Is female 'hair down there' a thing of the past?

ZiggyStar

dcfaithful wrote:

This sums up my stance on this subject. Landing strip is appropriate, but you can't land your plane directly into the Amazon...

Claireack

I am a proud wearer of a fro down below!

Mainly because I get a rash with shaving, ended up with an ingrown hair following waxing, creams are rubbish,tried epilating - rash again. Am trying a little experiment round the edges at the mo to see if I shave the same small area daily if the rash will eventually subside - no luck so far (3 weeks in).

Definetely will never go for the bald look and wouldn't want it in a man. What's wrong with things being au naturale?

P.s. I do shave my pits and bottom half of legs though so not a complete gorilla!

ZiggyStar

Yeah, I definitely like my men with hair.

ZiggyStar

Claireack wrote:

What's wrong with things being au naturale?

Nothing at all.....it just feels better the other way for some people I guess.

Claireack

ZiggyStar wrote:

Nothing at all.....it just feels better the other way for some people I guess.

Yeah I guess noone is the same. Although I would have thought you would really have to keep on top of it otherwise you would end up looking like you were sporting designer stubble all the time - which would be pricklier than the hair itself. Surely it would be like making love to a brillo pad.

aspoonfulweighsaton

This thread is useless without pics

stargirl69

What a briliant thread .... you are a star Ziggy

I myself have recently become a fan of waxing hair down there

After a famine of singledom then meeting my boy I was concerned that he would think he had met sasquatch.I took advice from my girlfriends and showed them my dense rainforest they all threw their hands up in horror saying you gotta prune it girl.
They took me by the hand and led me to a lovely lady who did not pass out with shock but did wheel in a vat of hot molten wax and she got started on tidying the garden.
I was amazed how clean and nice I felt and looked so I am now a covert and my boy finds the buttons much easier.
It is just a bugger it keeps growing back.

And yes I got a similar reaction from my 17 year old niece .... she gets waxed monthly ... a sign of the times.

Irish Al

Jaysus I go away and do a days work and the thread goes mental...with dunk calling everyone peodo's (same shit different day)

Anyway Ziggy dont let those prickly (no pun intended ) mods stop you in your quest to spice up the AET

I say...get rid of it...you'll feel better :shock:

decides2dream

dcfaithful wrote:

gabers wrote:

Fan of the landing strip myself. Like to have a reminder I'm with a WOMAN.

But yeah, the Buckwheat in a leglock look ain't too appealin'.

This sums up my stance on this subject. Landing strip is appropriate, but you can't land your plane directly into the Amazon...

both of these posts are simply quote worthy.
overall, i have to say i agree with the underlying theme in both as well. neat and tidy, very tidy, is all good. it's all about balance and moderation. and my preferred method of hair removal is laser. there is nothing smoother! ahhhhhhhhh.......

rival.

balder the better :?

AmentsChick

I'm willing to get waxed if he is. I don't think men really understand just how much waxing hurts. If they did, maybe they'd reconsider...and not be so selfish.

Steve Dunne

AmentsChick wrote:

I'm willing to get waxed if he is. I don't think men really understand just how much waxing hurts. If they did, maybe they'd reconsider...and not be so selfish.

hmmm....

AmentsChick

Steve Dunne wrote:

AmentsChick wrote:

I'm willing to get waxed if he is. I don't think men really understand just how much waxing hurts. If they did, maybe they'd reconsider...and not be so selfish.

hmmm....

Hmm...? Yes? Did you have something you wanted to say, Mr. Dunne?

South of Seattle

long red wrote:

eMMI wrote:

speaking as a woman, the idea of having no hair whatsoever down there seems just.. weird. I don't need to feel like a pre-teenager again.

i think women in general have the wrong idea here. it's not that men want to be with a pre-teen ... not most normal men, anyway ... it's just that the vagina is already an unknown mystery world ... covering it with hair just makes it all the more daunting.

it's like those old time maps ... when the drawer didn't know what laid beyond a certain point, they would always write, "Here be beasties" .... thats what I think when I see a the jungle look ...

"Here be Beasties."

Quite possibly the best answer I've ever read on the forum. Bravo Sir!

Drowned Out

This thread is difficult to reply to...I'm of the opinion that less is more, but it's hard to explain why on an all ages forum .

And imo, it is much cleaner without - esp post-sex...but don't forget that it also makes you more susceptible to STD's because of broken skin (rashes/cuts).

Steve Dunne

AmentsChick wrote:

Steve Dunne wrote:

AmentsChick wrote:

I'm willing to get waxed if he is. I don't think men really understand just how much waxing hurts. If they did, maybe they'd reconsider...and not be so selfish.

hmmm....

Hmm...? Yes? Did you have something you wanted to say, Mr. Dunne?

What? Sorry, I was looking up the number to the nearest salon.

The Champ

I'm not a big fan of the 'JonBenet' look..I much prefer a properly fertilized, well manicured lawn..

AmentsChick

The Champ wrote:

I'm not a big fan of the 'JonBenet' look..I much prefer a properly fertilized, well manicured lawn..

I'm guessing you listen to O&A?

CJMST3K

AmentsChick wrote:

The Champ wrote:

I'm not a big fan of the 'JonBenet' look..I much prefer a properly fertilized, well manicured lawn..

I'm guessing you listen to O&A?

I'm listening to them now... haha...

CJMST3K