Mubarak resigns

JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
edited February 2011 in A Moving Train
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • I'll be very curious to see what his reign is replaced with as we move into the future. I hope all of this has a true benefit for the world and Egypt's people. They certainly are deserving of something better.
  • memememe Posts: 4,695
    ... and the will to show I will always be better than before.
  • JeanwahJeanwah Posts: 6,363
    Check out the live feed, the celebration is awesome!

    http://english.aljazeera.net/watch_now/
  • Newch91Newch91 Posts: 17,560
    Shows: 6.27.08 Hartford, CT/5.15.10 Hartford, CT/6.18.2011 Hartford, CT (EV Solo)/10.19.13 Brooklyn/10.25.13 Hartford
    "Becoming a Bruce fan is like hitting puberty as a musical fan. It's inevitable." - dcfaithful
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    did he give power over to his military as reported in fox ?
    and I wonder if his vice president will assume power ?
    and what/who changed his mind ?

    Godfather.
  • Jason PJason P Posts: 19,158
    Only took 18 days to get the message through his ego.

    The bad thing is that as life resumes, where and how does it get any better for the citizens? I imagine the tourism industry will not bounce back.

    And hopefully they will not see a spike in violence between groups trying to seize power in the country. We learned in Iraq that when the dictator goes away, the crazies come out to play. Of course part of that was the fault of the U.S. strategy based strictly on kicking ass and not worrying about re-stabilizing the country. Hopefully the Egyptian military and it's current government can maintain order for peaceful September elections.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • polaris_xpolaris_x Posts: 13,559
    the VP has already been tagged by the US ... if he takes over ... i don't suspect we will see fair, democratic elections ... that will be the true test ...

    until then - this is pretty awesome ... a revolution accomplished WITHOUT VIOLENCE!!!!
  • ShawshankShawshank Posts: 1,018
    It all depends on who takes over. Mubarak was a tyrant anyway, but if we see the same thing happen here, which is similar to what happened in Iran 30 years ago, then I'm afraid things won't get better for the people.
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    the egyptian people are pretty secular and moderate... it would be tough for a fundamentalist religion to take hold. The problem I see was the lask of a strong opposition party during Mubarak's reign. There are a lot of little factions, like in Iraq, that will want to steer their country. It'll be rough for them for a while, but what the West needs to do is LET THEM DECIDE.
    The wildcard in the deck... Gaza.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • Godfather.Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    polaris_x wrote:
    the VP has already been tagged by the US ... if he takes over ... i don't suspect we will see fair, democratic elections ... that will be the true test ...

    until then - this is pretty awesome ... a revolution accomplished WITHOUT VIOLENCE!!!!

    kinda not true,people died...but it could have been a hell of a lot worse and for the most part it was a non-violent protest......seems odd, I don't trust the silence.

    Godfather.
  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    I know that Western Intelligence backed coups have been disguised as 'popular revolution' before...so I've spent the last couple weeks looking for a source that is pushing this theory in the Egyptian revolution...
    I know some of you will take that as anti-American, or backwards logic; looking for information to support a predetermined opinion....but it only makes sense. Not much happens in the world without Western foreknowledge or involvement.
    I read when this first started that the US had been funding and training revolutionaries for at least two years (wikileaks), but I couldn't figure out WHY they were going against one of their puppets; what had Mubarek done to cross the West? Apparently, he was resisting a US nuclear umbrella in the middle east....he refused to deepen relations with Israel...he refused to support war with Iran...and he refused to support the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (kangaroo court investigation into Hariri assasination in Lebannon). He stopped playing ball with US interests.

    Webster Tarpley lays it all out in a series of interviews of the last couple weeks:
    http://www.tarpley.net
    (there are audio links under the headlines - looks like the article is missing :D)
  • BinauralJamBinauralJam Posts: 14,158
    I've known that Western Intelligence backed coups have been disguised as 'popular revolution' before...so I've spent the last couple weeks looking for a source that is pushing this theory in the Egyptian revolution...
    I know some of you will take that as anti-American, or backwards logic; looking for information to support a predetermined opinion....but it only makes sense. Not much happens in the world without Western foreknowledge or involvement.
    I read when this first started that the US had been funding and training revolutionaries for at least two years (wikileaks), but I couldn't figure out WHY they were going against one of their puppets; what had Mubarek done to cross the West? Apparently, he was resisting a US nuclear umbrella in the middle east....he refused to deepen relations with Israel...he refused to support war with Iran...and he refused to support the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (kangaroo court investigation into Hariri assasination in Lebannon). He stopped playing ball with US interests.

    Webster Tarpley lays it all out in a series of interviews of the last couple weeks:
    http://www.tarpley.net
    (there are audio links under the headlines - looks like the article is missing :D)


    Sounds about right!
  • zarocatzarocat Posts: 1,901
    I know that Western Intelligence backed coups have been disguised as 'popular revolution' before...so I've spent the last couple weeks looking for a source that is pushing this theory in the Egyptian revolution...
    I know some of you will take that as anti-American, or backwards logic; looking for information to support a predetermined opinion....but it only makes sense. Not much happens in the world without Western foreknowledge or involvement.
    I read when this first started that the US had been funding and training revolutionaries for at least two years (wikileaks), but I couldn't figure out WHY they were going against one of their puppets; what had Mubarek done to cross the West? Apparently, he was resisting a US nuclear umbrella in the middle east....he refused to deepen relations with Israel...he refused to support war with Iran...and he refused to support the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (kangaroo court investigation into Hariri assasination in Lebannon). He stopped playing ball with US interests.

    Webster Tarpley lays it all out in a series of interviews of the last couple weeks:
    http://www.tarpley.net
    (there are audio links under the headlines - looks like the article is missing :D)

    mmhm
    1996: Toronto
    1998: Barrie
    2000: Montreal, Toronto, Auburn Hills
    2003: Cleveland, Buffalo, Toronto, Montreal
    2004: Boston X2, Grand Rapids
    2005: Kitchener, London, Hamilton, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto
    2006: Toronto X2
    2009: Toronto
    2011: PJ20, Montreal, Toronto X2, Hamilton
    2012: Manchester X2, Amsterdam X2, Prague, Berlin X2, Philadelphia, Missoula
    2013: Pittsburg, Buffalo
    2014: Milan, Trieste, Vienna, Berlin, Stockholm, Oslo, Detroit
    2016: Ottawa, Toronto X2
    2018: Padova, Rome, Prague, Krakow, Berlin, Barcelona
    2022: Ottawa, Hamilton, Toronto
    2023: Chicago X2
    2024: New York X2
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    this is fucking history! a people's movement for democracy and some of you motherfuckers are talking about this being another Iran??? it's not another Iran! be happy bitches! anyone who supports human rights and democracy should be ecstatic! I just got back from Tahrir Sq a short while ago and have been blastin live versions of Alive so far going crazy! :D
    I know that Western Intelligence backed coups have been disguised as 'popular revolution' before...so I've spent the last couple weeks looking for a source that is pushing this theory in the Egyptian revolution...
    I know some of you will take that as anti-American, or backwards logic; looking for information to support a predetermined opinion....but it only makes sense. Not much happens in the world without Western foreknowledge or involvement.
    I read when this first started that the US had been funding and training revolutionaries for at least two years (wikileaks), but I couldn't figure out WHY they were going against one of their puppets; what had Mubarek done to cross the West? Apparently, he was resisting a US nuclear umbrella in the middle east....he refused to deepen relations with Israel...he refused to support war with Iran...and he refused to support the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (kangaroo court investigation into Hariri assasination in Lebannon). He stopped playing ball with US interests.

    Webster Tarpley lays it all out in a series of interviews of the last couple weeks:
    http://www.tarpley.net
    (there are audio links under the headlines - looks like the article is missing :D)
    well I'm in Egypt right now and have been participating in the protests and the revolution and I can assure you that you are wrong. First, it IS a people's movement, not a secretly engineered U.S. one. it was unprecedented and the way Mubarak responded shows that. second, Mubarak has been playing ball with the U.S. and Israelis for YEARS! What are you talking about?? He refused to deepen relations with Israel? On what basis? he was selling them natural energy for like 80% below market price, which shows trade relations were fine. he was helping keep Hamas completely isolated and participating in the blockade even DURING the massacre in Gaza in Dec 08-Jan 09, so foreign policy wise he's been great. He has kept freedom of speech dead in his country which keeps the masses and their opinion on Israel subdued, and he HAS actually supported an American attack on Iran as the wikileaks cables show.....

    Not just that, but Obama and the White House have been struggling to try to keep the motherfucker, or the new name we suddenly kept hearing, Omar Suleiman, in power. but that has failed. now the REAL question is the military: what role will they play in this; will they truly serve the people or will foreign interests try to get in the way. that will be left for the future but for tonight I think people should only take this news in extreme joy: everyone, that is, except for Israel. Your racist apartheid regime is crumbling, can you feel it??
  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    this is fucking history! a people's movement for democracy and some of you motherfuckers are talking about this being another Iran??? it's not another Iran! be happy bitches! anyone who supports human rights and democracy should be ecstatic! I just got back from Tahrir Sq a short while ago and have been blastin live versions of Alive so far going crazy! :D
    I know that Western Intelligence backed coups have been disguised as 'popular revolution' before...so I've spent the last couple weeks looking for a source that is pushing this theory in the Egyptian revolution...
    I know some of you will take that as anti-American, or backwards logic; looking for information to support a predetermined opinion....but it only makes sense. Not much happens in the world without Western foreknowledge or involvement.
    I read when this first started that the US had been funding and training revolutionaries for at least two years (wikileaks), but I couldn't figure out WHY they were going against one of their puppets; what had Mubarek done to cross the West? Apparently, he was resisting a US nuclear umbrella in the middle east....he refused to deepen relations with Israel...he refused to support war with Iran...and he refused to support the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (kangaroo court investigation into Hariri assasination in Lebannon). He stopped playing ball with US interests.

    Webster Tarpley lays it all out in a series of interviews of the last couple weeks:
    http://www.tarpley.net
    (there are audio links under the headlines - looks like the article is missing :D)
    well I'm in Egypt right now and have been participating in the protests and the revolution and I can assure you that you are wrong. First, it IS a people's movement, not a secretly engineered U.S. one. it was unprecedented and the way Mubarak responded shows that. second, Mubarak has been playing ball with the U.S. and Israelis for YEARS! What are you talking about?? He refused to deepen relations with Israel? On what basis? he was selling them natural energy for like 80% below market price, which shows trade relations were fine. he was helping keep Hamas completely isolated and participating in the blockade even DURING the massacre in Gaza in Dec 08-Jan 09, so foreign policy wise he's been great. He has kept freedom of speech dead in his country which keeps the masses and their opinion on Israel subdued, and he HAS actually supported an American attack on Iran as the wikileaks cables show.....

    Not just that, but Obama and the White House have been struggling to try to keep the motherfucker, or the new name we suddenly kept hearing, Omar Suleiman, in power. but that has failed. now the REAL question is the military: what role will they play in this; will they truly serve the people or will foreign interests try to get in the way. that will be left for the future but for tonight I think people should only take this news in extreme joy: everyone, that is, except for Israel. Your racist apartheid regime is crumbling, can you feel it??
    Did you check the link I posted?
    This guy purports that the US favoured a military take over weeks ago, but Mubarek was more stubborn than expected. I'm not claiming any of this as truth, just posting what I found in support of suspicions I had.

    As I said, wikileaks showed that the US had been trying to covertly undermine the regime for at least two years, and it appears that it began shortly after the summit in which Mubarek rejected a nuclear umbrella over Egypt and Saudi Arabia ( http://original.antiwar.com/fareed-mahd ... -umbrella/ ). He was too strong in his country, and too stubborn. They want someone more pliant and indebted.


    I'm definitely NOT saying that the people were completely co-opted, doing the bidding of imperialists....or that this is not a good thing, or that this is all US-engineered.
    It appears that the US didn't have the influence it wanted over Mubarek any longer, and they supported regime change to begin with...but it's pretty obvious that the people of Egypt have been oppressed and waiting for a spark, and they got it. I suppose it doesn't really matter what started this, as long as the people are able to control the outcome.
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    polaris_x wrote:
    the VP has already been tagged by the US ... if he takes over ... i don't suspect we will see fair, democratic elections ... that will be the true test ...

    until then - this is pretty awesome ... a revolution accomplished
    WITHOUT VIOLENCE!!!!

    Without violence!!!! :lol: so i guess those people that died just dropped dead from god damn excitement. :rolleyes:
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    'Bout fucking time.

    I wonder what the Israeli's make of it?
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    ....now the REAL question is the military: what role will they play in this; will they truly serve the people or will foreign interests try to get in the way.....?

    Yep.... it will be interesting to see how this pans out.
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    Byrnzie wrote:
    'Bout fucking time.

    I wonder what the Israeli's make of it?

    Seriously steve do you really give a shit what the usraelis make of it?
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • kenny olavkenny olav Posts: 3,319
    WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

    this is fucking history! a people's movement for democracy and some of you motherfuckers are talking about this being another Iran??? it's not another Iran! be happy bitches! anyone who supports human rights and democracy should be ecstatic! I just got back from Tahrir Sq a short while ago and have been blastin live versions of Alive so far going crazy! :D
    I know that Western Intelligence backed coups have been disguised as 'popular revolution' before...so I've spent the last couple weeks looking for a source that is pushing this theory in the Egyptian revolution...
    I know some of you will take that as anti-American, or backwards logic; looking for information to support a predetermined opinion....but it only makes sense. Not much happens in the world without Western foreknowledge or involvement.
    I read when this first started that the US had been funding and training revolutionaries for at least two years (wikileaks), but I couldn't figure out WHY they were going against one of their puppets; what had Mubarek done to cross the West? Apparently, he was resisting a US nuclear umbrella in the middle east....he refused to deepen relations with Israel...he refused to support war with Iran...and he refused to support the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (kangaroo court investigation into Hariri assasination in Lebannon). He stopped playing ball with US interests.

    Webster Tarpley lays it all out in a series of interviews of the last couple weeks:
    http://www.tarpley.net
    (there are audio links under the headlines - looks like the article is missing :D)
    well I'm in Egypt right now and have been participating in the protests and the revolution and I can assure you that you are wrong. First, it IS a people's movement, not a secretly engineered U.S. one. it was unprecedented and the way Mubarak responded shows that. second, Mubarak has been playing ball with the U.S. and Israelis for YEARS! What are you talking about?? He refused to deepen relations with Israel? On what basis? he was selling them natural energy for like 80% below market price, which shows trade relations were fine. he was helping keep Hamas completely isolated and participating in the blockade even DURING the massacre in Gaza in Dec 08-Jan 09, so foreign policy wise he's been great. He has kept freedom of speech dead in his country which keeps the masses and their opinion on Israel subdued, and he HAS actually supported an American attack on Iran as the wikileaks cables show.....

    Not just that, but Obama and the White House have been struggling to try to keep the motherfucker, or the new name we suddenly kept hearing, Omar Suleiman, in power. but that has failed. now the REAL question is the military: what role will they play in this; will they truly serve the people or will foreign interests try to get in the way. that will be left for the future but for tonight I think people should only take this news in extreme joy: everyone, that is, except for Israel. Your racist apartheid regime is crumbling, can you feel it??



    Yes! Hey, I know we've sparred about religion on this board before, but I'm totally with you on this. I think this was a spontaneous people's revolution and the powers that be in the West didn't know what to make of it... as evidenced by Hillary Clinton's initial comments that the Mubarek regime was stable, and then Obama's insistence on trying to play both sides until finally they had to at least seem to be totally on the protesters' side... unless this was all an act? No, that's just being cynical. The folks who see the world as one giant conspiracy can speculate on how the West engineered this all they want, but reality will continue to discredit them. (Not that there aren't conspiracies...)

    The other thing that has bothered me... is how ignorant fools all over the media assume this will end up being an Islamist takeover, like Iran. I listened to an interview with one of the senior leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood yesterday reiterate what they have been saying during this whole ordeal... that they have no plans to run a candidate for President or any other office, and simply plan to help build Egypt from the ground up, and that they support democracy with full rights for all... Muslims, Christians, secularists. My cousin has lived in Egypt (and is actually currently living in Istanbul), she is secular like me, but loves the people over there, and finds them much more friendly than people here at home in the U.S.

    Look, I do fear the backslide into religious fundamentalism... and I don't know enough about Egypt to know how religious or how secular it will become. Also, define "religious". It means different things in different place. I think Egypt has a long hard road ahead of them, but I don't yet see an Islamist ruler or another Western puppet in their future.


    When I heard the breaking news of Mubarek's resignation on NPR yesterday... I must admit, I teared up a bit. My best wishes to the Egyptian people. Congratulations on a relatively peaceful revolution!
  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Byrnzie wrote:
    'Bout fucking time.

    I wonder what the Israeli's make of it?

    Seriously steve do you really give a shit what the usraelis make of it?

    What i mean is, i wonder what effect it will have on the situation in Gaza.
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    in my opinion it wont mean anything positive for gaza..
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • zarocatzarocat Posts: 1,901
    At the moment Gaza as been affected by a shortage of food coming from Egypt through the underground tunnels connecting the two sides. That I do know. Hamas is hungry and needs Egypt's stability back again to continue the supply of not only food but building goods also. Sacks of concrete for example.
    1996: Toronto
    1998: Barrie
    2000: Montreal, Toronto, Auburn Hills
    2003: Cleveland, Buffalo, Toronto, Montreal
    2004: Boston X2, Grand Rapids
    2005: Kitchener, London, Hamilton, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto
    2006: Toronto X2
    2009: Toronto
    2011: PJ20, Montreal, Toronto X2, Hamilton
    2012: Manchester X2, Amsterdam X2, Prague, Berlin X2, Philadelphia, Missoula
    2013: Pittsburg, Buffalo
    2014: Milan, Trieste, Vienna, Berlin, Stockholm, Oslo, Detroit
    2016: Ottawa, Toronto X2
    2018: Padova, Rome, Prague, Krakow, Berlin, Barcelona
    2022: Ottawa, Hamilton, Toronto
    2023: Chicago X2
    2024: New York X2
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    kenny olav wrote:
    Look, I do fear the backslide into religious fundamentalism... and I don't know enough about Egypt to know how religious or how secular it will become. Also, define "religious". It means different things in different place. I think Egypt has a long hard road ahead of them, but I don't yet see an Islamist ruler or another Western puppet in their future.
    Exactly, people like to conveniently bring the example of Iran or even Afghanistan, but they conveniently leave out Turkey. It's very possible for an Islamic party to be democratic and participate in government without imposing religion or its will on the people of the country. They can easily represent a significant part of the population without oppressing others. In any case, I have huge hope.
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    in my opinion it wont mean anything positive for gaza..
    wow, i STRONGLY disagree. democracy in Egypt means the people speak for themselves. the people support gaza which means the government will support Gaza (and Palestinians as a whole by extension). This won't mean anything good for Israel though! :) As the Palestine Papers show, Israel had the deal of a lifetime and they still rejected it! They're fucked now!
Sign In or Register to comment.