megaupload.com
Comments
-
Drowned Out wrote:cincybearcat wrote:Drowned Out wrote:Not if it's one of their customers selling it.
megaupload doesn't upload it's own content for public consumption. It's basically a bigass ftp site. And there are already a LOT of sites like it operating. This grandstanding, making an example, is a joke.
Right, people should be able to steal, huh?
in reality this situation is very complicated. There is a fine line to doing nothing and doing what they did, so I understand the frustration.
Should government be allowed to confiscate your legally obtained property, when you haven't broken any laws, because of a crime completely unrelated to you?
Hahaha that's priceless.
If a grocery store knowingly allows someone to set up a stand to sell heroin to people...it's the same thing. They know what is being put up is illegal. Its there whole purpose. People are kidding themselves.
The only shocker is that they are actually trying to do something about it now.
I think they certainly have the right to confiscate it as part of an investigation. When it's over, if the person is found to not have any part in illegal activity, it would be returned...like all other investigations. I think people are mad at the wrong people.hippiemom = goodness0 -
cincybearcat wrote:Drowned Out wrote:cincybearcat wrote:
Did I say that? No...I poked a hole in your weak analogy. I understand that it's complicated...but I don't really understand the fine line you're talking about? Do or do not....pretty black and white to me.
Should government be allowed to confiscate your legally obtained property, when you haven't broken any laws, because of a crime completely unrelated to you?
Hahaha that's priceless.
If a grocery store knowingly allows someone to set up a stand to sell heroin to people...it's the same thing. They know what is being put up is illegal. Its there whole purpose. People are kidding themselves.
The only shocker is that they are actually trying to do something about it now.
I think they certainly have the right to confiscate it as part of an investigation. When it's over, if the person is found to not have any part in illegal activity, it would be returned...like all other investigations. I think people are mad at the wrong people.
In your grocery store analogy, yes, if a store was aware that a customer set up a heroin stand and did nothing about it, they'd be negligent.....But if some guy was just meeting people in the store to sell them the heroin without the knowledge of the store, the store would not be responsible. From my understanding, megaupload are extremely diligent in responding to copyright claims. Moreso than many similar sites. Users agree not to share copyrighted material when uploading/signing up...so yes, the wrong people are being targeted.
Not to mention the fact that, as mentioned, there are a lot of similar sites on the net....so if the basis of your argument is that 'they know what is being put up is illegal', shouldnt ALL of these sites be shut down immediately? Why is it ok to make an example of just one company when it's perfectly clear that other sites offer the exact same service, and they're allowed to continue? That's not justice, it's politics.0 -
Drowned Out wrote:Not to mention the fact that, as mentioned, there are a lot of similar sites on the net....so if the basis of your argument is that 'they know what is being put up is illegal', shouldnt ALL of these sites be shut down immediately?
I would think so, and I think this is the test. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out. I do find it extremely humorous that the people that steal music, movies, etc are bitching about it though.hippiemom = goodness0 -
cincybearcat wrote:They know what is being put up is illegal. Its there whole purpose. People are kidding themselves.Be Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0
-
Jason P wrote:cincybearcat wrote:They know what is being put up is illegal. Its there whole purpose. People are kidding themselves.
Right, but they are making $ off of it right? And there was illegal activity? It'll be very interesting to see what their culpability is in all of this. Especially since they were making $ off memberships. Different animal then a completely free to use site I would think.
Let me ask some questions.
Do you think they knew it was being used for illegal activity?
If so, I'm betting that they just didn't believe they could be held accountable for it as it was always someone else uploading and downloading, they just provided the location.hippiemom = goodness0 -
cincybearcat wrote:Right, but they are making $ off of it right? And there was illegal activity? It'll be very interesting to see what their culpability is in all of this. Especially since they were making $ off memberships. Different animal then a completely free to use site I would think.
Let me ask some questions.
Do you think they knew it was being used for illegal activity?
If so, I'm betting that they just didn't believe they could be held accountable for it as it was always someone else uploading and downloading, they just provided the location.
It all depends if they can present evidence that they reacted properly when notified of illegal content. If they can, then the whole case is bogus. You might as well arrest Google for providing links to their website if otherwise.Be Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0 -
I wonder why Megaupload's CEO, Swizz Beatz, aka Kasseem Dean, aka Alicia Keys husband, was not arrested?Be Excellent To Each OtherParty On, Dudes!0
-
Jason P wrote:
It all depends if they can present evidence that they reacted properly when notified of illegal content. If they can, then the whole case is bogus. You might as well arrest Google for providing links to their website if otherwise.
Right and that is what the gov't is trying to do. Which is why I think it's an interesting case.hippiemom = goodness0 -
cincybearcat wrote:
If a grocery store is also selling cocaine...don't they close the whole store down?0 -
peacefrompaul wrote:cincybearcat wrote:
If a grocery store is also selling cocaine...don't they close the whole store down?:roll:
hippiemom = goodness0 -
cincybearcat wrote::roll:
:roll:0 -
The war on Piracy!
The US knows no borders.
America Fuck yeah0 -
Oh the poor dears who were using an illegal file sharing service and they got ripped off out of a few bucks.
The movie studios and music companies have been screwed out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
I'm glad they're gone, I hope they shut down more of these illegal file-sharing services. If you've been paying for this and feel ripped off, imagine how my industry feels that we spend a fortune producing content and people just post and share it with abandon, paying MegaUpload to distribute it but cutting us out.
If you're paying a gangster for bootlegged alcohol... you're eventually going to get screwed over. Oh well, the moral is "don't give your money to criminals and you have less of a chance of getting screwed over when they get arrested and their operation is shut down."0 -
Drowned Out wrote:Should government be allowed to confiscate your legally obtained property, when you haven't broken any laws, because of a crime completely unrelated to you?
Yes.
If you buy a diamond necklace from the back of a truck and it was stolen... yes, in fact... the police can come take it from you AND they can charge you with receiving stolen property.
Be glad all people lost was their piddly $15 monthly fee and their files. No customers have been arrested.
Yet.0 -
steal a necklace. it is gone.
share a file. it still exists0 -
Prince Of Dorkness wrote:The movie studios and music companies have been screwed out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
I'm sure they make up for it, not to mention how the record companies screw the artists over.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJ5iHaV0dP40 -
This is going to be like the War On Drugs, this is a war they cant win.0
-
Smellyman wrote:steal a necklace. it is gone.
share a file. it still exists
Take part in an illegal transaction, lose your money, get arrested.0 -
peacefrompaul wrote:Prince Of Dorkness wrote:The movie studios and music companies have been screwed out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
I'm sure they make up for it, not to mention how the record companies screw the artists over.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJ5iHaV0dP4
Oh, you're preaching to the choir. But in the end, the producers have the right to protect their copyright.0 -
Prince Of Dorkness wrote:peacefrompaul wrote:Prince Of Dorkness wrote:The movie studios and music companies have been screwed out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
I'm sure they make up for it, not to mention how the record companies screw the artists over.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJ5iHaV0dP4
Oh, you're preaching to the choir. But in the end, the producers have the right to protect their copyright.
That's a fact0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help