DONE.

2

Comments

  • MedozK
    MedozK Tennessee Posts: 9,212
    Would a Binaural get it?
  • PP193448
    PP193448 Here Posts: 4,282
    That might get mine if she's not interested.
    2006 Clev,Pitt; 2008 NY MSGx2; 2010 Columbus; 2012 Missoula; 2013 Phoenix,Vancouver,Seattle; 2014 Cincy; 2016 Lex, Wrigley 1&2; 2018 Wrigley 1&2; 2022 Louisville
  • MedozK
    MedozK Tennessee Posts: 9,212
    edited May 2015
    PP193448 said:

    That might get mine if she's not interested.

    Sorry, I wouldn't trade that, I'm just looking for the vinyl ballpark for trade ideas.

    The average sales prices of these on ebay is around $100, so I would think something of equivalent value would be good.
    Post edited by MedozK on
  • PP193448
    PP193448 Here Posts: 4,282
    Ahhh, gotcha. Are you in need of this too, as well as Paul??
    2006 Clev,Pitt; 2008 NY MSGx2; 2010 Columbus; 2012 Missoula; 2013 Phoenix,Vancouver,Seattle; 2014 Cincy; 2016 Lex, Wrigley 1&2; 2018 Wrigley 1&2; 2022 Louisville
  • leach7
    leach7 Posts: 403
    PM Sent
  • benjs
    benjs Toronto, ON Posts: 9,433
    If anyone in Canada is looking for a Lavender Music for Vinyl, I'd trade it (with additional cash if need be) for Riot Act, Lost Dogs, No Code, RVM, or Binaural - aka any studio album I still need. Thanks fellow humans!
    '05 - TO, '06 - TO 1, '08 - NYC 1 & 2, '09 - TO, Chi 1 & 2, '10 - Buffalo, NYC 1 & 2, '11 - TO 1 & 2, Hamilton, '13 - Buffalo, Brooklyn 1 & 2, '15 - Global Citizen, '16 - TO 1 & 2, Chi 2

    EV
    Toronto Film Festival 9/11/2007, '08 - Toronto 1 & 2, '09 - Albany 1, '11 - Chicago 1
  • pdalowsky
    pdalowsky Doncaster,UK Posts: 15,253
    PP193448 said:

    Ahhh, gotcha. Are you in need of this too, as well as Paul??

    No Pat but was fascinated by the reply 'it's there' and its 'not hard to understand'

    Would love to help Trey but it's like boxing in the dark
  • PP193448
    PP193448 Here Posts: 4,282
    I'll keep my eyes peeled for one too for him.
    2006 Clev,Pitt; 2008 NY MSGx2; 2010 Columbus; 2012 Missoula; 2013 Phoenix,Vancouver,Seattle; 2014 Cincy; 2016 Lex, Wrigley 1&2; 2018 Wrigley 1&2; 2022 Louisville
  • courtmcc
    courtmcc South Jersey Posts: 1,143
    pdalowsky said:

    PP193448 said:

    Ahhh, gotcha. Are you in need of this too, as well as Paul??

    No Pat but was fascinated by the reply 'it's there' and its 'not hard to understand'

    Would love to help Trey but it's like boxing in the dark
    No, it's not. I have what I want in the post. Give it a rest. You're just picking a fight with me at this point. Just stop. I'm just trying to make a trade.
  • KC2917
    KC2917 Posts: 872
    courtmcc said:

    pdalowsky said:

    PP193448 said:

    Ahhh, gotcha. Are you in need of this too, as well as Paul??

    No Pat but was fascinated by the reply 'it's there' and its 'not hard to understand'

    Would love to help Trey but it's like boxing in the dark
    No, it's not. I have what I want in the post. Give it a rest. You're just picking a fight with me at this point. Just stop. I'm just trying to make a trade.
    Right. Because "anything else Mike related" is so specific. Except, of course, for those Mike related things already mentioned. So what you really meant was "anything else Mike related... Except for the stuff I don't want."

    Get it now Paul? It really can't be spelled out any clearer.
  • pdalowsky
    pdalowsky Doncaster,UK Posts: 15,253
    KC2917 said:

    courtmcc said:

    pdalowsky said:

    PP193448 said:

    Ahhh, gotcha. Are you in need of this too, as well as Paul??

    No Pat but was fascinated by the reply 'it's there' and its 'not hard to understand'

    Would love to help Trey but it's like boxing in the dark
    No, it's not. I have what I want in the post. Give it a rest. You're just picking a fight with me at this point. Just stop. I'm just trying to make a trade.
    Right. Because "anything else Mike related" is so specific. Except, of course, for those Mike related things already mentioned. So what you really meant was "anything else Mike related... Except for the stuff I don't want."

    Get it now Paul? It really can't be spelled out any clearer.
    LOL

    exactly this, there is no picking a fight. But a few good folk asked you what you would like specifically to trade for in the hope of making that trade. and the reply was 'its there'. that was before you even updated the first post to add 'no xmas singles other than the 91'. It just said something like PJ vinyls and picks from before avocado. So naturally people are going to ask the question 'what exactly would you like'.

    IMO replies such as 'its there' - when it clearly wasn't, and then

    'its not that hard to understand'.....was just rude and off hand when in fact the original post is a clear as mud.

    So no, there is no picking a fight whatsoever, just a little frustration at the way you handled reasonable enquiries.

    Regardless good luck in finding a trade for whatever it might be you will accept.
  • courtmcc
    courtmcc South Jersey Posts: 1,143
    pdalowsky said:

    KC2917 said:

    courtmcc said:

    pdalowsky said:

    PP193448 said:

    Ahhh, gotcha. Are you in need of this too, as well as Paul??

    No Pat but was fascinated by the reply 'it's there' and its 'not hard to understand'

    Would love to help Trey but it's like boxing in the dark
    No, it's not. I have what I want in the post. Give it a rest. You're just picking a fight with me at this point. Just stop. I'm just trying to make a trade.
    Right. Because "anything else Mike related" is so specific. Except, of course, for those Mike related things already mentioned. So what you really meant was "anything else Mike related... Except for the stuff I don't want."

    Get it now Paul? It really can't be spelled out any clearer.
    LOL

    exactly this, there is no picking a fight. But a few good folk asked you what you would like specifically to trade for in the hope of making that trade. and the reply was 'its there'. that was before you even updated the first post to add 'no xmas singles other than the 91'. It just said something like PJ vinyls and picks from before avocado. So naturally people are going to ask the question 'what exactly would you like'.

    IMO replies such as 'its there' - when it clearly wasn't, and then

    'its not that hard to understand'.....was just rude and off hand when in fact the original post is a clear as mud.

    So no, there is no picking a fight whatsoever, just a little frustration at the way you handled reasonable enquiries.

    Regardless good luck in finding a trade for whatever it might be you will accept.
    You were rude from the beginning so I really don't want to hear about me being rude. Don't be an asshole. This isn't the first time you've attacked one of my post.
  • pdalowsky
    pdalowsky Doncaster,UK Posts: 15,253
    courtmcc said:

    pdalowsky said:

    KC2917 said:

    courtmcc said:

    pdalowsky said:

    PP193448 said:

    Ahhh, gotcha. Are you in need of this too, as well as Paul??

    No Pat but was fascinated by the reply 'it's there' and its 'not hard to understand'

    Would love to help Trey but it's like boxing in the dark
    No, it's not. I have what I want in the post. Give it a rest. You're just picking a fight with me at this point. Just stop. I'm just trying to make a trade.
    Right. Because "anything else Mike related" is so specific. Except, of course, for those Mike related things already mentioned. So what you really meant was "anything else Mike related... Except for the stuff I don't want."

    Get it now Paul? It really can't be spelled out any clearer.
    LOL

    exactly this, there is no picking a fight. But a few good folk asked you what you would like specifically to trade for in the hope of making that trade. and the reply was 'its there'. that was before you even updated the first post to add 'no xmas singles other than the 91'. It just said something like PJ vinyls and picks from before avocado. So naturally people are going to ask the question 'what exactly would you like'.

    IMO replies such as 'its there' - when it clearly wasn't, and then

    'its not that hard to understand'.....was just rude and off hand when in fact the original post is a clear as mud.

    So no, there is no picking a fight whatsoever, just a little frustration at the way you handled reasonable enquiries.

    Regardless good luck in finding a trade for whatever it might be you will accept.
    You were rude from the beginning so I really don't want to hear about me being rude. Don't be an asshole. This isn't the first time you've attacked one of my post.
    ah whatever, I wasn't rude, just asked for clarity, which still hasn't been forthcoming. Id love to know which other post I attacked......think you are maybe confusing me for someone else.
  • juddboz80
    juddboz80 Posts: 2,141
    pdalowsky said:

    courtmcc said:

    pdalowsky said:

    KC2917 said:

    courtmcc said:

    pdalowsky said:

    PP193448 said:

    Ahhh, gotcha. Are you in need of this too, as well as Paul??

    No Pat but was fascinated by the reply 'it's there' and its 'not hard to understand'

    Would love to help Trey but it's like boxing in the dark
    No, it's not. I have what I want in the post. Give it a rest. You're just picking a fight with me at this point. Just stop. I'm just trying to make a trade.
    Right. Because "anything else Mike related" is so specific. Except, of course, for those Mike related things already mentioned. So what you really meant was "anything else Mike related... Except for the stuff I don't want."

    Get it now Paul? It really can't be spelled out any clearer.
    LOL

    exactly this, there is no picking a fight. But a few good folk asked you what you would like specifically to trade for in the hope of making that trade. and the reply was 'its there'. that was before you even updated the first post to add 'no xmas singles other than the 91'. It just said something like PJ vinyls and picks from before avocado. So naturally people are going to ask the question 'what exactly would you like'.

    IMO replies such as 'its there' - when it clearly wasn't, and then

    'its not that hard to understand'.....was just rude and off hand when in fact the original post is a clear as mud.

    So no, there is no picking a fight whatsoever, just a little frustration at the way you handled reasonable enquiries.

    Regardless good luck in finding a trade for whatever it might be you will accept.
    You were rude from the beginning so I really don't want to hear about me being rude. Don't be an asshole. This isn't the first time you've attacked one of my post.
    ah whatever, I wasn't rude, just asked for clarity, which still hasn't been forthcoming. Id love to know which other post I attacked......think you are maybe confusing me for someone else.
    pdalowsky said:

    courtmcc said:

    pdalowsky said:

    KC2917 said:

    courtmcc said:

    pdalowsky said:

    PP193448 said:

    Ahhh, gotcha. Are you in need of this too, as well as Paul??

    No Pat but was fascinated by the reply 'it's there' and its 'not hard to understand'

    Would love to help Trey but it's like boxing in the dark
    No, it's not. I have what I want in the post. Give it a rest. You're just picking a fight with me at this point. Just stop. I'm just trying to make a trade.
    Right. Because "anything else Mike related" is so specific. Except, of course, for those Mike related things already mentioned. So what you really meant was "anything else Mike related... Except for the stuff I don't want."

    Get it now Paul? It really can't be spelled out any clearer.
    LOL

    exactly this, there is no picking a fight. But a few good folk asked you what you would like specifically to trade for in the hope of making that trade. and the reply was 'its there'. that was before you even updated the first post to add 'no xmas singles other than the 91'. It just said something like PJ vinyls and picks from before avocado. So naturally people are going to ask the question 'what exactly would you like'.

    IMO replies such as 'its there' - when it clearly wasn't, and then

    'its not that hard to understand'.....was just rude and off hand when in fact the original post is a clear as mud.

    So no, there is no picking a fight whatsoever, just a little frustration at the way you handled reasonable enquiries.

    Regardless good luck in finding a trade for whatever it might be you will accept.
    You were rude from the beginning so I really don't want to hear about me being rude. Don't be an asshole. This isn't the first time you've attacked one of my post.
    ah whatever, I wasn't rude, just asked for clarity, which still hasn't been forthcoming. Id love to know which other post I attacked......think you are maybe confusing me for someone else.
    I asked what you would trade for when this thread was first started Just so I had a clue what you could be interested in and still don't have a clue as to what your looking for!

    would u take a Jeff ament feels like pj40 pick??
    Cant buy what i want cause its free....
  • MayDay10
    MayDay10 Posts: 11,886
    wow.

    All those quotes looks trippy
  • courtmcc
    courtmcc South Jersey Posts: 1,143
    edited May 2015
    If you would like to do a trade, please PM me.
  • i have a few MM elements picks FT OP. any interest? also MM shadow 10" vinyl FT. let me know?
    First: ATL2 04/03/1994
    Last: SEA2 08/10/2018
    Next: ??
    http://expressobeans.com/members/collections.php?id=29417
    “I think you won, but I enjoyed the fight” - EV
  • courtmcc
    courtmcc South Jersey Posts: 1,143

    i have a few MM elements picks FT OP. any interest? also MM shadow 10" vinyl FT. let me know?

    I got them, sorry!
  • courtmcc
    courtmcc South Jersey Posts: 1,143
    Bump
  • jasonrolfe
    jasonrolfe Posts: 474
    I have the first X-Mas single and a signed bobble head. Would you be willing to trade that for the Lavender and an Avocado LP. I'm missing Avocado.
    2005: Kitchener / London / Hamilton | 2006: Toronto 1&2 | 2010: Hartford | 2011: Toronto 1&2 / Hamilton
    2013: London, Brooklyn 1&2 | 2014: Detroit | 2015: New York | 2016: Ottawa / Toronto 1 / Wrigley 1