Hahaha. That brief, holier than thou jibberish makes you look both elitist and foolish. You realize that right?
Kinda liked his email, no idea how you find it holier than thou? nor jibberish? Its fairly easy to understand. How can you describe this as foolish? its a little poking fun, and a little criticism. He's basically messing around with the guy...
The issue is not the review, it's the fan's response to it. Whenever someone else claim's that another just doesn't get it, it clearly implies an esoteric knowledge. In this instance, that esoteric bit of knowledge is full comprehension of Ed's "gift of music". That's textbook elitism.
It's foolish because it gives the rest of the fan community, some of whom appreciate and respect the opinion of others, a bad name. In a way, it makes us all look dumb.
The issue is not the review, it's the fan's response to it. Whenever someone else claim's that another just doesn't get it, it clearly implies an esoteric knowledge. In this instance, that esoteric bit of knowledge is full comprehension of Ed's "gift of music". That's textbook elitism.
It's foolish because it gives the rest of the fan community, some of whom appreciate and respect the opinion of others, a bad name. In a way, it makes us all look dumb.
Or maybe the guy is just reviewing the reviewers work?
you've gotta admit, the review is utter nonsense? its almost indecipherable for the sake of it
The issue is not the review, it's the fan's response to it. Whenever someone else claim's that another just doesn't get it, it clearly implies an esoteric knowledge. In this instance, that esoteric bit of knowledge is full comprehension of Ed's "gift of music". That's textbook elitism.
It's foolish because it gives the rest of the fan community, some of whom appreciate and respect the opinion of others, a bad name. In a way, it makes us all look dumb.
Hahaha. That brief, holier than thou jibberish makes you look both elitist and foolish. You realize that right?
thats funny! but actually, i thought he could have approached the article much more sensitively than that. I thought his words were completely tasteless.
Empty pockets will allow a greater sense of wealth.
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
Or maybe the guy is just reviewing the reviewers work?
you've gotta admit, the review is utter nonsense? its almost indecipherable for the sake of it
Yes, but he's not reviewing the review, he's berating the guy for "not getting it" which is childish and naive. And again, the review is NOT the issue - it's the guy's response to it. Don't focus on the wrong part of the story.
As an aside, pertaining to the review, what do we mean by "well written" or "utter nonsense"? These are very ambiguous terms. Are we referring to the diction? The structure? Or are we referring to an opinion we don't agree with? The first two are spot on; the article is well written. As for the third, the author's opinion, well it's fine to disagree but it's downright silly to claim something is utter nonsense or not well written because you're opinion doesn't line up with his. Right?
Montreal/98, Toronto/00'03'05'06x2, Brad Toronto/02, Buffalo/03, Kitchener/05, London/05, Hamilton/05, Late Show Taping/06, Cleveland/06, Pittsburgh/06, Bridge School Benefit Concert/06, Hartford/08, Mansfield 1/08, EV Montreal/08x2, EV Toronto/08x2...
Kinda liked his email, no idea how you find it holier than thou? nor jibberish? Its fairly easy to understand. How can you describe this as foolish? its a little poking fun, and a little criticism. He's basically messing around with the guy...
elitist? whatever.
Have you read the review?
thanks man! i didn't think that I should have been attacked for being a passionate fan sticking up for Ed and his music.
but, everyone has there own opinion I guess.
Empty pockets will allow a greater sense of wealth.
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
The issue is not the review, it's the fan's response to it. Whenever someone else claim's that another just doesn't get it, it clearly implies an esoteric knowledge. In this instance, that esoteric bit of knowledge is full comprehension of Ed's "gift of music". That's textbook elitism.
It's foolish because it gives the rest of the fan community, some of whom appreciate and respect the opinion of others, a bad name. In a way, it makes us all look dumb.
this is just ridiculous ^
Empty pockets will allow a greater sense of wealth.
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
You're right, you shouldn't be attacked and if it has come off that way then I need to apologize. So, sorry. I would like to think you could see my point of view however that your note to the author wasn't a bright idea.
Either way, I'm through with this thread. Back to work.
You're right, you shouldn't be attacked and if it has come off that way then I need to apologize. So, sorry. I would like to think you could see my point of view however that your note to the author wasn't a bright idea.
Either way, I'm through with this thread. Back to work.
good idea!
and I accept your apology.
Empty pockets will allow a greater sense of wealth.
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
Yes, but he's not reviewing the review, he's berating the guy for "not getting it" which is childish and naive. And again, the review is NOT the issue - it's the guy's response to it. Don't focus on the wrong part of the story.
As an aside, pertaining to the review, what do we mean by "well written" or "utter nonsense"? These are very ambiguous terms. Are we referring to the diction? The structure? Or are we referring to an opinion we don't agree with? The first two are spot on; the article is well written. As for the third, the author's opinion, well it's fine to disagree but it's downright silly to claim something is utter nonsense or not well written because you're opinion doesn't line up with his. Right?
thanks man! i didn't think that I should have been attacked for being a passionate fan sticking up for Ed and his music.
but, everyone has there own opinion I guess.
Should the author of the review have been accused of not having the oh so cerebral ability to "get" the show and having the audicity to go ahead and write about it anyway?
Creating walls to call your own
So no one catches you?
Should the author of the review have been accused of not having the oh so cerebral ability to "get" the show and having the audicity to go ahead and write about it anyway?
ABSOLUTELY!
YOU got it!
Empty pockets will allow a greater sense of wealth.
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
Should the author of the review have been accused of not having the oh so cerebral ability to "get" the show and having the audicity to go ahead and write about it anyway?
This is a more concise, more sardonic, funnier version of what I was saying. I clearly have no sense of humor, haven't you seen my site?
Just because the man didn't praise Ed as the Lord our Savior doesn't mean he doesn't know what he's talking about
he was doing a review of a show, he doesn't have to "get" anything
I'm sure he was quite aware of the worshippers in the audience, doesn't mean he has to succumb
Maybe.
But perhaps had he known about Ed and the band, he would have gotten why it wasn't out of stupidity that the fans were in awe when Arc was played. Also, when he discusses the lyrics of guaranteed... and takes them as proof of ed's self-righteousness... that's just stupid. He is lending his sensibility to another person (which he does always, and so beautifully).
It was a pretty bad review. It is also funny that a tight-assed newspaper accuses an artist of being tight-assed. But whatever.
... and the will to show I will always be better than before.
Comments
http://www.nj.com/entertainment/music/index.ssf/2008/08/pensive_ballads_at_heart_of_ve.html
Titled-"My Sympathies Ben"
"Man, I just wanted to express my sincere sympathies for you missing the Eddie Vedder show in NYC that was apparent as I read your review.
Anyone who has seen Vedder (either solo or with PJ) and has those kinds of statements, is truly missing out on the gift of music Ed has to share.
But then again, you do write for the times, so with that in mind, I guess your review is par for the course.
Sorry you didn't get it man."
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
he was doing a review of a show, he doesn't have to "get" anything
I'm sure he was quite aware of the worshippers in the audience, doesn't mean he has to succumb
your wrong. the review was woeful. The man wasted a seat. and he clearly knows nothing other than those lovely big posh words.
Kinda liked his email, no idea how you find it holier than thou? nor jibberish? Its fairly easy to understand. How can you describe this as foolish? its a little poking fun, and a little criticism. He's basically messing around with the guy...
elitist? whatever.
Have you read the review?
It's foolish because it gives the rest of the fan community, some of whom appreciate and respect the opinion of others, a bad name. In a way, it makes us all look dumb.
I'm glad someone in this world does not think Ed's is god- keeps the rest of us grounded.
LOL @ writing stupid letters to people who dont agree- Ed would be ashamed of you!
Awesome! I feel the same way, in the sense that its unfortunate that the writer can't get what we get out of it. I feel very lucky!
Or maybe the guy is just reviewing the reviewers work?
you've gotta admit, the review is utter nonsense? its almost indecipherable for the sake of it
You make me want to go to sleep.
thats funny! but actually, i thought he could have approached the article much more sensitively than that. I thought his words were completely tasteless.
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
As an aside, pertaining to the review, what do we mean by "well written" or "utter nonsense"? These are very ambiguous terms. Are we referring to the diction? The structure? Or are we referring to an opinion we don't agree with? The first two are spot on; the article is well written. As for the third, the author's opinion, well it's fine to disagree but it's downright silly to claim something is utter nonsense or not well written because you're opinion doesn't line up with his. Right?
Montreal/98, Toronto/00'03'05'06x2, Brad Toronto/02, Buffalo/03, Kitchener/05, London/05, Hamilton/05, Late Show Taping/06, Cleveland/06, Pittsburgh/06, Bridge School Benefit Concert/06, Hartford/08, Mansfield 1/08, EV Montreal/08x2, EV Toronto/08x2...
thanks man! i didn't think that I should have been attacked for being a passionate fan sticking up for Ed and his music.
but, everyone has there own opinion I guess.
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
this is just ridiculous ^
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
Either way, I'm through with this thread. Back to work.
good idea!
and I accept your apology.
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
I think we've just found the author....
Glad YOU got it!
Should the author of the review have been accused of not having the oh so cerebral ability to "get" the show and having the audicity to go ahead and write about it anyway?
So no one catches you?
nice site by the way
ROTFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
>
...a lover and a fighter.
"I'm at least half a bum" Rocky Balboa
http://www.videosift.com/video/Obamas-Message-To-American-Indians
Edmonton, AB. September 5th, 2005
Vancouver, BC. April 3rd, 2008
Calgary,AB. August 8th, 2009
ABSOLUTELY!
YOU got it!
Why contain yourself like any other book on the shelf?
Subtle voices in the wind hear the truth they're telling.
A world begins where the road ends.
Watch me leave it all behind.
Maybe.
But perhaps had he known about Ed and the band, he would have gotten why it wasn't out of stupidity that the fans were in awe when Arc was played. Also, when he discusses the lyrics of guaranteed... and takes them as proof of ed's self-righteousness... that's just stupid. He is lending his sensibility to another person (which he does always, and so beautifully).
It was a pretty bad review. It is also funny that a tight-assed newspaper accuses an artist of being tight-assed. But whatever.