obama want's to raise debt celing

MayDay Malone

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

Go Beavers wrote:

The question would be: "if you oppose it now, why didn't you oppose it when Bush Jr. did it?"

or reagan? what about the 18 times he raised it??

or g w bush? he raised it 7 times...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... times-geo/

I'd say Reagan needed to do it- we we're winning the Cold War- and you know how we did it?

We OUTSPENT them. God, I love capitalism.

gimmesometruth27

MayDay Malone wrote:

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

Go Beavers wrote:

The question would be: "if you oppose it now, why didn't you oppose it when Bush Jr. did it?"

or reagan? what about the 18 times he raised it??

or g w bush? he raised it 7 times...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... times-geo/

I'd say Reagan needed to do it- we we're winning the Cold War- and you know how we did it?

We OUTSPENT them. God, I love capitalism.

ok i get it...

spending was ok under saint reagan, but it is a no-no under obama...

no double standard there...

MayDay Malone

30 years ago- post-Carter, and embroiled in a Cold War.
I say needed. The spending created 20 million jobs, and reversed the effects of Carter's failed policies.

Now- we've lost our credit rating, and our debt is SO big, that we may very well be living in a post-Ameican world already. That probably makes a few hearts flutter with glee on here, but if you think things are bad now- just wait til Obama's utopia gets here. I'd stay out of the cities if I were you....or me...

There has to be a limit. We have reached that limit.

To say that people who are opposed to more spending now, are opposed because they don't like black people, is nothing more than inflammatory race-baiting.

Jason P

MayDay Malone wrote:

I'd say Reagan needed to do it- we we're winning the Cold War- and you know how we did it?

We OUTSPENT them. God, I love capitalism.

In the last years of the Cold War, the Soviet Union was devoting 25.5% of its GDP to military spending. Reagan was using 6.5% of the US GDP.

And the Soviets were wrapping up a costly war in Afghanistan right before their collapse as well. Read into that what you will.

Go Beavers

MayDay Malone wrote:

30 years ago- post-Carter, and embroiled in a Cold War.
I say needed. The spending created 20 million jobs, and reversed the effects of Carter's failed policies.

So government spending does create jobs..

gimmesometruth27

Go Beavers wrote:

MayDay Malone wrote:

30 years ago- post-Carter, and embroiled in a Cold War.
I say needed. The spending created 20 million jobs, and reversed the effects of Carter's failed policies.

So government spending does create jobs..

Newch91

Go Beavers wrote:

MayDay Malone wrote:

30 years ago- post-Carter, and embroiled in a Cold War.
I say needed. The spending created 20 million jobs, and reversed the effects of Carter's failed policies.

So government spending does create jobs..

Who knew

MayDay Malone

Go Beavers wrote:

MayDay Malone wrote:

30 years ago- post-Carter, and embroiled in a Cold War.
I say needed. The spending created 20 million jobs, and reversed the effects of Carter's failed policies.

So government spending does create jobs..

Miltary spending.... but I appreciate that you took the opportunity to make a funny.

catefrances

MayDay Malone wrote:

Go Beavers wrote:

MayDay Malone wrote:

Anyone that opposes this debt hike is a racist.

Raising the debt celing and a 'debt hike' are two different things.

If you say so.

But if you oppose either, I say you hate half-black people.

quite possibly half white people too. :?


man i feel stupid just thinking those words.

inmytree

MayDay Malone wrote:

30 years ago- post-Carter, and embroiled in a Cold War.
I say needed. The spending created 20 million jobs, and reversed the effects of Carter's failed policies.

Now- we've lost our credit rating, and our debt is SO big, that we may very well be living in a post-Ameican world already. That probably makes a few hearts flutter with glee on here, but if you think things are bad now- just wait til Obama's utopia gets here. I'd stay out of the cities if I were you....or me...

There has to be a limit. We have reached that limit.

To say that people who are opposed to more spending now, are opposed because they don't like black people, is nothing more than inflammatory race-baiting.

this is so scary....

as for race baiting...you're the person who brought up race (But if you oppose either, I say you hate half-black people) and now you bitch about race baiting....I love it, you race bait and then complain about race baiting...

dumb... :roll:

Go Beavers

MayDay Malone wrote:

Go Beavers wrote:

MayDay Malone wrote:

30 years ago- post-Carter, and embroiled in a Cold War.
I say needed. The spending created 20 million jobs, and reversed the effects of Carter's failed policies.

So government spending does create jobs..

Miltary spending.... but I appreciate that you took the opportunity to make a funny.

How do you figure that only military spending creates jobs, but not other types of spending?

MayDay Malone

inmytree wrote:

MayDay Malone wrote:

30 years ago- post-Carter, and embroiled in a Cold War.
I say needed. The spending created 20 million jobs, and reversed the effects of Carter's failed policies.

Now- we've lost our credit rating, and our debt is SO big, that we may very well be living in a post-Ameican world already. That probably makes a few hearts flutter with glee on here, but if you think things are bad now- just wait til Obama's utopia gets here. I'd stay out of the cities if I were you....or me...

There has to be a limit. We have reached that limit.

To say that people who are opposed to more spending now, are opposed because they don't like black people, is nothing more than inflammatory race-baiting.

this is so scary....

as for race baiting...you're the person who brought up race (But if you oppose either, I say you hate half-black people) and now you bitch about race baiting....I love it, you race bait and then complain about race baiting...

dumb... :roll:

I see that sarcasm is not your thing...

inmytree

MayDay Malone wrote:

I see that sarcasm is not your thing...

perhaps sarcasm is not your thing....

serious...

MayDay Malone

inmytree wrote:

MayDay Malone wrote:

I see that sarcasm is not your thing...

perhaps sarcasm is not your thing....

serious...

a week later?

serious...

inmytree

MayDay Malone wrote:

inmytree wrote:

MayDay Malone wrote:

I see that sarcasm is not your thing...

perhaps sarcasm is not your thing....

serious...

a week later?

serious...

sorry I don't live here...

you mad...