DC SNIPER To Be Executed in 2 Days

g under p

STILL some Killings Remain Unsolved as D.C. Sniper Execution Approaches I can still remember how they terrorized the DC Metro area, I worked two blocks from his first killings. Later i traveled to London and this story led the news over there, the day i came back is when they caught them.

The question became even murkier in 2006, when Malvo reportedly confessed to four additional shootings, including two killings, that had not been linked to him.

If Malvo's reported confessions are accepted as true, it would mean he and Muhammad are responsible for 27 shootings resulting in 17 deaths in 10 states (Maryland, Virginia, Alabama, Washington, Georgia, Texas, California, Florida, Arizona and Louisiana) plus the District of Columbia.

But Malvo would only talk to police in jurisdictions that promised not to prosecute him, a deal some agencies weren't willing to make.

So in Clearwater, Fla., the golf course shooting of Albert Michalczyk on May 18, 2002, officially remains unsolved, though Michalczyk took Malvo's reported confession in 2006 as confirmation of something he long suspected.

"My wife immediately thought it was these guys," Michalczyk said at the time. "We put two and two together, but we never came up with four. Now, we are coming up with four."

Police from Tucson, Ariz., consider the golf course killing of Jerry Taylor solved based on their interview with Malvo, which they obtained only after agreeing not to prosecute him.

The victim's daughter, Cheryll Witz, decided that knowing the truth was more important than seeing Malvo face criminal charges, given the fact that he was already serving life in prison. At one point, Malvo even called Witz on the telephone and apologized.

Peace

Byrnzie

The death penalty is the sickest of all sick things. No country can claim to be civilized if it murders it's citizens in the name of justice and the law.

CJMST3K

i have no problem with this.

mrvedderson

im forgainst it

CJMST3K

mrvedderson wrote:

im forgainst it

hahaha....

gimmesometruth27

i just read that the supreme court is refusing to hear his appeal. not looking good for this guy....

phillypjhead

I knew the daughter of one of the victims when I was younger. I'd imagine 2 days is 2 days too long for her.

Commy

he'll be executed and nothing will change, and people will think the state justified in murdering another citizen.

catefrances

Byrnzie wrote:

The death penalty is the sickest of all sick things. No country can claim to be civilized if it murders it's citizens in the name of justice and the law.

QFT.

pearljgirl2010

catefrances wrote:

Byrnzie wrote:

The death penalty is the sickest of all sick things. No country can claim to be civilized if it murders it's citizens in the name of justice and the law.

QFT.

what does QFT mean??

fuck

pearljgirl2010 wrote:

catefrances wrote:

Byrnzie wrote:

The death penalty is the sickest of all sick things. No country can claim to be civilized if it murders it's citizens in the name of justice and the law.

QFT.

what does QFT mean??

quoted for truth

howard zinn was just here at my school 2 days ago speaking about the death penalty actually, was very interesting...

Thorns2010

I live in the USA, have lived here my entire life, but one thing that boggles my mind is the fact that we still have the Death Penalty in this country.

According to Amnesty.org, in 2008 the USA was 4th in the world in government sanctioned killing. 1st was China, with 1,718 (which is an INSANE number) 2nd was Iran with 346, 3rd was Uganda with 114 and the USA 4th with 111.

I thought we (as in the USA) were suppose to be the guardian/police of the world? How can that be? How can we try and tell the rest of the world how to live (I'm looking at you Iraqi and Afghanistan, or should I say, people who support those 'wars') if we can't even join the majority of the world by abolishing the death penalty.

know1

Byrnzie wrote:

The death penalty is the sickest of all sick things. No country can claim to be civilized if it murders it's citizens in the name of justice and the law.

I agree. What good comes of killing another person related to this situation?

BinFrog

know1 wrote:

Byrnzie wrote:

The death penalty is the sickest of all sick things. No country can claim to be civilized if it murders it's citizens in the name of justice and the law.

I agree. What good comes of killing another person related to this situation?

On the flip side, just for the sake of a good debate, what good does keeping this a**hole alive do? He murdered handfulls of people. Why should my tax dollars support keeping him alive with 3 square meals a day and recreation time? I'm not sure a killer of this nature deserves any better than he himself allowed for his victims. While the death penalty as it is used now is obviously beyond flawed, the argument for keeping this guy alive until he dies of natural causes just seems so shallow. He is useless to society, to mankind, and he is responsible for absolutely wretched heartache and the loss of life to several families who have lost their loved ones forever in a completely nonsensical and disgusting way. He and his accomplice were picking people off who were just out living their lives and doing such *gasp* horrible things like filling up their gas tanks. I do not see the use of this person being on earth anymore.

Byrnzie

BinFrog wrote:

On the flip side, just for the sake of a good debate, what good does keeping this a**hole alive do? He murdered handfulls of people. Why should my tax dollars support keeping him alive with 3 square meals a day and recreation time? I'm not sure a killer of this nature deserves any better than he himself allowed for his victims. While the death penalty as it is used now is obviously beyond flawed, the argument for keeping this guy alive until he dies of natural causes just seems so shallow. He is useless to society, to mankind, and he is responsible for absolutely wretched heartache and the loss of life to several families who have lost their loved ones forever in a completely nonsensical and disgusting way. He and his accomplice were picking people off who were just out living their lives and doing such *gasp* horrible things like filling up their gas tanks. I do not see the use of this person being on earth anymore.

With all due respect...fuck your tax dollars. It's those same tax dollars that also just helped pay for a million Iraqi's to be snuffed out.
The death penalty doesn't work as a deterrent. It's useless barbarity that belongs with the Middle Ages. Maybe this person alive will be forced to confront what he's done, and maybe he can do some good somewhere down the line. Either way, murdering the murderer doesn't solve anything, and benefits no one.

Biggest Wave

Kill them all!

pandora

Byrnzie wrote:

BinFrog wrote:

On the flip side, just for the sake of a good debate, what good does keeping this a**hole alive do? He murdered handfulls of people. Why should my tax dollars support keeping him alive with 3 square meals a day and recreation time? I'm not sure a killer of this nature deserves any better than he himself allowed for his victims. While the death penalty as it is used now is obviously beyond flawed, the argument for keeping this guy alive until he dies of natural causes just seems so shallow. He is useless to society, to mankind, and he is responsible for absolutely wretched heartache and the loss of life to several families who have lost their loved ones forever in a completely nonsensical and disgusting way. He and his accomplice were picking people off who were just out living their lives and doing such *gasp* horrible things like filling up their gas tanks. I do not see the use of this person being on earth anymore.

With all due respect...fuck your tax dollars. It's those same tax dollars that also just helped pay for a million Iraqi's to be snuffed out.
The death penalty doesn't work as a deterrent. It's useless barbarity that belongs with the Middle Ages. Maybe this person alive will be forced to confront what he's done, and maybe he can do some good somewhere down the line. Either way, murdering the murderer doesn't solve anything, and benefits no one.

I am against capital punishment for the reason you stated- this human should live because he will touch others lives- good and bad. Through this others will feel and learn. Does he deserve to die oh yea but that should remain in Gods hands.

BinFrog

Byrnzie wrote:

With all due respect...fuck your tax dollars. It's those same tax dollars that also just helped pay for a million Iraqi's to be snuffed out.

And who said I support the Iraq invasion?

Byrnzie wrote:

The death penalty doesn't work as a deterrent.

That wasn't my argument. I know it doesn't.

cincybearcat

pandora wrote:

I am against capital punishment for the reason you stated- this human should live because he will touch others lives- good and bad. Through this others will feel and learn. Does he deserve to die oh yea but that should remain in Gods hands.

How is he going to touch anyone's life?

Kel Varnsen

BinFrog wrote:

know1 wrote:

Byrnzie wrote:

The death penalty is the sickest of all sick things. No country can claim to be civilized if it murders it's citizens in the name of justice and the law.

I agree. What good comes of killing another person related to this situation?

On the flip side, just for the sake of a good debate, what good does keeping this a**hole alive do? He murdered handfulls of people. Why should my tax dollars support keeping him alive with 3 square meals a day and recreation time? I'm not sure a killer of this nature deserves any better than he himself allowed for his victims. While the death penalty as it is used now is obviously beyond flawed, the argument for keeping this guy alive until he dies of natural causes just seems so shallow. He is useless to society, to mankind, and he is responsible for absolutely wretched heartache and the loss of life to several families who have lost their loved ones forever in a completely nonsensical and disgusting way. He and his accomplice were picking people off who were just out living their lives and doing such *gasp* horrible things like filling up their gas tanks. I do not see the use of this person being on earth anymore.

Personally I always thought that being locked in a solitary confinement cell for the rest of your life with no contact with the outside world would be a punishment way worse than a quick death.

pearljgirl2010

Kel Varnsen wrote:

Personally I always thought that being locked in a solitary confinement cell for the rest of your life with no contact with the outside world would be a punishment way worse than a quick death.[/quote]


I used to agree with this statement...you know, let him rot in a cell for the rest of his life, thinking about what he'd done. But he's getting 3 meals a day and a place to live...which is more than a lot of people have...

But, if someone murdered anyone I know, you better believe that I want the bastard dead.