who's got the brain of jfk?
ed243421
Posts: 7,659
it's been 47 years
give it back
give it back
The whole world will be different soon... - EV
RED ROCKS 6-19-95
AUGUSTA 9-26-96
MANSFIELD 9-15-98
BOSTON 9-29-04
BOSTON 5-25-06
MANSFIELD 6-30-08
EV SOLO BOSTON 8-01-08
BOSTON 5-17-10
EV SOLO BOSTON 6-16-11
PJ20 9-3-11
PJ20 9-4-11
WRIGLEY 7-19-13
WORCESTER 10-15-13
WORCESTER 10-16-13
HARTFORD 10-25-13
RED ROCKS 6-19-95
AUGUSTA 9-26-96
MANSFIELD 9-15-98
BOSTON 9-29-04
BOSTON 5-25-06
MANSFIELD 6-30-08
EV SOLO BOSTON 8-01-08
BOSTON 5-17-10
EV SOLO BOSTON 6-16-11
PJ20 9-3-11
PJ20 9-4-11
WRIGLEY 7-19-13
WORCESTER 10-15-13
WORCESTER 10-16-13
HARTFORD 10-25-13
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Godfather.
but there's two holes in it...it's broken.
Another habit says its long overdue
Another habit like an unwanted friend
I'm so happy with my righteous self
>
...a lover and a fighter.
"I'm at least half a bum" Rocky Balboa
http://www.videosift.com/video/Obamas-Message-To-American-Indians
Edmonton, AB. September 5th, 2005
Vancouver, BC. April 3rd, 2008
Calgary,AB. August 8th, 2009
*NYC 9/28/96 *NYC 9/29/96 *NJ 9/8/98 (front row "may i play drums with you")
*MSG 9/10/98 (backstage) *MSG 9/11/98 (backstage)
*Jones Beach 8/23/00 *Jones Beach 8/24/00 *Jones Beach 8/25/00
*Mansfield 8/29/00 *Mansfield 8/30/00 *Nassau 4/30/03 *Nissan VA 7/1/03
*Borgata 10/1/05 *Camden 5/27/06 *Camden 5/28/06 *DC 5/30/06
*VA Beach 6/17/08 *DC 6/22/08 *MSG 6/24/08 (backstage) *MSG 6/25/08
*EV DC 8/17/08 *EV Baltimore 6/15/09 *Philly 10/31/09
*Bristow VA 5/13/10 *MSG 5/20/10 *MSG 5/21/10
Did you just eat a piece?
I can't remember if I read it or if it was on a documentary. What's ISHI?
Another habit says its long overdue
Another habit like an unwanted friend
I'm so happy with my righteous self
Evidence of Revision (Part I)
Here is an article by an "underground" online zine writer who tracked down the mystery producer and got some answers: interesting article about "Evidence" Man
If anyone has any questions about just how MASSIVE this conspiracy was, all you have to do is make it to the 10 MINUTE MARK to hear what is OBVIOUSLY a "reporter" (ie: an operative, witting or not) READING A SCRIPT about how JFK was "always" befuddling his secret service, and then even MORE OBVIOUSLY starts reading about President William McKinley being assassinated by a lone gunman in 1901. This is RIGHT BEFORE JFK WALKS IN TO THE ROOM FOR A PRESS DINER\CONFERENCE.
This is like one of about four hundred CRAZY coincidences, CAUGHT ON CAMERA and ignored \ misunderstood by most of the world right up to this very day.
You watch this documentary, YOU WILL HAVE NO DOUBTS.
I know i shove this video out everytime someone says "jfk", but it is THAT impressive.
By FAR the best historical presentation of facts on JFK (and RFK, and Jonestown \ MK Ultra) i have ever watched ... period.
If I opened it now would you not understand?
Skip to the 3 minute mark.
Jack Ruby Confesses
"Everything pertaining to what's happening will never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts of what occured, my motives ... in other words, I'm the only person in the background that knows the truth pertaining to everything relating to my circumstances."
Reporter: "Do you think that will ever come out?"
Ruby: "No. Because, unfortunately, the people that have so much to gain, and have such an ulterior motive to put me in the position i'm in will never let the truth come above board to the world."
Reporter: "Are these people in very high positions, Jack?"
Ruby: "Yes."
Ruby was no honest man, but he is clearly being dead honest here.
He was PISSED OFF. He WAS part of the conspiracy, but he was then forced in to the center ring when he was apparently ordered to kill Oswald, WHO NEVER CONFESSED, AND WAS NOT GOING TO (hmm), AND WAS GOING TO END UP IN COURT, GIVING HIS DEFENSE, AND BLOWING THE ENTIRE CONSPIRACY:
Oswald says: "I'm just a patsy!"
Do I believe Oswald was entirely not involved?
NO!
I believe he had NO idea what was really going on,
he may have been working as part of an "abort team",
he may have been completely lied to about the events that day,
he may have actually been 100% uninvolved in the events of that day,
but was CLEARLY involved in SOMETHING leading up to the JFK assassination.
If you think Oswald is just a lone nut with no connections to anyone,
check this out --
On October 1st, 1963 (that is just 2 months before JFK was murdered) Oswald went to Mexico, specifically to the Cuban embassy. OR SO THE STORY GOES.
Want to know what is REALLY fishy about this?
THE CIA APPARENTLY FOLLOWED OSWALD TO MEXICO, OR *SOMEONE* CLAIMING TO BE OSWALD (a setup!) and took pictures of "Oswald" (clearly NOT oswald) entering the embassy, and recorderd a phone conversation of "Oswald" (clearly NOT) talking to a KNOWN KGB ASSASSIN.
What was really going on here?
SHEEP DIPPING (and probably something else as well, but i'll save that detour until someone asks)
The players involved apparently already knew that JFK would have to go, and they knew they needed a patsy (and also that Oswald probably already needed to be terminated for OTHER reasons, see: Judyth Vary Baker's story about her and Oswald's involvement in a Castro assassination conspiracy) and so they SENT OSWALD TO MEXICO TO FRAME HIM (or made it look like he went to mexico).
Think this is all a load of crap?
This is the ACTUAL PHOTOGRAPHS of "Lee Harvey Oswald" entering the Cuban embassy in Mexico -- TAKEN BY THE CIA (actually they claim their cameras malfunctioned, and that they, the CIA, had to use photos taken by the Mexcian intelligence agency --- hmm, so both the CIA and Mexican intelligence were in on this?).
This is ACTUALLY Lee Harvey Oswald:
Want further proof of SERIOUS FISHYNESS?
here is a PDF from MaryFerrell.org (MF is a serious JFK researcher) that proves the CIA was monitoring "oswald" in mexico: PDF of CIA records on Oswald in Mexico
AND HERE IT IS, YOUR MOMENT OF DISTOPIA:
This is President Lyndon B. Johnson talking to J Edgar Hoover the DAY AFTER THE ASSASSINATION:
LBJ and JEH talking
Hoover: I just wanted to let you know of a development which I think is very important in connection with this case. ---This man in Dallas, we of course, charged him with the murder of the President. The evidence that they have the present time is not very strong at the present time. We have just discovered the place where the gun was purchased and the shipment of the gun from Chicago to Dallas, to a post office box in Dallas to a man----No, to a woman named A. Heidel. It was purchased in March this year. That gun is now in our possession here in Washington, we had flown it up last night and our laboratory is making an examination of it.
LBJ: Yes, I told the secret service to see that that got taken care of.
Hoover: That’s right, we have the gun and we have the bullet. There was only one full bullet that was found that was on the stretcher the President was on. It apparently had fallen out when they managed his heart, and we have that one. We have what we call alivers, which are not very valuable in the identification. As soon as we finish the testing of the gun for fingerprints, and there are some latent fingerprints on it, we will be able to test the one bullet we have with the gun. But the important thing is that this gun was bought in Chicago on a money order---Cost $21.00, and it seems almost impossible to think that for $21.00 you could kill the President of the United States. Now, no one knows this.
LBJ: Now, who is A. Heidel?
Hoover: A. Heidel is an alias that this man has used on other occasions, and according to the information we have from the home in which he was living---his mother---he kept a rifle like this wrapped up in a blanket which he kept in the house. On the morning that this incident ---yesterday—the man who drove him to the building where they work, the building from where the shots came, said that he had a package wrapped up in paper —not a blanket. The blanket we found in the garage at home. But the paper in which the gun was wrapped that has also has been sent up to us and accommodation will be made of that. He did carry some kind of package down there, which could have been the gun yesterday morning in the car. None of us can swear to that. But the important thing at the time is the location of the purchase of the gun by a money order apparently to the Klein Gun Company in Chicago; we were able to establish that last night.
LBJ: Have you established any more about the visit to the Soviet embassy in Mexico in September?
Hoover: No, that’s one angle that’s very confusing, for this reason—we have up here the tape and the photograph of the man who was at the Soviet embassy, using Oswald’s name. That picture and the tape do not correspond to this man’s voice, nor to his appearance. In other words, it appears that there is a second person who was at the Soviet embassy down there. We do have a copy of a letter which was written by Oswald to the Soviet Embassy here in Washington inquiring as well as complaining abut the harassment of his wife and the questioning of his wife by the FBI. Now, of course, that letter information we process all of the information that goes to the Soviet Embassy --- it’s a very secret operation. Now mail is delivered to the Embassy without being examined and opened by us, so that we know what they receive. Such a letter was sent to the Embassy by this fellow Oswald making a complaint about his wife being harassed and questioned. The case as it stands now isn’t strong enough to get a conviction. Then there is this angle…..I think we have a very, very close plan. Now if we can identify this man who is at the Mexican Embassy at----the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City, ----this man Oswald has still denied everything. He doesn’t know anything about anything but the gun thing, of course, is a definite trend.
LBJ: It’s defiantly established that he---the same gun killed the policeman?
Hoover: That is an entirely different gun. We also have that gun that was a revolver.
LBJ: You think he might have two?
Hoover: Yes, yes he had two guns. And the one that killed the policeman was an arm revolver, the one that killed the President was found on the sixth floor of the building from which it had been fired. I think the bullets were fired from the fifth floor and three shells were found on the fifth floor. But he apparently went upstairs to the sixth floor to have fired the gun and throw the gun away and then went out. He went down to this theatre ---there at this theater is where he had the gun battle with the policeman officer.
LBJ: I wonder if you will give me a little synopsis and let me have what developments come your way during the day and try to get to me before we close up for the day.
Hoover: I will certainly do that.
LBJ: Thank you
Hoover: Thank you
FIND IT FUNNY THAT THIS SHIT WAS DISCUSSED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE ASSASSINATION?
Of what relevance is this Mexico trip to LBJ unless Hoover and LBJ are TRYING TO MAKE THE PIECES FIT THE PUZZLE EVEN IF THEY DON'T ... trying to obscure incongruous facts, to piecemeal some sort of "proof" even so far as trying to pin Oswald to Officer Tippit's murder, even WHEN THEY DON'T HAVE A MATCH ON THE GUN!
This is FAR BEYOND ABSURD.
America was told Oswald was a lone nut. A man with no connections, with nothing going on, who was just disgruntled (supposedly) with Kennedy.
The truth is FAR FAR FAR more complicated, and it is CLEAR AS DAY that Oswald was involved in SOMETHING MUCH BIGGER!
If I opened it now would you not understand?
drifting
outstanding stuff
this is so obvious
when will it end
RED ROCKS 6-19-95
AUGUSTA 9-26-96
MANSFIELD 9-15-98
BOSTON 9-29-04
BOSTON 5-25-06
MANSFIELD 6-30-08
EV SOLO BOSTON 8-01-08
BOSTON 5-17-10
EV SOLO BOSTON 6-16-11
PJ20 9-3-11
PJ20 9-4-11
WRIGLEY 7-19-13
WORCESTER 10-15-13
WORCESTER 10-16-13
HARTFORD 10-25-13
Bigger than i thought
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSBXW1-V ... re=related
Another habit says its long overdue
Another habit like an unwanted friend
I'm so happy with my righteous self
You will love it!
Kennedy stuff gets me real emotional because there are pieces of the historical record that are so glaringly blatant that it makes you sick to your stomach. There are a few times during Evidence of Revision where i've actually gotten teary eyed. Not from some sort of nostalgic Americana, or by-gone-era-ism or Camelot-Myopia ... but because the hair tingling realization that there is a massive force of organized evil, disinformation, and monstrous means forcing its will upon an entire nation & world and doing it in a way so "subtle" (even when it involves presidential assassination in broad day light) that 99% of the population mentally rejects the notion of its existence through the process of cognitive dissonance even when 75% of them can cognitively formulate an understanding that a "conspiracy" existed. That stuff gets me really goofy in the head in a bad way. :(
Anyway.
HAPPY TURKEY DAY!
PS -- CHECK OUT THE LAST PART OF THE SERIES, because the "interrogation" of the witness from the RFK assassination is SO BLATANT IT WILL MAKE YOU SHIVER!
If I opened it now would you not understand?
And how does this explain the fact that Kennedy was also hit with a bullet fired from in front of the car? The Zapruder film clearly shows him getting hit by a shot fired from the front as his head snaps back. The autopsy photo's also clearly show that he had an exit wound at the back of his head.
The Zapruder film clearly shows that the back of his head was intact after the head shot. You can see it clearly(conspiracy theorists never seems to notice this, but it's right there on the film). And his head didn't snap back so much as his whole body was thrown backwards. The reason for this is because Kennedy was wearing a back brace(under his suit jacket) at the time he was shot(not a lot of people knew this at the time). When he was shot in the head he was leaning forward. When the bullet struck his head from behind he was thrown back because his brace didn't allow for him to move forward, so the force of the impact snapped him in the opposite direction.
If you pause the Zapruder film a split second before the head shot and then go to the next frame(head shot) you will notice that Kennedy's head pitches slightly forward on impact(this proves the shot came from behind). And then his body is thrown backwards because he is wearing a back brace. If you have the movie JFK(which is full of BS) on dvd/blue rayyou can do this. There's actually a really good close up of the zapruder film that you can slow down and watch frame by frame.
You have to think, why would they shoot JFK from the front and back and then try to cover everything up by saying he was only shot from behind? Way too complicated. They could have just shot him from behind and blamed it on Oswald(which is still possible I guess).
Another habit says its long overdue
Another habit like an unwanted friend
I'm so happy with my righteous self
I've seen the autopsy photo's. The back of his head was blown away. He had an exit wound at the back of his head.
"I've seen the autopsy photo's. The back of his head was blown away. He had an exit wound at the back of his head."
Okay
Another habit says its long overdue
Another habit like an unwanted friend
I'm so happy with my righteous self
http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/autopsy.htm
There is something else to consider when looking through the autopsy evidence and trying sift through the various theories and opinions regarding the placement of the headwound.
That consideration is the following:
Officer JD Tippit.
Not too many people even realize that Oswald was originally brought in for questioning regarding the seperate (supposedly unrelated) murder of Dalas Officer JD Tippit, 4 miles away from Dealey, earlier in the day.
What gets me about the Tippit murder is that it was *all too convenient*.
IF Oswald was framed, it seems just too perfect that he would of COURSE go murder someone ELSE just prior to killing JFK ... THUS ALLOWING THE POLICE TO APPREHEND HIM IMMEDIATELY, and to IMMEDIATELY reduce suspicion over kennedy's murder.
Then when you start realizing that there is INTENSE controversy surrounding the TWO autopsies, and the DISCREPANT reports of both the SIZE *and* LOCATION of the "rear" head wound, THEN when you see the autopsy photos and are trying to make sense of all of it, period ... THEN you notice THE FOLLOWING:
JEEZ.
*** IF YOU KNEW THERE WERE POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS WITH WOUND PLACEMENT ON YOUR TARGET, AND YOU NEEDED TO COVER IT UP, WOULDN'T YOU (if you could) PROCURE A "STUNT" DOUBLE ? ***
::: wahhhh wahhhhh :::
here is some interesting stuff on the Tippit - Kennedy angle
If I opened it now would you not understand?
I still blame Nixon
I'm sorry, but those pictures don't show the back of his head blown off. You can't even see the back of his head. All it shows is blood and brain matter stuck to his hair on the top of his head. I think you're seeing what you want to see.
Another habit says its long overdue
Another habit like an unwanted friend
I'm so happy with my righteous self
if you don't think he was shot in the front of the head....what was jackie o doing on the back of the car immediately after he was shot? looks to me like she was trying to put him back together.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."