'using' Erica Garner to push yours.
Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
From:kfinney@hillaryclinton.com
To: nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2016-03-17 21:42
Subject: Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
Agree with 1-3, couple of things - first as former senator from NY we need
an NYC example, either naming a victim or applauding some of the efforts in
the City to deal with the issue like a group of mothers in Harlem or
members of the city council pushing CDC to collect data;
Also reminder that Re: Eric Garner he wasn't killed by a gun it was police
violence.
Last just flagging that one of the more high-profile cases recently
involved two police officers from the precinct right next to the Avalon
apt building a bunch of us live in, I think they were shot sitting in their
car. So would keep the emphasis on young people losing their lives to gun
violence
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Nick Merrill
wrote:
Four small things:
I'd change "him" to "them" in the first line.
I'm not sure I'd say she's lead the fight on the Charleston loophole,
because she really has no power other than to advocate or denounce. Good
to be strong in our language but might lose that first line.
And check the NRA piece with Jen. That played strangely in Ohio for us at
least initially. I think it should stay in but flag that for her.
Finally, I know we have Erica Garner issues but we don't want to mention
Eric at all? I can see her coming after us for leaving him out of the
piece.
On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Corey Ciorciari
wrote:
Here is 55k back-up: http://labs.time.com/story/gun-loophole/
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> This op-ed is live again, and we've made a few revisions. Would be great
> if everyone could take another quick look so we can get to HRC tonight.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Emily Aden
> wrote:
>
>> Research edits attached, need backup on one stat.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Harrell Kirstein <
>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I like it. Since it is the NYDN I think we should add the terrorist
>>> watch list piece. I defer to you on where but we could stick at the end of
>>> this riff as a proof point against the NRA?
>>>
>>> I’ve been fighting for this issue for years. So have families across
>>> the country. Still, the NRA and their allies in Congress have managed to
>>> block even the most commonsense reforms.
>>> ---
>>> Harrell Kirstein
>>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com
>>> 609 915-5662 | @harrellkirstein
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Attaching a draft op-ed from HRC on gun violence for placement in the
>>>> New York Daily News.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know any edits or comments in the next hour or so.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
> Benjamin A. Krauss
> +1 (914) 299-6480
> bakrauss@gmail.com
>
--
Corey Ciorciari
Policy Department
Hillary for America
@CoreyCiorciari09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
someone wanted a link to the wikileak and i obliged....this is what Erica Garner was pissed aboutHalifax2TheMax said:
And your issue is?pjalive21 said:CM189191 said:I'm telling you, this conspiracy thing goes all the way to top. Now they got to the VP: Clinton eyes Biden for secretary of state
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/33202CM189191 said:
what? no link to the actual email?Godfather. said:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/28/daughter-eric-garner-slams-clinton-campaign-over-emails-about-fathers-death.html
“I’m troubled by the revelation that you and this campaign actually discussed ‘using’ Eric Garner … Why would you want to ‘use my dad?” she said. “These people will co opt anything to push their agenda. Police violence is not the same as gun violence.
Hillary for president and all costs ?
Godfather.
once again, when you actually read the content it seems pretty benign.
and i hate to toss around the word irony so loosely. but you're accusing the campaign of 'using' Eric Garner to push their agenda, while you're 'using' Erica Garner to push yours.
Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
From:kfinney@hillaryclinton.com
To: nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2016-03-17 21:42
Subject: Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
Agree with 1-3, couple of things - first as former senator from NY we need
an NYC example, either naming a victim or applauding some of the efforts in
the City to deal with the issue like a group of mothers in Harlem or
members of the city council pushing CDC to collect data;
Also reminder that Re: Eric Garner he wasn't killed by a gun it was police
violence.
Last just flagging that one of the more high-profile cases recently
involved two police officers from the precinct right next to the Avalon
apt building a bunch of us live in, I think they were shot sitting in their
car. So would keep the emphasis on young people losing their lives to gun
violence
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Nick Merrill
wrote:
Four small things:
I'd change "him" to "them" in the first line.
I'm not sure I'd say she's lead the fight on the Charleston loophole,
because she really has no power other than to advocate or denounce. Good
to be strong in our language but might lose that first line.
And check the NRA piece with Jen. That played strangely in Ohio for us at
least initially. I think it should stay in but flag that for her.
Finally, I know we have Erica Garner issues but we don't want to mention
Eric at all? I can see her coming after us for leaving him out of the
piece.
On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Corey Ciorciari
wrote:
Here is 55k back-up: http://labs.time.com/story/gun-loophole/
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> This op-ed is live again, and we've made a few revisions. Would be great
> if everyone could take another quick look so we can get to HRC tonight.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Emily Aden
> wrote:
>
>> Research edits attached, need backup on one stat.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Harrell Kirstein <
>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I like it. Since it is the NYDN I think we should add the terrorist
>>> watch list piece. I defer to you on where but we could stick at the end of
>>> this riff as a proof point against the NRA?
>>>
>>> I’ve been fighting for this issue for years. So have families across
>>> the country. Still, the NRA and their allies in Congress have managed to
>>> block even the most commonsense reforms.
>>> ---
>>> Harrell Kirstein
>>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com
>>> 609 915-5662 | @harrellkirstein
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Attaching a draft op-ed from HRC on gun violence for placement in the
>>>> New York Daily News.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know any edits or comments in the next hour or so.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
> Benjamin A. Krauss
> +1 (914) 299-6480
> bakrauss@gmail.com
>
--
Corey Ciorciari
Policy Department
Hillary for America
@CoreyCiorciari
using her father as part of an anti gun campaign while speaking "ill" of her instead of making the issue about police brutality0 -
I get why your responding but again, what's the issue? Read the email chain in time sequence. The 9:48 or so email says not to use Eric garner in this context. The link provided to the article doesn't mention Eric garner. "Her" could refer to HRC not Eric Garner's wife or sister. Where is this ill will you speak of? Where's the link to the NYP op ed? Did Eric Garner get mentioned there? If so, in what context?pjalive21 said:
someone wanted a link to the wikileak and i obliged....this is what Erica Garner was pissed aboutHalifax2TheMax said:
And your issue is?pjalive21 said:CM189191 said:I'm telling you, this conspiracy thing goes all the way to top. Now they got to the VP: Clinton eyes Biden for secretary of state
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/33202CM189191 said:
what? no link to the actual email?Godfather. said:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/28/daughter-eric-garner-slams-clinton-campaign-over-emails-about-fathers-death.html
“I’m troubled by the revelation that you and this campaign actually discussed ‘using’ Eric Garner … Why would you want to ‘use my dad?” she said. “These people will co opt anything to push their agenda. Police violence is not the same as gun violence.
Hillary for president and all costs ?
Godfather.
once again, when you actually read the content it seems pretty benign.
and i hate to toss around the word irony so loosely. but you're accusing the campaign of 'using' Eric Garner to push their agenda, while you're 'using' Erica Garner to push yours.
Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
From:kfinney@hillaryclinton.com
To: nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2016-03-17 21:42
Subject: Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
Agree with 1-3, couple of things - first as former senator from NY we need
an NYC example, either naming a victim or applauding some of the efforts in
the City to deal with the issue like a group of mothers in Harlem or
members of the city council pushing CDC to collect data;
Also reminder that Re: Eric Garner he wasn't killed by a gun it was police
violence.
Last just flagging that one of the more high-profile cases recently
involved two police officers from the precinct right next to the Avalon
apt building a bunch of us live in, I think they were shot sitting in their
car. So would keep the emphasis on young people losing their lives to gun
violence
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Nick Merrill
wrote:
Four small things:
I'd change "him" to "them" in the first line.
I'm not sure I'd say she's lead the fight on the Charleston loophole,
because she really has no power other than to advocate or denounce. Good
to be strong in our language but might lose that first line.
And check the NRA piece with Jen. That played strangely in Ohio for us at
least initially. I think it should stay in but flag that for her.
Finally, I know we have Erica Garner issues but we don't want to mention
Eric at all? I can see her coming after us for leaving him out of the
piece.
On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Corey Ciorciari
wrote:
Here is 55k back-up: http://labs.time.com/story/gun-loophole/
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> This op-ed is live again, and we've made a few revisions. Would be great
> if everyone could take another quick look so we can get to HRC tonight.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Emily Aden
> wrote:
>
>> Research edits attached, need backup on one stat.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Harrell Kirstein <
>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I like it. Since it is the NYDN I think we should add the terrorist
>>> watch list piece. I defer to you on where but we could stick at the end of
>>> this riff as a proof point against the NRA?
>>>
>>> I’ve been fighting for this issue for years. So have families across
>>> the country. Still, the NRA and their allies in Congress have managed to
>>> block even the most commonsense reforms.
>>> ---
>>> Harrell Kirstein
>>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com
>>> 609 915-5662 | @harrellkirstein
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Attaching a draft op-ed from HRC on gun violence for placement in the
>>>> New York Daily News.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know any edits or comments in the next hour or so.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
> Benjamin A. Krauss
> +1 (914) 299-6480
> bakrauss@gmail.com
>
--
Corey Ciorciari
Policy Department
Hillary for America
@CoreyCiorciari
using her father as part of an anti gun campaign while speaking "ill" of her instead of making the issue about police brutality09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
out of all the things that have come out i personally don't have a big issue with this but i see why Erica Garner might, but its grasping at straws unless there is another email i didn't see and read...they wanted to shift the focus on guns and not police violence...there is an agenda there, but nothing ground breakingHalifax2TheMax said:
I get why your responding but again, what's the issue? Read the email chain in time sequence. The 9:48 or so email says not to use Eric garner in this context. The link provided to the article doesn't mention Eric garner. "Her" could refer to HRC not Eric Garner's wife or sister. Where is this ill will you speak of? Where's the link to the NYP op ed? Did Eric Garner get mentioned there? If so, in what context?pjalive21 said:
someone wanted a link to the wikileak and i obliged....this is what Erica Garner was pissed aboutHalifax2TheMax said:
And your issue is?pjalive21 said:CM189191 said:I'm telling you, this conspiracy thing goes all the way to top. Now they got to the VP: Clinton eyes Biden for secretary of state
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/33202CM189191 said:
what? no link to the actual email?Godfather. said:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/28/daughter-eric-garner-slams-clinton-campaign-over-emails-about-fathers-death.html
“I’m troubled by the revelation that you and this campaign actually discussed ‘using’ Eric Garner … Why would you want to ‘use my dad?” she said. “These people will co opt anything to push their agenda. Police violence is not the same as gun violence.
Hillary for president and all costs ?
Godfather.
once again, when you actually read the content it seems pretty benign.
and i hate to toss around the word irony so loosely. but you're accusing the campaign of 'using' Eric Garner to push their agenda, while you're 'using' Erica Garner to push yours.
Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
From:kfinney@hillaryclinton.com
To: nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2016-03-17 21:42
Subject: Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
Agree with 1-3, couple of things - first as former senator from NY we need
an NYC example, either naming a victim or applauding some of the efforts in
the City to deal with the issue like a group of mothers in Harlem or
members of the city council pushing CDC to collect data;
Also reminder that Re: Eric Garner he wasn't killed by a gun it was police
violence.
Last just flagging that one of the more high-profile cases recently
involved two police officers from the precinct right next to the Avalon
apt building a bunch of us live in, I think they were shot sitting in their
car. So would keep the emphasis on young people losing their lives to gun
violence
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Nick Merrill
wrote:
Four small things:
I'd change "him" to "them" in the first line.
I'm not sure I'd say she's lead the fight on the Charleston loophole,
because she really has no power other than to advocate or denounce. Good
to be strong in our language but might lose that first line.
And check the NRA piece with Jen. That played strangely in Ohio for us at
least initially. I think it should stay in but flag that for her.
Finally, I know we have Erica Garner issues but we don't want to mention
Eric at all? I can see her coming after us for leaving him out of the
piece.
On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Corey Ciorciari
wrote:
Here is 55k back-up: http://labs.time.com/story/gun-loophole/
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> This op-ed is live again, and we've made a few revisions. Would be great
> if everyone could take another quick look so we can get to HRC tonight.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Emily Aden
> wrote:
>
>> Research edits attached, need backup on one stat.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Harrell Kirstein <
>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I like it. Since it is the NYDN I think we should add the terrorist
>>> watch list piece. I defer to you on where but we could stick at the end of
>>> this riff as a proof point against the NRA?
>>>
>>> I’ve been fighting for this issue for years. So have families across
>>> the country. Still, the NRA and their allies in Congress have managed to
>>> block even the most commonsense reforms.
>>> ---
>>> Harrell Kirstein
>>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com
>>> 609 915-5662 | @harrellkirstein
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Attaching a draft op-ed from HRC on gun violence for placement in the
>>>> New York Daily News.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know any edits or comments in the next hour or so.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
> Benjamin A. Krauss
> +1 (914) 299-6480
> bakrauss@gmail.com
>
--
Corey Ciorciari
Policy Department
Hillary for America
@CoreyCiorciari
using her father as part of an anti gun campaign while speaking "ill" of her instead of making the issue about police brutality0 -
Another case of nothing there...Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Yea, the agenda is stricter gun control, something Hillary has been for for decades. In a political campaign no less. The outrage.pjalive21 said:
out of all the things that have come out i personally don't have a big issue with this but i see why Erica Garner might, but its grasping at straws unless there is another email i didn't see and read...they wanted to shift the focus on guns and not police violence...there is an agenda there, but nothing ground breakingHalifax2TheMax said:
I get why your responding but again, what's the issue? Read the email chain in time sequence. The 9:48 or so email says not to use Eric garner in this context. The link provided to the article doesn't mention Eric garner. "Her" could refer to HRC not Eric Garner's wife or sister. Where is this ill will you speak of? Where's the link to the NYP op ed? Did Eric Garner get mentioned there? If so, in what context?pjalive21 said:
someone wanted a link to the wikileak and i obliged....this is what Erica Garner was pissed aboutHalifax2TheMax said:
And your issue is?pjalive21 said:CM189191 said:I'm telling you, this conspiracy thing goes all the way to top. Now they got to the VP: Clinton eyes Biden for secretary of state
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/33202CM189191 said:
what? no link to the actual email?Godfather. said:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/28/daughter-eric-garner-slams-clinton-campaign-over-emails-about-fathers-death.html
“I’m troubled by the revelation that you and this campaign actually discussed ‘using’ Eric Garner … Why would you want to ‘use my dad?” she said. “These people will co opt anything to push their agenda. Police violence is not the same as gun violence.
Hillary for president and all costs ?
Godfather.
once again, when you actually read the content it seems pretty benign.
and i hate to toss around the word irony so loosely. but you're accusing the campaign of 'using' Eric Garner to push their agenda, while you're 'using' Erica Garner to push yours.
Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
From:kfinney@hillaryclinton.com
To: nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2016-03-17 21:42
Subject: Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
Agree with 1-3, couple of things - first as former senator from NY we need
an NYC example, either naming a victim or applauding some of the efforts in
the City to deal with the issue like a group of mothers in Harlem or
members of the city council pushing CDC to collect data;
Also reminder that Re: Eric Garner he wasn't killed by a gun it was police
violence.
Last just flagging that one of the more high-profile cases recently
involved two police officers from the precinct right next to the Avalon
apt building a bunch of us live in, I think they were shot sitting in their
car. So would keep the emphasis on young people losing their lives to gun
violence
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Nick Merrill
wrote:
Four small things:
I'd change "him" to "them" in the first line.
I'm not sure I'd say she's lead the fight on the Charleston loophole,
because she really has no power other than to advocate or denounce. Good
to be strong in our language but might lose that first line.
And check the NRA piece with Jen. That played strangely in Ohio for us at
least initially. I think it should stay in but flag that for her.
Finally, I know we have Erica Garner issues but we don't want to mention
Eric at all? I can see her coming after us for leaving him out of the
piece.
On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Corey Ciorciari
wrote:
Here is 55k back-up: http://labs.time.com/story/gun-loophole/
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> This op-ed is live again, and we've made a few revisions. Would be great
> if everyone could take another quick look so we can get to HRC tonight.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Emily Aden
> wrote:
>
>> Research edits attached, need backup on one stat.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Harrell Kirstein <
>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I like it. Since it is the NYDN I think we should add the terrorist
>>> watch list piece. I defer to you on where but we could stick at the end of
>>> this riff as a proof point against the NRA?
>>>
>>> I’ve been fighting for this issue for years. So have families across
>>> the country. Still, the NRA and their allies in Congress have managed to
>>> block even the most commonsense reforms.
>>> ---
>>> Harrell Kirstein
>>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com
>>> 609 915-5662 | @harrellkirstein
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Attaching a draft op-ed from HRC on gun violence for placement in the
>>>> New York Daily News.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know any edits or comments in the next hour or so.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
> Benjamin A. Krauss
> +1 (914) 299-6480
> bakrauss@gmail.com
>
--
Corey Ciorciari
Policy Department
Hillary for America
@CoreyCiorciari
using her father as part of an anti gun campaign while speaking "ill" of her instead of making the issue about police brutality
I've read probably at least 20 of these types of posts where the poster makes a claim, posts the alleged emails and imbedd links and after spending some time reading through it all, it turns out to be complete horseshit. When I've challenged the original poster with questions or calling it out as horseshit, I've been ignored or gotten a response like yours, no big deal.
Yawn. Distort and distract. Turd Blossom is proud.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
That's the Fox News formula. Horseshit.Halifax2TheMax said:
Yea, the agenda is stricter gun control, something Hillary has been for for decades. In a political campaign no less. The outrage.pjalive21 said:
out of all the things that have come out i personally don't have a big issue with this but i see why Erica Garner might, but its grasping at straws unless there is another email i didn't see and read...they wanted to shift the focus on guns and not police violence...there is an agenda there, but nothing ground breakingHalifax2TheMax said:
I get why your responding but again, what's the issue? Read the email chain in time sequence. The 9:48 or so email says not to use Eric garner in this context. The link provided to the article doesn't mention Eric garner. "Her" could refer to HRC not Eric Garner's wife or sister. Where is this ill will you speak of? Where's the link to the NYP op ed? Did Eric Garner get mentioned there? If so, in what context?pjalive21 said:
someone wanted a link to the wikileak and i obliged....this is what Erica Garner was pissed aboutHalifax2TheMax said:
And your issue is?pjalive21 said:CM189191 said:I'm telling you, this conspiracy thing goes all the way to top. Now they got to the VP: Clinton eyes Biden for secretary of state
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/33202CM189191 said:
what? no link to the actual email?Godfather. said:http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/28/daughter-eric-garner-slams-clinton-campaign-over-emails-about-fathers-death.html
“I’m troubled by the revelation that you and this campaign actually discussed ‘using’ Eric Garner … Why would you want to ‘use my dad?” she said. “These people will co opt anything to push their agenda. Police violence is not the same as gun violence.
Hillary for president and all costs ?
Godfather.
once again, when you actually read the content it seems pretty benign.
and i hate to toss around the word irony so loosely. but you're accusing the campaign of 'using' Eric Garner to push their agenda, while you're 'using' Erica Garner to push yours.
Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
From:kfinney@hillaryclinton.com
To: nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com
Date: 2016-03-17 21:42
Subject: Re: HRC Op-Ed on Gun Violence
Agree with 1-3, couple of things - first as former senator from NY we need
an NYC example, either naming a victim or applauding some of the efforts in
the City to deal with the issue like a group of mothers in Harlem or
members of the city council pushing CDC to collect data;
Also reminder that Re: Eric Garner he wasn't killed by a gun it was police
violence.
Last just flagging that one of the more high-profile cases recently
involved two police officers from the precinct right next to the Avalon
apt building a bunch of us live in, I think they were shot sitting in their
car. So would keep the emphasis on young people losing their lives to gun
violence
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2016, at 6:58 PM, Nick Merrill
wrote:
Four small things:
I'd change "him" to "them" in the first line.
I'm not sure I'd say she's lead the fight on the Charleston loophole,
because she really has no power other than to advocate or denounce. Good
to be strong in our language but might lose that first line.
And check the NRA piece with Jen. That played strangely in Ohio for us at
least initially. I think it should stay in but flag that for her.
Finally, I know we have Erica Garner issues but we don't want to mention
Eric at all? I can see her coming after us for leaving him out of the
piece.
On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Corey Ciorciari
wrote:
Here is 55k back-up: http://labs.time.com/story/gun-loophole/
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> This op-ed is live again, and we've made a few revisions. Would be great
> if everyone could take another quick look so we can get to HRC tonight.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Emily Aden
> wrote:
>
>> Research edits attached, need backup on one stat.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Harrell Kirstein <
>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I like it. Since it is the NYDN I think we should add the terrorist
>>> watch list piece. I defer to you on where but we could stick at the end of
>>> this riff as a proof point against the NRA?
>>>
>>> I’ve been fighting for this issue for years. So have families across
>>> the country. Still, the NRA and their allies in Congress have managed to
>>> block even the most commonsense reforms.
>>> ---
>>> Harrell Kirstein
>>> hkirstein@hillaryclinton.com
>>> 609 915-5662 | @harrellkirstein
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Ben Krauss wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Attaching a draft op-ed from HRC on gun violence for placement in the
>>>> New York Daily News.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know any edits or comments in the next hour or so.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
> Benjamin A. Krauss
> +1 (914) 299-6480
> bakrauss@gmail.com
>
--
Corey Ciorciari
Policy Department
Hillary for America
@CoreyCiorciari
using her father as part of an anti gun campaign while speaking "ill" of her instead of making the issue about police brutality
I've read probably at least 20 of these types of posts where the poster makes a claim, posts the alleged emails and imbedd links and after spending some time reading through it all, it turns out to be complete horseshit. When I've challenged the original poster with questions or calling it out as horseshit, I've been ignored or gotten a response like yours, no big deal.
Yawn. Distort and distract. Turd Blossom is proud.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
Has anyone ever met anyone who actually likes Hillary Clinton? Several of you are voting for her, but do you actually like her? Most of the people I've met who are supporting her are mainly supporting her because of trump or because she's the left candidate.
Does this kind of explain why she can't get people to turn out for her live events?
0 -
LOL...more with the attendance?tonifig8 said:Has anyone ever met anyone who actually likes Hillary Clinton? Several of you are voting for her, but do you actually like her? Most of the people I've met who are supporting her are mainly supporting her because of trump or because she's the left candidate.
Does this kind of explain why she can't get people to turn out for her live events?
Yes I like her. I know a lot of people that like her and can't get over the bullshit she is having to go through.
I've said a few times on here...she is getting worse treatment as a woman than Obama did as an African American. Unreal.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20 -
I've liked her for a long time...and I liked her even more after she had her alien baby.tonifig8 said:Has anyone ever met anyone who actually likes Hillary Clinton? Several of you are voting for her, but do you actually like her? Most of the people I've met who are supporting her are mainly supporting her because of trump or because she's the left candidate.
Does this kind of explain why she can't get people to turn out for her live events?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkSm1Pgyy7w
Falling down,...not staying down0 -
Wait... First off, that's your screwed up personal opionion. The fact that she has been consistently polling so high in the negative department for over a year is reality. Second, She's getting the worst treatment because why? You honestly can't be that blind to the fact that she herself is doing this to herself. We believed, before the leaks, that she was screwed up and now with the leaks it proves it. People disliked her for being a two face politician, amongst many other reasons, and the leaks have proven that to be fact.Gern Blansten said:
LOL...more with the attendance?tonifig8 said:Has anyone ever met anyone who actually likes Hillary Clinton? Several of you are voting for her, but do you actually like her? Most of the people I've met who are supporting her are mainly supporting her because of trump or because she's the left candidate.
Does this kind of explain why she can't get people to turn out for her live events?
Yes I like her. I know a lot of people that like her and can't get over the bullshit she is having to go through.
I've said a few times on here...she is getting worse treatment as a woman than Obama did as an African American. Unreal.
You've said it yourself several times that wasn't the best candidate. Not only that, but the fact is that you are a former BernieBro, or was that all BS? Therefore there was definitely a better option for you.
Her having attendance issues has always been the case. That was the case during the primaries. There's no need to play games here. It is what it is.
Post edited by Boxes&Books on0 -
Polling negative because of bullshit attacks.tonifig8 said:
Wait... First off, that's your screwed up personal opionion. The fact that she has been consistently polling so high in the negative department for over a year is reality. Second, She's getting the worst treatment because why? You honestly can't be that blind to the fact that she herself is doing this to herself. We believed before the leaks, and now with the leaks it proves it. People disliked her for being a two face politician, amongst many other reasons, and the leaks have proven that to be fact.Gern Blansten said:
LOL...more with the attendance?tonifig8 said:Has anyone ever met anyone who actually likes Hillary Clinton? Several of you are voting for her, but do you actually like her? Most of the people I've met who are supporting her are mainly supporting her because of trump or because she's the left candidate.
Does this kind of explain why she can't get people to turn out for her live events?
Yes I like her. I know a lot of people that like her and can't get over the bullshit she is having to go through.
I've said a few times on here...she is getting worse treatment as a woman than Obama did as an African American. Unreal.
You've said it yourself several times that wasn't the best candidate. Not only that, but the fact is that you are a former BernieBro, or was that all BS? Therefore there was definitely a better option for you.
Her having attendance issues has always been the case. That was the case during the primaries. There's no need to play games here. It is what it is.
No I don't believe she is doing it to herself. Look at the fucking emails. Admit it...you expected to see some really damaging shit in there and there isn't any.
She's a politician yes....she was nominated over Bernie Sanders and one other guy. No one else wanted to go up against her.
It remains to be seen how the election will turn out but a significant win for Clinton will show you how lopsided the coverage is. She wins because of people like me. Reasonable, intelligent people that see through the bullshit that you can't see through.Remember the Thomas Nine !! (10/02/2018)
The Golden Age is 2 months away. And guess what….. you’re gonna love it! (teskeinc 11.19.24)
1998: Noblesville; 2003: Noblesville; 2009: EV Nashville, Chicago, Chicago
2010: St Louis, Columbus, Noblesville; 2011: EV Chicago, East Troy, East Troy
2013: London ON, Wrigley; 2014: Cincy, St Louis, Moline (NO CODE)
2016: Lexington, Wrigley #1; 2018: Wrigley, Wrigley, Boston, Boston
2020: Oakland, Oakland: 2021: EV Ohana, Ohana, Ohana, Ohana
2022: Oakland, Oakland, Nashville, Louisville; 2023: Chicago, Chicago, Noblesville
2024: Noblesville, Wrigley, Wrigley, Ohana, Ohana; 2025: Pitt1, Pitt20
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help