9/11 Suspects to Face Death Penalty in NYC Trial...

PearlOfAGirlPearlOfAGirl Posts: 15,993
edited May 2010 in A Moving Train
Self-proclaimed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees will be brought to trial in a civilian federal courthouse in New York, near the site of the devastating 2001 terror attacks. Prosecutors expect to seek the death penalty.

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/ ... l=16626211


Wish you were here...

~RIP Dad
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    about frigging time.
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    I hope he is not allowed to preach about that whole anti-American/fundamentalist Islamic religion crap in open court. But, im guessing... he will.
    And instead of the Death Penalty... how about a 297,300 year sentence with no parole eligability at Pelican Bay, California in the Neo-Nazi psychos cell block... and rooming with the multiple murderer who partially ate some of his victims?
    That would make Camp X-Ray, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba look like a stint at Club Med.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • ShawshankShawshank Posts: 1,018
    I have a feeling when it's all over, these guys will be wishing they were in Gitmo still.
  • rebornFixerrebornFixer Posts: 4,901
    Cosmo wrote:
    And instead of the Death Penalty... how about a 297,300 year sentence with no parole eligability at Pelican Bay, California in the Neo-Nazi psychos cell block... and rooming with the multiple murderer who partially ate some of his victims?
    That would make Camp X-Ray, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba look like a stint at Club Med.

    +1
  • i believe in the spirit of democracy...those guys must have a fair trial no matter they did..if u kill a pesron or steal a packet of cigarettes..the thing happen in NYC was the worst i ever seen in my life..but the best penalty is the rest of their lifes behind bars...eye for an eye ,the normal societys must NOT do!!they act like they dont respect the human life..but we as more logical and we believe in human rights and respect the gift of life we must act different..Btw what took so long this to be in court??
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • googoo Posts: 226
    Btw what took so long this to be in court??

    because our justice system is a piece of shit. I'm all for these animals dying the worst death possible after what they inflicted on the people of this country. but if the jury pusses out and decides to put them in prison... it's going to make me sick knowing that other peoples' money is going towards feeding these animals 3 meals a day and insuring they have some level of comfort in their cell. that is not justice. I believe just about anyone can adapt to any form of living over a certain amount of time. you learn to live without. but if they could simply be thrown into a cement cell with no windows, no light, no food, they could die the slow, painful death they deserve.
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    goo wrote:
    Btw what took so long this to be in court??

    because our justice system is a piece of shit. I'm all for these animals dying the worst death possible after what they inflicted on the people of this country. but if the jury pusses out and decides to put them in prison... it's going to make me sick knowing that other peoples' money is going towards feeding these animals 3 meals a day and insuring they have some level of comfort in their cell. that is not justice. I believe just about anyone can adapt to any form of living over a certain amount of time. you learn to live without. but if they could simply be thrown into a cement cell with no windows, no light, no food, they could die the slow, painful death they deserve.
    ...
    You make a prison life sentence seem like some sort of luxury or something.
    I don't know... I think prison would be a nightmare. In my opinion.... 3 meals a day does not make the nightly ass raping any more pleasant.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • goo wrote:
    Btw what took so long this to be in court??

    because our justice system is a piece of shit. I'm all for these animals dying the worst death possible after what they inflicted on the people of this country. but if the jury pusses out and decides to put them in prison... it's going to make me sick knowing that other peoples' money is going towards feeding these animals 3 meals a day and insuring they have some level of comfort in their cell. that is not justice. I believe just about anyone can adapt to any form of living over a certain amount of time. you learn to live without. but if they could simply be thrown into a cement cell with no windows, no light, no food, they could die the slow, painful death they deserve.
    that about i was saying not to do,,they are Animals,i believe the same..we are not..never gonna be "right" justice..ofcourse u and me cant feel maybe how they feel when people think like them,,see a bomb from Nato destroy their home with their family in...couse there is no tv to show it...its a shit,,war is a shit,,eye for an eye is shit..
    PEACE
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    war is a shit,,eye for an eye is shit..
    PEACE

    yup.
    what a fucking media circus this is going to be.
    Don't they often move high profile trials to other cities or states to avoid jury bias, victim exposure, and what essentially becomes a public lynch-mob atmosphere? I'm curious how NY'ers feel about having the trial in their own backyard.
  • KSM should not be tried in a federal court. HE should be tried in a military tribunal. This is a vey bad decision on the part of Obama and Holder. Not only that it Unconstitutional. wtf is this president thinking ? What's going to happen if he walks on a technicality ? :x :x :x
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    prfctlefts wrote:
    KSM should not be tried in a federal court. HE should be tried in a military tribunal. This is a vey bad decision on the part of Obama and Holder. Not only that it Unconstitutional. wtf is this president thinking ? What's going to happen if he walks on a technicality ? :x :x :x
    so he should be tried in a military court to guarantee conviction?


    why even have a trial?
  • prfctlefts wrote:
    KSM should not be tried in a federal court. HE should be tried in a military tribunal. This is a vey bad decision on the part of Obama and Holder. Not only that it Unconstitutional. wtf is this president thinking ? What's going to happen if he walks on a technicality ? :x :x :x

    Agreed about the tribunal. My fear is that because he was never read his Miranda rights, then he was water boarded, his confession would not be admissible. And that could possibly get him acquitted.

    These guys wanted to plead guilty and be executed. I say we skip the trial and give them their wish.
  • Commy wrote:
    so he should be tried in a military court to guarantee conviction?


    why even have a trial?
    +1...fair trial means fair trial...
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • puremagicpuremagic Posts: 1,907
    It took so long because the Bush administration was content to let them sit in Gitmo until they died. This action may make sense to the politicians, but the only gain for America is that we have made Gitmo prisoners, martyrs. There has been no closure for the families?

    Look at victims of war crimes, they wait decades, just for an opportunity to 'see justice served' - to have their day in court. For no other reason than to have the world hear their voice and what happen to them. Our military court is closed to the media and public, records become sealed and the families and people are left to wonder the reasoning. It won't make a difference if KSM is found guilty in a military court or if he is hanged. The gesture is empty, because the victims and survivors had no voice.

    Just because this act took place in NY, it was an action against America, KSM was a planner, an accessory to the murders of thousands of people and should be accountable to the justice system which affords the citizens of this country to sit on a jury and determine their fate. If not, then turn him over to the Hague.

    Of course, this trial may be too much for the citizens of NY to have to relive and it would be very understandable if the State wishes to have it moved. Whether it is held in NY or Montana, lets keep it in our judicial system so that the voices get heard, so that the verdict is the verdict of the people, not the military, not the politicians, not the media, but the PEOPLE.

    Let it be the PEOPLE who decides KSM's fate as a criminal, not the military who will make him a martyr.
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • puremagic wrote:
    but the PEOPLE.

    Let it be the PEOPLE who decides KSM's fate as a criminal, not the military who will make him a martyr.
    :thumbup:
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    prfctlefts wrote:
    KSM should not be tried in a federal court. HE should be tried in a military tribunal. This is a vey bad decision on the part of Obama and Holder. Not only that it Unconstitutional. wtf is this president thinking ? What's going to happen if he walks on a technicality ? :x :x :x

    Agreed about the tribunal. My fear is that because he was never read his Miranda rights, then he was water boarded, his confession would not be admissible. And that could possibly get him acquitted.

    These guys wanted to plead guilty and be executed. I say we skip the trial and give them their wish.

    so much for due process. yeah lets martyr them and encourage more terrorists, what a brilliant idea....
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • I read somewhere that the Bush administration using the ilitary tribunal won three convictions in eight years. However, terror cases like these have a 100% conviction rate in the U.S.

    (off to find a source for this)
  • xavier mcdanielxavier mcdaniel Somewhere in NYC Posts: 9,308
    I'm not thrilled with it taking place in New York, but at this point I'm just glad it's finally getting started. Personally I don't think he deserves a trial, but if this country didn't grant him that, in spite of his sick actions, then we would stoop to the level of some of these non-democratic countries.
    Reading 2004
    Albany 2006 Camden 2006 E. Rutherford 2, 2006 Inglewood 2006,
    Chicago 2007
    Camden 2008 MSG 2008 MSG 2008 Hartford 2008.
    Seattle 2009 Seattle 2009 Philadelphia 2009,Philadelphia 2009 Philadelphia 2009
    Hartford 2010 MSG 2010 MSG 2010
    Toronto 2011,Toronto 2011
    Wrigley Field 2013 Brooklyn 2013 Brooklyn 2013 Philadelphia 2, 2013
    Philadelphia 1, 2016 Philadelphia 2 2016 New York 2016 New York 2016 Fenway 1, 2016
    Fenway 2, 2018
    MSG 2022
    St. Paul, 1, St. Paul 2 2023
    MSG 2024, MSG 2024
    Philadelphia 2024
    "I play good, hard-nosed basketball.
    Things happen in the game. Nothing you
    can do. I don't go and say,
    "I'm gonna beat this guy up."
  • so much for due process. yeah lets martyr them and encourage more terrorists, what a brilliant idea.

    Obviously you don't get it... They could all walk on a technicality such as their miranda rights never being read to them. Which would not happen in a M.T. And not to mention this is exactly what he wants. They will use this trial for nothing more than propaganda so that he can become a martyr and that will create more Jihadist. It will also bring the pain back to the families that lost loved ones on 911,but Im sure you and the rest of the lefties on here could care less about how the families feel. You're all more worried about the KSM's feelings or fox news.
  • NoKNoK Posts: 824
    Maybe during the course of the trial they can finally tell us what the link between 9-11 and Iraq was. Then the Iraqis can understand why 1 million of them had to die.
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    prfctlefts wrote:
    so much for due process. yeah lets martyr them and encourage more terrorists, what a brilliant idea.

    Obviously you don't get it... They could all walk on a technicality such as their miranda rights never being read to them. Which would not happen in a M.T. And not to mention this is exactly what he wants. They will use this trial for nothing more than propaganda so that he can become a martyr and that will create more Jihadist. It will also bring the pain back to the families that lost loved ones on 911,but Im sure you and the rest of the lefties on here could care less about how the families feel. You're all more worried about the KSM's feelings or fox news.

    obviously YOU do not get it. if they can walk on a technicality, and if that is a well known possibility, then why did those responsible for their arrest and holding them not do things by the book? why were they not read their rights, if it is your contention that they were not read them? why were they not given legal representation? why were they tortured? why did it take 8 years to charge them and bring them to some sort of trial? whatever happened to a speedy trial by jury of your peers? to become a martyr one has to DIE....if we kill them we make them martyrs and inspirational leaders to the next generation of jihadists, if we leave them in jail they do not become martyrs in that sense, they become more like that mumia muhammed guy that was imprisoned under shady circumstances which caused a groundswell in favor of giving him a new trial or outright release. if this case was so open and shut why was it not carried out years ago instead of being drug out and drug out and drug out? if they defendants want to die and be made martyrs why do you want to give them that satisfaction??

    i do not know if a trial will bring back the pain that has never really left for these families. i am sure a lot of them would want some sort of closure, and dragging out this process is doing quite the opposite of closure, more like allowing the wounds to fester. by doing this feet dragging it seems to me that YOU and the government are allowing the pain of the families to continue instead of getting these proceedings over and done with. personally i do not care about these defendants. i was not directly affected by 9/11 so i have no stake in what happens. i am however a stickler for the rule of law and the legal process. if the system is broken and these guys walk, you have nobody to blame other than those responsible for carrying out this case. if we fucked it up by not going by the book then that is the lesson these people will learn. you should stop painting liberals as uncaring about these families and people in general. i know for a fact that i have a great deal of empathy for these families. last i checked the right were the ones that are against any form of assistance for less fortunate, thus not caring for people other than themselves. i do not care about KSM's feelings, rather i expect my government to do things by the book. after 8 years they better have done so, if not you can blame the people in charge of this, and only them. i am concerned about fox news because they LIE to their viewers. which i am pretty sure this is where your paranoia of these defendants walking on a technicality is coming from in the first place.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • prfctlefts wrote:
    but Im sure you and the rest of the lefties on here could care less about how the families feel.

    Damn those on the left for their feelings about bringing the criminals to justice the American way. You all should be more respectful to their feelings...like this guy
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf33g9ep4YU
  • NoK wrote:
    Maybe during the course of the trial they can finally tell us what the link between 9-11 and Iraq was. Then the Iraqis can understand why 1 million of them had to die.
    +1
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • prfctlefts wrote:
    so much for due process. yeah lets martyr them and encourage more terrorists, what a brilliant idea.

    Obviously you don't get it... They could all walk on a technicality such as their miranda rights never being read to them. Which would not happen in a M.T. And not to mention this is exactly what he wants. They will use this trial for nothing more than propaganda so that he can become a martyr and that will create more Jihadist. It will also bring the pain back to the families that lost loved ones on 911,but Im sure you and the rest of the lefties on here could care less about how the families feel. You're all more worried about the KSM's feelings or fox news.

    obviously YOU do not get it. if they can walk on a technicality, and if that is a well known possibility, then why did those responsible for their arrest and holding them not do things by the book? why were they not read their rights, if it is your contention that they were not read them? why were they not given legal representation? why were they tortured? why did it take 8 years to charge them and bring them to some sort of trial? whatever happened to a speedy trial by jury of your peers? to become a martyr one has to DIE....if we kill them we make them martyrs and inspirational leaders to the next generation of jihadists, if we leave them in jail they do not become martyrs in that sense, they become more like that mumia muhammed guy that was imprisoned under shady circumstances which caused a groundswell in favor of giving him a new trial or outright release. if this case was so open and shut why was it not carried out years ago instead of being drug out and drug out and drug out? if they defendants want to die and be made martyrs why do you want to give them that satisfaction??

    i do not know if a trial will bring back the pain that has never really left for these families. i am sure a lot of them would want some sort of closure, and dragging out this process is doing quite the opposite of closure, more like allowing the wounds to fester. by doing this feet dragging it seems to me that YOU and the government are allowing the pain of the families to continue instead of getting these proceedings over and done with. personally i do not care about these defendants. i was not directly affected by 9/11 so i have no stake in what happens. i am however a stickler for the rule of law and the legal process. if the system is broken and these guys walk, you have nobody to blame other than those responsible for carrying out this case. if we fucked it up by not going by the book then that is the lesson these people will learn. you should stop painting liberals as uncaring about these families and people in general. i know for a fact that i have a great deal of empathy for these families. last i checked the right were the ones that are against any form of assistance for less fortunate, thus not caring for people other than themselves. i do not care about KSM's feelings, rather i expect my government to do things by the book. after 8 years they better have done so, if not you can blame the people in charge of this, and only them. i am concerned about fox news because they LIE to their viewers. which i am pretty sure this is where your paranoia of these defendants walking on a technicality is coming from in the first place.
    dont have to worry about new jihadiss...their familys that their people know that usa hold them 8 years without trial already join the club..
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • Kel VarnsenKel Varnsen Posts: 1,952
    A civilian trial seems like kind of a weird way to play this, it does make me wonder a few things though (although most of my legal knowlege comes from law and order). Who will they get to defend these guys? How the hell will they deal with jury selection, especially in NY trying to find 12 jurors who are impartial? What if one of the defendants decided he wants to represent himself?
  • soulsingingsoulsinging Posts: 13,202
    A civilian trial seems like kind of a weird way to play this, it does make me wonder a few things though (although most of my legal knowlege comes from law and order). Who will they get to defend these guys? How the hell will they deal with jury selection, especially in NY trying to find 12 jurors who are impartial? What if one of the defendants decided he wants to represent himself?

    these guys are going to have people tripping over themselves to defend them. the kind of press and notoriety you'd get from a case like this is a career maker. not to mention the possibility of fat defense checks cut by saudi oil princes on behalf of their distant cousins...

    jury selection... that'd be tough anywhere in the country probably. new yorkers are probably better equipped to serve as jurors anywya. as some comedian pointed out, the people most bloodthirsty for war and revenge in the wake of 9/11 are often those that live in places that would never be the target of an attack like this (ie. red state neocon strongholds). new yorkers generally have a solid handle on things at this point.

    if they want to defend themselves they can within reason. if they act out of line or prove unfit to mount a legal defense, that right will be taken from them and an attorney will be appointed. so they can't try to turn it into a circus. judges have some discretion.
  • A trial???? Aren't these guys already guilty?

    We'll get to hear the mastermind either tell the real story or just brag about the whole thing. The security will have to be so tight as you can bet some other loser will want to make a name for themselves by causing an uproar at the expense of NYC again. Just have the boat sink on the way from Cuba to FLA and be done with it.

    The poison from the poison stream caught up to you ELEVEN years ago and you floated out of here. Sept. 14, 08

  • My greatest concern is that it will be a shambles of a show trial that ignores all established legal precedent.the ramifications of that could be worse than terrorism itself. None of the prerequisites exist for a fair trial in the case of terrorist captured overseas by intelligence agents.

    For example, just for starters what objective proof do we have that the individual who will show up in the courtroom is actually the KSM who planned 911? What do we do if he simply asserts he is not the person the Gov.. claims he is ?

    What about chain of evidence ? KSM wasn't captured by civil law enforcement ,but by our military who were fighting a war,not gathering evidence. Did they carefully log every piece of evidence and log every time someone touched it. How will the prosecution refute a claim that evidence was tampered with ?

    what about KSM being water-boarded ? In a normal civil trial that would make his confession entirely inadmissible.Even if the jury knows of the confession external to the trial,an honest jury member would have to disregard such information. If the confession is allowed against all precedent,the jury could honestly
    disregard it just as they would in any proven instance of police brutality.

    A civil defendant has the right to face his accusers. Are we going to force intelligence officers and special agents to reveal their identities in open court ? If we don't,how do we prove that the Gov. witnesses are real people and that they are telling the truth about real people ? The defendant also has the right examine any and all evidence. So why not just let KSM and his defense team examine the the internals of the software and hardware we use to track enemy communications.

    These and other factors could all combine create a plausible defense that simply says that all the evidence presented was fabricated by the GOVernment . Such fabrication does occur in much less prominent,so a jury cannot disregard the possibility it could occur in such a high profile case. So how could the Gov. objectively refute such a claim when it employed none of the safeguards used by civil law enforcement ?
  • Drowned OutDrowned Out Posts: 6,056
    prfctlefts wrote:
    My greatest concern is that it will be a shambles of a show trial that ignores all established legal precedent.the ramifications of that could be worse than terrorism itself. None of the prerequisites exist for a fair trial in the case of terrorist captured overseas by intelligence agents.

    For example, just for starters what objective proof do we have that the individual who will show up in the courtroom is actually the KSM who planned 911? What do we do if he simply asserts he is not the person the Gov.. claims he is ?

    What about chain of evidence ? KSM wasn't captured by civil law enforcement ,but by our military who were fighting a war,not gathering evidence. Did they carefully log every piece of evidence and log every time someone touched it. How will the prosecution refute a claim that evidence was tampered with ?

    what about KSM being water-boarded ? In a normal civil trial that would make his confession entirely inadmissible.Even if the jury knows of the confession external to the trial,an honest jury member would have to disregard such information. If the confession is allowed against all precedent,the jury could honestly
    disregard it just as they would in any proven instance of police brutality.

    A civil defendant has the right to face his accusers. Are we going to force intelligence officers and special agents to reveal their identities in open court ? If we don't,how do we prove that the Gov. witnesses are real people and that they are telling the truth about real people ? The defendant also has the right examine any and all evidence. So why not just let KSM and his defense team examine the the internals of the software and hardware we use to track enemy communications.

    These and other factors could all combine create a plausible defense that simply says that all the evidence presented was fabricated by the GOVernment . Such fabrication does occur in much less prominent,so a jury cannot disregard the possibility it could occur in such a high profile case. So how could the Gov. objectively refute such a claim when it employed none of the safeguards used by civil law enforcement ?

    :roll:
    YOUR greatest concern, huh?
    http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10191.html
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    prfctlefts wrote:
    My greatest concern is that it will be a shambles of a show trial that ignores all established legal precedent.the ramifications of that could be worse than terrorism itself. None of the prerequisites exist for a fair trial in the case of terrorist captured overseas by intelligence agents.

    For example, just for starters what objective proof do we have that the individual who will show up in the courtroom is actually the KSM who planned 911? What do we do if he simply asserts he is not the person the Gov.. claims he is ?

    What about chain of evidence ? KSM wasn't captured by civil law enforcement ,but by our military who were fighting a war,not gathering evidence. Did they carefully log every piece of evidence and log every time someone touched it. How will the prosecution refute a claim that evidence was tampered with ?

    what about KSM being water-boarded ? In a normal civil trial that would make his confession entirely inadmissible.Even if the jury knows of the confession external to the trial,an honest jury member would have to disregard such information. If the confession is allowed against all precedent,the jury could honestly
    disregard it just as they would in any proven instance of police brutality.

    A civil defendant has the right to face his accusers. Are we going to force intelligence officers and special agents to reveal their identities in open court ? If we don't,how do we prove that the Gov. witnesses are real people and that they are telling the truth about real people ? The defendant also has the right examine any and all evidence. So why not just let KSM and his defense team examine the the internals of the software and hardware we use to track enemy communications.



    These and other factors could all combine create a plausible defense that simply says that all the evidence presented was fabricated by the GOVernment . Such fabrication does occur in much less prominent,so a jury cannot disregard the possibility it could occur in such a high profile case. So how could the Gov. objectively refute such a claim when it employed none of the safeguards used by civil law enforcement ?

    :roll:
    YOUR greatest concern, huh?
    http://chicagoboyz.net/archives/10191.html


    wow.....i did not think he wrote that. i actually googled a few sentences from that post a little while ago and got the same link.

    the lesson in this is if you are going to plagiarize a blog, try to save yourself the embarrassment and at least cite the author and say "i agree with what this person says" instead of posting it as if it is your own work. this just proves that people are intelligent enough around here to tell the difference between posters' writing styles....
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Sign In or Register to comment.