Holiday Single...?

2»

Comments

  • Umbertotamba
    Umbertotamba Posts: 1,385
    fox_mulderX wrote:
    ProgScape wrote:
    Oh, I know it's always late, but 6 months late seems a smidge wrong for it to be the 2009 "Holiday Single" - kinda defeats the purpose of it being a Holiday Single, eh? :)

    - m.

    the should just skip the 2009 holiday single and call it the 2010 holiday single. that way it's not 7-8 months late... it's 4-5 months early.


    I say skip the 2009 single and make it a double single ala the 95 single
    Springfield MA 94, Hartford CT 96
  • sk173447
    sk173447 Posts: 6
    still waiting for some news here...
  • firecrotch23
    firecrotch23 Posts: 586
    sk173447 wrote:
    still waiting for some news here...
    viewtopic.php?f=4&t=134712
    Small my table, seats just 3, its not crowded, its just lucky me

Categories