Bring back the Sonics!
Comments
-
i'm not completely sure as how it works or how it would work here...it's really a pipe dream since the owners and players (union) wouldn't want it0
-
81 wrote:sort of
Lets say the Jazz are the worst NBA team. They get demoted to the D league.
The D league champion is than promoted to the NBA.
The Jazz get back to the NBA by being the best D league team.
you could have one or two teams swap each season. So maybe it's the Jazz and Clippers going down.
But if only one, two, or three teams subtracted at the end of a season, with teams coming in to replace them...what would be the point. You'd still have a big number of teams. Would it be to simply hope that all your teams are winning, and elite teams. So then it's just a league of all these kick ass basketball teams?7/2/06 - Denver, CO
6/12/08 - Tampa, FL
8/23/09 - Chicago, IL
9/28/09 - Salt Lake City, UT (11 years too long!!!)
9/03/11 - East Troy, WI - PJ20 - Night 1
9/04/11 - East Troy, WI - PJ20 - Night 20 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276dcfaithful wrote:Yeah, that would add some difficulty to the whole situation.
maybe the NBA splits into two leagues. The A league and the B leauge. the A doesn't play the B. The A would get the top 24 and the B woudl get the bottom 12 (assume some expansion with seattle, chicago, KC, pittsburgh, buffalo, cincy, nashville and san jose)
there would clearly be an incentive to win and get to the A leauge. Prestige, higher ticket prices, high concession prices, chance at a real championship.
you could put some rules around transfers. maybe it's a minimum of 2 per year. If you finish in the bottom 5 for 3 years in a row, you get demoted as well. it'd be fun.81 is now off the air0 -
81 wrote:dcfaithful wrote:Yeah, that would add some difficulty to the whole situation.
maybe the NBA splits into two leagues. The A league and the B leauge. the A doesn't play the B. The A would get the top 24 and the B woudl get the bottom 12 (assume some expansion with seattle, chicago, KC, pittsburgh, buffalo, cincy, nashville and san jose)
there would clearly be an incentive to win and get to the A leauge. Prestige, higher ticket prices, high concession prices, chance at a real championship.
you could put some rules around transfers. maybe it's a minimum of 2 per year. If you finish in the bottom 5 for 3 or more years in a row, you get demoted as well. it'd be fun.
Or, what if it was simply divided amongst the conferences, and thus being only conference titles?7/2/06 - Denver, CO
6/12/08 - Tampa, FL
8/23/09 - Chicago, IL
9/28/09 - Salt Lake City, UT (11 years too long!!!)
9/03/11 - East Troy, WI - PJ20 - Night 1
9/04/11 - East Troy, WI - PJ20 - Night 20 -
-
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276dcfaithful wrote:81 wrote:dcfaithful wrote:Yeah, that would add some difficulty to the whole situation.
maybe the NBA splits into two leagues. The A league and the B leauge. the A doesn't play the B. The A would get the top 24 and the B woudl get the bottom 12 (assume some expansion with seattle, chicago, KC, pittsburgh, buffalo, cincy, nashville and san jose)
there would clearly be an incentive to win and get to the A leauge. Prestige, higher ticket prices, high concession prices, chance at a real championship.
you could put some rules around transfers. maybe it's a minimum of 2 per year. If you finish in the bottom 5 for 3 or more years in a row, you get demoted as well. it'd be fun.
Or, what if it was simply divided amongst the conferences, and thus being only conference titles?
however you want to title them.81 is now off the air0 -
81 wrote:however you want to title them.
I don't know, personally i'm fine with the league the way it is. I look forwardt o beating the piss out of shitty teams, and being extremely upset by losing to them too.
I think it's all apart of the sport. Shitty teams should have the right to contend and have the right to upset a favorite. Reference the Jazz's victory against the Heat back in November... Everyone expected Miami to win, myself included... turned out to be quite the upset and a great, great game.7/2/06 - Denver, CO
6/12/08 - Tampa, FL
8/23/09 - Chicago, IL
9/28/09 - Salt Lake City, UT (11 years too long!!!)
9/03/11 - East Troy, WI - PJ20 - Night 1
9/04/11 - East Troy, WI - PJ20 - Night 20 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276dcfaithful wrote:81 wrote:however you want to title them.
I don't know, personally i'm fine with the league the way it is. I look forwardt o beating the piss out of shitty teams, and being extremely upset by losing to them too.
I think it's all apart of the sport. Shitty teams should have the right to contend and have the right to upset a favorite. Reference the Jazz's victory against the Heat back in November... Everyone expected Miami to win, myself included... turned out to be quite the upset and a great, great game.
Jazz and Heat would have both been in the A league.
Teams like the Nets, Washington, Philly, Detroit, MN and Sacremento would be in the B league.
biggest issue would be attracting free agents to teams that know they will be stuck in the B league next season. you would really need to build the team thru the draft to get to the A league.81 is now off the air0 -
nice article! hell, i had a sonics jersey growing up and i lived in chicago (dunno how/why that happened)
i can't believe anaheim and st. louis are even in the same discussion
BRING EM BACK!0 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276Kilgore_Trout wrote:nice article! hell, i had a sonics jersey growing up and i lived in chicago (dunno how/why that happened)
!81 is now off the air0 -
81 wrote:Kilgore_Trout wrote:nice article! hell, i had a sonics jersey growing up and i lived in chicago (dunno how/why that happened)
!0 -
Shit, you get a couple hours of work done and this thread went crazy. I just think there are way too many teams with not nearly enough talent. A more competitive league with better teams will be better for everyone.0
-
norm wrote:what amazes me is with all the micro$oft millionaires they have in seattle, they can't get a decent arena?
and david stern's nutsack should be used as a speedbag
seattle deserves the sonics. i'm all for this.
isn't the key arena only like 20 years old? what was so bad about it?www.myspace.com0 -
the NHL needs to head to Seattle stat.
The NBA doesnt deserve Seattle0 -
81 wrote:contraction is good. the only reason lebron was crucified was because it would cost jobs and the players union doesn't wan that.
i think they should do what the do in soccer over seas. the team or two each season gets demoted to the minors, and the best team in the minors gets promoted too the majors.
none of the top 4 leagues should have more than 25 teams.
the reason most people say the nba was better back in the 80's or early 90's wasn't entirely because that was the era they grew up in....it's because it was true. there's just not enough top talent to spread around to 30 teams.www.myspace.com0 -
I have been saying for years that MLB would be awesome if it somehow revamped and adopted a tiered relegation/promotion system. There are already a couple tiers, but the bottom teams never really play for anything. The season is so long, many more games would be meaningful. You could also include most AAA teams. I would be much more receptive to the "open market" of MLB if it was structured that way.0
-
"BRING BACK OUR SEATTLE SUPERSONICS!!!!!!!" - Gary Payton0
-
The Maloofs are finalizing an agreement to sell the Sacramento Kings to the Hansen-Ballmer led Seattle group, sources tell Yahoo! Sports.
https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/ ... 6055227393
The deal will sell the Kings for approximately $500 million, with the Seattle group seeking relocation to Key Arena for the 2013-'14 season.
https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/ ... 3687746561
The Seattle group's plans, with support of the NBA, is to play two seasons in Key Arena before moving into a new Seattle arena, sources say.
https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/ ... 85507584000 -
81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276norm wrote:The Maloofs are finalizing an agreement to sell the Sacramento Kings to the Hansen-Ballmer led Seattle group, sources tell Yahoo! Sports.
https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/ ... 6055227393
The deal will sell the Kings for approximately $500 million, with the Seattle group seeking relocation to Key Arena for the 2013-'14 season.
https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/ ... 3687746561
The Seattle group's plans, with support of the NBA, is to play two seasons in Key Arena before moving into a new Seattle arena, sources say.
https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA/status/ ... 8550758400
stupid maloofs.
now can the new sonics trade for the old sonic players81 is now off the air0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help