MLB 2025 Season

16836846866886891227

Comments

  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,036
    edited October 2018
    pjhawks said:
    last night shows why the NL is a far superior product than the AL. Every one of the 25 players on the roster is important. And decisions by the managers have consequences.  yea i'm looking at you Cliffy :smiley:
    Yeah, nothing more exciting than a cool 2-1 13 inning game!  Though this time it was obviously pretty exciting.
  • DewieCox
    DewieCox Posts: 11,432
    edited October 2018
    As for the Cubs celebrating baserunners... They were trying to get their teammates hyped up to get something - anything - going.  It was a tough game with great pitching and neither team could buy a hit or a run.  I thought you guys wanted baseball to be more flashy, exciting, and fun?
    Anthony Rizzo is one of the best, most consistent players in baseball and a great guy too!  Dude does nothing but grind for us year in and year out.  He's been through the bad years and the team has been built around his leadership. Cancer survivor. Clemente Award winner.  Does amazing charity work.  Someone every young kid playing the game could look up to.
    Oh I almost forgot.  It's the cool thing to hate on the Cubs now because god forbid we enjoy a little bit of the spotlight now that we've had some continued success.  Boy, I sure wish we were contenders every year of my life like the Yankees and Red Sox and got to enjoy the fruits of victory like you guys.  Sorry we've inconvenienced everyone so much.
    😭

    You dont think Contreras was a little over the top? 

    Rizzo is fine though. Seems like a pretty cool dude.
    Post edited by DewieCox on
  • MayDay10
    MayDay10 Posts: 11,863
    I didnt say Rizzo is a bad guy or anything.  Im just sick of his head
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,401
    MayDay10 said:
    I didnt say Rizzo is a bad guy or anything.  Im just sick of his head
    :lol:
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
    Missoula 24
  • F Me In The Brain
    F Me In The Brain this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,882
    Dang, Pedro living large.
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • Wobbie
    Wobbie Posts: 31,401
    on the face of it, the AL matchups completely dwarf those of the NL.

    we shall see....
    If I had known then what I know now...

    Vegas 93, Vegas 98, Vegas 00 (10 year show), Vegas 03, Vegas 06
    VIC 07
    EV LA1 08
    Seattle1 09, Seattle2 09, Salt Lake 09, LA4 09
    Columbus 10
    EV LA 11
    Vancouver 11
    Missoula 12
    Portland 13, Spokane 13
    St. Paul 14, Denver 14
    Philly I & II, 16
    Denver 22
    Missoula 24
  • Cliffy6745
    Cliffy6745 Posts: 34,036
    Wobbie said:
    on the face of it, the AL matchups completely dwarf those of the NL.

    we shall see....
    Lol the NL playoffs might as well be triple a
  • Smellyman
    Smellyman Asia Posts: 4,528
    Cubs Lose! Cubs Lose! Cubs Lose!

    Rejoice.

  • HesCalledDyer
    HesCalledDyer Maryland Posts: 16,498
  • F Me In The Brain
    F Me In The Brain this knows everybody from other commets Posts: 31,882
    Cubs being winners are better than Cards or Pie-Rats being winners.  All 3 teams should suck, in my world.  (NL Central lover...cannot bring myself to hate the Brewers yet, although I still have a healthy dislike of the Astros.)
    The love he receives is the love that is saved
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,961
    Wobbie said:
    on the face of it, the AL matchups completely dwarf those of the NL.

    we shall see....
    Lol the NL playoffs might as well be triple a
    at least no one in the NL will start a reliever at pitcher.  gotta love today's bs analytic baseball. start fucking relievers. nauseating.
  • Indifference71
    Indifference71 Chicago Posts: 14,915
    pjhawks said:
    Wobbie said:
    on the face of it, the AL matchups completely dwarf those of the NL.

    we shall see....
    Lol the NL playoffs might as well be triple a
    at least no one in the NL will start a reliever at pitcher.  gotta love today's bs analytic baseball. start fucking relievers. nauseating.

    The Brewers are doing the relief pitcher thing today.  I don't get it.
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,961
    pjhawks said:
    Wobbie said:
    on the face of it, the AL matchups completely dwarf those of the NL.

    we shall see....
    Lol the NL playoffs might as well be triple a
    at least no one in the NL will start a reliever at pitcher.  gotta love today's bs analytic baseball. start fucking relievers. nauseating.

    The Brewers are doing the relief pitcher thing today.  I don't get it.
    i didn't see that.  i guess they might have an excuse since they played 13 innings the other night.  it's the new analytics game. can't wait to see the Indians use 7 pitchers per game again in the playoffs. 
  • Indifference71
    Indifference71 Chicago Posts: 14,915
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    Wobbie said:
    on the face of it, the AL matchups completely dwarf those of the NL.

    we shall see....
    Lol the NL playoffs might as well be triple a
    at least no one in the NL will start a reliever at pitcher.  gotta love today's bs analytic baseball. start fucking relievers. nauseating.

    The Brewers are doing the relief pitcher thing today.  I don't get it.
    i didn't see that.  i guess they might have an excuse since they played 13 innings the other night.  it's the new analytics game. can't wait to see the Indians use 7 pitchers per game again in the playoffs. 
    Yeah I just saw that.  I'm not one of these guys who hates analytics and think they have no use, but it just feels like some of these managers are overthinking it.  Aren't you more likely to have success with 1 pitcher starting instead of bringing in a new pitcher ever 1-2 innings???
  • pjhawks
    pjhawks Posts: 12,961
    pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    Wobbie said:
    on the face of it, the AL matchups completely dwarf those of the NL.

    we shall see....
    Lol the NL playoffs might as well be triple a
    at least no one in the NL will start a reliever at pitcher.  gotta love today's bs analytic baseball. start fucking relievers. nauseating.

    The Brewers are doing the relief pitcher thing today.  I don't get it.
    i didn't see that.  i guess they might have an excuse since they played 13 innings the other night.  it's the new analytics game. can't wait to see the Indians use 7 pitchers per game again in the playoffs. 
    Yeah I just saw that.  I'm not one of these guys who hates analytics and think they have no use, but it just feels like some of these managers are overthinking it.  Aren't you more likely to have success with 1 pitcher starting instead of bringing in a new pitcher ever 1-2 innings???
    Agree analytics has it's place but it's taking over and hurting the game.  too many pitching changes and shifts on defense .  And on  offense, between exit velocity and launch angle, everyone wants to just hit a home run or strike out. where has the double gone?
  • pjhawks said:
    pjhawks said:
    Wobbie said:
    on the face of it, the AL matchups completely dwarf those of the NL.

    we shall see....
    Lol the NL playoffs might as well be triple a
    at least no one in the NL will start a reliever at pitcher.  gotta love today's bs analytic baseball. start fucking relievers. nauseating.

    The Brewers are doing the relief pitcher thing today.  I don't get it.
    i didn't see that.  i guess they might have an excuse since they played 13 innings the other night.  it's the new analytics game. can't wait to see the Indians use 7 pitchers per game again in the playoffs. 
    Yeah I just saw that.  I'm not one of these guys who hates analytics and think they have no use, but it just feels like some of these managers are overthinking it.  Aren't you more likely to have success with 1 pitcher starting instead of bringing in a new pitcher ever 1-2 innings???
    Analytics say no.

    Once a batter sees the pitcher a third time they start to have success on them.