..
There are many people like me who are pro choice but not pro abortion.
...
im with you on this one pandora.(I know I know im as shocked as you are. ). id prefer women didn't have abortions but if for whatever reason they feel the need to im glad the safe legal option is there... and it should always be.
Agreed
Hmm, I'm pro not my decision unless I'm personally involved. A little wordy I know.
But this begs a question. If upon finding out that there was conception, she wishes to have the baby, he does not and makes that fact known well before birth. Should he still be liable for support?
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Hmm, I'm pro not my decision unless I'm personally involved. A little wordy I know.
But this begs a question. If upon finding out that there was conception, she wishes to have the baby, he does not and makes that fact known well before birth. Should he still be liable for support?
I would rather a woman not have an abortion, but that's not really my decision in the long run. It's not my body, it's not my child to feed, to clothe, to give shelter, to play with, to educate, etc.
As for the second part, that's a good question. It's one I'll have to ponder... I want to say no, but I'm not sure how that would work legally.
Hmm, I'm pro not my decision unless I'm personally involved. A little wordy I know.
But this begs a question. If upon finding out that there was conception, she wishes to have the baby, he does not and makes that fact known well before birth. Should he still be liable for support?
I would rather a woman not have an abortion, but that's not really my decision in the long run. It's not my body, it's not my child to feed, to clothe, to give shelter, to play with, to educate, etc.
As for the second part, that's a good question. It's one I'll have to ponder... I want to say no, but I'm not sure how that would work legally.
But that bolded part...it would be.
Now whether it should be, yeah. It's a tough question - liability meeting morals/conscience.
Hmm, I'm pro not my decision unless I'm personally involved. A little wordy I know.
But this begs a question. If upon finding out that there was conception, she wishes to have the baby, he does not and makes that fact known well before birth. Should he still be liable for support?
I would rather a woman not have an abortion, but that's not really my decision in the long run. It's not my body, it's not my child to feed, to clothe, to give shelter, to play with, to educate, etc.
As for the second part, that's a good question. It's one I'll have to ponder... I want to say no, but I'm not sure how that would work legally.
But that bolded part...it would be.
Now whether it should be, yeah. It's a tough question - liability meeting morals/conscience.
But this begs a question. If upon finding out that there was conception, she wishes to have the baby, he does not and makes that fact known well before birth. Should he still be liable for support?
He should have let the fact be known well before conception (ie before having sex) and ensured it would not have happened and therefore been an issue for him to deal with, whether willingly or through the courts.
But this begs a question. If upon finding out that there was conception, she wishes to have the baby, he does not and makes that fact known well before birth. Should he still be liable for support?
He should have let the fact be known well before conception (ie before having sex) and ensured it would not have happened and been an issue for him to deal with, whether willingly or through the courts.
well, that IS obvious.
Same applies to her too. How often do random hookups or even "commited" fuckbuddies have this conversation?
I think all too often this occurs without the communication before hand.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
[quote="mickeyrat" Same applies to her too................
I think all too often this occurs without the communication before hand.[/quote]
Absolutely. One should not rely on the other for contraception. Even if the lady uses contraception, the guy should still use a condom (and the girl demand it). STD....
[quote="mickeyrat" Same applies to her too................
I think all too often this occurs without the communication before hand.
Absolutely. One should not rely on the other for contraception. Even if the lady uses contraception, the guy should still use a condom (and the girl demand it). STD....[/quote]
Now, moving from this ideal world to reality....
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Your question whether the guy should pay for support if the woman gets pregnant?
Well.... if he did not take the necessary basic precautions himself, pregnancy (and therefore the possibility of fatherhood) is a consequence of his actions and he should take responsibility. Whether he wanted this final outcome or not (ie birth). For me, it's not a question of 'conversation beforehand' (as you say.. how many do have this conversation) but personal responsibility. Live with the consequences (man and woman). You don't want something to happen, you ensure it doesn't. If you've been foolish enough to have unprotected sex, you need to accept possible outcomes, including fatherhood. If the guy has been deceived, then he takes it to through the courts. I know it takes two to tango but one does what is necessary for one's self - cover your back, basically. And get a DNA test when the baby is born (can be done in the womb but oh so risky...).
'Committed' fuckbuddies are different to the random hookups. I'm sure most will have some kind of 'conversation' and ensure 'foolproof' (as foolproof as it can get) protection. If not, there are no words for their stupidity.
The law may seem a bit one-sided to blokes here when it comes to a woman's pregnancy (though not sure about US law). A guy can't force a woman to terminate her pregnancy if he doesn't want the kid and she does, nor force her to bring it to term if he does want the kid but she doesn't. Still considered a medical issue..
My thoughts. Maybe not what you like to hear but, if I had a son, that's what I would be telling him.
Your question whether the guy should pay for support if the woman gets pregnant?
Well.... if he did not take the necessary basic precautions himself, pregnancy (and therefore the possibility of fatherhood) is a consequence of his actions and he should take responsibility. Whether he wanted this final outcome or not (ie birth). For me, it's not a question of 'conversation beforehand' (as you say.. how many do have this conversation) but personal responsibility. Live with the consequences (man and woman). You don't want something to happen, you ensure it doesn't. If you've been foolish enough to have unprotected sex, you need to accept possible outcomes, including fatherhood. If the guy has been deceived, then he takes it to through the courts. I know it takes two to tango but one does what is necessary for one's self - cover your back, basically. And get a DNA test when the baby is born (can be done in the womb but oh so risky...).
'Committed' fuckbuddies are different to the random hookups. I'm sure most will have some kind of 'conversation' and ensure 'foolproof' (as foolproof as it can get) protection. If not, there are no words for their stupidity.
The law may seem a bit one-sided to blokes here when it comes to a woman's pregnancy (though not sure about US law). A guy can't force a woman to terminate her pregnancy if he doesn't want the kid and she does, nor force her to bring it to term if he does want the kid but she doesn't. Still considered a medical issue..
My thoughts. Maybe not what you like to hear but, if I had a son, that's what I would be telling him.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
1st - I don't know about being called a troll nobody knows what I look like like and if u did I don't look like a troll, plus who the fuck knows what a troll thinks. So why would anyone call me a troll? Weird insult.
2nd- this is a discussion board, a political one, and opinions are expressed here...right?
3rd- this is my opinion.
So, I've done some serious thinking and I think that a woman's rights and her right to do whatever she wants with her body have been limited way too much. And I have been thinking about where we are as a society. And I have sympathy for wome who choose to have a baby then discover that their body is required to keep that baby alive. So I think that a women or parent (women/man,women/woman, man/man, men/man) should lawfully be able to choose to do whatever they want with a child until it can express itself. If they want to inject themselves with speedballs while their baby is locked up in the room for days then they should legally be aloud. Because it is their body and life begins at expression.
I realize the world is progressing and I believe my opinion is forward thinking. Join me and let's move FORWARD!
If you don't back my idea you are stuck in the present or the past; not forward...
1st - I don't know about being called a troll nobody knows what I look like like and if u did I don't look like a troll, plus who the fuck knows what a troll thinks. So why would anyone call me a troll? Weird insult.
2nd- this is a discussion board, a political one, and opinions are expressed here...right?
3rd- this is my opinion.
So, I've done some serious thinking and I think that a woman's rights and her right to do whatever she wants with her body have been limited way too much. And I have been thinking about where we are as a society. And I have sympathy for wome who choose to have a baby then discover that their body is required to keep that baby alive. So I think that a women or parent (women/man,women/woman, man/man, men/man) should lawfully be able to choose to do whatever they want with a child until it can express itself. If they want to inject themselves with speedballs while their baby is locked up in the room for days then they should legally be aloud. Because it is their body and life begins at expression.
I realize the world is progressing and I believe my opinion is forward thinking. Join me and let's move FORWARD!
If you don't back my idea you are stuck in the present or the past; not forward...
1st - I don't know about being called a troll nobody knows what I look like like and if u did I don't look like a troll, plus who the fuck knows what a troll thinks. So why would anyone call me a troll? Weird insult.
2nd- this is a discussion board, a political one, and opinions are expressed here...right?
3rd- this is my opinion.
So, I've done some serious thinking and I think that a woman's rights and her right to do whatever she wants with her body have been limited way too much. And I have been thinking about where we are as a society. And I have sympathy for wome who choose to have a baby then discover that their body is required to keep that baby alive. So I think that a women or parent (women/man,women/woman, man/man, men/man) should lawfully be able to choose to do whatever they want with a child until it can express itself. If they want to inject themselves with speedballs while their baby is locked up in the room for days then they should legally be aloud. Because it is their body and life begins at expression.
I realize the world is progressing and I believe my opinion is forward thinking. Join me and let's move FORWARD!
If you don't back my idea you are stuck in the present or the past; not forward...
you may believe your opinions are of a forward thinking nature, that does not make them so.
So much effort being used up in just trying to rouse people, comes across as a little trollish, hence the label being given you.
I suppose it is a change from the previous attempts that some of you have been making.......shoes kill more people than guns, ban shoes (the stupidity has evolved)
..
There are many people like me who are pro choice but not pro abortion.
...
im with you on this one pandora.(I know I know im as shocked as you are. ). id prefer women didn't have abortions but if for whatever reason they feel the need to im glad the safe legal option is there... and it should always be.
1st - I don't know about being called a troll nobody knows what I look like like and if u did I don't look like a troll, plus who the fuck knows what a troll thinks. So why would anyone call me a troll? Weird insult.
2nd- this is a discussion board, a political one, and opinions are expressed here...right?
3rd- this is my opinion.
So, I've done some serious thinking and I think that a woman's rights and her right to do whatever she wants with her body have been limited way too much. And I have been thinking about where we are as a society. And I have sympathy for wome who choose to have a baby then discover that their body is required to keep that baby alive. So I think that a women or parent (women/man,women/woman, man/man, men/man) should lawfully be able to choose to do whatever they want with a child until it can express itself. If they want to inject themselves with speedballs while their baby is locked up in the room for days then they should legally be aloud. Because it is their body and life begins at expression.
I realize the world is progressing and I believe my opinion is forward thinking. Join me and let's move FORWARD!
If you don't back my idea you are stuck in the present or the past; not forward...
I've been doing some serious thinking too, and Its quite clear that some are already thinking like you. My Mother used to drive me around in the 70s without a seatbealt in the car. Cleary trying to kill me. Then she always bought donuts and diet coke. This is a clear attempt at my life. And now, to top it off, she let me move out and fend for myself. How the fuck am I supposed to survive? She's clearly murdering me, slowly..
1st - I don't know about being called a troll nobody knows what I look like like and if u did I don't look like a troll, plus who the fuck knows what a troll thinks. So why would anyone call me a troll? Weird insult.
2nd- this is a discussion board, a political one, and opinions are expressed here...right?
3rd- this is my opinion.
So, I've done some serious thinking and I think that a woman's rights and her right to do whatever she wants with her body have been limited way too much. And I have been thinking about where we are as a society. And I have sympathy for wome who choose to have a baby then discover that their body is required to keep that baby alive. So I think that a women or parent (women/man,women/woman, man/man, men/man) should lawfully be able to choose to do whatever they want with a child until it can express itself. If they want to inject themselves with speedballs while their baby is locked up in the room for days then they should legally be aloud. Because it is their body and life begins at expression.
I realize the world is progressing and I believe my opinion is forward thinking. Join me and let's move FORWARD!
If you don't back my idea you are stuck in the present or the past; not forward...
I've been doing some serious thinking too, and Its quite clear that some are already thinking like you. My Mother used to drive me around in the 70s without a seatbealt in the car. Cleary trying to kill me. Then she always bought donuts and diet coke. This is a clear attempt at my life. And now, to top it off, she let me move out and fend for myself. How the fuck am I supposed to survive? She's clearly murdering me, slowly..
1st - I don't know about being called a troll nobody knows what I look like like and if u did I don't look like a troll, plus who the fuck knows what a troll thinks. So why would anyone call me a troll? Weird insult.
2nd- this is a discussion board, a political one, and opinions are expressed here...right?
3rd- this is my opinion.
So, I've done some serious thinking and I think that a woman's rights and her right to do whatever she wants with her body have been limited way too much. And I have been thinking about where we are as a society. And I have sympathy for wome who choose to have a baby then discover that their body is required to keep that baby alive. So I think that a women or parent (women/man,women/woman, man/man, men/man) should lawfully be able to choose to do whatever they want with a child until it can express itself. If they want to inject themselves with speedballs while their baby is locked up in the room for days then they should legally be aloud. Because it is their body and life begins at expression.
I realize the world is progressing and I believe my opinion is forward thinking. Join me and let's move FORWARD!
If you don't back my idea you are stuck in the present or the past; not forward...
I have thought about this. I'm of the opinion that this is just a bratty teenager who has logged on to his father's 10C account which was left open on the laptop in the living room. The real Otter doesn't even know he has posted such goofy dribble.
Comments
I loved sloths until I saw a picture of one eating people's shit.
:fp:
Coprophagia is quite common in the animal world........
But this begs a question. If upon finding out that there was conception, she wishes to have the baby, he does not and makes that fact known well before birth. Should he still be liable for support?
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
I would rather a woman not have an abortion, but that's not really my decision in the long run. It's not my body, it's not my child to feed, to clothe, to give shelter, to play with, to educate, etc.
As for the second part, that's a good question. It's one I'll have to ponder... I want to say no, but I'm not sure how that would work legally.
Now whether it should be, yeah. It's a tough question - liability meeting morals/conscience.
I don't know.
If I was the father
Speaking as your everyday joe, it is not.
He should have let the fact be known well before conception (ie before having sex) and ensured it would not have happened and therefore been an issue for him to deal with, whether willingly or through the courts.
Same applies to her too. How often do random hookups or even "commited" fuckbuddies have this conversation?
I think all too often this occurs without the communication before hand.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Same applies to her too................
I think all too often this occurs without the communication before hand.[/quote]
Absolutely. One should not rely on the other for contraception. Even if the lady uses contraception, the guy should still use a condom (and the girl demand it). STD....
Absolutely. One should not rely on the other for contraception. Even if the lady uses contraception, the guy should still use a condom (and the girl demand it). STD....[/quote]
Now, moving from this ideal world to reality....
my question please?
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
Well.... if he did not take the necessary basic precautions himself, pregnancy (and therefore the possibility of fatherhood) is a consequence of his actions and he should take responsibility. Whether he wanted this final outcome or not (ie birth). For me, it's not a question of 'conversation beforehand' (as you say.. how many do have this conversation) but personal responsibility. Live with the consequences (man and woman). You don't want something to happen, you ensure it doesn't. If you've been foolish enough to have unprotected sex, you need to accept possible outcomes, including fatherhood. If the guy has been deceived, then he takes it to through the courts. I know it takes two to tango but one does what is necessary for one's self - cover your back, basically. And get a DNA test when the baby is born (can be done in the womb but oh so risky...).
'Committed' fuckbuddies are different to the random hookups. I'm sure most will have some kind of 'conversation' and ensure 'foolproof' (as foolproof as it can get) protection. If not, there are no words for their stupidity.
The law may seem a bit one-sided to blokes here when it comes to a woman's pregnancy (though not sure about US law). A guy can't force a woman to terminate her pregnancy if he doesn't want the kid and she does, nor force her to bring it to term if he does want the kid but she doesn't. Still considered a medical issue..
My thoughts. Maybe not what you like to hear but, if I had a son, that's what I would be telling him.
Laws are similar.
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '14
2nd- this is a discussion board, a political one, and opinions are expressed here...right?
3rd- this is my opinion.
So, I've done some serious thinking and I think that a woman's rights and her right to do whatever she wants with her body have been limited way too much. And I have been thinking about where we are as a society. And I have sympathy for wome who choose to have a baby then discover that their body is required to keep that baby alive. So I think that a women or parent (women/man,women/woman, man/man, men/man) should lawfully be able to choose to do whatever they want with a child until it can express itself. If they want to inject themselves with speedballs while their baby is locked up in the room for days then they should legally be aloud. Because it is their body and life begins at expression.
I realize the world is progressing and I believe my opinion is forward thinking. Join me and let's move FORWARD!
If you don't back my idea you are stuck in the present or the past; not forward...
This is my opinion: go seek counselling.
you may believe your opinions are of a forward thinking nature, that does not make them so.
So much effort being used up in just trying to rouse people, comes across as a little trollish, hence the label being given you.
I suppose it is a change from the previous attempts that some of you have been making.......shoes kill more people than guns, ban shoes (the stupidity has evolved)
Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
I've been doing some serious thinking too, and Its quite clear that some are already thinking like you. My Mother used to drive me around in the 70s without a seatbealt in the car. Cleary trying to kill me. Then she always bought donuts and diet coke. This is a clear attempt at my life. And now, to top it off, she let me move out and fend for myself. How the fuck am I supposed to survive? She's clearly murdering me, slowly..
that was just cravings.
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
I have thought about this. I'm of the opinion that this is just a bratty teenager who has logged on to his father's 10C account which was left open on the laptop in the living room. The real Otter doesn't even know he has posted such goofy dribble.
Dang kids. Geez.