Any chance this is a see I'm conservative but not racist because I just linked a black guy being critical of Obama post?
You might want to do better research on your targets, try going beyond the past six months if possible. You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
Any chance this is a see I'm conservative but not racist because I just linked a black guy being critical of Obama post?
You might want to do better research on your targets, try going beyond the past six months if possible. You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
I'm open to doing some research. Too many people with robot names in here.
Any chance this is a see I'm conservative but not racist because I just linked a black guy being critical of Obama post?
You might want to do better research on your targets, try going beyond the past six months if possible. You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
I'm open to doing some research. Too many people with robot names in here.
Dont ya think a true racist conservative would have been triggered by the kidnapped mentally challenged guy by 4 african americans hollering "Fk trump, Fk white people" and posted something about it other than "is this terrorism"? Thats like total racist conservative shit eating headlines, as someone recently described on here.
Any chance this is a see I'm conservative but not racist because I just linked a black guy being critical of Obama post?
You might want to do better research on your targets, try going beyond the past six months if possible. You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
I'm open to doing some research. Too many people with robot names in here.
this made me laugh out loud at my desk. I often wonder how people have any fucking clue who they are talking to now with all of these numerical screen names.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
Any chance this is a see I'm conservative but not racist because I just linked a black guy being critical of Obama post?
You might want to do better research on your targets, try going beyond the past six months if possible. You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
I'm open to doing some research. Too many people with robot names in here.
this made me laugh out loud at my desk. I often wonder how people have any fucking clue who they are talking to now with all of these numerical screen names.
can i change it? i thought i couldnt once i missed the deadline. if so i want Leninist
Your empty poster tube of air and sealed vinyl are on Elm Street. Do you know this place?
I will ask tenclub where this place is thank you. Please anyone else who doesn't want to help don't respond I really want it back. Tenclub where is Elm street?
Any chance this is a see I'm conservative but not racist because I just linked a black guy being critical of Obama post?
You might want to do better research on your targets, try going beyond the past six months if possible. You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
I'm open to doing some research. Too many people with robot names in here.
this made me laugh out loud at my desk. I often wonder how people have any fucking clue who they are talking to now with all of these numerical screen names.
can i change it? i thought i couldnt once i missed the deadline. if so i want Leninist
there was once a time you could change it on your own. then they updated the website and you no longer had that option, so I got it changed by pm-ing a mod. although not since the newest website update, so I'm not sure if they can still do it.
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
Any chance this is a see I'm conservative but not racist because I just linked a black guy being critical of Obama post?
You might want to do better research on your targets, try going beyond the past six months if possible. You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
I left this crumb yesterday before pissgate broke!
According to retired Army Colonel Earl Hopper, McCain divulged classified information North Vietnam used to hone their air defense system, including “the package routes, which were routes used to bomb North Vietnam. He gave in detail the altitude they were flying, the direction, if they made a turn … he gave them what primary targets the United States was interested in.” As result, Hopper claims, the U.S. lost 60 per cent more aircraft, and in 1968 “called off the bombing of North Vietnam, because of the information McCain had given to them.”
Any chance this is a see I'm conservative but not racist because I just linked a black guy being critical of Obama post?
You might want to do better research on your targets, try going beyond the past six months if possible. You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
I left this crumb yesterday before pissgate broke!
According to retired Army Colonel Earl Hopper, McCain divulged classified information North Vietnam used to hone their air defense system, including “the package routes, which were routes used to bomb North Vietnam. He gave in detail the altitude they were flying, the direction, if they made a turn … he gave them what primary targets the United States was interested in.” As result, Hopper claims, the U.S. lost 60 per cent more aircraft, and in 1968 “called off the bombing of North Vietnam, because of the information McCain had given to them.”
Sounds like an apologist for the Johnson/Nixon/Kissinger policy failure. And another one of your doozy turd droppings.
Kiley says he bases his most damning charges against McCain — that McCain gave information about the schedule of U.S. attacks in Vietnam in 1967, the year his plane was shot down and McCain was captured — on the word of Earl Hopper, a retired Army colonel.
In an interview, Hopper's wife, Patty, said that Hopper wasn't able to address the charges over the phone because of poor hearing. She said that Hopper has long been involved in the POW movement and that Earl Hopper's son, Earl Jr., is missing in action in Vietnam.
She cited as evidence for Hopper's charges a 1973 article by McCain that ran in U.S. News and World Report and what she said were "declassified U.S. military documents" she claimed to possess describing McCain's collaboration. Patty Hopper said she was away from her Arizona home and could not fax those documents.
But the 1973 article does not back up the charges made in the flyer. It provides the same basic account as McCain's book, corroborated by Timberg's book, which was based on interviews with many POWs.
Timberg, Day and Swindle noted that McCain, the son of a Navy admiral, was offered an early release from the prison but refused so that he could adhere to the military's code of conduct.
Timberg said he was perplexed by the allegations.
"Why do they hate him? There can be lots of issues you disagree with him about. But why try to destroy him?"
Because of the seriousness of the charge, the utter absence of evidence and the clear intention to harm McCain just days before a critical Republican primary, we find this claim to be Pants on Fire wrong.
But that's your MO, throw so much garbage out there realizing your target audience doesn't have the time nor inclination to fact check every post, read every email and follow up with a rebuttal. If ignored, it begins to be the "truth." Say hello to Putin and don't forget your shower cap.
Any chance this is a see I'm conservative but not racist because I just linked a black guy being critical of Obama post?
You might want to do better research on your targets, try going beyond the past six months if possible. You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
I left this crumb yesterday before pissgate broke!
According to retired Army Colonel Earl Hopper, McCain divulged classified information North Vietnam used to hone their air defense system, including “the package routes, which were routes used to bomb North Vietnam. He gave in detail the altitude they were flying, the direction, if they made a turn … he gave them what primary targets the United States was interested in.” As result, Hopper claims, the U.S. lost 60 per cent more aircraft, and in 1968 “called off the bombing of North Vietnam, because of the information McCain had given to them.”
Sounds like an apologist for the Johnson/Nixon/Kissinger policy failure. And another one of your doozy turd droppings.
Kiley says he bases his most damning charges against McCain — that McCain gave information about the schedule of U.S. attacks in Vietnam in 1967, the year his plane was shot down and McCain was captured — on the word of Earl Hopper, a retired Army colonel.
In an interview, Hopper's wife, Patty, said that Hopper wasn't able to address the charges over the phone because of poor hearing. She said that Hopper has long been involved in the POW movement and that Earl Hopper's son, Earl Jr., is missing in action in Vietnam.
She cited as evidence for Hopper's charges a 1973 article by McCain that ran in U.S. News and World Report and what she said were "declassified U.S. military documents" she claimed to possess describing McCain's collaboration. Patty Hopper said she was away from her Arizona home and could not fax those documents.
But the 1973 article does not back up the charges made in the flyer. It provides the same basic account as McCain's book, corroborated by Timberg's book, which was based on interviews with many POWs.
Timberg, Day and Swindle noted that McCain, the son of a Navy admiral, was offered an early release from the prison but refused so that he could adhere to the military's code of conduct.
Timberg said he was perplexed by the allegations.
"Why do they hate him? There can be lots of issues you disagree with him about. But why try to destroy him?"
Because of the seriousness of the charge, the utter absence of evidence and the clear intention to harm McCain just days before a critical Republican primary, we find this claim to be Pants on Fire wrong.
But that's your MO, throw so much garbage out there realizing your target audience doesn't have the time nor inclination to fact check every post, read every email and follow up with a rebuttal. If ignored, it begins to be the "truth." Say hello to Putin and don't forget your shower cap.
My source is the horse your source politifact through the wife, but your source is more credible, makes perfect sense. Great rebuttal. Your like undefeated at this.
Any chance this is a see I'm conservative but not racist because I just linked a black guy being critical of Obama post?
You might want to do better research on your targets, try going beyond the past six months if possible. You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
I left this crumb yesterday before pissgate broke!
According to retired Army Colonel Earl Hopper, McCain divulged classified information North Vietnam used to hone their air defense system, including “the package routes, which were routes used to bomb North Vietnam. He gave in detail the altitude they were flying, the direction, if they made a turn … he gave them what primary targets the United States was interested in.” As result, Hopper claims, the U.S. lost 60 per cent more aircraft, and in 1968 “called off the bombing of North Vietnam, because of the information McCain had given to them.”
Sounds like an apologist for the Johnson/Nixon/Kissinger policy failure. And another one of your doozy turd droppings.
Kiley says he bases his most damning charges against McCain — that McCain gave information about the schedule of U.S. attacks in Vietnam in 1967, the year his plane was shot down and McCain was captured — on the word of Earl Hopper, a retired Army colonel.
In an interview, Hopper's wife, Patty, said that Hopper wasn't able to address the charges over the phone because of poor hearing. She said that Hopper has long been involved in the POW movement and that Earl Hopper's son, Earl Jr., is missing in action in Vietnam.
She cited as evidence for Hopper's charges a 1973 article by McCain that ran in U.S. News and World Report and what she said were "declassified U.S. military documents" she claimed to possess describing McCain's collaboration. Patty Hopper said she was away from her Arizona home and could not fax those documents.
But the 1973 article does not back up the charges made in the flyer. It provides the same basic account as McCain's book, corroborated by Timberg's book, which was based on interviews with many POWs.
Timberg, Day and Swindle noted that McCain, the son of a Navy admiral, was offered an early release from the prison but refused so that he could adhere to the military's code of conduct.
Timberg said he was perplexed by the allegations.
"Why do they hate him? There can be lots of issues you disagree with him about. But why try to destroy him?"
Because of the seriousness of the charge, the utter absence of evidence and the clear intention to harm McCain just days before a critical Republican primary, we find this claim to be Pants on Fire wrong.
But that's your MO, throw so much garbage out there realizing your target audience doesn't have the time nor inclination to fact check every post, read every email and follow up with a rebuttal. If ignored, it begins to be the "truth." Say hello to Putin and don't forget your shower cap.
My source is the horse your source politifact through the wife, but your source is more credible, makes perfect sense. Great rebuttal. Your like undefeated at this.
Wrong. My source cites multiple sources inclusive of attempting to contact your sole source for which they were denied. You only cited your sole source. Who apparently is aligned with those with an ax to grind. What is politifact's motivation to "lie", "shade the truth" or otherwise protect McCain? Now ask the same of your sole source, your horses ass.
Any chance this is a see I'm conservative but not racist because I just linked a black guy being critical of Obama post?
You might want to do better research on your targets, try going beyond the past six months if possible. You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
I left this crumb yesterday before pissgate broke!
According to retired Army Colonel Earl Hopper, McCain divulged classified information North Vietnam used to hone their air defense system, including “the package routes, which were routes used to bomb North Vietnam. He gave in detail the altitude they were flying, the direction, if they made a turn … he gave them what primary targets the United States was interested in.” As result, Hopper claims, the U.S. lost 60 per cent more aircraft, and in 1968 “called off the bombing of North Vietnam, because of the information McCain had given to them.”
Sounds like an apologist for the Johnson/Nixon/Kissinger policy failure. And another one of your doozy turd droppings.
Kiley says he bases his most damning charges against McCain — that McCain gave information about the schedule of U.S. attacks in Vietnam in 1967, the year his plane was shot down and McCain was captured — on the word of Earl Hopper, a retired Army colonel.
In an interview, Hopper's wife, Patty, said that Hopper wasn't able to address the charges over the phone because of poor hearing. She said that Hopper has long been involved in the POW movement and that Earl Hopper's son, Earl Jr., is missing in action in Vietnam.
She cited as evidence for Hopper's charges a 1973 article by McCain that ran in U.S. News and World Report and what she said were "declassified U.S. military documents" she claimed to possess describing McCain's collaboration. Patty Hopper said she was away from her Arizona home and could not fax those documents.
But the 1973 article does not back up the charges made in the flyer. It provides the same basic account as McCain's book, corroborated by Timberg's book, which was based on interviews with many POWs.
Timberg, Day and Swindle noted that McCain, the son of a Navy admiral, was offered an early release from the prison but refused so that he could adhere to the military's code of conduct.
Timberg said he was perplexed by the allegations.
"Why do they hate him? There can be lots of issues you disagree with him about. But why try to destroy him?"
Because of the seriousness of the charge, the utter absence of evidence and the clear intention to harm McCain just days before a critical Republican primary, we find this claim to be Pants on Fire wrong.
But that's your MO, throw so much garbage out there realizing your target audience doesn't have the time nor inclination to fact check every post, read every email and follow up with a rebuttal. If ignored, it begins to be the "truth." Say hello to Putin and don't forget your shower cap.
My source is the horse your source politifact through the wife, but your source is more credible, makes perfect sense. Great rebuttal. Your like undefeated at this.
Wrong. My source cites multiple sources inclusive of attempting to contact your sole source for which they were denied. You only cited your sole source. Who apparently is aligned with those with an ax to grind. What is politifact's motivation to "lie", "shade the truth" or otherwise protect McCain? Now ask the same of your sole source, your horses ass.
Understood, multiple accounts are more credible then the original source. Fair enough.
The U.S. dropped an average of 72 bombs every day — the equivalent of three an hour — in 2016, according to an analysis of American strikes around the world.
The U.S. dropped an average of 72 bombs every day — the equivalent of three an hour — in 2016, according to an analysis of American strikes around the world.
When will you start a thread titled, "Some Facts for Trump Haters"?
Comments
You're acting like McCain giving away the flight plans to his captures.
-EV 8/14/93
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
I don't want waist
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Tenclub where is Elm street?
-EV 8/14/93
According to retired Army Colonel Earl Hopper, McCain divulged classified information North Vietnam used to hone their air defense system, including “the package routes, which were routes used to bomb North Vietnam. He gave in detail the altitude they were flying, the direction, if they made a turn … he gave them what primary targets the United States was interested in.” As result, Hopper claims, the U.S. lost 60 per cent more aircraft, and in 1968 “called off the bombing of North Vietnam, because of the information McCain had given to them.”
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/jan/17/vietnam-veterans-against-john-mccain/no-evidence-mccain-was-a-traitor/
Do you ever check your sources?
Kiley says he bases his most damning charges against McCain — that McCain gave information about the schedule of U.S. attacks in Vietnam in 1967, the year his plane was shot down and McCain was captured — on the word of Earl Hopper, a retired Army colonel.
In an interview, Hopper's wife, Patty, said that Hopper wasn't able to address the charges over the phone because of poor hearing. She said that Hopper has long been involved in the POW movement and that Earl Hopper's son, Earl Jr., is missing in action in Vietnam.
She cited as evidence for Hopper's charges a 1973 article by McCain that ran in U.S. News and World Report and what she said were "declassified U.S. military documents" she claimed to possess describing McCain's collaboration. Patty Hopper said she was away from her Arizona home and could not fax those documents.
But the 1973 article does not back up the charges made in the flyer. It provides the same basic account as McCain's book, corroborated by Timberg's book, which was based on interviews with many POWs.
Timberg, Day and Swindle noted that McCain, the son of a Navy admiral, was offered an early release from the prison but refused so that he could adhere to the military's code of conduct.
Timberg said he was perplexed by the allegations.
"Why do they hate him? There can be lots of issues you disagree with him about. But why try to destroy him?"
Because of the seriousness of the charge, the utter absence of evidence and the clear intention to harm McCain just days before a critical Republican primary, we find this claim to be Pants on Fire wrong.
But that's your MO, throw so much garbage out there realizing your target audience doesn't have the time nor inclination to fact check every post, read every email and follow up with a rebuttal. If ignored, it begins to be the "truth." Say hello to Putin and don't forget your shower cap.
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©
"I think you won (again) but I enjoyed the fight"
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-s-bombed-iraq-syria-pakistan-afghanistan-libya-yemen-somalia-n704636
The U.S. dropped an average of 72 bombs every day — the equivalent of three an hour — in 2016, according to an analysis of American strikes around the world.
gave me great pause.
-EV 8/14/93
"Defense" spending
Bush $500B
Obama $700B
Trade (both Free trade proponents)
Bush cafta
Obama Fast track, TPP (promised to review all trade agreements, didn't)
Deficit
Bush $3.2B 57% increase
Obama $6.6B 57% increase
Debt Added
Bush $5.8B
Obama $7.9B