Hello and Thank You....

124

Comments

  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,904
    81 wrote:
    Kat wrote:

    Why is that photo on the site of the Florida Progressive Coalition, LLC....?

    huh...looks like it's on a personal website
    No, Kat's right the link is to the Florida Progressive Coalition's site.
    I just google searched the image and thats the first one that came up.

    Apparently its from someone's blog, here's the link to the original posting:
    http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=htt ... s%3Disch:1

    Florida conservatives and underpants gnomes are indeed strange bedfellows.
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • 81
    81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    Poncier wrote:
    81 wrote:
    Kat wrote:

    Why is that photo on the site of the Florida Progressive Coalition, LLC....?

    huh...looks like it's on a personal website
    No, Kat's right the link is to the Florida Progressive Coalition's site.
    I just google searched the image and thats the first one that came up.

    Apparently its from someone's blog, here's the link to the original posting:
    http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=htt ... s%3Disch:1

    Florida conservatives and underpants gnomes are indeed strange bedfellows.


    i'm missing something because i come up with http://quinnell.us/sspb/wiki/images/gnomes.png as the direct link to the image and every thing is hosted on the quinnell.us site.
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • Poncier
    Poncier Posts: 17,904
    I think this Quinnell guy is the Florida Progressive Coalition, LLC.

    (Boy we've gotten off track)
    This weekend we rock Portland
  • 81
    81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    Poncier wrote:
    I think this Quinnell guy is the Florida Progressive Coalition, LLC.

    (Boy we've gotten off track)

    one member party. :lol:
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,948
    81 wrote:
    pjhawks wrote:
    if you wouldn't want your mother father or kids to read it or hear it , don't post it. good general rule guys. not sure why it is a difficult concept.


    parents are both passed and no kids......

    sweet, i can post anything :mrgreen:

    81 and Chadwick - man you guys... does everything have to be so literal? if you don't have the common decency to know what should and shouldn't be posted then i don't know if there is help for you other than being totally banned - again not this difficult people (bangs head against wall in frurstration)
  • eyedclaar
    eyedclaar Posts: 6,980
    pjhawks wrote:
    81 wrote:
    pjhawks wrote:
    if you wouldn't want your mother father or kids to read it or hear it , don't post it. good general rule guys. not sure why it is a difficult concept.


    parents are both passed and no kids......

    sweet, i can post anything :mrgreen:

    81 and Chadwick - man you guys... does everything have to be so literal? if you don't have the common decency to know what should and shouldn't be posted then i don't know if there is help for you other than being totally banned - again not this difficult people (bangs head against wall in frurstration)

    Come again. I'm not following you. It's like your writing in Sanskrit or something...
    Idaho's Premier Outdoor Writer

    Please Support My Writing Habit By Purchasing A Book:

    https://www.createspace.com/3437020

    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000663025696

    http://earthtremors.blogspot.com/
  • chadwick
    chadwick up my ass Posts: 21,157
    pjhawks wrote:
    81 wrote:
    pjhawks wrote:
    if you wouldn't want your mother father or kids to read it or hear it , don't post it. good general rule guys. not sure why it is a difficult concept.


    parents are both passed and no kids......

    sweet, i can post anything :mrgreen:

    81 and Chadwick - man you guys... does everything have to be so literal? if you don't have the common decency to know what should and shouldn't be posted then i don't know if there is help for you other than being totally banned - again not this difficult people (bangs head against wall in frurstration)
    find one single post of mine that holds grounds for my banning.
    you can't do it.
    perhaps you are cranky today or not quite awake yet?
    for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7

    "Hear me, my chiefs!
    I am tired; my heart is
    sick and sad. From where
    the sun stands I will fight
    no more forever."
    Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
  • Jearlpam0925
    Jearlpam0925 Deep South Philly Posts: 17,553
    eyedclaar wrote:
    pjhawks wrote:

    81 and Chadwick - man you guys... does everything have to be so literal? if you don't have the common decency to know what should and shouldn't be posted then i don't know if there is help for you other than being totally banned - again not this difficult people (bangs head against wall in frurstration)

    Come again. I'm not following you. It's like your writing in Sanskrit or something...

    Sanskrit. You're majoring in a 5,000 year old dead language.
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,948
    chadwick wrote:
    find one single post of mine that holds grounds for my banning.
    you can't do it.
    perhaps you are cranky today or not quite awake yet?

    yes i am cranky, late night last night. I am not saying you shoud be banned but you did make a snide remark regarding my post about how to figure out what can be posted so i was responding to that. Again my point is if someone doesn't have the commons sense to know what constitutes decency vs. indecency on a message board then the only real solution is banning in my opinion. it really isn't that difficult to understand.
  • unlost dogs
    unlost dogs Greater Boston Posts: 12,553
    I try to avoid posting when I'm cranky.

    Of course, as I'm cranky most of the time it can be difficult to refrain.
    15 years of sharks 06/30/08 (MA), 05/17/10 (Boston), 09/03/11 (Alpine Valley), 09/04/11 (Alpine Valley), 09/30/12 (Missoula), 07/19/13 (Wrigley), 10/15/13 (Worcester), 10/16/13 (Worcester), 10/25/13 (Hartford), 12/4/13 (Vancouver), 12/6/13 (Seattle), 6/26/14 (Berlin), 6/28/14 (Stockholm), 10/16/14 (Detroit)
  • neilybabes86
    neilybabes86 Posts: 16,057
    unlost dogs wrote:
    I try to avoid posting when I'm cranky.

    Of course, as I'm cranky most of the time it can be difficult to refrain.


    you??????? nah
    i post on the board of a band that doesn't exsist anymore .......i need my head examined.......
  • unlost dogs
    unlost dogs Greater Boston Posts: 12,553
    neilybabes86 wrote:
    unlost dogs wrote:
    I try to avoid posting when I'm cranky.

    Of course, as I'm cranky most of the time it can be difficult to refrain.


    you??????? nah

    SMOOCH
    15 years of sharks 06/30/08 (MA), 05/17/10 (Boston), 09/03/11 (Alpine Valley), 09/04/11 (Alpine Valley), 09/30/12 (Missoula), 07/19/13 (Wrigley), 10/15/13 (Worcester), 10/16/13 (Worcester), 10/25/13 (Hartford), 12/4/13 (Vancouver), 12/6/13 (Seattle), 6/26/14 (Berlin), 6/28/14 (Stockholm), 10/16/14 (Detroit)
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,948
    unlost dogs wrote:
    I try to avoid posting when I'm cranky.

    Of course, as I'm cranky most of the time it can be difficult to refrain.

    same here
  • 81
    81 Needing a ride to Forest Hills and a ounce of weed. Please inquire within. Thanks. Or not. Posts: 58,276
    Jearlpam0925 wrote:
    eyedclaar wrote:
    pjhawks wrote:

    81 and Chadwick - man you guys... does everything have to be so literal? if you don't have the common decency to know what should and shouldn't be posted then i don't know if there is help for you other than being totally banned - again not this difficult people (bangs head against wall in frurstration)

    Come again. I'm not following you. It's like your writing in Sanskrit or something...

    Sanskrit. You're majoring in a 5,000 year old dead language.

    muffification
    81 is now off the air

    Off_Air.jpg
  • The Juggler
    The Juggler Posts: 49,598
    pjhawks wrote:
    chadwick wrote:
    find one single post of mine that holds grounds for my banning.
    you can't do it.
    perhaps you are cranky today or not quite awake yet?

    yes i am cranky, late night last night. I am not saying you shoud be banned but you did make a snide remark regarding my post about how to figure out what can be posted so i was responding to that. Again my point is if someone doesn't have the commons sense to know what constitutes decency vs. indecency on a message board then the only real solution is banning in my opinion. it really isn't that difficult to understand.


    leave your high horse in the eagles thread.
    www.myspace.com
  • chadwick
    chadwick up my ass Posts: 21,157
    The Jeagler wrote:
    pjhawks wrote:
    chadwick wrote:
    find one single post of mine that holds grounds for my banning.
    you can't do it.
    perhaps you are cranky today or not quite awake yet?

    yes i am cranky, late night last night. I am not saying you shoud be banned but you did make a snide remark regarding my post about how to figure out what can be posted so i was responding to that. Again my point is if someone doesn't have the commons sense to know what constitutes decency vs. indecency on a message board then the only real solution is banning in my opinion. it really isn't that difficult to understand.


    leave your high horse in the eagles thread.
    mine or pjhawks?
    btw, eagles thread?
    as in talons and badass nests and feathers we aren't suppose to possess?
    the band, as in shit music and pretentious old dudes, the eagles thread?
    eagles thread... as in professional football?
    no worries the jeagler, i'd never enter a football thread unless to make fun of ppl :evil:
    for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7

    "Hear me, my chiefs!
    I am tired; my heart is
    sick and sad. From where
    the sun stands I will fight
    no more forever."
    Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
  • tremors
    tremors Posts: 8,051
    pjhawks wrote:
    if you wouldn't want your mother father or kids to read it or hear it , don't post it. good general rule guys. not sure why it is a difficult concept.


    My rule of thumb is if ed uses it onstage it's ok!!(not sure if this is the best yardstick mind!)

    The c word is generally seen as off limits to most decent conversations, at least in England - it has a long history of degradation.

    Geek note: Sting uses this word once on record, but he is pretty agitated, and referring to an obnoxious group of racist thugs.

    ____________________________________________________________
    footnote: (dictionary.com)

    Although there has been some relaxation of the taboo against using words such as f in conversation and print, the use of c is still not considered acceptable by most people outside very limited social contexts. Though originally a racily descriptive word in Middle English, it has been taboo for many centuries and continues to be so (!)
    Cancel my subscription to the Ressurection
    Send my credentials to the house of detention

    lettherecordsplay1x.gif?t=1377796878
  • unlost dogs
    unlost dogs Greater Boston Posts: 12,553
    tremors wrote:
    pjhawks wrote:
    if you wouldn't want your mother father or kids to read it or hear it , don't post it. good general rule guys. not sure why it is a difficult concept.


    My rule of thumb is if ed uses it onstage it's ok!!(not sure if this is the best yardstick mind!)

    The c word is generally seen as off limits to most decent conversations, at least in England - it has a long history of degradation.

    Geek note: Sting uses this word once on record, but he is pretty agitated, and referring to an obnoxious group of racist thugs.

    ____________________________________________________________
    footnote: (dictionary.com)

    Although there has been some relaxation of the taboo against using words such as f in conversation and print, the use of c is still not considered acceptable by most people outside very limited social contexts. Though originally a racily descriptive word in Middle English, it has been taboo for many centuries and continues to be so (!)

    It's a word, the only word, that makes me cringe. And I think anyone who's read my posts would agree that I have a very high tolerance for foul language.
    15 years of sharks 06/30/08 (MA), 05/17/10 (Boston), 09/03/11 (Alpine Valley), 09/04/11 (Alpine Valley), 09/30/12 (Missoula), 07/19/13 (Wrigley), 10/15/13 (Worcester), 10/16/13 (Worcester), 10/25/13 (Hartford), 12/4/13 (Vancouver), 12/6/13 (Seattle), 6/26/14 (Berlin), 6/28/14 (Stockholm), 10/16/14 (Detroit)
  • adropinthepark
    adropinthepark Posts: 475
    The 'c' word has grown on me since visiting England.

    I feel a little silly having to call it the 'c' word. I did a search and it seems to get used fully spelled out on here a lot. I'm pretty sure that not all of the people who made those posts were banned for it. Maybe the context makes all of the difference.

    What if we're talking about that fantastic bit in In Bruges?

    I think we can discuss the following as it relates to the films, but we are NOT to say any of it to eachother. :think:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSEYXWmEse8
    I carried a watermelon
  • DangDang
    DangDang Posts: 1,551
    This is strange. Where I grew up, the "c" word was a complimentary term used for a good looking woman, kind of like being "built like a brick shi..... I mean, ca ca house".

    Me and my two friends were members of a very small club called "The Three Cs". It was pronounced "seize" as opposed to beginning with C and rhyming with oranges.

    Hi Mom!

Categories