Would you rather?

81

rick1zoo2 wrote:

The 81 wrote:

=if(problem=65000+rowsofdata,access,if(problem=presentation,powerpoint,if(problem=number,excel,word)))

:P

that's classic. that I understand. My girlfriend is a lawyer, so she lives in Word, I live in Excel and Access

the access version

=iif(problem=65000+rowsofdata,access,iif(problem=presentation,powerpoint,iif(problem=number,excel,word)))

:P

Indifference71

$2,500 a week for sure. I'd never work again...

rick1zoo2

The 81 wrote:

rick1zoo2 wrote:

The 81 wrote:

=if(problem=65000+rowsofdata,access,if(problem=presentation,powerpoint,if(problem=number,excel,word)))

:P

that's classic. that I understand. My girlfriend is a lawyer, so she lives in Word, I live in Excel and Access

the access version

=iif(problem=65000+rowsofdata,access,iif(problem=presentation,powerpoint,iif(problem=number,excel,word)))

:P

Nerd.


j/k, takes one to know one

iamica

I'd take the weekly payment, just so I would know that I have at least some income coming in every week for the rest of my life.

decides2dream

Absolutely the 2500/week....no question.
We phave a smilar lottery here in NY tho less money, but good enough....1000/week for life, 2000/week for lifeor 5000/week for life.

chiquimonkey

Hmmm I dunno...I think I'd take the lump sum, just because it would be my luck that I'd win, go with the weekly payments, and then have a piano fall on me the very next day lol besides you could still invest some of that money anyway.

I'd love to have this problem to deal with, that's all I know!

decides2dream

chiquimonkey wrote:

Hmmm I dunno...I think I'd take the lump sum, just because it would be my luck that I'd win, go with the weekly payments, and then have a piano fall on me the very next day lol besides you could still invest some of that money anyway.

I'd love to have this problem to deal with, that's all I know!

Ahhhhh, an optimist!
My husband would probably think similarly. Me, id take my chances...

And hell yea, great problem to have!

chiquimonkey

decides2dream wrote:

chiquimonkey wrote:

Hmmm I dunno...I think I'd take the lump sum, just because it would be my luck that I'd win, go with the weekly payments, and then have a piano fall on me the very next day lol besides you could still invest some of that money anyway.

I'd love to have this problem to deal with, that's all I know!

Ahhhhh, an optimist!
My husband would probably think similarly. Me, id take my chances...

And hell yea, great problem to have!

The way things have been going lately, it'd probably be TWO pianos

This reminds me I really do need to play the lotto more often!

decides2dream

chiquimonkey wrote:

The way things have been going lately, it'd probably be TWO pianos

This reminds me I really do need to play the lotto more often!

I hear that, believe me. :?
Im hoping i am due to have my luck change for the better already.

We have a yearly ticket, have had since weve married.....so almost 19 years! Haha. Surely were due by now? I also pick up a couple tix/scratch offs the first of every month, since thats when i quit smoking almost 8 years ago. I know its not very likely, but we waste money on other stupid shit, and this gives me a little joy, so why not? As they say, you never know!

rick1zoo2

can't win unless you play

dcfaithful

I'm going to derail one more time, for this I apologize... but I just couldn't help myself. I hope someone serves back on this reference.

Would you rather do it with Jack Nicholson or Molly Ringwald?

81

dcfaithful wrote:

I'm going to derail one more time, for this I apologize... but I just couldn't help myself. I hope someone serves back on this reference.

Would you rather do it with Jack Nicholson or Molly Ringwald?

if(or(user=gay male,user=straight woman),jack,molly)

:P

Gary Carter

$2,500 a week

rick1zoo2

dcfaithful wrote:

I'm going to derail one more time, for this I apologize... but I just couldn't help myself. I hope someone serves back on this reference.

Would you rather do it with Jack Nicholson or Molly Ringwald?

can't I just have the money?

dcfaithful

rick1zoo2 wrote:

dcfaithful wrote:

I'm going to derail one more time, for this I apologize... but I just couldn't help myself. I hope someone serves back on this reference.

Would you rather do it with Jack Nicholson or Molly Ringwald?

can't I just have the money?

It's a Billy Madison reference. Damn you all! :(

pandora

I'm getting up there ... better take the lump sum cash and live it up while I can!

dcfaithful

The 81 wrote:

dcfaithful wrote:

I'm going to derail one more time, for this I apologize... but I just couldn't help myself. I hope someone serves back on this reference.

Would you rather do it with Jack Nicholson or Molly Ringwald?

if(or(user=gay male,user=straight woman),jack,molly)

:P

if(user=cool,awesome,sexy,dcfaithful) if(user=smartass,excessive forum posts,wants to be like dcfaithful, 81)

I'm sure I fucked that up.

MayDay10

wasnt it Meg Ryan?

dcfaithful

MayDay10 wrote:

wasnt it Meg Ryan?

I'm pretty sure it was Molly Ringwald... but I could be wrong.

81

dcfaithful wrote:

The 81 wrote:

dcfaithful wrote:

I'm going to derail one more time, for this I apologize... but I just couldn't help myself. I hope someone seorves back on this reference.

Would you rather do it with Jack Nicholson or Molly Ringwald?

if(or(user=gay male,user=straight woman),jack,molly)

:P

if(user=cool,awesome,sexy,dcfaithful) if(user=smartass,excessive forum posts,wants to be like dcfaithful, 81)

I'm sure I fucked that up.

dcfaithful

The 81 wrote:

dcfaithful wrote:

The 81 wrote:

if(or(user=gay male,user=straight woman),jack,molly)

:P

if(user=cool,awesome,sexy,dcfaithful) if(user=smartass,excessive forum posts,wants to be like dcfaithful, 81)

I'm sure I fucked that up.

Did I get the syntax right?

81

Not even close

dcfaithful

The 81 wrote:

Not even close

The point was made, and that is all that matters...

you dcfaithful wanna be, you.

:P

JOEJOEJOE

RKCNDY wrote:

weekly...taxes on $1.9m lump sum would only leave me with about $1m, which I could make in about 7.69 years (give or take a few years) with the weekly payments.

You'd net $1,235,000 assuming Federal tax of 35%

Luckily there is no state tax in WA

As long as tax rates stay the same, you are better-off opting for the weekly payments as long as you plan on living 18 years or more.

RKCNDY

JOEJOEJOE wrote:

RKCNDY wrote:

weekly...taxes on $1.9m lump sum would only leave me with about $1m, which I could make in about 7.69 years (give or take a few years) with the weekly payments.

You'd net $1,235,000 assuming Federal tax of 35%

Luckily there is no state tax in WA

As long as tax rates stay the same, you are better-off opting for the weekly payments as long as you plan on living 18 years or more.

I do plan on living at least another 50 years...I think I could make a nice chunk of change with weekly payments....even more if I put away half of it every week....or I could play another lottery, and win another $2500/week or $1.9m lump sum, invest that and live a fairly cushy life...again, hypothetically.

decides2dream

gave a couple of tickets to my hubby in his birthday card yesterday, including tix to win 2000/week for life and 5000/week for life. he won!!!












14 dollars.