Fantasy Football Today: Who should i start?

LeatherMosquitoMan

jethrojam420 wrote:

it's a safe bet that O will at least get in the endzone if nothing else. you are on thin ice on a bye week in that league, so you just have to ride the wave where it takes you.. and hope for the best

Yeah... i think i'll go with O and Jackie Battle.

jethrojam420

LeatherMosquitoMan wrote:

Wilds wrote:

Well the good news is you are in a good spot, no matter who you start.

ALL SIX are viable and at that point it is just a crap shoot.

So even if the one you bench goes off, you can't really second guess yourself.

yeah, that's exactly how i feel, at least it's an embarrasment of riches. Plus i have Mathews and Chris Johnson on that team, lol, and i'm benching CJ. Lol i didn't mention that. I have Chris Johnson on that team too, but i took him out of the equation...

and my other WR is Nate Washington, but i feel he's 4th on my depth chart

i am so happy he (CJ0K) was still sitting out when i drafted, leading my decision to pass on him. good move on both these decisions..

youngster

I also have a dilemma.

Matthews has been doing great for me all year at RB. Looks like he won't play tomorrow which leaves me with Brandon Jacobs for NY or James Starks for GB.

Ahmad Bradshaw looks doubtful with a broken foot but is Jacobs their go-to back? And Starks starts behind Ryan Grant in GB so how many touches will he actually get?

Tough one.

Any help would be appreciated.

jethrojam420

youngster wrote:

I also have a dilemma.

Matthews has been doing great for me all year at RB. Looks like he won't play tomorrow which leaves me with Brandon Jacobs for NY or James Starks for GB.

Ahmad Bradshaw looks doubtful with a broken foot but is Jacobs their go-to back? And Starks starts behind Ryan Grant in GB so how many touches will he actually get?

Tough one.

Any help would be appreciated.

Jacobs likes to fumble a lot but is the starter against our beloved pats who probably will concentrate on defending the air assault rather than the run. Ryan grant is a terrible start due to ARog's consistent desire to throw the ball all the time, so starks would be even worse. Jacobs is the man for the job.

Wilds

Jacobs should do fine. Bradshaw is out and the Pats will give up some yards as both offenses score a lot.



Also thanks for the advice all....

youngster

jethrojam420 wrote:

youngster wrote:

I also have a dilemma.

Matthews has been doing great for me all year at RB. Looks like he won't play tomorrow which leaves me with Brandon Jacobs for NY or James Starks for GB.

Ahmad Bradshaw looks doubtful with a broken foot but is Jacobs their go-to back? And Starks starts behind Ryan Grant in GB so how many touches will he actually get?

Tough one.

Any help would be appreciated.

Jacobs likes to fumble a lot but is the starter against our beloved pats who probably will concentrate on defending the air assault rather than the run. Ryan grant is a terrible start due to ARog's consistent desire to throw the ball all the time, so starks would be even worse. Jacobs is the man for the job.

Thanks for the advice. I put Jacobs in over Starks. Good thing I have Greg Jennings as one of my WR''s sine GB's air assault should be in full effect.

LeatherMosquitoMan

jethrojam420 wrote:

youngster wrote:

I also have a dilemma.

Matthews has been doing great for me all year at RB. Looks like he won't play tomorrow which leaves me with Brandon Jacobs for NY or James Starks for GB.

Ahmad Bradshaw looks doubtful with a broken foot but is Jacobs their go-to back? And Starks starts behind Ryan Grant in GB so how many touches will he actually get?

Tough one.

Any help would be appreciated.

Jacobs likes to fumble a lot but is the starter against our beloved pats who probably will concentrate on defending the air assault rather than the run. Ryan grant is a terrible start due to ARog's consistent desire to throw the ball all the time, so starks would be even worse. Jacobs is the man for the job.

This

LeatherMosquitoMan

Bump

LeatherMosquitoMan

Ugh. Big money league... 2nd WR.. Deion Branch or Nate Washington?

jethrojam420

LeatherMosquitoMan wrote:

Ugh. Big money league... 2nd WR.. Deion Branch or Nate Washington?

washington but its close

jethrojam420

And the winners are....

was a good idea to keep put tolbert instead of marshall. although we shouldve dumped benson in favor of marshall. like yahoo said...


eric decker wins over stevie johnson, while kevin walter shouldve stayed on the bench

nate washington was a tie against deon branch

jacobs killed starks

ringer beat out the BIG O by a nose

i think given the circumstances it wasnt too bad. after all, you wouldve called me crazy 8 hours ago to bench brady in favor of andy dalton right??

LeatherMosquitoMan

I ended up benching Benson.

I played Bowe, Lloyd and Marshall as my flex, with Tolbert and DeMarco Murray. My team blew up. I also have Rivers and Jason Witten to round that team out. I'm going to win by over 100

Other league, is a non-factor. I got shit out of Branch, Ogbannaya did fucking nothing and Jackie Battle was average.

Thanks for the advice.

I got promising numbers out of Johnson and Benson on the bench, and also Ryan Mathews. I'm definitely set w/this team i feel...

Wilds

Wilds wrote:

I rank them in a PPR league like this:


Tolbert (should catch 4 or 5 balls) = 23
Lloyd (getting a lot of targets) = 13
Bowe (think the 2ndary is bit hurt AND it's Miami to begin with) = 14
Murray (feature back) = 21
Marshall (getting targets and is bound to catch more than he has been) = 24
Benson (that's one ugly lookin' dude) = 7

Yeah for me.

Wilds

So I played Steve Johnson over Decker. either was fine....


But Heyward-Bey royally screwed me.

ughhh.