Checking in to see if you still love Brad Marchand.
Absolutely.
F the Bruins front office. Marchand & Frederic were the only two players worth watching this year. I don’t begrudge the Frederic trade, but Marchand should have worn the spoken B for life.
Checking in to see if you still love Brad Marchand.
Absolutely.
F the Bruins front office. Marchand & Frederic were the only two players worth watching this year. I don’t begrudge the Frederic trade, but Marchand should have worn the spoken B for life.
Checking in to see if you still love Brad Marchand.
Absolutely.
F the Bruins front office. Marchand & Frederic were the only two players worth watching this year. I don’t begrudge the Frederic trade, but Marchand should have worn the spoken B for life.
nah. Im rooting for a 100% tkachuk to come back and beat the Leafs or Habs in the playoffs to show how much of a circus this circumvention issue is and it becomes a front-and-center issue as Canadian fans and hockey media won't drop it.
There’s never a good reason to root fit the Panthers (unless they are playing the Bruins).
even that reason is moot, now.
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
nah. Im rooting for a 100% tkachuk to come back and beat the Leafs or Habs in the playoffs to show how much of a circus this circumvention issue is and it becomes a front-and-center issue as Canadian fans and hockey media won't drop it.
There’s never a good reason to root fit the Panthers (unless they are playing the Bruins).
During the Tonight Show interview, Jimmy Fallon asked Tkachuk about the intense rivalry between Team Canada and the U.S. in the 4 Nations Final, a series that culminated in a dramatic showdown. Tkachuk, who is known for his candid and sometimes controversial statements, didn’t hold back when addressing the result.
“Well, we didn’t lose to Canada, we lost to the refs,” Tkachuk said, with a hint of frustration in his voice. “Canada definitely got the special whistle in that game.” Fallon, amused but intrigued, probed further, asking Tkachuk to elaborate on what he meant by “the special whistle.”
Tkachuk explained that several key moments in the game were influenced by questionable calls that he believed disproportionately favored Canada. While he acknowledged the talent of the Canadian team, he made it clear that the refereeing decisions had a significant impact on the outcome. “It wasn’t the game we were playing,” Tkachuk added. “It was the calls that were made—and not made—that decided the final result.”
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
Jets v Stars is a big deal tonight. Will show how much we got.
Not really overly important. Like the Leafs, let’s see what you can do in the playoffs
1996: Toronto 2003: St. Paul 2005: Thunder Bay 2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa 2009: Chicago I, Chicago II 2010: Boston 2011: Toronto I, Toronto II, Winnipeg 2012: Missoula 2013: London, Pittsburgh, Buffalo 2014: St. Paul, Milwaukee 2016: Quebec City, Ottawa, Toronto I, Toronto II 2022: Hamilton, Toronto 2023: St. Paul I, St. Paul II 2024: Vancouver I, Vancouver II
Jets are solid, I hope they go deep. Canada’s best chance by far this year. I think all the guys want to be there and they moved on from the guys that did not want to be there. The west has some depth though, Stars, Avs, Knights
1996: Toronto 2003: St. Paul 2005: Thunder Bay 2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa 2009: Chicago I, Chicago II 2010: Boston 2011: Toronto I, Toronto II, Winnipeg 2012: Missoula 2013: London, Pittsburgh, Buffalo 2014: St. Paul, Milwaukee 2016: Quebec City, Ottawa, Toronto I, Toronto II 2022: Hamilton, Toronto 2023: St. Paul I, St. Paul II 2024: Vancouver I, Vancouver II
0
F Me In The Brain
this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,650
Good tilt last night, wish they let it go. Love how both of the guys were stoked, after.
Had high hopes. But the Jets just can’t seem to crack the codes of some teams.
My new prediction is they get swept in the 2nd round, or in 6 games in the first round, depending who they play.
I don't understand. They have 106 points. Why are you down on them? Great goaltending is number one priority in playoffs and yo have that. And you've scored the most goals in the West.
The only risk I see is winning the President's, which is a curse.
Had high hopes. But the Jets just can’t seem to crack the codes of some teams.
My new prediction is they get swept in the 2nd round, or in 6 games in the first round, depending who they play.
I don't understand. They have 106 points. Why are you down on them? Great goaltending is number one priority in playoffs and yo have that. And you've scored the most goals in the West.
The only risk I see is winning the President's, which is a curse.
a) like I mentioned, we can't crack the codes of certain teams. The Kings swept the season series. Quite easily. b) add to that our track record in the playoffs even with a good season. Sure, different coach, some different players. I don't know man. Maybe I'm just more cautious in my hopes as it draws nearer.
Edit to add: and people who know WAY more about hockey than I do don't give them much of a chance at a serious run.
Post edited by HughFreakingDillon on
"Oh Canada...you're beautiful when you're drunk" -EV 8/14/93
Had high hopes. But the Jets just can’t seem to crack the codes of some teams.
My new prediction is they get swept in the 2nd round, or in 6 games in the first round, depending who they play.
I don't understand. They have 106 points. Why are you down on them? Great goaltending is number one priority in playoffs and yo have that. And you've scored the most goals in the West.
The only risk I see is winning the President's, which is a curse.
a) like I mentioned, we can't crack the codes of certain teams. The Kings swept the season series. Quite easily. b) add to that our track record in the playoffs even with a good season. Sure, different coach, some different players. I don't know man. Maybe I'm just more cautious in my hopes as it draws nearer.
Edit to add: and people who know WAY more about hockey than I do don't give them much of a chance at a serious run.
IT sounds like you are in protection mode. Hope for the best, expect the worst.
that’s a turnoff to me, too. then again, he passed a trump sympathizer. maybe fuck ‘em both?
If I had known then what I know now...
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
Comments
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14
https://autulu.com/nunu/nhl-star-matthew-tkachuk-refuses-to-acknowledge-canadas-victory-in-the-4-nations-final-during-his-appearance-on-the-tonight-show-with-jimmy-fallon/#google_vignette
“Canada Got the Special Whistle”
During the Tonight Show interview, Jimmy Fallon asked Tkachuk about the intense rivalry between Team Canada and the U.S. in the 4 Nations Final, a series that culminated in a dramatic showdown. Tkachuk, who is known for his candid and sometimes controversial statements, didn’t hold back when addressing the result.
“Well, we didn’t lose to Canada, we lost to the refs,” Tkachuk said, with a hint of frustration in his voice. “Canada definitely got the special whistle in that game.” Fallon, amused but intrigued, probed further, asking Tkachuk to elaborate on what he meant by “the special whistle.”
Tkachuk explained that several key moments in the game were influenced by questionable calls that he believed disproportionately favored Canada. While he acknowledged the talent of the Canadian team, he made it clear that the refereeing decisions had a significant impact on the outcome. “It wasn’t the game we were playing,” Tkachuk added. “It was the calls that were made—and not made—that decided the final result.”
-EV 8/14/93
-EV 8/14/93
2003: St. Paul
2005: Thunder Bay
2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa
2009: Chicago I, Chicago II
2010: Boston
2011: Toronto I, Toronto II, Winnipeg
2012: Missoula
2013: London, Pittsburgh, Buffalo
2014: St. Paul, Milwaukee
2016: Quebec City, Ottawa, Toronto I, Toronto II
2022: Hamilton, Toronto
2023: St. Paul I, St. Paul II
2024: Vancouver I, Vancouver II
-EV 8/14/93
2003: St. Paul
2005: Thunder Bay
2008: West Palm Beach, Tampa
2009: Chicago I, Chicago II
2010: Boston
2011: Toronto I, Toronto II, Winnipeg
2012: Missoula
2013: London, Pittsburgh, Buffalo
2014: St. Paul, Milwaukee
2016: Quebec City, Ottawa, Toronto I, Toronto II
2022: Hamilton, Toronto
2023: St. Paul I, St. Paul II
2024: Vancouver I, Vancouver II
Love how both of the guys were stoked, after.
-EV 8/14/93
The only risk I see is winning the President's, which is a curse.
b) add to that our track record in the playoffs even with a good season. Sure, different coach, some different players. I don't know man. Maybe I'm just more cautious in my hopes as it draws nearer.
Edit to add: and people who know WAY more about hockey than I do don't give them much of a chance at a serious run.
-EV 8/14/93
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
I still don't think anyone will ever match Nolan Ryan's 5000+ strikeouts.
Till there aint nothing left worth taking away from me.....
Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
VIC 07
EV LA1 08
Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
Columbus 10
EV LA 11
Vancouver 11
Missoula 12
Portland 13, Spokane 13
St. Paul 14, Denver 14