Tiananmen Square 25 Years Ago

ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
When the Tanks Rolled In

It was the night that the frightened old men of the Chinese government chose to ‘kill the kids instead of change’. Under one-party rule, the same men remain in power today and continue to pretend the Tiananmen massacre never happened.

Below are graphic images from the the evening of June 3rd into June 4th back in 1989 in Beijing.

http://hongwrong.com/tiananmen-anniversary/
«1

Comments

  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Good article here from 1990 on the details of the massacre:

    http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dclarke/public/Munro_Who_Died_in_Beijing_and_Why.pdf
  • mattsl1983mattsl1983 Posts: 711
    What exactly did that change in China? I've seen your posts and what you argue for and against. Can I ask you why you choose the sketch drawing of DB Cooper as your avatar?
  • mattsl1983mattsl1983 Posts: 711
    I hate to bring the real world to you, but aside from becoming an image that the ready of the world could support, it changed nothing in China.

    You are very out spoken against US policy in the Middle East, can I also ask where you are from and what you support?
  • Naomi Klein offers a great perspective on the source of conflict in The Shock Doctrine, Byrnzie. The kids were opposed to the idea of capitalism serving corruption in government and China becoming the sweat shop capital of the world- which it has.

    Matt's question is a fair one and I hope you address it fairly without 'getting on the attack'. I'm also curious to know... what would the percentages of China's population be used to describe upper, middle, and lower classes?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • qontheboardqontheboard Posts: 784

    I hate to bring the real world to you, but aside from becoming an image that the ready of the world could support, it changed nothing in China.

    You are very out spoken against US policy in the Middle East, can I also ask where you are from and what you support?

    Can someone please point out where in Byrnzie's original post, he claims anything has changed. Maybe my reading comprehension is fucked.
    Byrnzie said:



    It was the night that the frightened old men of the Chinese government chose to ‘kill the kids instead of change’. Under one-party rule, the same men remain in power today and continue to pretend the Tiananmen massacre never happened.

    I understand this statement to mean nothing has changed.
  • Nobody is attacking Byrnzie.

    He's living in China right now. He has a great insight as to what the mood and sentiment of the people there is.

    He introduced the thread and people are asking for more information.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • qontheboardqontheboard Posts: 784
    edited June 2014
    I don't believe I accused anyone of attacking B, nor do I have a problem with the questions that were asked. I too would be interested to learn more about China's class divisions. However...

    I hate to bring the real world to you, but aside from becoming an image that the ready of the world could support, it changed nothing in China.

    This is not a question. This statement implies that Bryzine's post claimed some sort of "change" took place. Hence my request for clarification as to where Bryzine claimed or insinuated that change occurred.

    Post edited by qontheboard on
  • I don't believe I accused anyone of attacking B, nor do I have a problem with the questions that were asked. I too would be interested to learn more about China's class divisions. However...

    I hate to bring the real world to you, but aside from becoming an image that the ready of the world could support, it changed nothing in China.

    This is not a question. This statement implies that Bryzine's post claimed some sort of "change" took place. Hence my request for clarification as to where Bryzine claimed or insinuated that change occurred.

    Got ya!
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • Last-12-ExitLast-12-Exit Posts: 8,661
    edited June 2014
    I can remember watching the news coverage of this as a kid (I was 11). Never fully understanding or comprehending the magnitude of the situation. I asked my grandpa why that guy stood in front of that tank. I don't remember his answer but I do remember asking him if what they did worked. He simply replied "no".

    Sorry I don't have real insight of the situation. Looking through those pictures just made me think of that coversation I had with my grandpa 25 years ago.
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,049
    Maybe what changed as a result of that event is the feeling many people have that no one in China gives a rat's (or rabbit's, or horse's, etc.) ass. Obviously there are some terrifically devoted activists there!
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • JWPearlJWPearl Posts: 19,893
    brianlux said:

    Maybe what changed as a result of that event is the feeling many people have that no one in China gives a rat's (or rabbit's, or horse's, etc.) ass. Obviously there are some terrifically devoted activists there!

    I agree and disagree, there are people dying and suffering in different methods now.
    Shocking Asia have you seen it ? It gets worse what goes on. And in muslim countries women are beaten and gang raped. Some are kidnapped and held hostage and raped repeatedly, sometimes its in the family. People stab one another now.There are serial murders who taunt their victims who dont get caught.
    Theres bullying, and also animal cruelty.
    And then theres bull fighting, it still exists.
    So it is more discreet now and aside from that there is the poor starving and there are sex slaves and I could go on.
    I dont see much difference really.
  • JWPearlJWPearl Posts: 19,893
    sorry wrong thread lol
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    edited June 2014

    I hate to bring the real world to you, but aside from becoming an image that the ready of the world could support, it changed nothing in China.

    I apologize for forcing you to have to bring the real World to me. Thanks for making such a sacrifice. I'm clearly an ignoramus in need of educating.

    Though as for the Tienanmen Square massacre changing nothing, this clearly shows how little you know. It in fact changed many things, some for the better, and some for the worse. The events caused the Chinese leadership to grant far more personal freedom to the people of China, and helped speed up the process of reform and opening set in motion by Deng Xiao Ping a decade earlier - in an attempt to pacify the population. And in hindsight it worked a treat. The lives of the ordinary Chinese since 1989 have improved greatly, including the lives of the poor in the countryside, to a significant degree (though many do still live in poverty). As long as people are free to make money, then they will tend not to rock the boat too much, and that's exactly what's happened.
    At the same time, the government have clamped down on dissent and any perceived threat to their rule - the internet age has helped them in this, and the 'Great internet firewall of China' is now notorious, as are the 30,000+ paid internet police surveying Chinese cyberspace every day.

    Basically, what the Chinese leadership told the people after Tienanmen was that if they don't mess with the government, then they're pretty much free to do what they want. But Tienanmen also taught the government that the people, and especially the working classes, will not tolerate their corruption and tyranny beyond a certain point, and that if the government lean on them too hard again then the country could again erupt like a powder-keg. The fear and paranoia of the Chinese leadership since 1989 is all too obvious to the ordinary Chinese, but so far the cat-and-mouse game has been pretty balanced. But it wouldn't take much for things to kick off again, and I doubt that things will play out the same way the next time around.

    You are very out spoken against US policy in the Middle East, can I also ask where you are from and what you support?

    I'm from England. What do I support? What do you mean?

    Post edited by Byrnzie on
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    edited June 2014
    brianlux said:

    Maybe what changed as a result of that event is the feeling many people have that no one in China gives a rat's (or rabbit's, or horse's, etc.) ass. Obviously there are some terrifically devoted activists there!

    Yes, and no. The government has done a great job of burying the incident. A lot of younger Chinese don't even know it happened. The propaganda campaign since 1989 has been intense.

    But this also shows how afraid the leadership is of the people. And of course, Beijingers haven't forgotten, and the more educated Chinese in the big cities, like Shanghai. But, yeah, most people are ignorant, and just content to make money. (Not much different to people in the U.S, or U.K in that respect).
    The school system here is also designed to keep the children ignorant. They study from about 7am-9pm 6 days a week, and many do extra-curricular studies on the 7th day too, so they have no time to develop any personal interests. They're just controlled and bombarded with 'facts' for about 18 years until they mostly end up like robots.
    'Education' really is a great tool for controlling and molding people.

    But, the Chinese are getting richer, and many are becoming more World-Wise, and a lot of people I met here six years ago have now travelled to the U.S, Russia, Germany, e.t.c, and the more they're exposed to the outside World, then there's a greater chance that they'll end up demanding more freedoms for themselves, and more transparency and accountability from their own government. Distance and cultural diversity tend to grant a much clearer perspective on things.


    Post edited by Byrnzie on
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    edited June 2014
    Regarding how many of China's young feel about the events of 1989:


    http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117983/tiananmen-square-massacre-how-chinas-millennials-discuss-it-now


    "I Think It's Already Been Forgotten" How China's millennials talk about Tiananmen Square
    June 3, 2014


    '...Twenty-five years after June 4, 1989, even China’s educated youth have only a foggy understanding of the incident, and they’re skittish about discussing it openly. Textbooks don’t mention the violence that left hundreds, maybe thousands, dead in the streets of Beijing. The Chinese Internet has been scrubbed of all but the official accounts. (The first result on the search engine Baidu is a short article from People’s Daily concluding that the incident “taught the party and the people a useful lesson.”) The Chinese government has arrested dozens of people in recent weeks for planning or participating in events related to the anniversary, and police have warned foreign journalists not to cover the story. Still, most young Chinese people I approached were willing to talk—as long as they could remain anonymous.

    Awareness of the Tiananmen incident among young Chinese tends to correlate with education level, exposure to the world outside China, and general curiosity. Wang, a goofy 26-year-old from Lanzhou who works in finance, didn’t learn about June 4 until he was in college and saw The Gate of Heavenly Peace, an American-produced documentary about the student protests and the ensuing crackdown. It was only then that he started to understand the motivations behind the movement, the tensions between liberal and hardline factions within Deng Xiaoping’s government, and the infighting among students and workers that ultimately doomed their cause. Liu, who is 31 and works at a Chinese media organization, saw the same documentary after graduating college, and had a different takeaway: “The government is an asshole.”


    ...Even for the young people who have learned about June 4, it’s still a distant concept—nothing like the open wound it is for their parents’ generation. “It’s like something from a legend,” said Jenny. “It seems so exaggerated.”

    “I may understand it, but I can hardly feel it,” said Liu. “It’s like the Cultural Revolution to us.”

    And like the Cultural Revolution, the ten-year horror show that ended in 1976, it may take a couple of generations before people can speak candidly. “If a historical event is recent, you can’t evaluate it objectively,” said Jenny. “You have to let time pass before you can judge it.” But what if it’s been forgotten by then? I asked. “I think it’s already been forgotten,” she said.

    Forgetting isn’t just easy; it’s often necessary. As Louisa Lim writes in her new book The People’s Republic of Amnesia, “moving on—not dwelling on the past—has become a key survival tactic, perhaps the most important one.” The young people I spoke with seemed torn between wanting to care, and knowing that caring wouldn’t make a difference. “Say I really get to know what happened,” Jenny said. “So what? … Maybe I’ll get really angry, but I won’t be able to do anything about it. So I’d rather not know.” Susan seemed almost scared of what she herself would be capable of if she knew too much. “What am I going to do,” she said, “raise a revolution? Write an article? I can’t. I know myself, I know if I start writing I’ll be so aggressive, so critical, so negative. I don’t want to be noticed by the government.” She believes that even searching for forbidden key words could get her in trouble, she said: “They can track you down within minutes.”

    They were pessimistic that the next generation would know any more about 1989 than they do. The post-’90s generation, the oldest of whom are now graduating from college, prefer American TV shows and Korean pop stars to social issues, said Amy. Susan argued that most young Chinese are too focused on getting by to worry about grand political issues. “They don’t care, as long as they have something to eat and a place to live,” she said. “We’re just walking dead.” Between the quest for material goods and the squelching of her own curiosity, Jenny said, “the government succeeded. We’ve been brainwashed.”
    Post edited by Byrnzie on
  • brianluxbrianlux Posts: 42,049
    OK, Byrnzie, JWPearl- I said basically that the are some people in China who give a rats (etc.) ass and that there are some devoted activists there. I'm not sure what there is to disagree with there unless it's true that no one in China gives a (you name the animal's) ass and there no devoted activist in China. What am I missing here?

    Sorry to get off topic here but jeez-louise, it's like AMT has become just a place to be contrary.

    The sky is blue.
    No, it's pink.

    Horse whinny.
    No, they neigh.

    Obama's hair is turning grey.
    No, it's getting less black.

    Sheesh.
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.”
    Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.













  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    brianlux said:

    OK, Byrnzie, JWPearl- I said basically that the are some people in China who give a rats (etc.) ass and that there are some devoted activists there. I'm not sure what there is to disagree with there unless it's true that no one in China gives a (you name the animal's) ass and there no devoted activist in China. What am I missing here?

    Sorry to get off topic here but jeez-louise, it's like AMT has become just a place to be contrary.

    The sky is blue.
    No, it's pink.

    Horse whinny.
    No, they neigh.

    Obama's hair is turning grey.
    No, it's getting less black.

    Sheesh.

    I didn't disagree with you.

  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037

    Yeah, there are many dissidents still actively opposing the Chinese leadership, such as artist Ai Wei Wei, Liu Xiaobo (awarded the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize), Chen Guangcheng (civil rights activist who fled to the U.S in 2012, Ma Jian (writer - see his novel 'Beijing Coma' - and political activist), and Liao Yiwu (writer, reporter, musician, poet, and political activist).
  • chadwickchadwick Posts: 21,157
    i've said i was taking a bit of a break from the message board but i will say something here

    i fucking love china, the orient... all of it
    deep old history
    the powerful will in spirit & mind is overwhelming

    i wish the u.s. made more of its own products

    tiananmen square... i know less about this than i know of it. i'll have to read up on this sometime.
    those pictures up above are brutal... soup & mush

    good on the chinese citizens for not taking the governments bullshit
    we could learn to do that here

    the citizens of china & the citizens of america & any other country are more than likely very capable of being friends, loving friends even. it is the governments that wanna fuck shit up real good for everybody. that stinks

    are china, nepal & tibet relations still a disaster?
    for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7

    "Hear me, my chiefs!
    I am tired; my heart is
    sick and sad. From where
    the sun stands I will fight
    no more forever."

    Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    chadwick said:

    are china, nepal & tibet relations still a disaster?

    I don't think China and Nepal have had much of a problem with each other, probably due to the fact that they're separated by the highest mountain range in the World. But as for Tibet, they're pretty much being fucked hard by the Chinese - there are more Chinese in Lhasa now than Tibetans - 2/3rds Chinese, and it looks like the Chinese are set on destroying Tibetan culture.They're trying the same shit now with Xinjiang province in the far West of the country, but the Xinjiang people - the Uighurs - are fighting back, as it's in their history, and their nature to do.

  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    edited June 2014
    I was thinking today about the Tienanmen Square massacre. What changed because of it? Not much. Just a speeding up of an influx of Capitalism and a love of the mighty $$$, along with a cementing of power and restrictions by the old gangsters in Beijing.
    As for the future of China, Westerners love talking about this. It's like a game to see who can prophesy when and how the 'inevitable' downfall of the Communist system will come about. But I think this is mostly just projecting. We like to think that the Chinese want the same things as us, and want the same lifestyle as us. I don't think they do, except for maybe the superficial trappings and gimmicks. They want certain basics rights and securities, but apart from that, they're mostly perfectly satisfied that politics is left in the hands of those at the top. Most people just don't give a fuck about it, because for the majority, it rarely effects them.
    I watched a documentary today called 'The Gate of Heavenly Peace' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVvwA_34WB8 and at one point [part 14] a singer from Taiwan says 'Our culture, as well as the political system in mainland China, suppresses the individual, and promotes the collective. Collectivism and patriotism are used to make the majority serve the few. The message is: You're not allowed to care about yourself...I call the 1989 movement 'a self-liberation movement. Did Mao really liberate the Chinese people? Gradually people realized "We're not really liberated". "We want to liberate ourselves". During the movement, everyone wanted to release their pent-up anger and frustration.'
    I think this essentially sums it up. The idealistic youth of 1989 wanting to throw off some of the shackles of heavily ingrained Chinese cultural indoctrination. The main difference today being that China's youth are so numbed by excessive schooling and peer pressure, that by the time they get to university they've mostly had any spark of independence and/or creativity squeezed out of them. That, coupled with the fact that information is so tightly controlled, restricted, and manipulated.
    I think the question that should be asked is: Do the Chinese want democracy? Do they want freedom? And I think the answer to that is: No. The students in 1989 weren't necessarily fighting for political freedom, so much as personal freedom, or cultural freedom. And such freedom can't be granted from the top down. It comes from the bottom up. And most Chinese are still enmeshed in a culture that tells them that they have to be married by the age of thirty or be regarded as an outcast. They live in a culture that's obsessed with hierarchy, and respect for authority. It's a society where group-think is standard, and rebellion and dissent are almost unheard of. There are exceptions, such as those people I listed earlier, but most Chinese are now just concerned with making money and doing what they're told by their parents: i,e, get good grades, get a good job, get married, and have a baby.
    What did 1989 mean? Not much. Just a brief wave of dissent in an otherwise flat sea of obedience.

    Though I could be wrong about this. [Just thinking out loud].
    Post edited by Byrnzie on
  • unsungunsung Posts: 9,487
    I don't have time to watch your video, I have to hurry and get to Wal-Mart and get another useless electronic device made in China that I don't need but will make me forget about my shitty life and how I'm so fucking pathetic that I'd actually get there at midnight on Thanksgiving so I can save $8. I'll do this with the other hordes of living dead who will probably try to assault me over saving that $8 all the while we support a regime that endlessly abuses it's people and also cut my own throat because all of our jobs were shipped over there.
  • unsung said:

    I don't have time to watch your video, I have to hurry and get to Wal-Mart and get another useless electronic device made in China that I don't need but will make me forget about my shitty life and how I'm so fucking pathetic that I'd actually get there at midnight on Thanksgiving so I can save $8. I'll do this with the other hordes of living dead who will probably try to assault me over saving that $8 all the while we support a regime that endlessly abuses it's people and also cut my own throat because all of our jobs were shipped over there.

    Thanks for the heads up. I'll try to beat you there to get the deal before you.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    edited June 2014
    .
    Post edited by Drowned Out on
  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    edited June 2014
    What do you guys think about these articles?

    Tiananmen: the massacre that wasn't
    What really happened 25 years ago in Tiananmen Square?

    http://www.pslweb.org/liberationnews/news/what-really-happened-in.html

    From the “Tiananmen Massacre” to the “Lhasa Protests”
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/from-the-tiananmen-massacre-to-the-lhasa-protests/8635

    Both articles provide witness accounts from students and Western journalists that seem to corroborate the Chinese government's claim that the protestors left the square peacefully around dawn...and that much of the bloodshed was due to student actions against police and military forces, mostly on the streets around the square, with virtually no violence occurring in the square itself.....both articles claim that Western media manipulated the truth to vilify the Chinese government by lying about and grossly exaggerated the casualties. One article went so far as to say that the West actively supported 'regime change' via the protests. Remember this was a time when the Soviet Union was failing, and the iron curtain (and break-away) states were seeking capitalist allies....

    Is this just revisionist Chinese propaganda being fed thru Western outlets?...or is there something to it? I know I sure as hell don't trust our media any more than other countries...

    Post edited by Drowned Out on
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037

    What do you guys think about these articles?

    Tiananmen: the massacre that wasn't
    What really happened 25 years ago in Tiananmen Square?

    http://www.pslweb.org/liberationnews/news/what-really-happened-in.html

    From the “Tiananmen Massacre” to the “Lhasa Protests”
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/from-the-tiananmen-massacre-to-the-lhasa-protests/8635

    Both articles provide witness accounts from students and Western journalists that seem to corroborate the Chinese government's claim that the protestors left the square peacefully around dawn...and that much of the bloodshed was due to student actions against police and military forces, mostly on the streets around the square, with virtually no violence occurring in the square itself.....both articles claim that Western media manipulated the truth to vilify the Chinese government by lying about and grossly exaggerated the casualties. One article went so far as to say that the West actively supported 'regime change' via the protests. Remember this was a time when the Soviet Union was failing, and the iron curtain (and break-away) states were seeking capitalist allies....

    Is this just revisionist Chinese propaganda being fed thru Western outlets?...or is there something to it? I know I sure as hell don't trust our media any more than other countries...

    Apparently most of the killing took place along the approach roads to the square, in the West of the city. http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/dclarke/public/Munro_Who_Died_in_Beijing_and_Why.pdf

  • Byrnzie...

    What about my enquiry to the class stratification in China? Is there a prominent middle class in China?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    edited June 2014

    Byrnzie...

    What about my enquiry to the class stratification in China? Is there a prominent middle class in China?

    There's no class system in China, at least not in the way it exists in Britain. The main dividing lines here tend to lie between the cities and the countryside, with most of the migrant workers from the countryside being denied certain basic rights when working in the cities, due to the household registration system, or Hukou, which essentially ties them to their place of origin, and prevents them from claiming education, the right to buy property, and basic services, in the cities.

    A lot of the cities along the coast of China are very rich now. Go to Shanghai and you'll see that it makes London and new York look like a garbage bins. Most people in my city tend to drive BMW's, and there's also a Lamborghini parked outside my building on most days. But in the countryside most people still live pretty basic lives. You go inside some houses and see that the only furniture the family has is one bed.

    Basically, China is all contradictions.
    Post edited by Byrnzie on
  • Byrnzie said:

    Byrnzie...

    What about my enquiry to the class stratification in China? Is there a prominent middle class in China?

    The main dividing lines here tend to lie between the cities and the countryside, with most of the migrant workers from the countryside being denied certain basic rights when working in the cities, due to the household registration system, or Hukou, which essentially ties them to their place of origin, and prevents them from claiming education, the right to buy property, and basic services, in the cities.
    This is interesting.

    So, in essence, the opportunity for some to rise from poverty is non-existent... or at a very minimum... extremely difficult... because Hokou limits people based on where they are born?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
Sign In or Register to comment.