***ECHOES: Pearl Jam's new interviews (new)
What the guys are saying....
3.31.10 ecopolitology, Stone interview, chart
http://ecopolitology.org/2010/03/30/pea ... nt-page-1/
3.30.10 Ethiopian Review, Stone interview, charts
http://www.ethiopianreview.com/news/31830
3.30.10 Seattle Times, Stone interview
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/n ... le30m.html
3.30.10 Reuters UK, Stone interview
http://smallbusiness.uk.reuters.com/201 ... o-climate/
3.31.10 ecopolitology, Stone interview, chart
http://ecopolitology.org/2010/03/30/pea ... nt-page-1/
3.30.10 Ethiopian Review, Stone interview, charts
http://www.ethiopianreview.com/news/31830
3.30.10 Seattle Times, Stone interview
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/n ... le30m.html
3.30.10 Reuters UK, Stone interview
http://smallbusiness.uk.reuters.com/201 ... o-climate/
Falling down,...not staying down
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
everyone's a hero from behind their keyboard
thanks for sharing Kat!!
i agree with that also.
I live in Hudson River Valley. We have a group called Scenic Hudson that buys as much land as they can along the river as well as adjacent properties. It will be forever wild and that is the end of further development along the river on those properties.
I believe that is a similar approach taken by groups that Pearl Jam supports. They are not buying fucking carbon emission credits, they are way too smart for that.
Pretty cool that they took note and are now working together.
I have been to three of their shows in the last year (2009) for a total of 2,576 miles in the car. I would say that was just a little more than 26 miles.
I feel that, as Stone admits as a "business owner", the band is merely doing the easy thing here...throwing money to the environmental group while wading in the publicity just before their mini tour begins. It just sounds so stiff and business-like rather than who the guys used to be, when they got their hands dirty in their causes. Will the guys be actually helping to plant those trees? If Stone and the guys aren't there with shovels in hands, it looks like things now are just easier to just give money to and leave...a purely stiff business tactic.
:thumbup:
There are others but this is all I could put my finger on at the moment. Have a lovely evening everyone! x
EV: It's your band.
~Q Magazine
"Kisses for the glow...kisses for the lease." - BDRII
Is there any way you could persuade the band to do an interview for their own magazine?
What a great question! The band certainly is quite detached from their fans...
nah - i'd say this band is as close to their fans as any other
I have to admit that I was very much disappointed with this solution. If nothing else, how can you hope to improve your "business" (by pleasing your fans) if you play less tour dates? And to do so on purpose to lower your carbon footprint sounds really ridiculous. As a fan in Phoenix, if I would have not traveled anywhere else to see them, I would have not bought as much merchandise or live shows, or signed up for the tenclub membership- if I would have not traveled to see them since their last AZ show in 2003. I am sure I'm not alone when I bitch and complain about not seeing them live ENOUGH; it's what makes this band amazing after all: the live shows.
If you play fewer shows on purpose you will be seen by less people. Less people will be introduced to your music and your causes. You will end up playing a few shows for a few elitists who will afford enormous ticket prices. You may be making the same amount of money as before while making your music (and your causes) known to less people. The wide appeal of your business (music, fan-base, lyrics, causes...) will be known only to you and a few "chosen" well-to-do fans.
My optimism leads me to disbelieve any of this would be possible, but I don't agree that less touring is the solution to any problems. Less touring (in fewer places) means that fewer people will be able to attend shows, which will eventually raise ticket prices. This IS a reality! It's happening now. People get tenclub memberships just to sell their good tickets 10X more than what they're bought for on stubhut or other legal scalping site. And people buy these tickets at these ridiculous prices BECAUSE Pearl Jam is touring less. So there, Stone ! Your business IS suffering! I like to think of PJ as a religion, their live performances being communions, places where people can get together and get united.
I like to believe that I am a good PJ follower and supporter and I have a very difficult time saying much negative about them. I will prove my dedication by working a shitload of overtime in the next month, then traveling from Phoenix to Boston to see PJ this summer. Feeling guilty would be as silly as PJ touring less to "save the planet".
I would like to end by quoting the lyrics to “See me, feel me” by the Who. I believe they describe perfectly what PJ means to me. By touring less, I would get less touching and healing, therefore, fewer people would get “opinion” or “the story”. DON’T STOP TOURING LESS !!!
See Me
Feel Me
Touch Me
Heal Me
Listening to you, I get the music
Gazing at you, I get the heat
Following you, I climb the mountain
I get excitement at your feet
Right behind you, I see the millions
On you, I see the glory
From you, I get opinion
From you, I get the story
LOL. How do you figure?
So.. Why the FUCK... would they tour less?????? Same FUCKING equation right? Burn more carbon.. make more money... plant more FUCKING trees!
They can track this shit... they can try and do the right thing... I'll support it. They don't feel like touring as much because of their families and age.. I'll support that too.
I WON'T support not getting tickets to shows because they aren't playing enough dates because of their Carbon footprint. That is bonkers. Here are some alternative ideas.
Plant a fucking tree.
Eddie.. stop smoking cigs.. burning shit gives off carbon.
Order themselves nuclear waste barrels for their caskets to make sure that no carbon from their decomposing bodies escapes into the atmosphere for 10,000 years.
1996: Ft Lauderdale
1998: Birmingham
2000: Charlotte, Tampa
2003: Tampa, Atlanta, Phoenix
2004: Kissimmee
2008: West Palm Beach, Bonnaroo, Columbia
2010: MSG2
2012: Music Midtown
2014: Memphis
2018: Wrigley 1, Fenway 1
2022: Nashville
2023: Ft. Worth II
First link gives the basics and tells you which offsets are better than others and why. Although tree-planting is not considered the 'best,' i think it still rocks b/c trees are nice to look at and their impact is very obvious in the local community and can turn into social events etc.
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Chan ... ffsets.asp
this link has more background and such...
http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Publications ... rs.asp#top
and finally this is one company that i use and they are 'gold standard' and all that good stuff. And no i don't own stock in them lol, though i would if they were public. haha.
anyways, that's it, enjoy the info if you wanna delve in.
mike
well from where I am their ticket prices are typically a quarter cheaper than other comparable artists playing the exact same venues
also I know that the band listens to their fans and looks out for them a lot - look at the cool shit in the ten redux package or how they look after the crowd when there's a surge at the front
As others have noted, it doesn't bode well when fans need to drive over 8 hours or fly to another city for a chance to see them play live. If everyone is concerned with the carbon footprint, then this surely must be considered.
What have YOU done today?
I dont think Gossard likes touring :(
including what's planned so far this year, I've clocked very roughly 80,000 miles since 2006 :shock: (and I didn't even do any Oz/NZ show!)
edit: and that's for 75 shows, so average is over a 1000 miles (only 5 of them were within 10 miles even though I live in London, even Reading was further than 26 miles)