Found in children's textbook
unsung
Posts: 9,487
The propaganda that exists is disgusting. I will seriously explore homeschooling or some type of alternative schooling when I have kids.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Thanks.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Here's a link from Amazon
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/141699674 ... mdp_mobile
Here is what I found out from my kids being in school. The kids will retain and act on the things they learn when it is REINFORCED at home by the parents.
Olivia Goes to Venice.
It's not a textbook- it's a kid's book... likely from the library.
Exactly how is this propaganda?
Geez you love being dramatic don't you?
Try again.
http://www.amazon.com/Olivia-Goes-Venic ... 1416996745
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
Ugh... ok, now, I do understand that some people have a bit of trouble separating "entertainment" from "education," so I'll take it easy on you.
This is NOT a "textbook." A Textbook is a book that is made for students to learn the information inside it. If you ever went to school, you might remember having a math text book or a science text book. They didn't tell stories and have cute pictures in them. They had facts and problems to solve and things to help you learn.
Although clearly that didn't take with everyone.
This IS a "children's story book" and it takes place in Venice, which is a city in Italy. Italy is a country in Europe which is a big land mass WAAAAYYYYY across the ocean where there is socialized medicine and NO TSA Agents AT ALL! Can you imagine such a wondrous land? Now... if you've never read a book about Olivia the Pig... she's very precocious and she is "very pleased" about many things. That's kinda her schtick. When she goes the airport, they search everyone for weapons because that's what they DO at airports and she's just as "pleased" with that as she also is for the Gondola rides in Venice and the Gelato (which is a kind of Italian Ice Cream).
Maybe next time before you get too upset, you can base your off-the-handle indignation on more than just a SINGLE PAGE of a book series?
or is that too much to ask?
Everything going ok today PoD?
That's just hogwash, utterly laughable.
I love me some bacon
Propaganda???? What is singing the national anthem? Reciting the pledge of allegiance? I'll just stop there.
The poison from the poison stream caught up to you ELEVEN years ago and you floated out of here. Sept. 14, 08
First one being, there are illustrations of uniformed pigs doing the frisking.
Next, people actually find this to be 'propaganda'.
Then, there is the false claim that this children's book is a 'textbook'.
Finally, the thought that it is part of some sort of overwhelming government indoctrination of little children by leftist socialists.
...
I find this all pretty funny. A bit absurd and a little disturbing... but, I sometimes find humor in the absurd and disturbing.
Hail, Hail!!!
Good grief.
2003-06-16 St. Paul
2006-06-26 St. Paul
2007-08-05 Chicago
2009-08-23 Chicago
2009-08-28 San Francisco
2010-05-01 NOLA (Jazz Fest)
2011-07-02 EV Minneapolis
2011-09-03 PJ20
2011-09-04 PJ20
2011-09-17 Winnipeg
2012-06-26 Amsterdam
2012-06-27 Amsterdam
2013-07-19 Wrigley
2013-11-21 San Diego
2013-11-23 Los Angeles
2013-11-24 Los Angeles
2014-07-08 Leeds, UK
2014-07-11 Milton Keynes, UK
2014-10-09 Lincoln
2014-10-19 St. Paul
2014-10-20 Milwaukee
2016-08-20 Wrigley 1
2016-08-22 Wrigley 2
2018-06-18 London 1
2018-08-18 Wrigley 1
2018-08-20 Wrigley 2
2022-09-16 Nashville
2023-08-31 St. Paul
2023-09-02 St. Paul
2023-09-05 Chicago 1
2024-08-31 Wrigley 2
2024-09-15 Fenway 1
2024-09-27 Ohana 1
2024-09-29 Ohana 2
this book definitely pushes an ideology ... especially with the text accompanying it ... basically saying that we should all be grateful for all the security measures the gov't has put in place ... if she were simply abiding by the procedure - it would be one thing but the insinuation that it should make people happy is troubling to me ...
this kind of stuff works very well on children ... you only have to see the mass amounts of marketing dollars spent convincing kids that high fructose corn syrup laden synthetic shit is all they need in life to be happy ... and now you have a populace where 1/3 are diabetic or at risk ... civil liberties and the constitution have been slowly eroding for a long time now ...
i'm not sure unsung doesn't have a point here ...
The kids book is centered on travel and perhaps it was the author's attempt to point out the normalcy a child might expect when proceeding through an airport- easing the anxiety they might feel as they go through the sometimes invasive security measures.
I don't think this author is on a government payroll to indoctrinate children and have them become indebted to the government's role in their life. I think this is a simple children's book that tells a story.
If conspiracists ever did actually have a point... it would likely be lost upon most given the fact that filters are rarely used before introducing items as evidence to support their beliefs. It's tough to take anything too serious when they are amid a stream of nonsensical items that invoke laughter, but very little concern. They would help themselves and their cause more by exercising even the modest of discretion.
Children can't work, so they have no money to buy anything with
Children can't drive, so they can't go to the grocery stoe
So to your point, they can market to children all the want, but WHO are the ones actually buying it and making the decisions?
That's right, the PARENTS...
Not to mention you have to have a pre-disposition or genetics to get diabetes
well ... i didn't necessarily say it was a gov't conspiracy nor do i think this is a plot by the gov't ...
just simply that there is an ideology here being presented ... it may seem benign to most but these things typically are subtle ...
first of all ... nothing you write is grounded in any reality ...
children CAN work and even if children aren't working ... they can have access to money ... my friend's 10 year-old spent all his bday money and allowance for over a year and bought an ipad mini the other day ... there are other ways to have money (gifts, allowance, etc.) ... also ... children can't drive so they can't get to a grocery store!?? ... are you serious? ... ever heard of walking or taking a bike? ... even IF they had no money and couldn't get to a store ... you think the kid has no influence on parents and their purchases?
and i suggest reading up on diabetes ... although genetics plays a role ... environment and diet are huge factors ... especially type 2 diabetes ...
You did say that perhaps Unsung had a point. I'm saying that the likelihood of this book serving as early methodology to indoctrinate children is extremely low and is a reach to suggest so. One could dissect virtually anything and spin it to serve themselves if they wished. And, to what I said earlier... some here do this with great frequency and it really diminishes their credibility. If they ever did have something important to offer... it would likely be poorly received given the other material it rests with.
but his initial post was particularly vague ... if you want to pin him strictly as an anti-gov't crusader and interpret everything in a particular vain ... that is your choice ... if my objective is to interact and learn on a forum such as this ... the more i can separate agendas and assumptions the better off i will be ...
edit: also i said i'm not unsure he doesn't have a point ... double negative for sure but it clearly says that i don't see it as black and white ...
all i'm saying here is that i do see an ideology in this particular example ... and that simply kids are very influential ...
Thank you. My original "textbook" comment may have been jumping the gun but I mentioned in a following post that I too was awaiting the full story. I could edit the title but really what's the point. I'm good with it.
Children should not be de-sensitized to wrongs. We must remain vigilant in the battle for our liberty and our overall well-being.
I can't speak for all, but I'm not sure airport security is a 'wrong'. As much as I hope the pilot got a good night's sleep, I fly much more peaceful knowing some wacko isn't planning on taking the plane down and has the means to do it because people think it is a violation of our freedom to thoroughly inspect those choosing to fly. If it means I have to take my shoes off and plop my half finished water in the garbage before the security line then so be it.
Children should be taught why airport security is in place and they should feel comfortable that those measures are designed for their safety. Christ, what are we talking about here?
This thread is ridiculous and becoming more so by the post.
Again, what's the problem you're trying to address here? What are you arguing? That the image of Olivia the Pig being searched and being "pleased" with it is actually an insidious attempt to convince kids...what?
If you want to argue that media in all it's forms is subtle, pervasive, persuasive and thus, potentially very dangerous, that's fine. I think everyone will agree with you. I certainly do.
But that's not really your point is it. You didn't pick out a story about the subliminal messaging about body image for young women or the hyper-capitalism of Christmas. You picked one that had to do with a very specific type of search.
So I'll ask it directly: what is wrong with kids being taught that searches before flying is a good thing? Is your implication with this thread that kids should actually fear searches at the airport? Should Olivia the Pig have actually said "fuck off pigs , this is an unacceptable form of government tyranny! This isn't about safety - this is cops run amok!" Are you trying to claim that kids being convinced that "airport searches are acceptable" means they will also accept warrantless searches in the rest of their lives? If so, where's your proof? What's the rest of the story about?
The internet is killing intelligent discourse. Unvetted image or statement --> instantly transmitted --> impulsive response --> commentary that's baseless, irrational or not thought out --> instantly transmitted. Sadly, that's kind of the common theme in these threads.
I haven't read the book, but I'll wager that it's not about random sobriety checkpoints, mass electronic wiretaps, or whistleblower trials. So what's it all about this time? I appreciate your second post, in which you confess that you too need to see what the rest of the story is about. Maybe you should do that next time before you fire off a baseless thread.
2003-06-16 St. Paul
2006-06-26 St. Paul
2007-08-05 Chicago
2009-08-23 Chicago
2009-08-28 San Francisco
2010-05-01 NOLA (Jazz Fest)
2011-07-02 EV Minneapolis
2011-09-03 PJ20
2011-09-04 PJ20
2011-09-17 Winnipeg
2012-06-26 Amsterdam
2012-06-27 Amsterdam
2013-07-19 Wrigley
2013-11-21 San Diego
2013-11-23 Los Angeles
2013-11-24 Los Angeles
2014-07-08 Leeds, UK
2014-07-11 Milton Keynes, UK
2014-10-09 Lincoln
2014-10-19 St. Paul
2014-10-20 Milwaukee
2016-08-20 Wrigley 1
2016-08-22 Wrigley 2
2018-06-18 London 1
2018-08-18 Wrigley 1
2018-08-20 Wrigley 2
2022-09-16 Nashville
2023-08-31 St. Paul
2023-09-02 St. Paul
2023-09-05 Chicago 1
2024-08-31 Wrigley 2
2024-09-15 Fenway 1
2024-09-27 Ohana 1
2024-09-29 Ohana 2