wow, this is pretty sad

2»

Comments

  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    "But forget the politics: what moral theory allows these firefighters (admittedly acting under orders) to watch this house burn to the ground when 1) they have already responded to the scene; 2) they have the means to stop it ready at hand; 3) they have a reasonable expectation to be compensated for their trouble?" .

    That's what gets me. Spoke to a neighbour who's a firefighter. He was appalled. He said no self-respecting firefighter would act that way. I remember during a firefighter strike here (note - even on strike they were responding to emergencies), he gathered the people in our neighbourhood, talked us through things, letting us know where the hydrants were and telling us he had a hose and ladder at his home. He also gave us the direct phone number of the local fire stations. None of the firefighters wanted anything bad to happen because of a political situation and union orders. Being a firefighter is not just a job, it's a vocation - I really can't get my mind around how these firefighters could just stand back and watch...
  • I would have turned the hose on and if they threatened my job I would have told them I'll quit in the morning when the fucking fire's out.

    How could they just stand there?? I couldn't live with myself, orders or no orders. :evil:
    Gimli 1993
    Fargo 2003
    Winnipeg 2005
    Winnipeg 2011
    St. Paul 2014
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    norm wrote:
    should have known those two douches were going to weigh in on it...funny they are defending the government and the $75 fee when they are so against government, fees, and taxes.... :roll:

    i don't think i would piss on beck if he was on fire...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    norm wrote:
    should have known those two douches were going to weigh in on it...funny they are defending the government and the $75 fee when they are so against government, fees, and taxes.... :roll:

    i don't think i would piss on beck if he was on fire...

    turns out it is a christian thing to do

    http://action.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147499026

    some people really make me sick
  • haffajappahaffajappa British Columbia Posts: 5,955
    norm wrote:

    turns out it is a christian thing to do

    http://action.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147499026

    some people really make me sick

    The fire department did the right and Christian thing. The right thing, by the way, is also the Christian thing, because there can be no difference between the two. The right thing to do will always be the Christian thing to do, and the Christian thing to do will always be the right thing to do.

    If I somehow think the right thing to do is not the Christian thing to do, then I am either confused about what is right or confused about Christianity, or both.

    In this case, critics of the fire department are confused both about right and wrong and about Christianity. And it is because they have fallen prey to a weakened, feminized version of Christianity that is only about softer virtues such as compassion and not in any part about the muscular Christian virtues of individual responsibility and accountability.


    What.
    live pearl jam is best pearl jam
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    what would they have done if there were people in that house?
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    haffajappa wrote:
    norm wrote:

    turns out it is a christian thing to do

    http://action.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147499026

    some people really make me sick

    The fire department did the right and Christian thing. The right thing, by the way, is also the Christian thing, because there can be no difference between the two. The right thing to do will always be the Christian thing to do, and the Christian thing to do will always be the right thing to do.

    If I somehow think the right thing to do is not the Christian thing to do, then I am either confused about what is right or confused about Christianity, or both.

    In this case, critics of the fire department are confused both about right and wrong and about Christianity. And it is because they have fallen prey to a weakened, feminized version of Christianity that is only about softer virtues such as compassion and not in any part about the muscular Christian virtues of individual responsibility and accountability.


    What.
    i am surprised they did not come right out and say jesus burnt the guy's house down..
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • haffajappahaffajappa British Columbia Posts: 5,955
    norm wrote:
    what would they have done if there were people in that house?
    They would have done the right thing.
    Which is the Christian thing.
    Very ambiguous, I know.

    Da roof, da roof, da roof is on fiyah!
    We don't need no watah let the motha fakka burnnn...burnnn
    live pearl jam is best pearl jam
  • redrockredrock Posts: 18,341
    edited October 2010
    "The fire department was called when Gene Cranick’s grandson accidentally set his property on fire, but made no attempt to extinguish the flames, for the simple reason that they had no legal or moral authority or responsibility to do so. When the fire endangered the property of Cranick’s neighbor, who had paid the $75 fee, the fire department swung into action and put out the fire on the neighbor’s property. Cranick’s home meanwhile, burned to the ground after his family had fled for safety. "

    No moral responsibility? We ALL have a moral responsibility towards our fellow human beings, whether it's our job or not! Seems their 'moral responsibility' was set in motion for the neighbour who had paid. So moral responsibility = $ then? If my neighbour's house is on fire and I can do something, do I just stand by and watch it burn to ashes with her kitty in it because we haven't negotiated some form of payment/reward for my help?
    Post edited by redrock on
  • haffajappahaffajappa British Columbia Posts: 5,955
    redrock wrote:
    "The fire department was called when Gene Cranick’s grandson accidentally set his property on fire, but made no attempt to extinguish the flames, for the simple reason that they had no legal or moral authority or responsibility to do so. When the fire endangered the property of Cranick’s neighbor, who had paid the $75 fee, the fire department swung into action and put out the fire on the neighbor’s property. Cranick’s home meanwhile, burned to the ground after his family had fled for safety. "

    No moral responsibility? We ALL have a moral responsibility towards our fellow human beings, whether it's our job or not! Seems their 'moral responsibility' was set in motion for the neighbour who had paid. So moral responsibility = $ then? If my neighbour's house is on fire and I can do something, do I just stand by and watch it burn to ashes with her kitty in it because we haven't negotiated some form of payment/reward for my help?
    I don't know what 'morals' you think you have by letting 3 dogs and a cat burn to death for the sake of 75 dollars.
    live pearl jam is best pearl jam
Sign In or Register to comment.