Enough evidence to be put in Gitmo. The prisoners aren't detained there for no reason. To think the government just picks random people to detain and question there, quite frankly, is ridiculous. Since 2002 and of this past July, 779 people have been detained at Gitmo. Roughly 78 a year.
So what you're saying is that you have no idea what kind of evidence is needed to get put in Gitmo. I don't think it's random, I think the threshold is extremely low. I guess you're more trusting and you think the threshold is high.
Enough evidence to be put in Gitmo. The prisoners aren't detained there for no reason. To think the government just picks random people to detain and question there, quite frankly, is ridiculous. Since 2002 and of this past July, 779 people have been detained at Gitmo. Roughly 78 a year.
So what you're saying is that you have no idea what kind of evidence is needed to get put in Gitmo. I don't think it's random, I think the threshold is extremely low. I guess you're more trusting and you think the threshold is high.
Threshold low? 779 since 2002? :? :fp: Your local county jail has more prisoners than that. I don't need to know the evidence needed to be put there and neither does any other US citizen. Let me know when the population of Gitmo gets to 3,000,000 or roughly less than 1% of the US population...then there may be an issue. Until then....keep questioning them.
Comments
So what you're saying is that you have no idea what kind of evidence is needed to get put in Gitmo. I don't think it's random, I think the threshold is extremely low. I guess you're more trusting and you think the threshold is high.
Threshold low?