Rock On Romney!

13»

Comments

  • whygohomewhygohome Posts: 2,305
    So Obama fires back today :?: Maybe he should have opened his mouth last night?

    Seriously. he was handed blatant lies on a silver platter.
  • Dirtie_FrankDirtie_Frank Posts: 1,348
    whygohome wrote:
    So Obama fires back today :?: Maybe he should have opened his mouth last night?

    Seriously. he was handed blatant lies on a silver platter.

    I have been reading one of the hundreds of fact checks, that is a job in itself, Obama was not truthful the entire night either.
    96 Randall's Island II
    98 CAA
    00 Virginia Beach;Camden I; Jones Beach III
    05 Borgata Night I; Wachovia Center
    06 Letterman Show; Webcast (guy in blue shirt), Camden I; DC
    08 Camden I; Camden II; DC
    09 Phillie III
    10 MSG II
    13 Wrigley Field
    16 Phillie II
  • VitalogensiaVitalogensia Posts: 2,042
    This here debate is better than the one last night :corn:
    Virginia Beach 2000; Pittsburgh 2000; Columbus 2003; D.C. 2003; Pittsburgh 2006; Virginia Beach 2008; Cleveland 2010; PJ20 2011; Pittsburgh 2013; Baltimore 2013; Charlottesville 2013; Charlotte 2013; Lincoln 2014; Moline 2014; St. Paul 2014; Greenville 2016; Hampton 2016; Lexington 2016; Wrigley 2016; Prague 2018; Krakow 2018; Berlin 2018; Fenway 2018; Camden 2022; St. Paul 2023; MSG 1 2024; Baltimore 2024
  • MoonpigMoonpig Posts: 659
    Dug it out of my head. I enjoy politics, like a sport.

    I say the head of an oil company is a great energy advisor. Id guess you would probably have some EPA
    eco-warrior in there. Its just our differences. Im sure we agree on some things: PJ, at least.

    But my goal for US energy is use it to our advantage, and become independent from foreign energy influences. Create jobs. Create wealth. Prosper. Drive my V8 SUV for $1.00/gallon.

    The left sees US energy, and apologizes for it. Stifles it. Villifies oil companies, coal companies, etc.
    The left sees US energy, and has the same reaction they have to most things: FEAR- "oh no, what about the environment?" "What about the spotted spiny-backed turd beetle?" Geez... they take it to extremes.

    Yup, that about sums up the problem within your country, it's very sad really. Shouting over substance. What ever way you all vote over there, fucked either way.
  • pjradiopjradio Posts: 6,704
    edited October 2012
    the challenger almost always beats the incumbent in the 1st debate...
    Post edited by pjradio on
    aqo2t.jpg
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    inmytree wrote:
    pandora wrote:
    Please explain...
    would it be because I have to pay more? My plan not as good?
    You see, I don't think the Federal government should take care of me at any age.


    I see....

    you support a 90 year old women having to purchase her own insurance with a voucher...nice...I'm sure that will go smoothly...

    I see...

    you're ok with paying more for medical care when you in you later years, but whine about taxes now....

    yes, I see...
    Whine about taxes who would if we weren't staring at trillions in deficit?

    Taxes will never be enough and they will never help the country.
    We must spend less, yes it will hurt, and lower taxes to encourage business growth
    hiring and personal spending. Clearly what is being done now is not working.

    If your spouse was a spending freak... running you in so much debt that bankruptcy
    was eminent would you give them more from each paycheck to blow
    or get another credit card for them to run up?
    I'm thinking if you did you'd be foolish and probably whipped.
    No you would cut them off, spread your debt out and pay it down, cut expenses
    and not take on more debt, this if you were a responsible person
    who understands consequence.

    Yes, I am for a voucher system for those who need assistance,
    for the 90 year old woman, for me and you. ;) if we need it
    and I believe it should come from the state level.
    I do not feel entitled to have it just because I reach a certain age.
    All help should be on a need basis.
    I am not for the federal government supplying health insurance, telling people
    who to see, what should be done and when, how much it will cost, or controlling our doctors.

    Silly me, last time I checked this was a free country and that goes both ways...
    pay your own way.
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741


    Kerry was a Senator.

    Romney is a Govenor.

    Historically: big difference.

    Mondale and Ross Perot "won" their first debates, too...

    that's real history...

    boom goes your mind.... :lol:
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    pandora wrote:
    inmytree wrote:
    pandora wrote:
    Please explain...
    would it be because I have to pay more? My plan not as good?
    You see, I don't think the Federal government should take care of me at any age.


    I see....

    you support a 90 year old women having to purchase her own insurance with a voucher...nice...I'm sure that will go smoothly...

    I see...

    you're ok with paying more for medical care when you in you later years, but whine about taxes now....

    yes, I see...
    Whine about taxes who would if we weren't staring at trillions in deficit?

    Taxes will never be enough and they will never help the country.
    We must spend less, yes it will hurt, and lower taxes to encourage business growth
    hiring and personal spending. Clearly what is being done now is not working.

    If your spouse was a spending freak... running you in so much debt that bankruptcy
    was eminent would you give them more from each paycheck to blow
    or get another credit card for them to run up?
    I'm thinking if you did you'd be foolish and probably whipped.
    No you would cut them off, spread your debt out and pay it down, cut expenses
    and not take on more debt, this if you were a responsible person
    who understands consequence.

    Yes, I am for a voucher system for those who need assistance,
    for the 90 year old woman, for me and you. ;) if we need it
    and I believe it should come from the state level.
    I do not feel entitled to have it just because I reach a certain age.
    All help should be on a need basis.
    I am not for the federal government supplying health insurance, telling people
    who to see, what should be done and when, how much it will cost, or controlling our doctors.

    Silly me, last time I checked this was a free country and that goes both ways...
    pay your own way.


    get the heck off my roads...and don't cross that bridge you lazy freeloader....pave your own and pay your own way...

    it's sad to me that folks can just tell a 90 year old lady to go screw herself, you know, since she should pay her own way...

    selfish and shortsighted...and disgusting to boot.... :x
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    whygohome wrote:
    So Obama fires back today :?: Maybe he should have opened his mouth last night?

    Seriously. he was handed blatant lies on a silver platter.

    I have been reading one of the hundreds of fact checks, that is a job in itself, Obama was not truthful the entire night either.

    care to share...?

    shoot me a link, I'd like to see this info you've found....
  • pandorapandora Posts: 21,855
    inmytree wrote:
    pandora wrote:
    inmytree wrote:

    I see....

    you support a 90 year old women having to purchase her own insurance with a voucher...nice...I'm sure that will go smoothly...

    I see...

    you're ok with paying more for medical care when you in you later years, but whine about taxes now....

    yes, I see...
    Whine about taxes who would if we weren't staring at trillions in deficit?

    Taxes will never be enough and they will never help the country.
    We must spend less, yes it will hurt, and lower taxes to encourage business growth
    hiring and personal spending. Clearly what is being done now is not working.

    If your spouse was a spending freak... running you in so much debt that bankruptcy
    was eminent would you give them more from each paycheck to blow
    or get another credit card for them to run up?
    I'm thinking if you did you'd be foolish and probably whipped.
    No you would cut them off, spread your debt out and pay it down, cut expenses
    and not take on more debt, this if you were a responsible person
    who understands consequence.

    Yes, I am for a voucher system for those who need assistance,
    for the 90 year old woman, for me and you. ;) if we need it
    and I believe it should come from the state level.
    I do not feel entitled to have it just because I reach a certain age.
    All help should be on a need basis.
    I am not for the federal government supplying health insurance, telling people
    who to see, what should be done and when, how much it will cost, or controlling our doctors.

    Silly me, last time I checked this was a free country and that goes both ways...
    pay your own way.


    get the heck off my roads...and don't cross that bridge you lazy freeloader....pave your own and pay your own way...

    it's sad to me that folks can just tell a 90 year old lady to go screw herself, you know, since she should pay her own way...

    selfish and shortsighted...and disgusting to boot.... :x
    As I said based on need or did you miss that?
    Do you think if Grandma can afford her health plan the government
    should still pay for it?

    Hey speaking of roads ...
    I'm all for the Fed govt taking care of interstate roads and helping
    states in times of disaster. There is not much more we need from them besides
    protection and information. Let the States take care of their own.
Sign In or Register to comment.