The National Football League
Comments
-
Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.0
-
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.0 -
I don’t know the details of the lawsuit, or the odds of its success, I just know it’s happening according to what I’ve seen.0
-
mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.0 -
Yeah so why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.Post edited by mrussel1 on0 -
mrussel1 said:
Yeah do why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.Owners protecting owners. Shift the focus to a racist coach and everyone stops talking about a team with an offensive name and an investigation into a horrible workplace.0 -
You think this was good for Mark Davis? This blew up his season, his team and he likely made a huge payout while having to find and hire a new coach. You're arguing that they are somehow protecting Snyder by hammering Davis. And how did this protect the Skins or Bruce Allen? The investigation continues.Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
Yeah do why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.Owners protecting owners. Shift the focus to a racist coach and everyone stops talking about a team with an offensive name and an investigation into a horrible workplace.
0 -
mrussel1 said:
You think this was good for Mark Davis? This blew up his season, his team and he likely made a huge payout while having to find and hire a new coach. You're arguing that they are somehow protecting Snyder by hammering Davis. And how did this protect the Skins or Bruce Allen? The investigation continues.Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
Yeah do why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.Owners protecting owners. Shift the focus to a racist coach and everyone stops talking about a team with an offensive name and an investigation into a horrible workplace.You asked what incentive they would have for leaking the emails.0 -
Well true, I'm just saying it seems tenuous. I don't know who leaked them. It just doesn't seem rational for the NFL to do it.Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
You think this was good for Mark Davis? This blew up his season, his team and he likely made a huge payout while having to find and hire a new coach. You're arguing that they are somehow protecting Snyder by hammering Davis. And how did this protect the Skins or Bruce Allen? The investigation continues.Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
Yeah do why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.Owners protecting owners. Shift the focus to a racist coach and everyone stops talking about a team with an offensive name and an investigation into a horrible workplace.You asked what incentive they would have for leaking the emails.0 -
He bad mouthed dicktater Roger in one of them, incentive enough.mrussel1 said:
Yeah so why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.
Its hard to believe that out of 650,000+ emails only 3 from John Gruden got leaked by sheer coincidence...someone had it out for the guy.This weekend we rock Portland0 -
Someone, yes. Agreed. But he has to prune it was the NFL.Poncier said:
He bad mouthed dicktater Roger in one of them, incentive enough.mrussel1 said:
Yeah so why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.
Its hard to believe that out of 650,000+ emails only 3 from John Gruden got leaked by sheer coincidence...someone had it out for the guy.
Gruden is an idiot though. He deserved to be fired.0 -
Both things can be true:mrussel1 said:
Someone, yes. Agreed. But he has to prune it was the NFL.Poncier said:
He bad mouthed dicktater Roger in one of them, incentive enough.mrussel1 said:
Yeah so why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.
Its hard to believe that out of 650,000+ emails only 3 from John Gruden got leaked by sheer coincidence...someone had it out for the guy.
Gruden is an idiot though. He deserved to be fired.
Gruden’s a moron & had to go once those emails came to light. He also got selectively screwed by whomever leaked the emails.
It could be a tough case to prove, but the guy has a grudge & deep pockets.0 -
Merkin Baller said:
Both things can be true:mrussel1 said:
Someone, yes. Agreed. But he has to prune it was the NFL.Poncier said:
He bad mouthed dicktater Roger in one of them, incentive enough.mrussel1 said:
Yeah so why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.
Its hard to believe that out of 650,000+ emails only 3 from John Gruden got leaked by sheer coincidence...someone had it out for the guy.
Gruden is an idiot though. He deserved to be fired.
Gruden’s a moron & had to go once those emails came to light. He also got selectively screwed by whomever leaked the emails.
It could be a tough case to prove, but the guy has a grudge & deep pockets.
possible it was a black lesbian investigator/lawyer/reviewer going through them
_____________________________________SIGNATURE________________________________________________
Not today Sir, Probably not tomorrow.............................................. bayfront arena st. pete '94
you're finally here and I'm a mess................................................... nationwide arena columbus '10
memories like fingerprints are slowly raising.................................... first niagara center buffalo '13
another man ..... moved by sleight of hand...................................... joe louis arena detroit '140 -
Probably a transgender and the person sneaked into the wrong bathroom to steal the emails, while humming songs about CRT.mickeyrat said:Merkin Baller said:
Both things can be true:mrussel1 said:
Someone, yes. Agreed. But he has to prune it was the NFL.Poncier said:
He bad mouthed dicktater Roger in one of them, incentive enough.mrussel1 said:
Yeah so why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.
Its hard to believe that out of 650,000+ emails only 3 from John Gruden got leaked by sheer coincidence...someone had it out for the guy.
Gruden is an idiot though. He deserved to be fired.
Gruden’s a moron & had to go once those emails came to light. He also got selectively screwed by whomever leaked the emails.
It could be a tough case to prove, but the guy has a grudge & deep pockets.
possible it was a black lesbian investigator/lawyer/reviewer going through them0 -
Gruden is gonna get a big settlement out of this though. The NFL has to settle. No way they can let all those emails out in any depositions or trial,Merkin Baller said:
Both things can be true:mrussel1 said:
Someone, yes. Agreed. But he has to prune it was the NFL.Poncier said:
He bad mouthed dicktater Roger in one of them, incentive enough.mrussel1 said:
Yeah so why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.
Its hard to believe that out of 650,000+ emails only 3 from John Gruden got leaked by sheer coincidence...someone had it out for the guy.
Gruden is an idiot though. He deserved to be fired.
Gruden’s a moron & had to go once those emails came to light. He also got selectively screwed by whomever leaked the emails.
It could be a tough case to prove, but the guy has a grudge & deep pockets.0 -
pjhawks said:
Gruden is gonna get a big settlement out of this though. The NFL has to settle. No way they can let all those emails out in any depositions or trial,Merkin Baller said:
Both things can be true:mrussel1 said:
Someone, yes. Agreed. But he has to prune it was the NFL.Poncier said:
He bad mouthed dicktater Roger in one of them, incentive enough.mrussel1 said:
Yeah so why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.
Its hard to believe that out of 650,000+ emails only 3 from John Gruden got leaked by sheer coincidence...someone had it out for the guy.
Gruden is an idiot though. He deserved to be fired.
Gruden’s a moron & had to go once those emails came to light. He also got selectively screwed by whomever leaked the emails.
It could be a tough case to prove, but the guy has a grudge & deep pockets.
you may have a point…If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14Philly I & II, 16Denver 22
Missoula 240 -
The settlement is going to have to be huge, he already has money.pjhawks said:
Gruden is gonna get a big settlement out of this though. The NFL has to settle. No way they can let all those emails out in any depositions or trial,Merkin Baller said:
Both things can be true:mrussel1 said:
Someone, yes. Agreed. But he has to prune it was the NFL.Poncier said:
He bad mouthed dicktater Roger in one of them, incentive enough.mrussel1 said:
Yeah so why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.
Its hard to believe that out of 650,000+ emails only 3 from John Gruden got leaked by sheer coincidence...someone had it out for the guy.
Gruden is an idiot though. He deserved to be fired.
Gruden’s a moron & had to go once those emails came to light. He also got selectively screwed by whomever leaked the emails.
It could be a tough case to prove, but the guy has a grudge & deep pockets.I have zero predictions but am very interested to see how it plays out. I would love if this got to discovery, but doubt it will. Like you said, the NFL can’t let that happen.0 -
Yep. This is exactly what happened. They were going to keep leaking emails from him until he resigned or got fired. Please let this case get to discovery! Those 650,000 emails would prob take down several owners and coaches....Poncier said:
He bad mouthed dicktater Roger in one of them, incentive enough.mrussel1 said:
Yeah so why would he NFL have the incentive to do that?Jumb0 said:mrussel1 said:
For what cause? He resigned. If he's suing because the emails were leaked then he will have to prove that the NFL did it.. not the Redskins, not anyone else.. but an NFL official. And he will have to prove it was done to harm him.Merkin Baller said:Gruden’s suing the NFL.I would too.Saying the NFL selectively leaked out his emails to force him out and damage his reputation.
Its hard to believe that out of 650,000+ emails only 3 from John Gruden got leaked by sheer coincidence...someone had it out for the guy.0 -
Detroit just can’t catch a break. They should offer BB a billion dollars and full control.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
This is what they wanted....don't go winless but don't lose #1 draft slot.
Detroit Lions are the worst.The love he receives is the love that is saved0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help