it's a simple choice

MN3270MN3270 Posts: 12
edited October 2012 in A Moving Train
a vote for obama is a vote to perpetuate the downward spiral in our country. . . . . that is, there is little or no incentive for the millions of free loaders to ever become productive members of society. i know so many hard working people that are struggling more than people collecting government benefits. this administration supports this severely flawed system, which will lead to further generations of free loaders.


let's face it; obama was a media creation to begin with and is more concerned with being a celebrity than he is fixing the problems in this country.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    MN3270 wrote:
    a vote for obama is a vote to perpetuate the downward spiral in our country. . . . . that is, there is little or no incentive for the millions of free loaders to ever become productive members of society. i know so many hard working people that are struggling more than people collecting government benefits. this administration supports this severely flawed system, which will lead to further generations of free loaders.


    let's face it; obama was a media creation to begin with and is more concerned with being a celebrity than he is fixing the problems in this country.
    ok yeah, let's go back to the same reagan and w bush policies that are proven failures that got us into this mess in the first place. that is a splendid idea...

    that is what a romney vote will get ya..
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • MN3270 wrote:
    a vote for obama is a vote to perpetuate the downward spiral in our country. . . . . that is, there is little or no incentive for the millions of free loaders to ever become productive members of society.

    I'm so sick and tired of hearing Republicans (a high number of whom are on some form of government assistance that people like ME have to foot the bill for) telling me about the "free loaders" and "moochers" and people asking for a "handout."

    A vote for Mitt Romney is a vote for someone whose entire "business" experience has been buying successful companies, bankrupting them and selling the parts to China. Someone who doesn't give half a shit about you and hides his tax returns because - and sorry, but we ALL know this - he is a tax cheat and stole money from YOU.

    So you go ahead and vote for the man who changes his policies every couple of days, depending on whom he needs to suck up to or who wrote him the biggest check that week. See where it gets you.

    And... sorry... but you deserve this one, too... Let's not forget what happened the LAST time we let idiot Republicans give a chance to a stinking rich idiot plutocrat.
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,090
    Why does this all sound vaguely familiar? Sheesh. Like this thread will change votes.

    Two more weeks of this... only two more weeks.

    Reminds me of a joke, and I can tell this one because my wife told it to me and she's blonde:

    Two blondes are in a bar toasting each other.

    "Two weeks! Here's to two weeks!"

    After three or four rounds of this the bartender finally says, "OK, I have to know. What is it with 'Two weeks?'"

    One of the blondes says, "Well, we got a jigsaw puzzle and it say right on the box 'Two to Four Years' and we did it in TWO WEEKS!"

    Happy voting, everyone. Two weeks, here's to two weeks.
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.” Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.
    Democracy Dies in Darkness- Washington Post













  • MN3270 wrote:
    a vote for obama is a vote to perpetuate the downward spiral in our country. . . . . that is, there is little or no incentive for the millions of free loaders to ever become productive members of society. i know so many hard working people that are struggling more than people collecting government benefits. this administration supports this severely flawed system, which will lead to further generations of free loaders.


    let's face it; obama was a media creation to begin with and is more concerned with being a celebrity than he is fixing the problems in this country.

    Aside from the other inflammatory things you have said... your last statement borders on ridiculous.

    What if someone said:

    let's face it; Romney is a bored, rich, privileged man who wishes to seek the presidency from a dare originating from a heated, post dinner cigar conversation with his cronies one summer evening: "I'll show you how to run this country!"

    Wouldn't that be ridiculous?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • AzWickerAzWicker Posts: 1,162
    When a company takes tax breaks or gov funding it is considered a smart business move, when a person does it, it is considered leeching. Weird since a corporation is an individual now.

    That said,
    Obama = Romney
    Ed: 2011-07-09 2012-11-04
    PJ: 2011-09-03 2011-09-04
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    A vote for Mitt Romney is a vote for someone whose entire "business" experience has been buying successful companies, bankrupting them and selling the parts to China. Someone who doesn't give half a shit about you and hides his tax returns because - and sorry, but we ALL know this - he is a tax cheat and stole money from YOU.

    You have proof that he is a tax cheat? And that the IRS is ignoring it? You don't think that Obama would be shouting it from the rooftops if it were true?

    I understand supporting someone (although neither of these two scumbags), but to just be so deceptive and to outright lie is pretty deplorable.

    (Also, cheating on taxes is not really stealing from citizens)
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    The original post didn't strike me as rude; why the backlash?

    It's no more inflammatory than other threads and posts I've read in these forums, not to mention some of the replies right here.

    Anyway...traffic will be somewhat fucked up here in LA later today; President's going on Leno again :P
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,090
    hedonist wrote:
    The original post didn't strike me as rude; why the backlash?

    It's no more inflammatory than other threads and posts I've read in these forums, not to mention some of the replies right here.

    Anyway...traffic will be somewhat fucked up here in LA later today; President's going on Leno again :P

    I think it was the incendiary comment about "freeloaders" which goes back to that Romney statement about 47% of Americans.

    And isn't traffic always fucked up in L.A. ? :lol:
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.” Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.
    Democracy Dies in Darkness- Washington Post













  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    It is a very simple choice.

    101126_barack_obama_lead_ap_605.jpg
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    brianlux wrote:
    hedonist wrote:
    The original post didn't strike me as rude; why the backlash?

    It's no more inflammatory than other threads and posts I've read in these forums, not to mention some of the replies right here.

    Anyway...traffic will be somewhat fucked up here in LA later today; President's going on Leno again :P

    I think it was the incendiary comment about "freeloaders" which goes back to that Romney statement about 47% of Americans.

    And isn't traffic always fucked up in L.A. ? :lol:
    Like I said - no more inflammatory. I don't agree with that particular term of painting an entire group, but we seem to have many artistes here (and I'll say, Picassos, we are not!).

    And yeah, pretty much always fucked, roadwise.
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    brianlux wrote:
    I think it was the incendiary comment about "freeloaders" which goes back to that Romney statement about 47% of Americans.

    And isn't traffic always fucked up in L.A. ? :lol:

    as well as that there was absolutely nothing factual about his post and that it reeked of the same partisan BS that plagues america ...
  • JonnyPistachioJonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,219
    That there are more people on food stamps these days is not a make it or break it situation to me. Its unfortunate and i do think something needs to be done. However, I think spending, or rather offering an additional 2 TRILLION bucks to the military is a far bigger problem when it comes to domestic spending.
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • know1 wrote:
    You have proof that he is a tax cheat?

    Got proof that he isn't?

    You know what my "proof" is? we haven't seen any of his tax records before 2009. And that's when the Amnesty was given to Americans who were hiding money in foreign accounts and not paying taxes on it. And if he released his taxes before that, we'd see proof of it.

    Why has the IRS not gone after him? Because of the Amnesty given to the Americans who wanted to come clean and not be charged for it.

    Does this PROVE it? No. But if you can come up with a better excuse he'd have to just make this issue go away and release even ONE year... I'm all ears.
    I understand supporting someone (although neither of these two scumbags), but to just be so deceptive and to outright lie is pretty deplorable.

    I agree. And yet, the OP doesn't seem to have a problem with it.
    (Also, cheating on taxes is not really stealing from citizens)

    Of course it is. Cheating on Taxes means that the tax revenue you avoided paying would have gone to the deficit... to the national debt... to pay for school lunches and roads and bridges and yes... even that war. Cheating on taxes is absolutely stealing from the citizens.
  • whygohomewhygohome Posts: 2,305
    It's a simple choice: open this thread or don't.

    I made the wrong choice.
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,090
    hedonist wrote:
    brianlux wrote:
    hedonist wrote:
    The original post didn't strike me as rude; why the backlash?

    It's no more inflammatory than other threads and posts I've read in these forums, not to mention some of the replies right here.

    Anyway...traffic will be somewhat fucked up here in LA later today; President's going on Leno again :P

    I think it was the incendiary comment about "freeloaders" which goes back to that Romney statement about 47% of Americans.

    And isn't traffic always fucked up in L.A. ? :lol:
    Like I said - no more inflammatory. I don't agree with that particular term of painting an entire group, but we seem to have many artistes here (and I'll say, Picassos, we are not!).

    And yeah, pretty much always fucked, roadwise.

    I'm having a bit of a battle in my head while thinking about this Hedonist. I think you make a good point but I also think often what is painted are generalizations of thought- like a landscape- which I think is often appropriate. But when individual people are placed in that landscape, it's good to at least give a little more thought to how one wants them portrayed.

    I hope I'm not coming across as an artist. That is, as a bullshit artist!
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.” Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.
    Democracy Dies in Darkness- Washington Post













  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    brianlux wrote:
    I'm having a bit of a battle in my head while thinking about this Hedonist. I think you make a good point but I also think often what is painted are generalizations of thought- like a landscape- which I think is often appropriate. But when individual people are placed in that landscape, it's good to at least give a little more thought to how one wants them portrayed.

    I hope I'm not coming across as an artist. That is, as a bullshit artist!
    Generalizations of groups of people is often inappropriate to me. If (part of) one's ideology is despised, seems the entire person is; if someone has had bad experiences with a particular group, the entire group is shit.

    Like I said in another thread earlier, I'm just sick of it already. I get that there's anger, for many valid reasons, but it just seems to perpetuate silly arguments, inconsequential distractions, and some ugliness toward eachother.

    It'd be a shame if nothing positive - at the least, seeing things from a different, perhaps unfamiliar view - comes from all this.
  • brianluxbrianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 42,090
    hedonist wrote:
    brianlux wrote:
    I'm having a bit of a battle in my head while thinking about this Hedonist. I think you make a good point but I also think often what is painted are generalizations of thought- like a landscape- which I think is often appropriate. But when individual people are placed in that landscape, it's good to at least give a little more thought to how one wants them portrayed.

    I hope I'm not coming across as an artist. That is, as a bullshit artist!
    Generalizations of groups of people is often inappropriate to me. If (part of) one's ideology is despised, seems the entire person is; if someone has had bad experiences with a particular group, the entire group is shit.

    Like I said in another thread earlier, I'm just sick of it already. I get that there's anger, for many valid reasons, but it just seems to perpetuate silly arguments, inconsequential distractions, and some ugliness toward eachother.

    It'd be a shame if nothing positive - at the least, seeing things from a different, perhaps unfamiliar view - comes from all this.

    I see what you're saying and if something-- if anything- I personally have said here or elsewhere was offensive to you I apologize for that. I have apologized to others here for the same kind of thing. At some time or other almost everyone here has gotten over-heated about a topic they feel strongly about and passions or strong opinions about them take over. Hopefully all of us take time to step back now and then at least long enough to reformulate our words. I use "Preview" a lot but sometimes I'm in a hurry and hit "Submit" (which could also be called "Fail") first instead. We're all learning.
    “The fear of death follows from the fear of life. A man [or woman] who lives fully is prepared to die at any time.” Variously credited to Mark Twain or Edward Abbey.
    Democracy Dies in Darkness- Washington Post













  • know1 wrote:
    You have proof that he is a tax cheat?

    Got proof that he isn't?

    You know what my "proof" is? we haven't seen any of his tax records before 2009. And that's when the Amnesty was given to Americans who were hiding money in foreign accounts and not paying taxes on it. And if he released his taxes before that, we'd see proof of it.

    I gotta tell ya, Prince, that this is the same damn argument conspiracy theorists used about Obama not being American. Romney not releasing his tax records does not mean he is automatically a cheat, just like Obama not showing his birth certificate to the world didn't make him a Kenyan.
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • hedonisthedonist Posts: 24,524
    brianlux wrote:
    I see what you're saying and if something-- if anything- I personally have said here or elsewhere was offensive to you I apologize for that. I have apologized to others here for the same kind of thing. At some time or other almost everyone here has gotten over-heated about a topic they feel strongly about and passions or strong opinions about them take over. Hopefully all of us take time to step back now and then at least long enough to reformulate our words. I use "Preview" a lot but sometimes I'm in a hurry and hit "Submit" (which could also be called "Fail") first instead. We're all learning.
    Brian - you have no need to apologize to me. I know you're a decent man and while we're not eye-to-eye on some things, there's enough I've seen of you to get it...to not let those differences get in the way.

    (I too use "preview" and then sometimes just get rid of the shit. It's a nice purge - type it out and then......delete! The alternative can be so tiring at times.)

    And, on the learning part? Amen. I hope I never stop.
  • I gotta tell ya, Prince, that this is the same damn argument conspiracy theorists used about Obama not being American. Romney not releasing his tax records does not mean he is automatically a cheat, just like Obama not showing his birth certificate to the world didn't make him a Kenyan.

    Don't agree with you on that.

    The president DID release a birth certificate early on... and the people who couldn't accept that a black man had won pounced on it saying they wanted the "LONG FORM" one. Then when he did release that, they insisted that it was a fake. A bit different.

    (and while every presidential candidate has released his returns from 10 years back... no other president has been expected to release his "long form" birth certificate. Different rules for black men?)

    Romney has never released a tax return from before 2009.

    Now, you're right.. not releasing tax returns doesn't necessarily make him a cheat... although he insisted that he never paid less than 13% and when there was closer scrutiny, it was clear that he had intentionally left out deductions on his 2011 return to keep the number that high (and those amendments will be made after he loses the election, I'm sure).

    But it DOES raise a pretty big red flag with me that someone who has foreign accounts in the Cayman Islands and Switzerland and won't release returns before 2009 when the Amnesty was granted to people using foreign tax shelters... that's a few pretty glaring clues that there's something up.

    Don't you think?
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    know1 wrote:
    You have proof that he is a tax cheat?

    Got proof that he isn't?

    You know what my "proof" is? we haven't seen any of his tax records before 2009. And that's when the Amnesty was given to Americans who were hiding money in foreign accounts and not paying taxes on it. And if he released his taxes before that, we'd see proof of it.

    I gotta tell ya, Prince, that this is the same damn argument conspiracy theorists used about Obama not being American. Romney not releasing his tax records does not mean he is automatically a cheat, just like Obama not showing his birth certificate to the world didn't make him a Kenyan.

    I get a kick out of this stuff :lol: I've decided whome I'll vote for but the back and forth argument is really not worth the time it takes to post my opinion my mind is made up at this point, all the back and forth half baked arguments for both sides has become a simple tit for tat with no hard proof on either side so I ask myself if Romney was a dem and Obama was a repubican would we have the same debate in a reverse roll ?

    if Obama wins this election how will my life change ? if Romney wins how will my life change ?...I guess we'll find that out in November and the following four years, we can all speculate what one or the other will do but the honest answer will not be seen until that person gets into office.

    Godfather.
  • I gotta tell ya, Prince, that this is the same damn argument conspiracy theorists used about Obama not being American. Romney not releasing his tax records does not mean he is automatically a cheat, just like Obama not showing his birth certificate to the world didn't make him a Kenyan.

    Don't agree with you on that.

    The president DID release a birth certificate early on... and the people who couldn't accept that a black man had won pounced on it saying they wanted the "LONG FORM" one. Then when he did release that, they insisted that it was a fake. A bit different.

    (and while every presidential candidate has released his returns from 10 years back... no other president has been expected to release his "long form" birth certificate. Different rules for black men?)

    Romney has never released a tax return from before 2009.

    Now, you're right.. not releasing tax returns doesn't necessarily make him a cheat... although he insisted that he never paid less than 13% and when there was closer scrutiny, it was clear that he had intentionally left out deductions on his 2011 return to keep the number that high (and those amendments will be made after he loses the election, I'm sure).

    But it DOES raise a pretty big red flag with me that someone who has foreign accounts in the Cayman Islands and Switzerland and won't release returns before 2009 when the Amnesty was granted to people using foreign tax shelters... that's a few pretty glaring clues that there's something up.

    Don't you think?

    yes
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    MN3270 wrote:
    a vote for obama is a vote to perpetuate the downward spiral in our country. . . . . that is, there is little or no incentive for the millions of free loaders to ever become productive members of society. i know so many hard working people that are struggling more than people collecting government benefits. this administration supports this severely flawed system, which will lead to further generations of free loaders.


    let's face it; obama was a media creation to begin with and is more concerned with being a celebrity than he is fixing the problems in this country.
    I was wondering how many of the Democrats here are in social work, entertainment,
    work in research, non profit, at colleges, on aid themselves.

    The OP's post brings this question to mind.

    Our place in life, our daily experiences have a lot to do with our choice
    in this election. It is personal. We have something to lose, we think.

    Someone here said something to me that truly stuck when I spoke of the role or theory
    behind each party. They said it hasn't been like that for the Republicans, the true
    'cause' in a very long time.
    I went further and thought that can be said about the Democrats also.

    Somewhere along the line the parties changed, their goodness was bought out.
    Both systems are flawed if they even remain ... still alive.
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,104
    pandora wrote:


    I was wondering how many of the Democrats here are in social work, entertainment,
    work in research, non profit, at colleges, on aid themselves.

    The OP's post brings this question to mind.

    I'm not sure what you're getting at here.
  • Go Beavers wrote:
    pandora wrote:


    I was wondering how many of the Democrats here are in social work, entertainment,
    work in research, non profit, at colleges, on aid themselves.

    The OP's post brings this question to mind.

    I'm not sure what you're getting at here.

    I think she's trying to point to jobs that are funded or partially funded by the government. calling that "aid".
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Go Beavers wrote:
    pandora wrote:


    I was wondering how many of the Democrats here are in social work, entertainment,
    work in research, non profit, at colleges, on aid themselves.

    The OP's post brings this question to mind.

    I'm not sure what you're getting at here.

    I think she's trying to point to jobs that are funded or partially funded by the government. calling that "aid".
    ...
    What about the people that work building M230 30mm Guns for AH-64 Apache Gunships and get paid by taxpayer Department of Defense contracts. Do they count?
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    Go Beavers wrote:
    pandora wrote:


    I was wondering how many of the Democrats here are in social work, entertainment,
    work in research, non profit, at colleges, on aid themselves.

    The OP's post brings this question to mind.

    I'm not sure what you're getting at here.
    Nope I wasn't calling it aid to work with government programs etc.

    just getting at our different places in life makes our choice personal.

    The OP got me thinking that and I know having a small
    blue collar manufacturing business this is very true for me.
  • Go BeaversGo Beavers Posts: 9,104
    pandora wrote:
    Go Beavers wrote:
    pandora wrote:


    I was wondering how many of the Democrats here are in social work, entertainment,
    work in research, non profit, at colleges, on aid themselves.

    The OP's post brings this question to mind.

    I'm not sure what you're getting at here.
    Nope I wasn't calling it aid to work with government programs etc.

    just getting at our different places in life makes our choice personal.

    The OP got me thinking that and I know having a small
    blue collar manufacturing business this is very true for me.

    Thanks for clearing that up for me :lol:
  • DissidentmanDissidentman Posts: 15,378
    whygohome wrote:
    It's a simple choice: open this thread or don't.

    I made the wrong choice.

    :thumbup: :lol::lol:
  • JC29856JC29856 Posts: 9,617
    hilarious to me how corporate welfare $ dwarfs the amount spent on social programs for human beings that eat sleep and breathe.

    government handouts/bailouts to faceless corporations = "incentives"
    government funding for human beings = "entitlements"

    Corporate subsidies $92B pr year
    Tax shelters $58B per year
    Reduced Capital Gains Tax $59B per year
    Carried Interest Loophole $2B per year

    Bank Bailouts $700B (that can be accounted for)
    $9 trillion in loans a zero, yes 0% interest

    Not to mention the land and resource giveaways and the uber wasteful spending on "defense" "military" and "homeland security".

    WHO ARE THE FREELOADERS?
Sign In or Register to comment.