"Makes much more sense to live in the present tense"
Mansfield 08 1
Boston 2010
Montreal 2011
EV Prov 11
Worcester 1 13
Worcester 2 13
Hartford 13 Boston 16 - 1 Boston 16 - 2 Boston 18 - 1 Boston 18 -2 MSG 24 - 1 Boston 24 -1 Boston 24 -2
Price Point - are kidding me? By the sounds of it you're a business major/business type of guy but in today's economy this is a little much. I just bought a Neil Young ticket for the Wang theatre for $101 and last month I got a ticket for Cornell for $39.50 at even a smaller venue - so how does Eddie charge $75 with charges amounts to be around $95-$100.
I'm going to go - I've seen him solo 4 times now and paid the same for all the shows but it does add up and to say "price point" is flat out wrong. Neil and Chris have been around longer and have more material. I have a feeling unless it's a arena like td bank north or an ampitheatr like the comcast, theatres are always going to sell-out no matter the price - this is about making cash that simple.
It's one of those things basically if you don't want to pay the money don't go but don't make it a "price point" thing. Peace and love!
If you are talking expensive, I'm on board with what you are saying. If you say overpriced then you are flat out wrong.
You can bring in emotion, level of the artist, how long an artist has been around, and how much material they have, how rich they are, and all sorts of B.S. to make you feel that your point is valid, but it is not.
Tickets that are overpriced won't sell. Doesn't mean they aren't expensive.
It might only be about making cash(which I find flat out ridiculous), I don't know that and neither do you, but you can't say they are overpriced IMO.
You say it's a cash grab, I say it is more likely that Eddie Vedder treats his auxiliary staff well. I could be right, or you might be.
But that is besides the point.
And in 1997 I graduated from the University of Massachusetts Amherst with a degree in Sports Management.
Tickets $78. Ouch. About $90 after service charges.
The money is not bad if you're only going to one show. It's when you shell out $350 for 2 shows where it gets bad.(if you're getting pairs from the 10c). Especially if the shows are pretty much 90% the same.
Tickets $78. Ouch. About $90 after service charges.
The money is not bad if you're only going to one show. It's when you shell out $350 for 2 shows where it gets bad.(if you're getting pairs from the 10c). Especially if the shows are pretty much 90% the same.
I loved both LA shows in 08 or whenever they were, but I was mildly disappointed about the repetitive nature of the 2nd show.
Enough so that I will have a serious debate as to whether or not I'll attend a 2nd this time around.
Fortunately I'll have the East Coast leg to give me a heads up about the set lists.
well done wilds. imo, i prefer non tiered ticket pricing cause it's totally un rock n roll like to make people pay more cause they are close up. same price for any ticket in the building. only with lawns i do prefer 2 ticket levels
HTUC got called the "anti-d" last week. i'd prefer debbie downer
If being truthful and realistic without blinders = debbie downer then so be it. I spoke of the truth. Based on Wilds explanation of overpriced, if we want to get technical by dictionary definitions, then maybe that was the wrong word. I will change my adjective to greedy. He is greedy. They are greedy.
And tiered pricing pretty much sucks. Nosebleeds at the Spectrum were the same price as front row. That is essentially the same as charging $300 for front row tickets. Overhcarging for nosebleeds...undercharging for front rows. If you averaged up the prices of a show ranging from $150 - $40 tickets in an arena I would be willing to bet the average comes in lower than charging the same for every seat. It is a clever way to hide maximum profit.
What I don't understand is...if Eddie will tour theaters and sell out at $90 then why won't the band tour the south doing just that? They seem to think they have to play an arena to justify touring an area. I don't know if it's ego or money or what.
It's all just my opinion obviously and I will be voting with my wallet. In spite of my complaining I would probably still consider going if the shows looked different that the previous shows I went to. As of now, they are looking pretty similar. The Tower in Philly is an amazing venue though and hopefully some new people get to experience the shows.
Do we think that there will be another show added for Friday?
Probably not if he is playing in Hartford on Saturday.
I just noticed that too. Wed then? I would be suprised if he only did one show.
Very curious to see the final "official" schedule. If there are two nights in Boston I probably won't go to Hartford. One night then most likely I will.
Please don't make us go through another TBD fiasco.
well done wilds. imo, i prefer non tiered ticket pricing cause it's totally un rock n roll like to make people pay more cause they are close up. same price for any ticket in the building. only with lawns i do prefer 2 ticket levels
HTUC got called the "anti-d" last week. i'd prefer debbie downer
If being truthful and realistic without blinders = debbie downer then so be it. I spoke of the truth. Based on Wilds explanation of overpriced, if we want to get technical by dictionary definitions, then maybe that was the wrong word. I will change my adjective to greedy. He is greedy. They are greedy.
And tiered pricing pretty much sucks. Nosebleeds at the Spectrum were the same price as front row. That is essentially the same as charging $300 for front row tickets. Overhcarging for nosebleeds...undercharging for front rows. If you averaged up the prices of a show ranging from $150 - $40 tickets in an arena I would be willing to bet the average comes in lower than charging the same for every seat. It is a clever way to hide maximum profit.
What I don't understand is...if Eddie will tour theaters and sell out at $90 then why won't the band tour the south doing just that? They seem to think they have to play an arena to justify touring an area. I don't know if it's ego or money or what.
It's all just my opinion obviously and I will be voting with my wallet. In spite of my complaining I would probably still consider going if the shows looked different that the previous shows I went to. As of now, they are looking pretty similar. The Tower in Philly is an amazing venue though and hopefully some new people get to experience the shows.
A very fair opinion. One I disagree with, but fair none-the-less.
I find bands traditionally keep prices artificially low for their fans. Real market value is exposed in the free second hand market, and it is not pretty.
It has been discussed a lot about how and why EV and PJ arrive at the price that is set. Some feel it is greed, I feel there are many, many factors, most of which we will never be privy to.
And yes we all vote with our wallet. Every single time. It is the only power we have.
Collectively we are totally fine with the price of tickets for both PJ and EV solo shows.
I am with you JimmyV. If there is a 2nd show, most likely the day before, I wont be going to Hartford. But I bet Hartford on a Sat night would be a blast. Though I have a 20th anniversary show to save up for.
I have been to 4 Ed shows, and IMO he is worth every penny. I absolutely love his live shows, infact i am more excited about the prospects of seeing him again this summer than i would have been at seeing a full Pearl Jam show.
His setlist seems slightly more varied now than it was when he first started touring, although obviously nowhere near the PJ shows. If the opportunity arises, i'd definitely go check him out again on back to back nights.
Shows: Montreal 98, Barrie 98, Montreal 00, Montreal 03, Montreal 05, Ottawa 05, Toronto 06, Vancouver Night 1 08 (EV), Vancouver Night 2 08 (EV), MSG1 08, MSG2 08, Montreal Night 2 08 (EV), Toronto Night 1 08 (EV), Toronto 09, Hartford 11 (EV), Ottawa 11, Ottawa 16, Ottawa 22.
Ed puts on an excellent show..But, as of right now I am not going any of shows..Specially if I have to travel a long distance....Right now, each day that goes by I am losing my passion for the band pearl jam...I can't explain the reasons why...Just not into the band as much as I use to be..
Ed puts on an excellent show..But, as of right now I am not going any of shows..Specially if I have to travel a long distance....Right now, each day that goes by I am losing my passion for the band pearl jam...I can't explain the reasons why...Just not into the band as much as I use to be..
Jeremy
Sorry to hear that man! BTW - What is your Tenclub number???
:P
Comments
Mansfield 08 1
Boston 2010
Montreal 2011
EV Prov 11
Worcester 1 13
Worcester 2 13
Hartford 13
Boston 16 - 1
Boston 16 - 2
Boston 18 - 1
Boston 18 -2
MSG 24 - 1
Boston 24 -1
Boston 24 -2
If you are talking expensive, I'm on board with what you are saying. If you say overpriced then you are flat out wrong.
You can bring in emotion, level of the artist, how long an artist has been around, and how much material they have, how rich they are, and all sorts of B.S. to make you feel that your point is valid, but it is not.
Tickets that are overpriced won't sell. Doesn't mean they aren't expensive.
It might only be about making cash(which I find flat out ridiculous), I don't know that and neither do you, but you can't say they are overpriced IMO.
You say it's a cash grab, I say it is more likely that Eddie Vedder treats his auxiliary staff well. I could be right, or you might be.
But that is besides the point.
And in 1997 I graduated from the University of Massachusetts Amherst with a degree in Sports Management.
Basket weaving was full.
Good luck East coast. These tickets will be gone in one minute.
link brings up an error page now...hahaha...someone must have been yelled at there
The best part about grungereport is 90% of their news comes directly off these boards.
you mean like every other East Coast ticket sale?!
Probably not if he is playing in Hartford on Saturday.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
The money is not bad if you're only going to one show. It's when you shell out $350 for 2 shows where it gets bad.(if you're getting pairs from the 10c). Especially if the shows are pretty much 90% the same.
I just noticed that too. Wed then? I would be suprised if he only did one show.
word! WTF is up with this one show shit?!!!
I loved both LA shows in 08 or whenever they were, but I was mildly disappointed about the repetitive nature of the 2nd show.
Enough so that I will have a serious debate as to whether or not I'll attend a 2nd this time around.
Fortunately I'll have the East Coast leg to give me a heads up about the set lists.
If being truthful and realistic without blinders = debbie downer then so be it. I spoke of the truth. Based on Wilds explanation of overpriced, if we want to get technical by dictionary definitions, then maybe that was the wrong word. I will change my adjective to greedy. He is greedy. They are greedy.
And tiered pricing pretty much sucks. Nosebleeds at the Spectrum were the same price as front row. That is essentially the same as charging $300 for front row tickets. Overhcarging for nosebleeds...undercharging for front rows. If you averaged up the prices of a show ranging from $150 - $40 tickets in an arena I would be willing to bet the average comes in lower than charging the same for every seat. It is a clever way to hide maximum profit.
What I don't understand is...if Eddie will tour theaters and sell out at $90 then why won't the band tour the south doing just that? They seem to think they have to play an arena to justify touring an area. I don't know if it's ego or money or what.
It's all just my opinion obviously and I will be voting with my wallet. In spite of my complaining I would probably still consider going if the shows looked different that the previous shows I went to. As of now, they are looking pretty similar. The Tower in Philly is an amazing venue though and hopefully some new people get to experience the shows.
Very curious to see the final "official" schedule. If there are two nights in Boston I probably won't go to Hartford. One night then most likely I will.
Please don't make us go through another TBD fiasco.
"...I changed by not changing at all..."
A very fair opinion. One I disagree with, but fair none-the-less.
I find bands traditionally keep prices artificially low for their fans. Real market value is exposed in the free second hand market, and it is not pretty.
It has been discussed a lot about how and why EV and PJ arrive at the price that is set. Some feel it is greed, I feel there are many, many factors, most of which we will never be privy to.
And yes we all vote with our wallet. Every single time. It is the only power we have.
Collectively we are totally fine with the price of tickets for both PJ and EV solo shows.
His setlist seems slightly more varied now than it was when he first started touring, although obviously nowhere near the PJ shows. If the opportunity arises, i'd definitely go check him out again on back to back nights.
Jeremy
Sorry to hear that man! BTW - What is your Tenclub number???
:P