The final word on Sean Penn

Byrnzie

lukin2006 wrote:

How do you know what those other guys do. Maybe they don'y feel the need yo tell every one about their charity work.

Maybe because they don't do any charity work.

Byrnzie

scottstappsucks wrote:

I don't get why Ed hangs out with this dude. He must have some gooooood reefer.

So why do you have his picture as your avatar? :?

lukin2006

Byrnzie wrote:

lukin2006 wrote:

How do you know what those other guys do. Maybe they don'y feel the need yo tell every one about their charity work.

Maybe because they don't do any charity work.

They didn't answer the question now did it. What facts do people have?

lukin2006

Byrnzie wrote:

scottstappsucks wrote:

I don't get why Ed hangs out with this dude. He must have some gooooood reefer.

So why do you have his picture as your avatar? :?

Maybe he's being facetious.

Byrnzie

lukin2006 wrote:

Byrnzie wrote:

lukin2006 wrote:

How do you know what those other guys do. Maybe they don'y feel the need yo tell every one about their charity work.

Maybe because they don't do any charity work.

They didn't answer the question now did it. What facts do people have?

I don't know. What facts do you have?

ajedigecko

what i do know......as long as we have people on the far left or far right, we will be ok. the time to worry, is when either of these groups disappear. because your group will be next.

Heatherj43

What goes around comes around. Bad vibes, Sean!!

Byrnzie

darthvedder81 wrote:

There's really no way you can defend this guy:

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrow ... ncer-pass/

So, why not just post the article instead of merely providing a link for it, so that those people slagging Sean Penn here can just what their defending?:

Lonewolf Diaries: Media Gives Sean Penn a ‘Rectal Cancer’ Pass
by Steven Crowder

Is it just me, or do the “outrageous” quotes from Limbaugh, Coulter, and Beck that send the mainstream-media into a tizzy pale in comparison to the vitriolic hatred of Penn?

If Sean Penn were to tell his detractors to take a hike, that would be fine. If he suggested that they jump off a bridge, I’d be cool with that. But to describe in vivid detail, a torturous, agonizing death (one from which many cancer-sufferers were likely suffering while watching the interview from their hospital beds) in which his detractors should perish, is evil, pure and simple. The worst part about it is that we all know Sean Penn isn’t quick enough to think on his feet, which leaves no doubt that the man had spent “a lot of energy on it” in order to craft the graphic mental imagery beforehand. What a sick, twisted, vulgar, knee-high little minikin.

Listen Sean, I don’t like you. Really, I don’t. Yet you’ve never heard me wish upon you the most agonizing of cervical cancers.

Would I love to pummel you? If I could cut five or six weight classes, yes of course I would. Better yet, I’d rather just let any of the photographers or women you’ve assaulted in years past line up to womp you one by one, a la “Airplane.”

Would I like to see you shunned from your Hollywood brethren for hate speech? Sure, why not? He who lives by the politically correct sword deserves to die by it.

I don’t, however, want to see you die a horrible, excruciating death. Not only because you’re undoubtedly going to hell, but because it’s just not my style to wish that on anybody, nor is it for most conservatives. We tend to be decent people. See, we call you and your ilk elitists, you call us scrotum-suckers (i.e. teabaggers). We point out your misguided ideals, you call us racists. We make fun of your cable networks pathetic ratings, you call us propagandists. Is anyone else noticing the pattern here?

This isn’t just about Jeff Spicoli. Sean Penn’s recent comment is the epitome of all that is wrong with Tinseltown. They can hurl the most vile, angry, hateful insults at middle-Americans because they know that the press will cover for them. On the flip-side, conservatives constantly have to play defense because they know that any marginally offensive comment they make will be blown-up into hate speech of epic proportions and played on a never-ending repeat circuit in the mainstream media. Who else is sick of it? In the spirit of honesty, I ask you conservatives, what would you say if someone like Rush Limbaugh wished all of his detractors “died screaming of rectal cancer”?

As for Sean, you disgust me. Yet, I would never hope to see you die an agonizing death, screaming from uterine cancer. See how that works?'


Sean Penn's cancer remark was just a throwaway comment. He could have used 101 other phrases that would have gotten his point across. Just the fact that he happened to use the C word gave all you smug right wingers an excuse to take some phony moral high-ground.

Rather than just reading the shit that the author of the above piece wrote, how about watching the full interview instead and making up your own minds about it?

As for the author of the above piece, Steven Crowder, he's obviously a fucking dick. There's really no way you can defend this guy.

cincybearcat

gimmesometruth27 wrote:

by the way, the author is a moron. guys can't get cervical cancer....and he sounds like just another whiney conservative complaining because "the liberal media and hollywood give him a pass but not coulter, limbaugh, and beck....WAH WAH!!!"

and he wishes for penn to be beaten by a line of women airplane style.. IMO he is no better than penn for wishing violence on him...

Do you really believe all the crap you type?

Seriously, isn't there ever a time where you think..."You know what, I'm not going to try and defend this douchebag even thought I have agreed with him on some things in the past...he's just a crazy moron now"?

You remind me of those here that you love to butt heads with about Rush and Beck, etc.

Starfall

Byrnzie wrote:

darthvedder81 wrote:

There's really no way you can defend this guy:

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrow ... ncer-pass/

So, why not just post the article instead of merely providing a link for it, so that those people slagging Sean Penn here can just what their defending?:

Because there's something called Fair Use in copyright law, which basically boils down to this - you can link to an article online, and you can quote a few relevant lines from it, but you're not allowed to copy and paste it wholesale to another site.
It also has the added benefit of not making threads way too long, and it allows people who are not particularly interested in the article to skip over it (I despise that lying scumbag Andrew Breitbart, for instance, and I'm not giving his site the satisfaction of clicking on it), and those who want to can read it for themselves in the original venue.

I would appreciate it if everyone kept this in mind so as not to get this site in legal trouble.