meh, I hope it remains illegal. The folks in the inner cities need something to earn a living and if they lose this business then they'll have to start selling harder drugs. What would you do - work at McDonald's for minimum wage or sling a few dimebags on your own time and make 5x as much money? If it is legalized, these proprietors would have to switch to a more harmful (but more lucrative) product. OTOH, the stuff that is grown for "medicinal" purposes in Cali is AMAZING and I would assume that would translate to a quality crop elsewhere. Hmm....
And yes, I know I am dating myself by using the term "dimebag."
Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
i wonder if i'm the only one on this message board who has actually never smoked it even once?
To me, that is kind of like saying, "I've never drank alcohol."
You're not missing much... but it can be fun (occassionally).
(edit): but I do think it is a MUCH better alternative to alcohol. Less damaging physically (not addictive or carcinogenic and you wake up the next day feeling great), socially (nobody beats up someone else when they are hih), and spiritually (the conclusions you come to during the experience are sometimes profound).
Post edited by he still stands on
Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
To me, that is kind of like saying, "I've never drank alcohol."
You're not missing much... but it can be fun (occassionally).
(edit): but I do think it is a MUCH better alternative to alcohol. Less damaging physically (not addictive or carcinogenic and you wake up the next day feeling great), socially (nobody beats up someone else when they are hih), and spiritually (the conclusions you come to during the experience are sometimes profound).
I think it depends on your definition of addiction. While yes it is not physically addictive, it is very much psychologically addictive. As is just about everything in life is.
I've known plenty of people who smoke everyday because they 'can't function' without it. That to me is an addiction.
i wonder if i'm the only one on this message board who has actually never smoked it even once?
what is this marijuana?.. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
"...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
"..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
“..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
I think it depends on your definition of addiction. While yes it is not physically addictive, it is very much psychologically addictive. As is just about everything in life is.
I've known plenty of people who smoke everyday because they 'can't function' without it. That to me is an addiction.
it less addictive than chocolate, coffee, or cheeseburgers. Should those items be criminalized, too? They are are all more harmful to the body...
Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
i wonder if i'm the only one on this message board who has actually never smoked it even once?
To me, that is kind of like saying, "I've never drank alcohol."
You're not missing much... but it can be fun (occassionally).
(edit): but I do think it is a MUCH better alternative to alcohol. Less damaging physically (not addictive or carcinogenic and you wake up the next day feeling great), socially (nobody beats up someone else when they are hih), and spiritually (the conclusions you come to during the experience are sometimes profound).
oh i didnt avoid it because i thought it was something horrible to do. i've never even took a puff of a cigarette. smoking just never appealed to me. i think it should be legal.
I think it depends on your definition of addiction. While yes it is not physically addictive, it is very much psychologically addictive. As is just about everything in life is.
I've known plenty of people who smoke everyday because they 'can't function' without it. That to me is an addiction.
it less addictive than chocolate, coffee, or cheeseburgers. Should those items be criminalized, too? They are are all more harmful to the body...
I'm not advocating keeping it illegal or making it legal. I was just making a comment that in my opinion marijuana IS addictive.
At the end of the day, it is still harmful to the body, at least when it is inhaled, so it annoys me when people say 'well it isn't as bad as.......'
It is still illegal because the government hasn't found a way to logically tax it. I mean, they've pumped billions into anti drug ads saying it's bad for all these years. All of sudden they're gonna say, "Eh, it's not really that bad anymore." Not likely. But if it ever does become legal, the gov't will be there to collect taxes on it.
At the end of the day, it is still harmful to the body, at least when it is inhaled, so it annoys me when people say 'well it isn't as bad as.......'
then use a vaporizer... or put 1/4 oz and a stick of butter in a pan and simmer at 225 degrees for 1 hour (don't burn it) and then use that for some brownies or whatever else you would bake with butter...
now how is it bad for you (physically)?
I'm not saying EVERYONE should to it because, for some reason, some people do it way too often. And it does bother me too when people claim it is a panacea...
Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
Bad for the body? Have you looked at the weight of the average American - now that's bad for the body! Perhaps they should pick up a joint and put down that super-sized Big Mac Meal! :!:
Personally, I don't know if it needs to be legalized, as already said it would put many out of a job, though I feel that it would employ many too as farms would be created and dispensaries, etc.
But... I do feel that medical marijuana is necessary, for there is no reason to strip someone of a medicine which can potentially have astronomical healing effects. MS, AIDS, glaucoma, etc. There have been a multitude of scientific studies done to illuminate the healing properties of marijuana, so if nothing else it should be legalized for those whom need it in that way.
As someone that will partake on occasion. I prefer decriminalization. I have a feeling the 1/8th at the liquor store is gonna be quite a bit more than I'm paying now.
Bad for the body? Have you looked at the weight of the average American - now that's bad for the body! Perhaps they should pick up a joint and put down that super-sized Big Mac Meal! :!:
except that the joint might make the person imbibing crave that super sized big mac meal so it is a double whammy
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
I am for the legalization of all drugs
why you might ask
1. We have lost the war on drugs and we can't win it. Its stupid to think we can. Somebody once posed the question if we can't keep drugs out of maximum security prisons how can we keep them off our streets.
2. I don't believe a democratic government has the right to make any items illegal...I mean any product could be deemed bad for you and then made illegal for example butter. Its a person choice weather they want to put that item into their body. The role of the FDA should be to properly warn people and also to make the food items we buy is actually safe ( or as safe as its supposed to be)
3. The legalization of drugs would make them cheaper and safer for the users.
4. The government could tax that item...I willing to bet we could get ride of the Income tax ( which is unconstitutional, yes I know they created an amendment but I am calling Shenanigans)
5. I don't think any more or less people would be addicted to drugs then we have now....the reason you make something illegal is to try and make it harder to get....but if you want drugs they are not hard to get...so what has making them illegal really accomplished?
6. Illegal drugs create a black market which leads to violent crimes, which leads to more people in prison and possible for longer because they now might be put away for violent crimes. It also leads to higher prices, the possible for bad drugs. International crime..ie the drug lords in SA and other places need to get the drugs here by illegal means ( this would need for Drug Mules).
7. The legal sale of drugs would CREATE jobs where people would be able to pay taxes on. From the production to the sale. Some of the taxes collected would goto into helping people who are addicted and want to quit
I can't think of anything else right now I am sure there is more.
I am for the legalization of all drugs
why you might ask
1. We have lost the war on drugs and we can't win it. Its stupid to think we can. Somebody once posed the question if we can't keep drugs out of maximum security prisons how can we keep them off our streets.
2. I don't believe a democratic government has the right to make any items illegal...I mean any product could be deemed bad for you and then made illegal for example butter. Its a person choice weather they want to put that item into their body. The role of the FDA should be to properly warn people and also to make the food items we buy is actually safe ( or as safe as its supposed to be)
3. The legalization of drugs would make them cheaper and safer for the users.
4. The government could tax that item...I willing to bet we could get ride of the Income tax ( which is unconstitutional, yes I know they created an amendment but I am calling Shenanigans)
5. I don't think any more or less people would be addicted to drugs then we have now....the reason you make something illegal is to try and make it harder to get....but if you want drugs they are not hard to get...so what has making them illegal really accomplished?
6. Illegal drugs create a black market which leads to violent crimes, which leads to more people in prison and possible for longer because they now might be put away for violent crimes. It also leads to higher prices, the possible for bad drugs. International crime..ie the drug lords in SA and other places need to get the drugs here by illegal means ( this would need for Drug Mules).
7. The legal sale of drugs would CREATE jobs where people would be able to pay taxes on. From the production to the sale. Some of the taxes collected would goto into helping people who are addicted and want to quit
I can't think of anything else right now I am sure there is more.
I agree with everything but #3 I think it will make the price of drugs go up, which in turn will keep some dealers active. Plus there's no way they'll just legalize all drugs.
I am for the legalization of all drugs
why you might ask
Well yeah of course... but we stick to "realistic" discussions here. In other words, policies that wouldn't get a politician re-elected are not relevant.
You're talking about flying to the moon when we haven't even invented the wheel yet!
Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
I am for the legalization of all drugs
why you might ask
Well yeah of course... but we stick to "realistic" discussions here. In other words, policies that wouldn't get a politician re-elected are not relevant.
You're talking about flying to the moon when we haven't even invented the wheel yet!
Ron Paul believes it and he gets elected just fine!
I am for the legalization of all drugs
why you might ask
Well yeah of course... but we stick to "realistic" discussions here. In other words, policies that wouldn't get a politician re-elected are not relevant.
You're talking about flying to the moon when we haven't even invented the wheel yet!
Ron Paul believes it and he gets elected just fine!
Yep. Kucinich does too... but I don't think either of them have actually tried to make it happen or even a priority of their respective jobs. Could be wrong though because I don't follow politics/news/current events. (other than word of mouth)
Everything not forbidden is compulsory and eveything not compulsory is forbidden. You are free... free to do what the government says you can do.
I am for the legalization of all drugs
why you might ask
Well yeah of course... but we stick to "realistic" discussions here. In other words, policies that wouldn't get a politician re-elected are not relevant.
You're talking about flying to the moon when we haven't even invented the wheel yet!
Ron Paul believes it and he gets elected just fine!
ron paul has as much of a chance of being elected president as i do. even if he won he would have to convince congress to do this and everyone knows that will never happen in another 200 years.
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry." - Lincoln
Comments
And yes, I know I am dating myself by using the term "dimebag."
i wonder if i'm the only one on this message board who has actually never smoked it even once?
To me, that is kind of like saying, "I've never drank alcohol."
You're not missing much... but it can be fun (occassionally).
(edit): but I do think it is a MUCH better alternative to alcohol. Less damaging physically (not addictive or carcinogenic and you wake up the next day feeling great), socially (nobody beats up someone else when they are hih), and spiritually (the conclusions you come to during the experience are sometimes profound).
Decriminilization might even be better for that reason.
I think it depends on your definition of addiction. While yes it is not physically addictive, it is very much psychologically addictive. As is just about everything in life is.
I've known plenty of people who smoke everyday because they 'can't function' without it. That to me is an addiction.
"..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
“..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
it less addictive than chocolate, coffee, or cheeseburgers. Should those items be criminalized, too? They are are all more harmful to the body...
oh i didnt avoid it because i thought it was something horrible to do. i've never even took a puff of a cigarette. smoking just never appealed to me. i think it should be legal.
Hail Hail HIPPIEMOM
Wishlist Foundation-
http://www.wishlistfoundation.org
info@wishlistfoundation.org
Anything is better than the finest Southeast PA green... eek.
Then again I did just move here from PHX and made regular trips to NorCal for work... so it's all relative.
I'm not advocating keeping it illegal or making it legal. I was just making a comment that in my opinion marijuana IS addictive.
At the end of the day, it is still harmful to the body, at least when it is inhaled, so it annoys me when people say 'well it isn't as bad as.......'
9/29/04 Boston, 6/28/08 Mansfield, 8/23/09 Chicago, 5/15/10 Hartford
5/17/10 Boston, 10/15/13 Worcester, 10/16/13 Worcester, 10/25/13 Hartford
8/5/16 Fenway, 8/7/16 Fenway
EV Solo: 6/16/11 Boston, 6/18/11 Hartford,
then use a vaporizer... or put 1/4 oz and a stick of butter in a pan and simmer at 225 degrees for 1 hour (don't burn it) and then use that for some brownies or whatever else you would bake with butter...
now how is it bad for you (physically)?
I'm not saying EVERYONE should to it because, for some reason, some people do it way too often. And it does bother me too when people claim it is a panacea...
But... I do feel that medical marijuana is necessary, for there is no reason to strip someone of a medicine which can potentially have astronomical healing effects. MS, AIDS, glaucoma, etc. There have been a multitude of scientific studies done to illuminate the healing properties of marijuana, so if nothing else it should be legalized for those whom need it in that way.
www.ivaw.org
1995 San Francisco
San Jose
San Diego 2 shows
2003 Missoula
2005 Missoula
2006 Denver 2 shows with Tom Petty
Gorge 2 shows
2009 Utah
LA1
LA2
2012 Missoula : Meet and Greet : "Instant Classic show"
2013 Portland
Spokane
2018 Missoula
except that the joint might make the person imbibing crave that super sized big mac meal so it is a double whammy
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
why you might ask
1. We have lost the war on drugs and we can't win it. Its stupid to think we can. Somebody once posed the question if we can't keep drugs out of maximum security prisons how can we keep them off our streets.
2. I don't believe a democratic government has the right to make any items illegal...I mean any product could be deemed bad for you and then made illegal for example butter. Its a person choice weather they want to put that item into their body. The role of the FDA should be to properly warn people and also to make the food items we buy is actually safe ( or as safe as its supposed to be)
3. The legalization of drugs would make them cheaper and safer for the users.
4. The government could tax that item...I willing to bet we could get ride of the Income tax ( which is unconstitutional, yes I know they created an amendment but I am calling Shenanigans)
5. I don't think any more or less people would be addicted to drugs then we have now....the reason you make something illegal is to try and make it harder to get....but if you want drugs they are not hard to get...so what has making them illegal really accomplished?
6. Illegal drugs create a black market which leads to violent crimes, which leads to more people in prison and possible for longer because they now might be put away for violent crimes. It also leads to higher prices, the possible for bad drugs. International crime..ie the drug lords in SA and other places need to get the drugs here by illegal means ( this would need for Drug Mules).
7. The legal sale of drugs would CREATE jobs where people would be able to pay taxes on. From the production to the sale. Some of the taxes collected would goto into helping people who are addicted and want to quit
I can't think of anything else right now I am sure there is more.
I agree with everything but #3 I think it will make the price of drugs go up, which in turn will keep some dealers active. Plus there's no way they'll just legalize all drugs.
Well yeah of course... but we stick to "realistic" discussions here. In other words, policies that wouldn't get a politician re-elected are not relevant.
You're talking about flying to the moon when we haven't even invented the wheel yet!
Ron Paul believes it and he gets elected just fine!
Yep. Kucinich does too... but I don't think either of them have actually tried to make it happen or even a priority of their respective jobs. Could be wrong though because I don't follow politics/news/current events. (other than word of mouth)
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
the sky is blue.
Rejoice for Today is: Setting Orange - Day 73 of the Aftermath - YOLD 3175
(Happy New Year for the Pope Gregory Calendar followers)
I have smoked pot and never moved on to cocaine, should I consider myself lucky?
Google "why marijuana is illegal" and have fun! (hint:follow the money)
I mean slaves work and behave much better when happy right?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKyMvjPJdtM
edit: becomes relevant at about 2minute mark... but the whole thing is HILARIOUS (and true)