Is female 'hair down there' a thing of the past?

ZiggyStar

I was talking to my 18 year old niece and I asked "do you wax or shave your bikini line" and she said:

"Ewww, I don't just do my bikini line...I do the whole thing...NO ONE has pubic hair anymore...that's disgusting...EVERYONE I know goes brazilian!!"

I was a bit shocked at how absolutely negative she was towards pubic hair.

Do you think pubic hair on females will eventually become non-existant like underarm hair? Or is this a passing fad? Most porn has no hair nowadays (not that I watch it myself :? ). I myself generally do the lot...because it's just easier and feels better...not because "it's disgusting". Her negativity towards hair really spun me out.

Maybe the norm in the not too distant future will be for females bodies to be completely hairless?

CJMST3K

i sure hope so!

ZiggyStar

I was waiting for that response!

Irish Al

If a dude started this thread it would be sooooo locked by now

I am curious though...in terms of being a part-time, ahem, wax/razor salesman not at all a dirty "young" man

orig_long red

i sure as hell hope so. I remember my early days of sexual encounters, when the girls were inexperienced in "maintenance" ... you finish with what amounts to rug burn on your face. ouch.

ZiggyStar

long red wrote:

i sure as hell hope so. I remember my early days of sexual encounters, when the girls were inexperienced in "maintenance" ... you finish with what amounts to rug burn on your face. ouch.

Yeah well welcome to our world......you guys keep that in mind when you have stubble!

ZiggyStar

Irish Al wrote:

If a dude started this thread it would be sooooo locked by now

They like to lock my sexy threads too.......so it won't be long, trust me!

eMMI

ZiggyStar wrote:

long red wrote:

i sure as hell hope so. I remember my early days of sexual encounters, when the girls were inexperienced in "maintenance" ... you finish with what amounts to rug burn on your face. ouch.

Yeah well welcome to our world......you guys keep that in mind when you have stubble!

hear, hear.

cableguy119

Someone let my wife know the jungle is out of vogue.

ZiggyStar

cableguy119 wrote:

Someone let my wife know the jungle is out of vogue.

Well tell her.....

cableguy119

actually last month we had kid number3 via c section so the brazilian is in effect. Figuring how to get her to keep it is the challenge.

orig_long red

ZiggyStar wrote:

cableguy119 wrote:

Someone let my wife know the jungle is out of vogue.

Well tell her.....

yea right .. that'll go over well. "honey, your hairy bush makes me sick. please remedy this immediately."

he'll be on the street in no time ... nary a bush to call his own.

gabers

Fan of the landing strip myself. Like to have a reminder I'm with a WOMAN.

But yeah, the Buckwheat in a leglock look ain't too appealin'.

ZiggyStar

long red wrote:

ZiggyStar wrote:

cableguy119 wrote:

Someone let my wife know the jungle is out of vogue.

Well tell her.....

yea right .. that'll go over well. "honey, your hairy bush makes me sick. please remedy this immediately."

he'll be on the street in no time ... nary a bush to call his own.

:? Well I wouldn't consider it "sick"...........that's going a bit far.........

Maybe they can BOTH go in for a wax..........your hair can be just as annoying, you know!

eMMI

gabers wrote:

Fan of the landing strip myself. Like to have a reminder I'm with a WOMAN.

But yeah, the Buckwheat in a leglock look ain't too appealin'.

speaking as a woman, the idea of having no hair whatsoever down there seems just.. weird. I don't need to feel like a pre-teenager again.

Dissidentman

I beleive this would be considered "The Sphynx"..

ZiggyStar

eMMI wrote:

speaking as a woman, the idea of having no hair whatsoever down there seems just.. weird. I don't need to feel like a pre-teenager again.

I know! I felt exactly the same way......

orig_long red

eMMI wrote:

speaking as a woman, the idea of having no hair whatsoever down there seems just.. weird. I don't need to feel like a pre-teenager again.

i think women in general have the wrong idea here. it's not that men want to be with a pre-teen ... not most normal men, anyway ... it's just that the vagina is already an unknown mystery world ... covering it with hair just makes it all the more daunting.

it's like those old time maps ... when the drawer didn't know what laid beyond a certain point, they would always write, "Here be beasties" .... thats what I think when I see a the jungle look ...

"Here be Beasties."

eMMI

long red wrote:

eMMI wrote:

speaking as a woman, the idea of having no hair whatsoever down there seems just.. weird. I don't need to feel like a pre-teenager again.

i think women in general have the wrong idea here. it's not that men want to be with a pre-teen ... not most normal men, anyway ... it's just that the vagina is already an unknown mystery world ... covering it with hair just makes it all the more daunting.

it's like those old time maps ... when the drawer didn't know what laid beyond a certain point, they would always write, "Here be beasties" .... thats what I think when I see a the jungle look ...

"Here be Beasties."

fair enough. to be honest, I didn't think men like no-hair cause of the pre-teen thing. it's more about how I feel. haha.

the mentioned 'landing strip' doesn't cover that much, now does it? not the strategic parts anyway.

ZiggyStar

long red wrote:

eMMI wrote:

speaking as a woman, the idea of having no hair whatsoever down there seems just.. weird. I don't need to feel like a pre-teenager again.

i think women in general have the wrong idea here. it's not that men want to be with a pre-teen ... not most normal men, anyway ... it's just that the vagina is already an unknown mystery world ... covering it with hair just makes it all the more daunting.

it's like those old time maps ... when the drawer didn't know what laid beyond a certain point, they would always write, "Here be beasties" .... thats what I think when I see a the jungle look ...

"Here be Beasties."

hahahah I love it! Here be beasties!

ZiggyStar

eMMI wrote:

fair enough. to be honest, I didn't think men like no-hair cause of the pre-teen thing. it's more about how I feel. haha.

the mentioned 'landing strip' doesn't cover that much, now does it? not the strategic parts anyway.

And my question is --- why cover?

But answering that will probably take this thread WAY off topic.......

orig_long red

ZiggyStar wrote:

eMMI wrote:

fair enough. to be honest, I didn't think men like no-hair cause of the pre-teen thing. it's more about how I feel. haha.

the mentioned 'landing strip' doesn't cover that much, now does it? not the strategic parts anyway.

And my question is --- why cover?

But answering that will probably take this thread WAY off topic.......

yes, why cover indeed.

the wolf

It's there for a reason. to be honest I have no idea what that reason is, but.........

anyway, I like it to be maintaned well, but not gone.

if I get a vote or choice in the matter that is.

eMMI

long red wrote:

ZiggyStar wrote:

eMMI wrote:

fair enough. to be honest, I didn't think men like no-hair cause of the pre-teen thing. it's more about how I feel. haha.

the mentioned 'landing strip' doesn't cover that much, now does it? not the strategic parts anyway.

And my question is --- why cover?

But answering that will probably take this thread WAY off topic.......

yes, why cover indeed.

hm. I really don't know. I don't cover. but I don't wanna go "all out" either. :P

it's probably not about _covering_ for most women anyway. god knows there's enough things to shave/wax anways. lol. some women probably just don't give a crap and/or are too 'lazy' to keep it up or even think about it.

eMMI

the wolf wrote:

It's there for a reason. to be honest I have no idea what that reason is, but.........

anyway, I like it to be maintaned well, but not gone.

if I get a vote or choice in the matter that is.

*thumbs up*

ZiggyStar

the wolf wrote:

It's there for a reason. to be honest I have no idea what that reason is, but.........

So I assume you like your women with hairy pits too?

I know what you're saying though......

orig_long red

lets keep things simple and to the point: hair is gross. it carries disease and parasites. the only place it belongs on the body is the head. it's useless everywhere else.

ZiggyStar

long red wrote:

lets keep things simple and to the point: hair is gross. it carries disease and parasites. the only place it belongs on the body is the head. it's useless everywhere else.

Will you wax yours off then?

orig_long red

ZiggyStar wrote:

long red wrote:

lets keep things simple and to the point: hair is gross. it carries disease and parasites. the only place it belongs on the body is the head. it's useless everywhere else.

Will you wax yours off then?

maybe i dont need to.

eMMI

ZiggyStar wrote:

long red wrote:

lets keep things simple and to the point: hair is gross. it carries disease and parasites. the only place it belongs on the body is the head. it's useless everywhere else.

Will you wax yours off then?

yeah, and not just down there. off with chesthair! no more hairy legs or armpits! equality! :evil:

ZiggyStar

eMMI wrote:

ZiggyStar wrote:

long red wrote:

lets keep things simple and to the point: hair is gross. it carries disease and parasites. the only place it belongs on the body is the head. it's useless everywhere else.

Will you wax yours off then?

yeah, and not just down there. off with chesthair! no more hairy legs or armpits! equality! :evil:

haha YES! All off....and i want to watch and laugh!