A. All you fuckers who watch this are sick bastards and it's pathetic that our society allows you to think that this is okay or you can't help yourselves or whatever other line of bullshit helps you sleep at night. Whoever gets the computer virus from downloading the video deserves it.
B. I disagree with what some people have said about it somehow being more okay if the person filmed herself (or himself) in the privacy of his/her own bedroom and it "leaked". Although I, personally, think it's stupid to film yourself having sex, I still think the same level of privacy is warranted as would be if you didn't know you were being filmed.
A. All you fuckers who watch this are sick bastards and it's pathetic that our society allows you to think that this is okay or you can't help yourselves or whatever other line of bullshit helps you sleep at night. Whoever gets the computer virus from downloading the video deserves it.
B. I disagree with what some people have said about it somehow being more okay if the person filmed herself (or himself) in the privacy of his/her own bedroom and it "leaked". Although I, personally, think it's stupid to film yourself having sex, I still think the same level of privacy is warranted as would be if you didn't know you were being filmed.
I never said that it was "okay" if someone's sex video leaked. What I was saying is that a celebrity who makes a sex video takes on the risk of it leaking whereas in this scenario a person is videotaped unwillingly and had that video leaked. The celebrity had a choice knowing the consequences if the tape should fall into the wrong hands. Erin Andrews never had that choice.
We are the facilitators of our own creative evolution.--Bill Hicks
A. All you fuckers who watch this are sick bastards and it's pathetic that our society allows you to think that this is okay or you can't help yourselves or whatever other line of bullshit helps you sleep at night. Whoever gets the computer virus from downloading the video deserves it.
I never said I couldn't help myself, I said I just don't care.
Inside Job....Now you know who she is....Her career will explode.
That might hold water if she wasn't already a household name among every person in her network's target audience...
Ok...So now everyone outside the target audience knows her. She can only be a sideline reporter for so long. Seems like a smart move to me. Front page of the NY Post= Household name
Sacramento 10-30-00, Bridge School 10-20 and 10-21-01, Bridge School 10-25 and 10-26-01, Irvine 06-02-03, Irvine 06-03-03, San Diego 06-05-03, San Diego 07-07-06, Los Angeles 07-09-06, Santa Barbara 07-13-06, London UK 06-18-07, San Diego 10-9-09, San Diego 2013, LA 1 2013
you think she's happy about that NY Post cover? She's probably mortified
I don't know what she is thinking, but I can tell you that in that business you can't buy publicity like that. It's horrible....no doubt....
Sacramento 10-30-00, Bridge School 10-20 and 10-21-01, Bridge School 10-25 and 10-26-01, Irvine 06-02-03, Irvine 06-03-03, San Diego 06-05-03, San Diego 07-07-06, Los Angeles 07-09-06, Santa Barbara 07-13-06, London UK 06-18-07, San Diego 10-9-09, San Diego 2013, LA 1 2013
Mike Francesa just made a good point. Will phil Mushnick, the NY Post's self appointed media police, comment on this, attacking his own paper? He absolutely would f another newspaper, or a radio show, made pictures from the video accessible
Btw, what's worse, that the Post posted the blurry pictures of the footage, or the way they wrote up the article:
"Sexy ESPN sportscaster Erin Andrews was the target of a peephole pervert who surreptitiously shot a video of her walking around her hotel room naked -- and posted it on the Internet.
The sideline siren wants the creepy cameraman brought to justice, both for herself and to keep other victims from having to go through the same nightmare. "
Btw, what's worse, that the Post posted the blurry pictures of the footage, or the way they wrote up the article:
"Sexy ESPN sportscaster Erin Andrews was the target of a peephole pervert who surreptitiously shot a video of her walking around her hotel room naked -- and posted it on the Internet.
The sideline siren wants the creepy cameraman brought to justice, both for herself and to keep other victims from having to go through the same nightmare. "
I have to wonder how many people that are freaking about this were up in arms over that vid that circulated by email a while back of a guy that was taped by his roomie fucking a blow up doll ....I remember a lot of laughter and not one complaint about privacy. I still get recognized on the street from that, damnit
I was so surprised how easy it was to find this earlier today. I just typed in Erin Andrews into youtube and there it was, totally uncut/uncensored. Two hours later it was gone as could be expected. If anybody has seen it I thought it was wierd, she kept checking out her ass it seemed in the mirror from different angles and directions. So do I feel guilty about it, a little, and as phony as it sounds, I only watched it once, not for a sexual desire, but more curiosity of what it would be like. But this story could have been squashed if everybody wanted it to be, in my opinion.
Btw, what's worse, that the Post posted the blurry pictures of the footage, or the way they wrote up the article:
"Sexy ESPN sportscaster Erin Andrews was the target of a peephole pervert who surreptitiously shot a video of her walking around her hotel room naked -- and posted it on the Internet.
The sideline siren wants the creepy cameraman brought to justice, both for herself and to keep other victims from having to go through the same nightmare. "
Sexy sportscaster...sideline siren?
would you really expect anything less from a smut paper like the post. hell look at there articles on michael jackson or any other day.
Ron: I just don't feel like going out tonight
Sammi: Wanna just break up?
CHICAGO, Illinois (CNN) -- Authorities arrested a man accused of secretly taping ESPN sports reporter Erin Andrews in the nude and posting the videos on the Internet, the FBI said Friday.
Authorities arrested 48-year-old Michael David Barrett at Chicago O'Hare International Airport on Friday. Barrett faces a charge of interstate stalking, the FBI said.
Barrett is accused of taping Andrews while she was nude in two hotel rooms. He then made eight videos that he posted on the Internet, the FBI said.
Barrett allegedly filmed seven of the eight videos at a hotel room in Nashville, Tennessee, in September 2008. FBI agents said they found evidence that a peephole to the door of Andrews' hotel room had been altered.
The FBI learned that Barrett checked into the same hotel at that time and asked for a room adjacent to Andrews using his home address to register for the room.
According to a criminal complaint, Barrett tried to sell the videos to celebrity gossip Web site TMZ.com. Employees at the Web site also helped in the investigation providing Barrett's information to Andrews' attorney.
Andrews works as a sideline reporter traveling around the country covering college football games.
Barrett will have his first court appearance in Chicago at 10 a.m. (11 a.m. ET) Saturday, authorities said.
The maximum penalty for the charge of interstate stalking is five years in federal prison, the FBI said.
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Comments
B. I disagree with what some people have said about it somehow being more okay if the person filmed herself (or himself) in the privacy of his/her own bedroom and it "leaked". Although I, personally, think it's stupid to film yourself having sex, I still think the same level of privacy is warranted as would be if you didn't know you were being filmed.
I never said that it was "okay" if someone's sex video leaked. What I was saying is that a celebrity who makes a sex video takes on the risk of it leaking whereas in this scenario a person is videotaped unwillingly and had that video leaked. The celebrity had a choice knowing the consequences if the tape should fall into the wrong hands. Erin Andrews never had that choice.
I never said I couldn't help myself, I said I just don't care.
Ok...So now everyone outside the target audience knows her. She can only be a sideline reporter for so long. Seems like a smart move to me. Front page of the NY Post= Household name
I don't know what she is thinking, but I can tell you that in that business you can't buy publicity like that. It's horrible....no doubt....
"Sexy ESPN sportscaster Erin Andrews was the target of a peephole pervert who surreptitiously shot a video of her walking around her hotel room naked -- and posted it on the Internet.
The sideline siren wants the creepy cameraman brought to justice, both for herself and to keep other victims from having to go through the same nightmare. "
Sexy sportscaster...sideline siren?
it's the post...what did you expect?
Sammi: Wanna just break up?
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/10/03/ill ... topstories
Arrest made in ESPN reporter's voyeur video case
CHICAGO, Illinois (CNN) -- Authorities arrested a man accused of secretly taping ESPN sports reporter Erin Andrews in the nude and posting the videos on the Internet, the FBI said Friday.
Authorities arrested 48-year-old Michael David Barrett at Chicago O'Hare International Airport on Friday. Barrett faces a charge of interstate stalking, the FBI said.
Barrett is accused of taping Andrews while she was nude in two hotel rooms. He then made eight videos that he posted on the Internet, the FBI said.
Barrett allegedly filmed seven of the eight videos at a hotel room in Nashville, Tennessee, in September 2008. FBI agents said they found evidence that a peephole to the door of Andrews' hotel room had been altered.
The FBI learned that Barrett checked into the same hotel at that time and asked for a room adjacent to Andrews using his home address to register for the room.
According to a criminal complaint, Barrett tried to sell the videos to celebrity gossip Web site TMZ.com. Employees at the Web site also helped in the investigation providing Barrett's information to Andrews' attorney.
Andrews works as a sideline reporter traveling around the country covering college football games.
Barrett will have his first court appearance in Chicago at 10 a.m. (11 a.m. ET) Saturday, authorities said.
The maximum penalty for the charge of interstate stalking is five years in federal prison, the FBI said.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln