Porn condom use put to a vote in LA

Prince Of Dorkness

cincybearcat wrote:

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

How many thousand dollars did you get the last time you had sex?

None, but I also didn't take it in the ass and my risk of contracting a fatal disease was extremely low if not zero.

Neither did I and my risk was the same.

:ugeek:

cincybearcat

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

cincybearcat wrote:

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

How many thousand dollars did you get the last time you had sex?

None, but I also didn't take it in the ass and my risk of contracting a fatal disease was extremely low if not zero.

Neither did I and my risk was the same.

:ugeek:

Good deal. For those having unprotected sex with people that have not been tested for 15-30 days and who in that time frame have had sex with multiple people with the same testing guidelines, their risk is much higher.

What they need is a very cheap, quick test that can give you results in hours/minutes. Then all woudl be right with the porn world.

JonnyPistachio

cincybearcat wrote:

Then all woudl be right with the porn world.

Just sounds funny.

Prince Of Dorkness

JonnyPistachio wrote:

any job openings out west there where I can keep my clothes on?

Well we need a fluffer. Our last one died of Lock Jaw. Took the doctors 10 hours to get the smile off his face.

Prince Of Dorkness

cincybearcat wrote:

Good deal. For those having unprotected sex with people that have not been tested for 15-30 days and who in that time frame have had sex with multiple people with the same testing guidelines, their risk is much higher.

Not necessarily. Do you know that your sex partners have been tested? I know a lot of straight guys who don't use condoms in their regular hookups and don't know if the girls they've been with have been tested in the last couple of weeks

What they need is a very cheap, quick test that can give you results in hours/minutes. Then all would be right with the porn world.

Well there IS a very cheap quick test for HIV that will give you results in 20 minutes. But those aren't very accurate. And a high-ed HIV test (that adult companies use) takes a matter of minutes but costs $250 because it looks for the DNA of the virus... kind of.

Things can be (a) Good (b) Fast (c) Cheap and never more than two at a time.

(remember that I work in the gay porn industry. I've directed straight scenes but not for over a year. So I only work with studios that use condoms. I don't do bareback.)

JonnyPistachio

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

JonnyPistachio wrote:

any job openings out west there where I can keep my clothes on?

Well we need a fluffer. Our last one died of Lock Jaw. Took the doctors 10 hours to get the smile off his face.

umm, yeah no.
How about administrative, editing or prop management?

(I actually do video editing)

cincybearcat

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

Well there IS a very cheap quick test for HIV that will give you results in 20 minutes. But those aren't very accurate. And a high-ed HIV test (that adult companies use) takes a matter of minutes but costs $250 because it looks for the DNA of the virus... kind of.

Things can be (a) Good (b) Fast (c) Cheap and never more than two at a time.

(remember that I work in the gay porn industry. I've directed straight scenes but not for over a year. So I only work with studios that use condoms. I don't do bareback.)

Sure they can be all of those. And actually, I'm thinking that $250 is cheap enough that porn companies should be required to use it or condoms to protect their employees.

hedonist

JonnyPistachio wrote:

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

JonnyPistachio wrote:

any job openings out west there where I can keep my clothes on?

Well we need a fluffer. Our last one died of Lock Jaw. Took the doctors 10 hours to get the smile off his face.

umm, yeah no.
How about administrative, editing or prop management?

(I actually do video editing)

"Prop management" sounds like a user-friendly (no pun intended) term for "fluffer" :P

Prince Of Dorkness

cincybearcat wrote:

Sure they can be all of those. And actually, I'm thinking that $250 is cheap enough that porn companies should be required to use it or condoms to protect their employees.

Well, they DO use those.

Once every 15 days to 30 days.

If those odds are to much for you, then maybe adult movies isn't the career for you.

Prince Of Dorkness

JonnyPistachio wrote:

How about administrative, editing or prop management?

You think you can manage these?

mickeyrat

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

JonnyPistachio wrote:

How about administrative, editing or prop management?

You think you can manage these?

so thats where the term "put my boot up your ass" comes from. I always wondered about that.

JonnyPistachio

If the pay is right, and I have an endless supply of gloves and maybe access to a decontamination room.
Just kidding...I figured the only props would be costumes, plumbers belts, construction hats, ball gags, etc...I assumed there was no need for those tools you posted since both parties come equipped with such devices naturally. :?

Ok, so we've narrowed it down, administrative it is. :P

cincybearcat

Prince Of Dorkness wrote:

cincybearcat wrote:

Sure they can be all of those. And actually, I'm thinking that $250 is cheap enough that porn companies should be required to use it or condoms to protect their employees.

Well, they DO use those.

Once every 15 days to 30 days.

If those odds are to much for you, then maybe adult movies isn't the career for you.

I've just been confused why certain industries have different requirements that's all.

I mean, why does a manufacturing plant have to guard it's equipment? People know machines can be hazardous when they take the job. The know the risks. Yet the company can be fined and they are certainly held responsible should an incident occur if the guarding is not complaint.

Oh, well, I guess I'll never understand why employers have to protect their employees only in certain fields. Hell, we still allow people to smoke in places where waitstaff are exposed. Can you imagine if a manufacturing plant knowingly allowed there employees to be exposed to a known carcinogen every day????