The NRA is scared it is losing Control

mickeyrat

fife wrote:

peacefrompaul wrote:

I fail to see the racism.

I agree Paul there really is no racism there. I do however agree that naming any child in a video is not responsible and should not be allowed.

Just another question that I have asked many times. in the 2nd amendment is states that "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.[8]" I am interested in the words "shall not be infringed." today we have laws that say who can buy guns and who can't i.e ex-cons can't legally get a gun. is that not an infringement?

I'd much rather see the "well regulated militia" addressed as a function of the 2nd amendment. It seems like with a ruling from scotus this little section gets tossed in favor what I see as a misguided action to man a virtual free for all on ownership of whatever type of weapon available with little to no oversite by anyone going forward, which is bullshit.


Join a fucking regulated militia and have at it. which to me means you will be fully registered with all weapons in your possession or you give up this right.

fife

USARAY wrote:

JimmyV wrote:

USARAY wrote:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/10/obama-signs-bill-gets-secret-service-protection-for-life/
millions for thetaxpayers lifelong is a long fuckintime
his pen is astrokin

How shortsighted is it to think this is a bad idea when we live in a world with global terrorism? How juicy a target would an unprotected former president be? Seriously...get over it.

just saying banhis guns too my life mykids lives would be is justas valuable
the timing is fuckin ironic and laughable,take awayrights to legallyown guns but make sure he is protected
for life by a gun.

again where is Obama banning all guns? show me where he is banning all guns?

JonnyPistachio

USARAY wrote:

JimmyV wrote:

USARAY wrote:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/10/obama-signs-bill-gets-secret-service-protection-for-life/
millions for thetaxpayers lifelong is a long fuckintime
his pen is astrokin

How shortsighted is it to think this is a bad idea when we live in a world with global terrorism? How juicy a target would an unprotected former president be? Seriously...get over it.

just saying banhis guns too my life mykids lives would be is justas valuable
the timing is fuckin ironic and laughable,take awayrights to legallyown guns but make sure he is protected
for life by a gun.

:fp: :fp: Obama isnt banning all guns! for godsake, how hard is it to undserstand?! :fp:
Yes, your kids lives are just as valuable, we know...nobody is better than anyone else, however, some are more likely to be targeted. Do you understand that Obama's kids are in more danger than your kids? Does that register with you to any degree? Jesus H! :roll:

and PS - I will send you all 14 dollars and 31 cents in my wallet if you promise to use your space bar and a period every now and then.

chadwick

puremagic wrote:

We all know this to be TRUE - had the Sandy Hook shooting happened in a minority urban area school WE as a NATION would not be seriously talking about gun control.

So now the NRA wants to defuse the issue by injecting racism into the equation.

The issue is about .223 ammo repeatedly fired from an AR-15 into the bodies of 4, 5, 6 and 7 year old children along with adults, at the velocity of point-blank range.

If now is not the time to talk about taking some type of preventive gun control action – WHEN!!!

i thought the assault rifle was kept in trunk of car as he elected to use handguns? is this not what the news has reported over & over again?

cincybearcat

chadwick wrote:

puremagic wrote:

We all know this to be TRUE - had the Sandy Hook shooting happened in a minority urban area school WE as a NATION would not be seriously talking about gun control.

So now the NRA wants to defuse the issue by injecting racism into the equation.

The issue is about .223 ammo repeatedly fired from an AR-15 into the bodies of 4, 5, 6 and 7 year old children along with adults, at the velocity of point-blank range.

If now is not the time to talk about taking some type of preventive gun control action – WHEN!!!

i thought the assault rifle was kept in trunk of car as he elected to use handguns? is this not what the news has reported over & over again?

At first. Later, one of the docs doing the autopsies stated that all of the people he viewed died from multiple gunshots by a 'long gun"...meaning the assault rifle.

mickeyrat

chadwick wrote:

puremagic wrote:

We all know this to be TRUE - had the Sandy Hook shooting happened in a minority urban area school WE as a NATION would not be seriously talking about gun control.

So now the NRA wants to defuse the issue by injecting racism into the equation.

The issue is about .223 ammo repeatedly fired from an AR-15 into the bodies of 4, 5, 6 and 7 year old children along with adults, at the velocity of point-blank range.

If now is not the time to talk about taking some type of preventive gun control action – WHEN!!!

i thought the assault rifle was kept in trunk of car as he elected to use handguns? is this not what the news has reported over & over again?

rush to report with wrong facts Chad. This was debunked the day after by the coroner.