America's Gun Violence

1693694696698699903

Comments

  • dankind
    dankind Posts: 20,841
    Thoughts and prayers. Lot of good those prayers are doing, by the way.
    https://youtu.be/W9mhsW5aWJM
    I SAW PEARL JAM
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    If we want to play wild west with our gun laws then we should go back to wild west guns.
    Revolvers and bolt action rifles and fuck everything else and the cowards who can't bear to lose their precious compensators.
    Not sure all of that would hold up in the Supreme Court.  Nice fantasy though.
    Sure it could.  Read Scalia's majority opinion in the Heller decision.  There's no reason to believe that revolvers and bolt action couldn't be the extent of available guns.  Why do you think it wouldn't fall into the concept of reasonable limitations?  Where do you think the line exists?
    Well, you could ask judge Kavanaugh.  He was pretty clear on his definition of “common”.  But if you are looking for a battle to lose, that’s your prerogative.  Cannot even get ar-15s banned, let alone all semi-auto pistols and rifles.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,918
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    If we want to play wild west with our gun laws then we should go back to wild west guns.
    Revolvers and bolt action rifles and fuck everything else and the cowards who can't bear to lose their precious compensators.
    Not sure all of that would hold up in the Supreme Court.  Nice fantasy though.
    Sure it could.  Read Scalia's majority opinion in the Heller decision.  There's no reason to believe that revolvers and bolt action couldn't be the extent of available guns.  Why do you think it wouldn't fall into the concept of reasonable limitations?  Where do you think the line exists?
    Well, you could ask judge Kavanaugh.  He was pretty clear on his definition of “common”.  But if you are looking for a battle to lose, that’s your prerogative.  Cannot even get ar-15s banned, let alone all semi-auto pistols and rifles.
    The SCOTUS ruled that AR-15 ban is Unconstitutional?  Please point me to that.  
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited November 2018
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    If we want to play wild west with our gun laws then we should go back to wild west guns.
    Revolvers and bolt action rifles and fuck everything else and the cowards who can't bear to lose their precious compensators.
    Not sure all of that would hold up in the Supreme Court.  Nice fantasy though.
    Sure it could.  Read Scalia's majority opinion in the Heller decision.  There's no reason to believe that revolvers and bolt action couldn't be the extent of available guns.  Why do you think it wouldn't fall into the concept of reasonable limitations?  Where do you think the line exists?
    Well, you could ask judge Kavanaugh.  He was pretty clear on his definition of “common”.  But if you are looking for a battle to lose, that’s your prerogative.  Cannot even get ar-15s banned, let alone all semi-auto pistols and rifles.
    The SCOTUS ruled that AR-15 ban is Unconstitutional?  Please point me to that.  
    I’m not sure that is what I said...?  I said that they cannot or have not yet despite many attempts.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,918
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    If we want to play wild west with our gun laws then we should go back to wild west guns.
    Revolvers and bolt action rifles and fuck everything else and the cowards who can't bear to lose their precious compensators.
    Not sure all of that would hold up in the Supreme Court.  Nice fantasy though.
    Sure it could.  Read Scalia's majority opinion in the Heller decision.  There's no reason to believe that revolvers and bolt action couldn't be the extent of available guns.  Why do you think it wouldn't fall into the concept of reasonable limitations?  Where do you think the line exists?
    Well, you could ask judge Kavanaugh.  He was pretty clear on his definition of “common”.  But if you are looking for a battle to lose, that’s your prerogative.  Cannot even get ar-15s banned, let alone all semi-auto pistols and rifles.
    The SCOTUS ruled that AR-15 ban is Unconstitutional?  Please point me to that.  
    I’m not sure that is what I said...?  I said that they cannot or have not yet despite many attempts.
    You're confusing me with the non-sequitur.  The question was about the Constitutionality, not whether the Congress had the will to do it (although don't forget they did it in 94 for 10 years, so it's not unheard of).
  • mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    If we want to play wild west with our gun laws then we should go back to wild west guns.
    Revolvers and bolt action rifles and fuck everything else and the cowards who can't bear to lose their precious compensators.
    Not sure all of that would hold up in the Supreme Court.  Nice fantasy though.
    Sure it could.  Read Scalia's majority opinion in the Heller decision.  There's no reason to believe that revolvers and bolt action couldn't be the extent of available guns.  Why do you think it wouldn't fall into the concept of reasonable limitations?  Where do you think the line exists?
    Well, you could ask judge Kavanaugh.  He was pretty clear on his definition of “common”.  But if you are looking for a battle to lose, that’s your prerogative.  Cannot even get ar-15s banned, let alone all semi-auto pistols and rifles.
    The SCOTUS ruled that AR-15 ban is Unconstitutional?  Please point me to that.  
    I’m not sure that is what I said...?  I said that they cannot or have not yet despite many attempts.
    You're confusing me with the non-sequitur.  The question was about the Constitutionality, not whether the Congress had the will to do it (although don't forget they did it in 94 for 10 years, so it's not unheard of).

    rgambs said:
    If we want to play wild west with our gun laws then we should go back to wild west guns.
    Revolvers and bolt action rifles and fuck everything else and the cowards who can't bear to lose their precious compensators.
    That was also an import ban.  It said nothing about selling the ones that were already in the states though.  That was grandfathered.

    If they are here but can be bought and sold among each other is that ok?
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    mrussel1 said:
    PJPOWER said:
    rgambs said:
    If we want to play wild west with our gun laws then we should go back to wild west guns.
    Revolvers and bolt action rifles and fuck everything else and the cowards who can't bear to lose their precious compensators.
    Not sure all of that would hold up in the Supreme Court.  Nice fantasy though.
    Sure it could.  Read Scalia's majority opinion in the Heller decision.  There's no reason to believe that revolvers and bolt action couldn't be the extent of available guns.  Why do you think it wouldn't fall into the concept of reasonable limitations?  Where do you think the line exists?
    Well, you could ask judge Kavanaugh.  He was pretty clear on his definition of “common”.  But if you are looking for a battle to lose, that’s your prerogative.  Cannot even get ar-15s banned, let alone all semi-auto pistols and rifles.
    The SCOTUS ruled that AR-15 ban is Unconstitutional?  Please point me to that.  
    I’m not sure that is what I said...?  I said that they cannot or have not yet despite many attempts.
    You're confusing me with the non-sequitur.  The question was about the Constitutionality, not whether the Congress had the will to do it (although don't forget they did it in 94 for 10 years, so it's not unheard of).

    rgambs said:
    If we want to play wild west with our gun laws then we should go back to wild west guns.
    Revolvers and bolt action rifles and fuck everything else and the cowards who can't bear to lose their precious compensators.
    That was also an import ban.  It said nothing about selling the ones that were already in the states though.  That was grandfathered.

    If they are here but can be bought and sold among each other is that ok?

    Not to mention that it didn’t even come close to only allowing revolvers and bolt actions either.  There are plenty of semi-autos out there that have never been banned.

  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,143
    Shooter yesterday was a marine who served for 4 1/2 years and was in Afghanistan.  God damn we need to get our vets better help when they get home.   I know it is a slippery slope but the guy had just met with a mental health specialist, to me all firearms should have been confiscated at this point.  
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,143
    https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/08/us/thousand-oaks-gunman/index.html

    I am at a loss, what do you do here?  The guy should have never had a firearm.  ugh.


    Dean said that investigators were seeking a search warrant to look through Long's house, where he lived with his mother.
    A neighbor told CNN that Long's mother "lived in fear" of what her son might do, saying when police were called to the house earlier this year "it took them about a half a day to get him out of the house."
    Neighbor Richard Berge said Long's mother told him she was concerned about her son, though not worried about her own safety, and that "she was ... kind of beside herself, she didn't know what to do because he wouldn't get help."Dean said that investigators were seeking a search warrant to look through Long's house, where he lived with his mother.
    A neighbor told CNN that Long's mother "lived in fear" of what her son might do, saying when police were called to the house earlier this year "it took them about a half a day to get him out of the house."
    Neighbor Richard Berge said Long's mother told him she was concerned about her son, though not worried about her own safety, and that "she was ... kind of beside herself, she didn't know what to do because he wouldn't get help."
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,790
    mcgruff10 said:
    Shooter yesterday was a marine who served for 4 1/2 years and was in Afghanistan.  God damn we need to get our vets better help when they get home.   I know it is a slippery slope but the guy had just met with a mental health specialist, to me all firearms should have been confiscated at this point.  
    lol yeah who and what administration will do that ? we will just have to get used to these massacres it's not like a hundred got mowed down it was only 12 this is part of the gun culture own it ....
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,143
    mcgruff10 said:
    Shooter yesterday was a marine who served for 4 1/2 years and was in Afghanistan.  God damn we need to get our vets better help when they get home.   I know it is a slippery slope but the guy had just met with a mental health specialist, to me all firearms should have been confiscated at this point.  
    lol yeah who and what administration will do that ? we will just have to get used to these massacres it's not like a hundred got mowed down it was only 12 this is part of the gun culture own it ....
    gun culture own what?  It was a former Marine who I am guessing had some demons.  Blame the individual, not the supposed shooter and in this case get them some help.  

    Why is it always a male?  ugh
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Shooter yesterday was a marine who served for 4 1/2 years and was in Afghanistan.  God damn we need to get our vets better help when they get home.   I know it is a slippery slope but the guy had just met with a mental health specialist, to me all firearms should have been confiscated at this point.  
    lol yeah who and what administration will do that ? we will just have to get used to these massacres it's not like a hundred got mowed down it was only 12 this is part of the gun culture own it ....
    gun culture own what?  It was a former Marine who I am guessing had some demons.  Blame the individual, not the supposed shooter and in this case get them some help.  

    Why is it always a male?  ugh
    And an assault rifle too. Why can't it be a shotgun sometimes?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    edited November 2018
    mcgruff10 said:
    Shooter yesterday was a marine who served for 4 1/2 years and was in Afghanistan.  God damn we need to get our vets better help when they get home.   I know it is a slippery slope but the guy had just met with a mental health specialist, to me all firearms should have been confiscated at this point.  
    You must tread lightly when you want people to seek out appropriate mental healthcare and threaten to take away their personal property if they do so, I can only envision less people seeking mental health care.  We definitely need to be doing a better job taking care of our veterans, though, the suicide rate is sickening.
    Post edited by PJPOWER on
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,143
    mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Shooter yesterday was a marine who served for 4 1/2 years and was in Afghanistan.  God damn we need to get our vets better help when they get home.   I know it is a slippery slope but the guy had just met with a mental health specialist, to me all firearms should have been confiscated at this point.  
    lol yeah who and what administration will do that ? we will just have to get used to these massacres it's not like a hundred got mowed down it was only 12 this is part of the gun culture own it ....
    gun culture own what?  It was a former Marine who I am guessing had some demons.  Blame the individual, not the supposed shooter and in this case get them some help.  

    Why is it always a male?  ugh
    And an assault rifle too. Why can't it be a shotgun sometimes?
    I know you are using sarcasm but I can't even begin to imagine how much more deadly last night would have been if the guy used a shotgun.  
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,143
    PJPOWER said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Shooter yesterday was a marine who served for 4 1/2 years and was in Afghanistan.  God damn we need to get our vets better help when they get home.   I know it is a slippery slope but the guy had just met with a mental health specialist, to me all firearms should have been confiscated at this point.  
    You must tread lightly when you want people to seek out appropriate mental healthcare and threaten to take away their personal property if they do so, I can only envision less people seeking mental health care.  We definitely need to be doing a better job taking care of our veterans, though, the suicide rate is sickening.
    I know it is a slippery slope.  I don't know what could have been done but the guy definitely had some red flags.  
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • Thoughts and prayers, until next week.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,790
    mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Shooter yesterday was a marine who served for 4 1/2 years and was in Afghanistan.  God damn we need to get our vets better help when they get home.   I know it is a slippery slope but the guy had just met with a mental health specialist, to me all firearms should have been confiscated at this point.  
    lol yeah who and what administration will do that ? we will just have to get used to these massacres it's not like a hundred got mowed down it was only 12 this is part of the gun culture own it ....
    gun culture own what?  It was a former Marine who I am guessing had some demons.  Blame the individual, not the supposed shooter and in this case get them some help.  

    Why is it always a male?  ugh
    How many other individuals had mental issues that decided it was time to mow down a few dozen individuals , it's not only the soldiers that need mental help it's thousands of people out here who own guns that have mental issues ...The gun culture in this country has to take a hit on these massacres ...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Shooter yesterday was a marine who served for 4 1/2 years and was in Afghanistan.  God damn we need to get our vets better help when they get home.   I know it is a slippery slope but the guy had just met with a mental health specialist, to me all firearms should have been confiscated at this point.  
    lol yeah who and what administration will do that ? we will just have to get used to these massacres it's not like a hundred got mowed down it was only 12 this is part of the gun culture own it ....
    gun culture own what?  It was a former Marine who I am guessing had some demons.  Blame the individual, not the supposed shooter and in this case get them some help.  

    Why is it always a male?  ugh
    And an assault rifle too. Why can't it be a shotgun sometimes?
    I know you are using sarcasm but I can't even begin to imagine how much more deadly last night would have been if the guy used a shotgun.  
    Debatable.

    No pistol grip. No large capacity magazine. Folding the gun in half to reload both barrels.

    A while back in this thread, we saw some woman get shot in the face by a shotgun and her injuries amounted to prying pellets out of her cheek (yes... point blank is another story... but you have to get someone point blank to shoot them point blank- it's tough to do with everyone running away).
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Shooter yesterday was a marine who served for 4 1/2 years and was in Afghanistan.  God damn we need to get our vets better help when they get home.   I know it is a slippery slope but the guy had just met with a mental health specialist, to me all firearms should have been confiscated at this point.  
    lol yeah who and what administration will do that ? we will just have to get used to these massacres it's not like a hundred got mowed down it was only 12 this is part of the gun culture own it ....
    gun culture own what?  It was a former Marine who I am guessing had some demons.  Blame the individual, not the supposed shooter and in this case get them some help.  

    Why is it always a male?  ugh
    And an assault rifle too. Why can't it be a shotgun sometimes?
    I know you are using sarcasm but I can't even begin to imagine how much more deadly last night would have been if the guy used a shotgun.  
    Debatable.

    No pistol grip. No large capacity magazine. Folding the gun in half to reload both barrels.

    A while back in this thread, we saw some woman get shot in the face by a shotgun and her injuries amounted to prying pellets out of her cheek (yes... point blank is another story... but you have to get someone point blank to shoot them point blank- it's tough to do with everyone running away).
    You do realize that not all shotguns are double barrel that you have to fold in half and there are a variety of shotgun rounds that do different amounts of damage, right?  Also many varieties that are semi-auto and can be equipped with large capacity magazines.  You’re smarter than that Thirty.
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,790
    This thread was started 2014 can someone tell us if any new legislation has been passed since , i don't even want to know the number killed since then ...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
This discussion has been closed.